in the circuit court of jackson county, missouri, at independence
in the circuit court of jackson county, missouri, at independence in the circuit court of jackson county, missouri, at independence
195. Plaintiff hereby re alleges the preceding averments of facts and incorporates them herein. 196. The Defendants breached their contract with Medical Supply (MSCI) which interests are now assigned to SAMUEL LIPARI to provide MSCI with a full range of business banking services, including corporate trust services and escrow agency to be performed lawfully and professionally with a “five star guarantee” of quality of service. 197. This contract was executed in writing by the Defendants and MSCI when their respective agents opened the Medical Supply Chain Corporate checking account. 198. The Defendants breached their contract with MSCI to provide MSCI with corporate trust services, escrow agency and the service of hosting escrow accounts for MSCI and its candidates. 199. This contract was made while the plaintiff was influenced by representations over the phone at a distance of 300 miles between the defendant US BANK’s St. Louis office and the plaintiff as chief executive officer of MSCI a customer of US BANK’s Noland Road Independence office in the regular course of business. 200. No writing or other memorialization of this contract to provide a full range of banking services with a “Five Star Guarantee” was referred to or contemplated at any time 46
during its negotiation and formation by either the Defendants or MSCI. 201. The Defendant’s Vice President Brian Kabbes and Samuel Lipari came into formation of a written contract for escrow account services when both had agreed upon some or all of the terms in exchanges of email including: the composition of the escrow form, the language limiting the liability of US BANK and the escrow agent, the language designating US BANK’s compensation for its duties in any legal disputes arising between the parties, the directions for US BANK’s investment of long term held funds, the directions for US BANK’s investment of short term held funds, the selection of investment vehicles for both funds respectively, the name and address of BRIAN KABBES as escrow agent on the escrow form, the name and address of US BANK as escrow depository on the escrow form, the price term US BANK is charging for the agreed upon escrow service and the price term and payment schedule for maintaining the account. 202. The Defendants performed diligence to determine whether to accept the contract with MSCI to provide MSCI with corporate trust services, escrow agency and the service of hosting escrow accounts for MSCI and its candidates. 203. The Defendants required only one item to be rectified 47
- Page 1 and 2: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COU
- Page 3 and 4: defendants that regularly do busine
- Page 5 and 6: defendants was denied and the inter
- Page 7 and 8: conduct designed to cause Medical S
- Page 9 and 10: 32. The Kansas District Court Judge
- Page 11 and 12: thereby reducing costs up to 40% in
- Page 13 and 14: 50. The account was opened in the n
- Page 15 and 16: after the New York Times had began
- Page 17 and 18: Medical Supply’s Internal Capital
- Page 19 and 20: detailed evaluation of resumes, job
- Page 21 and 22: language of paragraph 10 “Securit
- Page 23 and 24: November 1st deadline, which requir
- Page 25 and 26: Repudiation of Agreement to Provide
- Page 27 and 28: 129. At 9 a.m. the following mornin
- Page 29 and 30: Defendants’ Knowledge of Breach 1
- Page 31 and 32: 153. SAMUEL LIPARI instructed him n
- Page 33 and 34: 164. Medical Supply stated that it
- Page 35 and 36: 175. Medical Supply counsel called
- Page 37 and 38: 183. US BANCORP’s counsel reitera
- Page 39 and 40: 196. Medical Supply became fearful
- Page 41 and 42: defendants breach, this time with a
- Page 43 and 44: an agreement, GHX, L.L.C. and Neofo
- Page 45: Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold
- Page 49 and 50: COUNT II CAUSE OF ACTION FOR FRAUD
- Page 51 and 52: main reason is to know your custome
- Page 53 and 54: provided you a bid and we certainly
- Page 55 and 56: why this patriot act was brought in
- Page 57 and 58: going to constantly come back to th
- Page 59 and 60: Lars Anderson US Bancorp; “Ok, we
- Page 61 and 62: Group Purchasing Organization (“G
- Page 63 and 64: 233. The Defendants were at the tim
- Page 65 and 66: used a change in federal law as a p
- Page 67 and 68: e. causing a Kansas attorney discip
- Page 69 and 70: enefits, dental coverage is being c
- Page 71 and 72: financials in possession of US BANK
195. Pla<strong>in</strong>tiff hereby re alleges <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g averments <strong>of</strong><br />
facts and <strong>in</strong>corpor<strong>at</strong>es <strong>the</strong>m here<strong>in</strong>.<br />
196. The Defendants breached <strong>the</strong>ir contract with Medical<br />
Supply (MSCI) which <strong>in</strong>terests are now assigned to SAMUEL<br />
LIPARI to provide MSCI with a full range <strong>of</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
bank<strong>in</strong>g services, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g corpor<strong>at</strong>e trust services and<br />
escrow agency to be performed lawfully and pr<strong>of</strong>essionally<br />
with a “five star guarantee” <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> service.<br />
197. This contract was executed <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g by <strong>the</strong><br />
Defendants and MSCI when <strong>the</strong>ir respective agents opened <strong>the</strong><br />
Medical Supply Cha<strong>in</strong> Corpor<strong>at</strong>e check<strong>in</strong>g account.<br />
198. The Defendants breached <strong>the</strong>ir contract with MSCI to<br />
provide MSCI with corpor<strong>at</strong>e trust services, escrow agency<br />
and <strong>the</strong> service <strong>of</strong> host<strong>in</strong>g escrow accounts for MSCI and its<br />
candid<strong>at</strong>es.<br />
199. This contract was made while <strong>the</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>tiff was<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluenced by represent<strong>at</strong>ions over <strong>the</strong> phone <strong>at</strong> a distance<br />
<strong>of</strong> 300 miles between <strong>the</strong> defendant US BANK’s St. Louis<br />
<strong>of</strong>fice and <strong>the</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>tiff as chief executive <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> MSCI<br />
a customer <strong>of</strong> US BANK’s Noland Road Independence <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> regular course <strong>of</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />
200. No writ<strong>in</strong>g or o<strong>the</strong>r memorializ<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> this contract<br />
to provide a full range <strong>of</strong> bank<strong>in</strong>g services with a “Five<br />
Star Guarantee” was referred to or contempl<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> any time<br />
46