a comparative study of a Roman frontier province. - Historia Antigua
a comparative study of a Roman frontier province. - Historia Antigua a comparative study of a Roman frontier province. - Historia Antigua
-392- 4: 1 /4: 2 50. Sarel-Sternberg 1963,126. The payment of sharecroppers is based on a 51. 52. 53. 54. proportion of the harvest which varies between 1/3 and on the type of crop involved (p. 130). Sarel-Sternberg 1963,123. Sarel-Sternberg 1963,128. Trousset 1978a, 157. Cauneille 1963,102. 1/10 depending 55. Louis 1975,52, records the organisation of a small caravan to Ghadames by the inhabitants of Chenini in the Cebel as late as 1889. 56. 57. Euzennat and Trousset 1975,57 and Fig. 15 p. 62. The Beni Ulid olive groves were much remarked on by early explorers. Lvon 1821.35-37.61; Barth 1857,450; Nachtigal 1879/1974,42-42; Denham and Clapperton 1826, XV. 58. Barker and Jones 1982,8; Barker 1982,2-8. 59. Cauneille 1963,101-12. 60. Klitsch and Baird 1969,73-80. 61 Cauneille 1963,108-110. 62. Cerrata 1933,189-237. 63. Cauneille 1963,101,105. 64. Brogan 1964,49-50,53-56; 1971,121-30; Di Vita . 1964a, 67-71; Levi Della Vida 1951,65-68; 1964a, 57-63. 65. 66. 67. 68. IRT906, for example from the wadi Unmi el-Agerem records Nasif, Masauchan, Iylul. Levi Della Vida 1927,91-116, 1965,59-62; Reynolds 1955,141-42. Bulliet 1981,106-109. Haudricourt and Delamarre 1955. Bulliet 1975,194-208; 1981,109. the names Thanuba, 1963,65-94; 69. See further the analyses of Barker 1981,131-45; 1983,1-49; Johnson 1973,29-66, on traditional pastoral economies in Cyrenaica. 4: 2 TRIBAL CENTRES 1. Bertier 1981, passim, but particularly 112-17,144-53. 2. For the normal view of an extensive Numidia see Camps 1960, Fig. 18, facing p. 190. Compare Bertier 1981,159-77 and Plate 1 on the topography of Cirta itself and, more particularly, his analysis of the campaigns, p. 33-93, which illustrates the impossibly vast distances that the armies would have had to cover if Constantine was the Cirta referred to in every case. 3. Camps 1960,254-60. 4. RIL, no. s 1 and 2 (Cf also 3-7); Camps 1960,176-79,255-57,265-71. 5. Sallust, BJ, LVI-LVII, for the position of Zama Regia. 6. Sallust, BJ, XXXVII. 7. Sallust, BJ, XCII, 5- XCV; Florus, I, 36,14, saxeo inditam monti Molucham urbem per Ligurem adita arduo inaccessione penetravit. 8. Berthier 1981,73-79 and Plates 8 and 9, has tried to relate Sallust's detailed account to the topography of the Kalaat Senane hillfort. There is one major problem, however, in that Kalaat Senane is some twentyfive kilometres distant from the wadi Nellegue which Bertier identified with the Mulucha river. 9. Procopius, Wars, IV, 4,26-27; IV, 6, -4714; IV, 13,33-34; IV, 19,21- IV, 20,29. These sites were referred to as pyrgoi. 10. Sallust, BJ, LXXXIX, 4 - XCI, 7; also Bertier 1981,71-73. 11. For the spring at Capsa, BJ, LXXXIX, 6-7, Capsenses una modo atque ea intra oppidum iugi aqua cetera pluvia utebantur. On its natural defences, BJ LXXXIX, 4-5; XCI, 3-7. 12. Camps 1960,276; Trousset 1978,165; CIL 8.22796.
