in the circuit court of jackson county, missouri, at independence
in the circuit court of jackson county, missouri, at independence in the circuit court of jackson county, missouri, at independence
secrets transmitted to them by Douglas Lewis and disseminated them to hospital suppliers and GPO’s competing with MSCI. 246. US BANCORP and US BANK violated their duty of undivided loyalty to MSCI and to the escrow beneficiaries thereof by engaging in self-dealing by requiring the escrow account funds to be invested in a fund owned by US BANCORP without disclosure of US BANCORP’s interest. COUNT V CAUSE OF ACTION FOR PRIMA FACIE TORT 247. Plaintiff hereby re-alleges the preceding averments of facts and incorporates them herein. 248. Plaintiff hereby re-alleges the preceding averments of facts and incorporates them herein. 249. US BANK and US BANCORP's Prima Facie Tort Part 1 1) Intentional lawful acts were committed by US BANK and US BANCORP including: a refusing to provide escrow account services; b. circulating derogatory financial information about MSCI. c. placing warning notes against MSCI’s officers on US BANK’s computer system d. disparaging MSCI’s legal claims against US BANK and US BANCORP 66
e. causing a Kansas attorney disciplinary complaint to be filed against MSCI’s counsel f. preventing MSCI from obtaining a loan secured with escrow account funds as they were released to MSCI. 2) US BANK and US BANCORP's committed these lawful acts with intent to injure the MSCI; 3) US BANK and US BANCORP's acts caused injury to MSCI and SAMUEL LIPARI 4) There is an absence of justification and in the alternative insufficient justification for US BANK and US BANCORP’s acts. a. MSCI had good credit. b. MSCI was a registered Missouri corporation in good standing. c. MSCI was being kept out of the market for hospital supplies by the concerted action off its competitors and their publicized exclusive agreements over hospital supplies with US BANCORP and US BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY. e. The defendants’ agent Shughart Thomson & Kilroy did not have good faith cause to make an ethics complaint against MSCI’s counsel for appealing the Kansas District Court’s clear error. 67
- Page 15 and 16: after the New York Times had began
- Page 17 and 18: Medical Supply’s Internal Capital
- Page 19 and 20: detailed evaluation of resumes, job
- Page 21 and 22: language of paragraph 10 “Securit
- Page 23 and 24: November 1st deadline, which requir
- Page 25 and 26: Repudiation of Agreement to Provide
- Page 27 and 28: 129. At 9 a.m. the following mornin
- Page 29 and 30: Defendants’ Knowledge of Breach 1
- Page 31 and 32: 153. SAMUEL LIPARI instructed him n
- Page 33 and 34: 164. Medical Supply stated that it
- Page 35 and 36: 175. Medical Supply counsel called
- Page 37 and 38: 183. US BANCORP’s counsel reitera
- Page 39 and 40: 196. Medical Supply became fearful
- Page 41 and 42: defendants breach, this time with a
- Page 43 and 44: an agreement, GHX, L.L.C. and Neofo
- Page 45 and 46: Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold
- Page 47 and 48: during its negotiation and formatio
- Page 49 and 50: COUNT II CAUSE OF ACTION FOR FRAUD
- Page 51 and 52: main reason is to know your custome
- Page 53 and 54: provided you a bid and we certainly
- Page 55 and 56: why this patriot act was brought in
- Page 57 and 58: going to constantly come back to th
- Page 59 and 60: Lars Anderson US Bancorp; “Ok, we
- Page 61 and 62: Group Purchasing Organization (“G
- Page 63 and 64: 233. The Defendants were at the tim
- Page 65: used a change in federal law as a p
- Page 69 and 70: enefits, dental coverage is being c
- Page 71 and 72: financials in possession of US BANK
secrets transmitted to <strong>the</strong>m by Douglas Lewis and<br />
dissem<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>m to hospital suppliers and GPO’s compet<strong>in</strong>g<br />
with MSCI.<br />
246. US BANCORP and US BANK viol<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>ir duty <strong>of</strong><br />
undivided loyalty to MSCI and to <strong>the</strong> escrow beneficiaries<br />
<strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong> by engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> self-deal<strong>in</strong>g by requir<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> escrow<br />
account funds to be <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> a fund owned by US BANCORP<br />
without disclosure <strong>of</strong> US BANCORP’s <strong>in</strong>terest.<br />
COUNT V<br />
CAUSE OF ACTION FOR PRIMA FACIE TORT<br />
247. Pla<strong>in</strong>tiff hereby re-alleges <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g averments <strong>of</strong><br />
facts and <strong>in</strong>corpor<strong>at</strong>es <strong>the</strong>m here<strong>in</strong>.<br />
248. Pla<strong>in</strong>tiff hereby re-alleges <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g averments <strong>of</strong><br />
facts and <strong>in</strong>corpor<strong>at</strong>es <strong>the</strong>m here<strong>in</strong>.<br />
249. US BANK and US BANCORP's Prima Facie Tort Part 1<br />
1) Intentional lawful acts were committed by US<br />
BANK and US BANCORP <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
a refus<strong>in</strong>g to provide escrow account services;<br />
b. circul<strong>at</strong><strong>in</strong>g derog<strong>at</strong>ory f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>form<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
about MSCI.<br />
c. plac<strong>in</strong>g warn<strong>in</strong>g notes aga<strong>in</strong>st MSCI’s <strong>of</strong>ficers<br />
on US BANK’s computer system<br />
d. disparag<strong>in</strong>g MSCI’s legal claims aga<strong>in</strong>st US BANK<br />
and US BANCORP<br />
66