a comparative study of a Roman frontier province. - Historia Antigua

a comparative study of a Roman frontier province. - Historia Antigua a comparative study of a Roman frontier province. - Historia Antigua

historiantigua.cl
from historiantigua.cl More from this publisher
04.02.2015 Views

-368- 1: 1/1: 2 23. Brogan 1954; 1955; 1962; 1964; 1965 a and b; 1971 a and b; 1975 a and b; 1980; Brogan and Kendrick 1973; Brogan and Oates 1953; Brogan and Reynolds 1964; Brogan and Smith 1957,1967. 24. Di Vita 1964 a and b; 1965; 1967; 1968; 1971; 1982. Perhaps his greatest contribution lies in his recognition of the underlying Punic and Libyan cultural influences in Tripolitania. 25. Reynolds 1951; 1955; 1958; 1977; Reynolds and Brogan 1960; Reynolds et al 1958; Reynolds and Ward-Perkins 1952 - IRT. - 26. Daniels 1968; 1969; 1970 a and b; 1971 a and b; 1973; 1975; 1977. 27. Rebuffat 1967a; 1969; 1970a, b, c and d; 1971b; 1972a; 1973a, b and c; 1975 a, b and c; 1977; 1979; 1980a; 1982a, b and c; Rebuffat and Marichal 1973. 28. Hammond et al 1964; Hammond 1967. 29. Euzennat 1972, explains the background to the project. 30. Euzennat 1971,1972,1977 a, b and c; Euzennat and Trousset, 1975 - 1978; Trousset 1974; 1976; 1978; 1980 a and b; 1981; 1982. 31. Jones and Barker 1980; Barker and Jones 1981; 1982; Barker et al 1983; Jones et al 1983; Rebuffat 1982c. 32. Lawless 1970. 33. Trousset 1974. But note Rebuffat 1980a, a savage review article. 34. Fentress 1978, published as Fentress 1979. See also Shaw 1978. 35. Alfoldy 1974 (Noricum); Baatz 1975 (Germany); Breeze 1982; Breeze and Dobson 1976; Frere 1978 (Britain); Mitford 1972 (Cappadocia); Mcsy 1974 (Pannonia and Upper Moesia); Wilkes 1969 (Dalmatia). 36. Over four calendar months were spent in North Africa (Libya, Tunisia and Algeria) during my tenure of a D. E. S. studentship. I have also travelled in Germany, Turkey and the Negev desert, as well as taking part in fieldwork and excavation relating to Hadrian's Wall, the Stanegate frontier and the Antonine Wall in Britain. 1: 2 The Conceptual framework 1. Gsell 1933, was one of the first papers to propose this theory and was extremely influential on the course of the debate. 2. Gsell 1933; HAAN V; Guey 1939; Leschi 1942; Gautier 1952; Van Berchem 1952. 3. Courtois 1955; Benabou 1976. 4. The most recent exponents being Rachet 1970 and Benabou 1976. 5. Rachet 1970, particularly 57-258. 6. There is currently a trend away from such extreme views. Lepelley in his Preface to Gsell 1981,16-17, commented that Gsell's article "La Tripolitaine au 111e siecle" (1933) was no longer judged to be historically valid, but had been included in the anthology because of its historiographical significance. See also Euzennat and Trousset 1975; Garnsey 1978; Whittaker 1978, Fentress 1979; Trousset 1980; 1981; Rebuffat 1982a. 7. Carcopino 1925; 1933. 8. SHA, Severus Alex. LVIII, 4-5. Even if true, the reported land grant refers to te aftermath of wars in Mauretania, Tingitana, Illyricum and Armenia. 9. Cod. Theod. VII , 15,1. 10. Goodchild 1949a; 1950 a and c; 1951b; 1952 b and c; 1953d; Ward-Perkins and Goodchild 1949. 11. Ward-Perkins and Goodchild 1949,19-32. 12. A. H. M. Jones 1971 13. Brogan 1964; 1971; di Vita 1964; Jones and Barker 1980; Barker and Jones 1981; 1982; Jones et al 1983.