-393- 4: 2 13. Sallust, BJ, XCII, 1-4, alia oppida. 14. Suetonius, Vespasian, 4. 15. For an integrated account of the Iron Age background, the hillforts and the history of the Roman invasion of Britain, see Cunliffe 1973,16-18, 22; 1978,83-136. 16. In North Africa Cirta (Constantine) is a spectacular exception to this general rule. Bertier 1981, plate 1; Horn and Auger 1979, Plate 12, illustrate the tremendous natural defences provided by the Constantine gorge. The origin of the site was almost certainly as an dperon barre hillfort site. 17. The topic is much neglected, but see Csell, HAAN V, 232-45,250-57; Fentress 1979,30-39, has drawn up a disappointingly short list of native sites, based mainly on Gsell 1913; Marion 1957,117-73; 1959, 27-41, provided a useful study of a region peripheral to the Mauretanias; Lawless 1970,, Vol. I, 55-87 and II, 1-20 is a useful summary of this and other work on Mauretania Caesariensis; the work of Daniels in the Fezzan is of most relevance to the current study, see note 37, below. 18. Marion 1957,126-28 and Plates I, II, IV, VI and VII, provides a graphic illustration of the type; also Lawless 1970,71-75. 19. Gsell, HAAN V, 234; Marion 1959,27-41. 20. Fentress 1979,31 (her site 6, Gouiret). 21. Beechey and Beechey 1828,504-12, "I could not but be sorely disappointed on seeing some ill-constructed houses. .. and a few tombs ... mixed style and of very indifferent taste. " 22. Gsell, HAAN V, 233-35. 23. Marion 1957,117-63; Lawless 1970,57-62; Fentress, 1979,33-36; in a Daniels 1968,113-94. Personal observation. 24. Marion 1957,126-27,171-73. Jorf Ouazzern (site 129) is 600 x 340 m in size (Plates VI, 2, VII). Jebel Mahsseur (site 148) is a vast eperon 800 x 400 m (Plate VI, 1). Other eperon barrc sites recorded in the Oudja/Ras Asfour region were p. 165-73, sites 15,28 (100 x 80 m), 57 (Plate II), 111( ), 112,113 (Plate XI, 2), 114 (Plate IV), 125, 127,130 (2 phases, 150 x 75 in. and 185 x 90 m), 146 (275 x 100 m), 147 (240 x 170 m). 25. Lawless 1970,57-62; Fentress 1979,35-36 suggests four alternative models. 26. Contra the explanations offered by Marion, Lawless and Fentress, which all presume that several distinct tribes were involved. 27. Marion 1957,126-27. 28. Lawless 1970,59. 29. Gellner 1969,56. 30. Lawless 1970, I. 71-75, II9 1-20. 31. Gsell 1913, contains references to numerous examples as does Gsell HAAN V, 232-50. 32. Fentress 1979,30-39, lists only ten sites and gives no new information on them. 33. Baradez 1949a, 251,253; Fentress, 1979,39. 34. Berthier 1981,73-79, Figs. 8 and 9. See note 8, above. 35. A Trajanic boundary stone delimiting the north-eastern extent of Musulamian territory was found 5 km east of Kalaat Senane, AS, 1923,26. 36. Berthier 1981,74, gives the area of the plateau as 90-100 ha. The densely built up area covers about one third of this. 37. Daniels 1968,113-194; 1969,31-52; 1970a; 1970b; 27-66; 1971a, 261-85; 1971b, 6-7; 1973,35-40; 1975,249-65; 1977,5-7. See also Pace, Sergi and Caputo 1951,201-431; Ayoub 1962; 1967a and b. 38. Daniels 1968,113-94 - 1970b, 37-66 (an abridged version of the report on Zinchecra). For the work in Old Germa, Ayoub 1962,12-20; 1967a, 12-26; Daniels 1971a, 264-65. 39. Approximate values calculated from fig. 14.
