in the circuit court of jackson county, missouri, at independence

for approval; a current good standing status from the
Missouri Secretary of State, which MSCI provided,
satisfying their sole open element.
204. The Defendants approved MSCI’s escrow form for
delivery along with MSCI’s associate contract to MSCI’s
independent representative candidates for their examination
and submission for review to their personal legal counsel.
After entering into a contract with MSCI, the defendants
breached the contract and did not provide the escrow
accounts.
205. The Defendants breached the contract to provide escrow
accounts to MSCI when the defendants discovered MSCI would
reduce hospital supply prices nationwide with an internet
based electronic marketplace.
206. MSCI attempted to cover or substitute as described in
the statement of facts, seeking the services of Shook,
Hardy & Bacon, then the defendants’ own law firm to
administer escrow accounts unsuccessfully.
207. MSCI then attempted to cover or substitute by
obtaining the capitalization for entry to market through a
real estate transaction with GE which breached its contract
when it also discovered MSCI would reduce hospital supply
prices nationwide with an internet based electronic
marketplace.
48