08-3187 Volume Appendix15.pdf - Medical Supply Chain

03.02.2015 Views
08-3187 Medical Supply Chain vs. Neoforma Volume XV 5855

08-3187 Medical Supply Chain vs. Neoforma Volume XV 5856

Page 1 and 2: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Page 3 and 4: Respectfully submitted, /s/ Jay E.

Page 5 and 6: After the instant Motion to Compel

Page 7 and 8: Thus, under Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(i), Pl

Page 9 and 10: help focus the discovery efforts of

Page 11 and 12: With respect to the first requireme

Page 13 and 14: Defendants, are documents that he (

Page 15 and 16: IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated in Kansas C

Page 17 and 18: 2008 pretrial conference, and an Au

Page 19 and 20: motive on the part of the movant, r

Page 21 and 22: Plaintiff’s contention that he ne

Page 23 and 24: 08-3187 Medical Supply Chain vs. Ne

























Page 73 and 74: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT DISTRICT

Page 75 and 76: FILED United States Court of Appeal


Page 79 and 80: plaintiff sanctioned for not produc

Page 81 and 82: Monday, August 18, 2008 9:06 AM Sub

Page 83 and 84: method of communication, that it ma

Page 85 and 86: ********************PRIVATE AND CON

Page 87 and 88: Monday, August 18, 2008 9:55 AM Sub

Page 89 and 90: DJW/bh IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC




Page 97 and 98: MARK A. OLTHOFF KS # 70339 SHUGHART

Page 99 and 100: Not Reported in F.Supp.2d Page 2 No


Page 103 and 104: 21, 2008. 4 On August 21, 2008, Def

Page 105 and 106: Here, the parties have submitted se


Page 109 and 110: Whereas the trial judge has not rev

Page 111 and 112: (mh) (Entered: 08/20/2008) 7. The d

Page 113 and 114: that rejected in Glass v. Pfeffer,

Page 115 and 116: Prior Extrajudicial Source Bias The

Page 117 and 118: molthoff@stklaw.com ademarea@stklaw

Page 119 and 120: supplies. Similarly, the defendant

Page 121 and 122: JUDICIAL COUNCIL THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Page 123 and 124: the respondent ordered dismissal of

Page 125 and 126: Appearance Docket of the subject li

Page 127 and 128: were parties to the action at the t

Page 129 and 130: 21. The petitioner had opposed tran

Page 131 and 132: State Court and the Western Distric

Page 133 and 134: dismissed, contradicting controllin

Page 135 and 136: (1) Respondent’s Effect On Litiga

Page 137 and 138: enter the market where Missouri doc

Page 139 and 140: 58. Through the petitioner’s lobb

Page 141 and 142: made by the respondent that would h

Page 143 and 144: due date for a response to the defe

Page 145 and 146: Head v. Platte County, Mo., 749 P.2

Page 147 and 148: this court, we must call attention

Page 149 and 150: petitioner’s appeal or to other t

Page 151 and 152: adopted their poorly concealed fals

Page 153 and 154: without independent review resultin

Page 155 and 156: The action has the petitioner’s m

Page 157 and 158: Date: February, 1 st 2008 Office of

Page 159 and 160: permitted the repeated outcomes her

Page 161 and 162: JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE TENTH CIRCU

Page 163 and 164: Council. As set out in the miscondu

Page 165 and 166: SUMMARY OF DEADLINES AND SETTINGS E

Page 167 and 168: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TH

Page 169 and 170: MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT The plaintiff