- Page 1 and 2: TRIP0LITANIA: a comparative study o
- Page 3 and 4: -367- FOOTNOTES Chapter 1: Introduc
- Page 5 and 6: -369- 1: 2 /1: 3 14. Benabou 1976,
- Page 7 and 8: -371- CHAPTER 2: GEOGRAPHY AND CLIM
- Page 9 and 10: -373- 2: 2/2: 3 45. Capot-Rey 1953,
- Page 11 and 12: -375- 2: 4 10. Penrose et al, 1970;
- Page 13 and 14: -377- 2: 5/2: 6 34. On the lotus, s
- Page 15 and 16: -379- 2: 7 the basis of the mileage
- Page 17 and 18: -381- 2: 7 64. Goodchild 1954 b and
- Page 19 and 20: -383- 7 3: 1/3: 2 17. An example of
- Page 21 and 22: -385- 3: 2/3: 3 46. Frezouls 1957,6
- Page 23 and 24: -387- 3: 3 tribes which cumulativel
- Page 25 and 26: -389- 3: 3 75. There were at least
- Page 27: -391- 4: 1 21. Johnson 1969,1-3. 22
- Page 31 and 32: -395- 4: 2 65. For Saniat Gebril, s
- Page 33 and 34: -397- 4: 3j4; 4 20. Camps 1960,279-
- Page 35 and 36: -399- 4: 5 12. See above note 7. Ma
- Page 37 and 38: I -401- CHAPTER 5 FRONTIER THEORY A
- Page 39 and 40: -403- 5: 1 36. A few examples from
- Page 41 and 42: -405- 5: 1 66. On Byzantine frontie
- Page 43 and 44: -407- 5: 2 15. Desanges 1957,5-43.
- Page 45 and 46: -409- 5: 2 intervention and when Ca
- Page 47 and 48: -411- 5: 3 12. The evidence has bee
- Page 49 and 50: -413- 5: 3 50. See note 49, above.
- Page 51 and 52: -415- 5: 4 43. Rebuffat 1981,213-22
- Page 53 and 54: -417- FOOTNOTES CHAPTER 6 TRIPODITA
- Page 55 and 56: -419- 6: 1 53. Romanelli 1939,110-1
- Page 57 and 58: -421- 6: 2 9. The case has been con
- Page 59 and 60: -423- 6: 2 /6: 3 presented each one
- Page 61 and 62: -425- 6: 3 Tillibari (Ramada); Then
- Page 63 and 64: -427- 6: 3 have been a nzanerus col
- Page 65 and 66: -429- 6: 4 9. Rebuffat 1977,402-14;
- Page 67 and 68: -431- 7: 1 26. See Jones et al 1983
- Page 69 and 70: -433- 7; 1/7; 2 81. Cagnat 1913,542
- Page 71 and 72: 7: 2 -435- 45. The survey of the si
- Page 73 and 74: -437- 7; 3 2. See Pringle 1981,96 a
- Page 75 and 76: -438- 7: 3 28. Trousset 1978,167-79
- Page 77 and 78: -440- 7: 4 V1CI 1. The study of vic
-393-<br />
4: 2<br />
13. Sallust, BJ, XCII, 1-4, alia oppida.<br />
14. Suetonius, Vespasian, 4.<br />
15. For an integrated account <strong>of</strong> the Iron Age background, the hillforts and<br />
the history <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Roman</strong> invasion <strong>of</strong> Britain, see Cunliffe 1973,16-18,<br />
22; 1978,83-136.<br />
16. In North Africa Cirta (Constantine) is a spectacular exception to this<br />
general rule. Bertier 1981, plate 1; Horn and Auger 1979, Plate 12,<br />
illustrate the tremendous natural defences provided by the Constantine<br />
gorge. The origin <strong>of</strong> the site was almost certainly as an dperon barre<br />
hillfort site.<br />
17. The topic is much neglected, but see Csell, HAAN V, 232-45,250-57;<br />
Fentress 1979,30-39, has drawn up a disappointingly short list <strong>of</strong><br />
native sites, based mainly on Gsell 1913; Marion 1957,117-73; 1959,<br />
