08-3187 Volume Appendix15.pdf - Medical Supply Chain

ased on the defendants’ misconduct in preceding litigation that included
conduct the respondent witnessed and knew occurred. See Exb. 10.
18. The petitioner had also filed a partial summary judgment briefing the
respondent on the current state of the applicable federal law governing the
petitioner’s claims on this misconduct and providing supporting evidentiary
documents. See “Memorandum In Support Of First Plaintiff’s Motion For
Partial Summary Judgment Under F. R. CIV. P. Local Rule 56.1”,Exb 11. And
Exb 11 supporting attachments 1 thru 13.
19. The conduct complained of in the complaint and documented in the
motion for partial summary judgment concerned extrinsic fraud through
Extortion Under Color of Official Right in depriving the petitioner of
representation so that the petitioner would be forced to forfeit his claims. See
Exb 10.
20. The extrinsic fraud of Extortion Under Color of Official Right used to
procure the decision in this case was also contained in the procedural history
portion of the petitioner’s state law contract claims against US Bank and US
Bancorp (see Exb. 29) filed by the petitioner in the 16 th Circuit Court of the
State of Missouri at Independence, Missouri and is again before the respondent
without alteration after fraudulently being removed and transferred to the
respondent where he exercised jurisdiction over them while the Tenth Circuit
appeal of their dismissal was proceeding and the respondent was in the
complete absence of jurisdiction.
8
08-3187 Medical Supply Chain vs. Neoforma Volume XV 5703