-369- 1: 2 /1: 3 14. Benabou 1976, for instance argued for strong cultural as well as military resistance by indigenous Africans. The level of Romanisation achieved or even aimed at is an highly controversial topic at present. Benabou 1978; Garnsey 1978; Leveau 1978; Thebert 1978 and below, Chapter 9. 15. I must acknowledge my debt to Mr. J. R. Burns of Newcastle University and the Libyan Valleys Project, who as a "minimalist" has freely discussed his ideas with me. 16. Luttwak 1976. 17. Luttwak 1976,7-50; 51-126; 127-190. 18. See especially Mann 1979, for a critical review article. 19. For various suggested approaches and applications see Birley 1974a; Dyson 1974; Jones 1978; Mann 1974a; Warmington 1974. 20. Demougeot 1960, Euzennat and Trousset 1975; Euzennat 1977a and b; Garnsey 1978; Lepelley in Gsell 1981,16-17; Trousset 1974; 1980; Rebuffat 1982a. 21. Di Vita 1964; Brogan 1964; 1971a; Jones and Barker 1980; Barker and Jones 1981; 1982; Jones et al 1983. 22. Goodchild's work in particular must not be under-estimated. It is still the fundamental base for all study of eastern Tripolitania and the questions he raised still need answers, even though there are more data available to us today. 1: 3 The Historical Framework 1. As for instance Procopius and Corippus and the Arab sources like Ibn Abd-el-Hakam. For detailed studies of the sub-Roman period see Jerary 1976; Pringle 1981; Mattingly 1983. 2. The term Tripolitania is employed throughout this thesis only in reference to specific Roman usage (limes, financial area or province). Tripolitania, on the other hand, is used freely with reference to the geographical region. Until the third century A. D. the region was treated as part of Africa Proconsularis, with civil authority vested in the Proconsul and military in the Legionary legate. This split in authority was perpetuated when the separate province of Numidia was created under Severus, though the recognition of a regio and a limes Tripolitanus at about this time forecast further fragmentation. Provincia Tripolitania, with its own praeses as governor, was constituted by Diocletian at the end of the third century. See Romanelli 1933, 73-79; Chastagnol 1967,119-22; CIL 8.16542-16543; 11105; 22765; Ant, It. 73,4; Rebuffat 1977,406. 3. The standard historical works are Merighi 1940; Romanelli 1959 and Benabou 1976. Other recent studies which merit attention, with some reservations, are Raven 1969; Rachet 1970; Decret and Fantar 1981; MacKendrick 1980. There seems little reason to doubt that Lepcis was pre-eminent among the Emporia, Gascou 1972; 1982; IRT p. 76-78. 4. Although often designated as Leptis in Latin sources and on inscrip- tions outside Africa, the epigraphic record from the city itself confirms that Lepcis was the correct African form. Magnus was added to distinguish the town from Lepti Minus near Sousse, Romanelli 1924a, 253-62; IRT p. 73-76; Pflaum 1959,85-92. 5. This opinion is voiced by Duncan-Jones 1962,57 and Lepelley 1981a, 337. 6. Livy XXIX, 33,8-9. 7. Caesar, BAf, 97,3; see also Gsell 1924,41-46. 8. Livy XXXIV, 62,1-18; Appian, Af. wars, 69, Kotula 1974b, 47-61. 9. Sallust, BJ, LXXVII, 1. 10. Caesar, BAf, 97.3. 11. Lucan IX, 946-49; Plutarch, Cato Y., 56; Caesar BAf 97.

