03.02.2015 Views

in the circuit court of jackson county, missouri, at independence

in the circuit court of jackson county, missouri, at independence

in the circuit court of jackson county, missouri, at independence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day Tuesday 10/22/02, believ<strong>in</strong>g US BANK to<br />

be mis<strong>in</strong>formed about <strong>the</strong> USA P<strong>at</strong>riot Act and any reason for<br />

deny<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> escrow accounts.<br />

159. US BANCORP Trust Department corpor<strong>at</strong>e counsel, Kristen<br />

Strong replied Friday 10/18/02 via fax and priority<br />

delivery with a letter deny<strong>in</strong>g US BANCORP NA was <strong>in</strong><br />

contract with Medical Supply and th<strong>at</strong> if any law suit is<br />

filed to address service for <strong>the</strong> trust department to her <strong>at</strong><br />

her <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />

160. Medical Supply called <strong>the</strong> trust department counsel<br />

Monday 10/21/02 to ask for service addresses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

named entities and employees.<br />

161. Kristen Strong said <strong>the</strong> same address would be good for<br />

all and <strong>the</strong>n proceeded to ask wh<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> causes <strong>of</strong> action<br />

were.<br />

162. Medical Supply expla<strong>in</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> it was chiefly an<br />

antitrust action based on <strong>the</strong> Sherman, Clayton and Hobbs<br />

Act and th<strong>at</strong> causes <strong>of</strong> action under <strong>the</strong> USA P<strong>at</strong>riot Act<br />

were also a basis for <strong>the</strong> suit.<br />

163. Kristen Strong was surprised Medical Supply was told<br />

<strong>the</strong> USA P<strong>at</strong>riot Act had been given as <strong>the</strong> reason for <strong>the</strong><br />

denial <strong>of</strong> escrow account service but reiter<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>re<br />

was no contract <strong>in</strong> her view and she saw no basis for <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r causes <strong>of</strong> action.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!