Page 171 and 172: law); Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. B

Page 173 and 174: generating source of the power (to

Page 175 and 176: Judge Carlos Murguia’s prior deci

Page 177 and 178: Case 2:05-cv-02299-CM-GLR Document




Page 185 and 186: enter the market. The Defendants ta

Page 187 and 188: (1) the attendance of a witness or

Page 189 and 190: 598. The USA PATRIOT Act reaffirmed

Page 191 and 192: 611. Defendants’ actions were wil

Page 193 and 194: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TH

Page 195 and 196: admitted was incorrect about the US

Page 197 and 198: government need only prove that the

Page 199 and 200: Accordingly, one who opts into or p

Page 201 and 202: other elements of the Section 1962(

Page 203 and 204: y circumstantial evidence and the l

Page 205 and 206: dealers or potential dealers. The p

Page 207 and 208: Kilroy reveal the law firm was the

Page 209 and 210: US Department Of Justice Post Trial

Page 211 and 212: of Liggett; Ernest Pepples of B&W;

Page 213 and 214: Certificate of Service I certify th

Page 215 and 216: 2. I know first hand the consequenc

Page 217 and 218: Army officer and an African America

Page 219 and 220: Social and Rehabilitation Services

Page 221 and 222: answered the complaint and sent add

Page 223 and 224: shared. The stress aggravated their

Page 225 and 226: objective of eliminating liability

Page 227 and 228: 14 08-3187 Medical Supply Chain vs.

Page 229 and 230: The Hon. Magistrate Judge James P.

Page 231 and 232: Bancorp and its investment bank sub

Page 233 and 234: the earlier ethics complaint as an

Page 235 and 236: misconduct that can remedy its effe

Page 237 and 238: Kansas District court would not cor

Page 239 and 240: he served as a lawyer in the matter

Page 241 and 242: Attorney James P. O'Hara Named U.S.

Page 243 and 244: Kansas City, MO. -- January 26, 200


Page 247 and 248: Exb 13 Atch 3 08-3187 Medical Suppl




Page 255 and 256: 19 In contrast, as a practical matt

Page 257 and 258: 02-3443 Medical Supply Chain v. US











Page 279: 08-3187 Medical Supply Chain vs. Ne




























Page 337 and 338: Dated this 24th day of October, 200

Page 339 and 340: lack of health insurance and the co

Page 341 and 342: Washington, DC 20004-1206 John K. P

Page 343 and 344: United States Court of Appeals for

Page 345 and 346: “Defendant's second allegation is

Page 347 and 348: 3. The defendants were not parties

Page 349 and 350: tie-in sales and other means of exp

Page 351 and 352: judicata grounds. The court noted,

Page 353 and 354: Id pg. 328. d. Identity of claims U

Page 355 and 356: Heard v. Board of Pub. Util. of Kan

Page 357 and 358: The hospital supply competitors VHA

Page 359 and 360: 56 states: “By 8/21/04 The NY Tim

Page 361 and 362: 506 (2002); Crawford-El v. Britton,

Page 363 and 364: The burden to state a claim for int

Page 365 and 366: 502 states: “Defendants through t

Page 367 and 368: the conspiracy, agreed to commit pr

Page 369 and 370: enterprise." Mason Tenders District

Page 371 and 372: “Section 315 of the Patriot Act a

Page 373 and 374: saml@medicalsupplychain.com Pro se

Page 375 and 376: !"#$%&"'()&$*'+,$&-(%'()!('()&.'/01

Page 377 and 378: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILE

Page 379 and 380: in ensuring that the claims he brin

Page 381 and 382: supplies which included the threat

Page 383 and 384: Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law

Page 385 and 386: Certificate of Service I certify I

Page 387 and 388: ! "#!$%&!'()&*+,-(&)#!).!%&*&/0!1&*

Page 389 and 390: ###################################





neoforma

volume

plaintiff

defendants

kansas

complaint

circuit

conduct

lipari

tenth

medicalsupplychain.com

08-3187 Volume Appendix15.pdf - Medical Supply Chain

08-3187 Volume Appendix15.pdf - Medical Supply Chain ... View more 08-3187 Volume Appendix15.pdf - Medical Supply Chain

Delete template?

Save as template ?

08-3187 Volume Appendix15.pdf - Medical Supply Chain 08-3187 Volume Appendix15.pdf - Medical Supply Chain