08-3187 Volume Appendix15.pdf - Medical Supply Chain

DJW/bh
SAMUEL K. LIPARI,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
v.
U.S. BANCORP, N.A., et al.,
Plaintiff,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION
No. 07-2146-CM-DJW
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Compliance with Rule
26(a)(1) (doc. 68). For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background Information
On April 20, 2007, Plaintiff served his initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 26(a)(1). His disclosure statement listed 67 individuals and provided a generic
identification for each person, such as “Antitrust,” “Technology,” “Contracting,” “Funding,” and
“FBI.” Other individuals were identified only as “Witness.” No addresses or telephone numbers
were provided for any of the 67 listed individuals.
Plaintiff’s disclosure statement also listed thousands of documents, 1 many of which were
only briefly described. 2 Some of the documents were also identified by Bates Stamp Numbers.
Accompanying the disclosure statement was a CD containing the documents listed in the disclosure
statement. The disc contains more than 11,000 pages of documents.
1 The listing of documents is approximately 39 pages in length.
2
For example, documents were identified as “Neil Marsh Invoice,” “Article When Private
Goes Public,” “Vendor Rating a GPO Model.”
08-3187 Medical Supply Chain vs. Neoforma Volume XV 5579