-369-<br />

1: 2 /1: 3<br />

14. Benabou 1976, for instance argued for strong cultural as well as<br />

military resistance by indigenous Africans. The level <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roman</strong>isation<br />

achieved or even aimed at is an highly controversial topic at present.<br />

Benabou 1978; Garnsey 1978; Leveau 1978; Thebert 1978 and below,<br />

Chapter 9.<br />

15. I must acknowledge my debt to Mr. J. R. Burns <strong>of</strong> Newcastle University<br />

and the Libyan Valleys Project, who as a "minimalist" has freely<br />

discussed his ideas with me.<br />

16. Luttwak 1976.<br />

17. Luttwak 1976,7-50; 51-126; 127-190.<br />

18. See especially Mann 1979, for a critical review article.<br />

19. For various suggested approaches and applications see Birley 1974a;<br />

Dyson 1974; Jones 1978; Mann 1974a; Warmington 1974.<br />

20. Demougeot 1960, Euzennat and Trousset 1975; Euzennat 1977a and b;<br />

Garnsey 1978; Lepelley in Gsell 1981,16-17; Trousset 1974; 1980;<br />

Rebuffat 1982a.<br />

21. Di Vita 1964; Brogan 1964; 1971a; Jones and Barker 1980; Barker and<br />

Jones 1981; 1982; Jones et al 1983.<br />

22. Goodchild's work in particular must not be under-estimated. It is<br />

still the fundamental base for all <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> eastern Tripolitania and<br />

the questions he raised still need answers, even though there are more<br />

data available to us today.<br />

1: 3 The Historical Framework<br />

1. As for instance Procopius and Corippus and the Arab sources like<br />

Ibn Abd-el-Hakam. For detailed studies <strong>of</strong> the sub-<strong>Roman</strong> period see<br />

Jerary 1976; Pringle 1981; Mattingly 1983.<br />

2. The term Tripolitania is employed throughout this thesis only in<br />

reference to specific <strong>Roman</strong> usage (limes, financial area or <strong>province</strong>).<br />

Tripolitania, on the other hand, is used freely with reference to the<br />

geographical region. Until the third century A. D. the region was<br />

treated as part <strong>of</strong> Africa Proconsularis, with civil authority vested<br />

in the Proconsul and military in the Legionary legate. This split in<br />

authority was perpetuated when the separate <strong>province</strong> <strong>of</strong> Numidia was<br />

created under Severus, though the recognition <strong>of</strong> a regio and a<br />

limes Tripolitanus at about this time forecast further fragmentation.<br />

Provincia Tripolitania, with its own praeses as governor, was constituted<br />

by Diocletian at the end <strong>of</strong> the third century. See <strong>Roman</strong>elli 1933,<br />

73-79; Chastagnol 1967,119-22; CIL 8.16542-16543; 11105; 22765;<br />

Ant, It. 73,4; Rebuffat 1977,406.<br />

3. The standard historical works are Merighi 1940; <strong>Roman</strong>elli 1959 and<br />

Benabou 1976. Other recent studies which merit attention, with some<br />

reservations, are Raven 1969; Rachet 1970; Decret and Fantar 1981;<br />

MacKendrick 1980. There seems little reason to doubt that Lepcis<br />

was pre-eminent among the Emporia, Gascou 1972; 1982; IRT p. 76-78.<br />

4. Although <strong>of</strong>ten designated as Leptis in Latin sources and on inscrip-<br />

tions outside Africa, the epigraphic record from the city itself<br />

confirms that Lepcis was the correct African form. Magnus was added<br />

to distinguish the town from Lepti Minus near Sousse, <strong>Roman</strong>elli 1924a,<br />

253-62; IRT p. 73-76; Pflaum 1959,85-92.<br />

5. This opinion is voiced by Duncan-Jones 1962,57 and Lepelley 1981a, 337.<br />

6. Livy XXIX, 33,8-9.<br />

7. Caesar, BAf, 97,3; see also Gsell 1924,41-46.<br />

8. Livy XXXIV, 62,1-18; Appian, Af. wars, 69, Kotula 1974b, 47-61.<br />

9. Sallust, BJ, LXXVII, 1.<br />

10. Caesar, BAf, 97.3.<br />

11. Lucan IX, 946-49; Plutarch, Cato Y., 56; Caesar BAf 97.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!