27-41, provided a useful <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> a region peripheral to the Mauretanias;<br />
Lawless 1970,, Vol. I, 55-87 and II, 1-20 is a useful summary <strong>of</strong> this<br />
and other work on Mauretania Caesariensis; the work <strong>of</strong> Daniels in the<br />
Fezzan is <strong>of</strong> most relevance to the current <strong>study</strong>, see note 37, below.<br />
18. Marion 1957,126-28 and Plates I, II, IV, VI and VII, provides a<br />
graphic illustration <strong>of</strong> the type; also Lawless 1970,71-75.<br />
19. Gsell, HAAN V, 234; Marion 1959,27-41.<br />
20. Fentress 1979,31 (her site 6, Gouiret).<br />
21. Beechey and Beechey 1828,504-12, "I could not but be sorely disappointed<br />
on seeing some ill-constructed houses.<br />
.. and a few tombs ...<br />
mixed style and <strong>of</strong> very indifferent taste. "<br />
22. Gsell, HAAN V, 233-35.<br />
23. Marion 1957,117-63; Lawless 1970,57-62; Fentress, 1979,33-36;<br />
in<br />
a<br />
Daniels 1968,113-94. Personal observation.<br />
24. Marion 1957,126-27,171-73. Jorf Ouazzern (site 129) is 600 x 340 m<br />
in size (Plates VI, 2, VII). Jebel Mahsseur (site 148) is a vast eperon<br />
800 x 400 m (Plate VI, 1). Other eperon barrc sites recorded in the<br />
Oudja/Ras Asfour region were p. 165-73, sites 15,28 (100 x 80 m),<br />
57 (Plate II), 111( ), 112,113 (Plate XI, 2), 114 (Plate IV), 125,<br />
127,130 (2 phases, 150 x 75 in. and 185 x 90 m), 146 (275 x 100 m),<br />
147 (240 x 170 m).<br />
25. Lawless 1970,57-62; Fentress 1979,35-36 suggests four alternative<br />
models.<br />
26. Contra the explanations <strong>of</strong>fered by Marion, Lawless and Fentress, which<br />
all presume that several distinct tribes were involved.<br />
27. Marion 1957,126-27.<br />
28. Lawless 1970,59.<br />
29. Gellner 1969,56.<br />
30. Lawless 1970, I. 71-75, II9 1-20.<br />
31. Gsell 1913, contains references to numerous examples as does Gsell<br />
HAAN V, 232-50.<br />
32. Fentress 1979,30-39, lists only ten sites and gives no new information<br />
on them.<br />
33. Baradez 1949a, 251,253; Fentress, 1979,39.<br />
34. Berthier 1981,73-79, Figs. 8 and 9. See note 8, above.<br />
35. A Trajanic boundary stone delimiting the north-eastern extent <strong>of</strong><br />
Musulamian territory was found 5 km east <strong>of</strong> Kalaat Senane, AS, 1923,26.<br />
36. Berthier 1981,74, gives the area <strong>of</strong> the plateau as 90-100 ha. The<br />
densely built up area covers about one third <strong>of</strong> this.<br />
37. Daniels 1968,113-194; 1969,31-52; 1970a; 1970b; 27-66; 1971a, 261-85;<br />
1971b, 6-7; 1973,35-40; 1975,249-65; 1977,5-7. See also Pace, Sergi<br />
and Caputo 1951,201-431; Ayoub 1962; 1967a and b.<br />
38. Daniels 1968,113-94 - 1970b, 37-66 (an abridged version <strong>of</strong> the report<br />
on Zinchecra). For the work in Old Germa, Ayoub 1962,12-20; 1967a,<br />
12-26; Daniels 1971a, 264-65.<br />
39. Approximate values calculated from fig. 14.