NBCE Results - Palmer College of Chiropractic, Intranet Home Page

NBCE Results - Palmer College of Chiropractic, Intranet Home Page NBCE Results - Palmer College of Chiropractic, Intranet Home Page

w3.palmer.edu
from w3.palmer.edu More from this publisher

<strong>NBCE</strong> <strong>Results</strong> – What can we<br />

learn; what can we do<br />

Spring 2012 In-Service<br />

3/5/2012<br />

Kevin W. Paustian D.C., Ed.S.<br />

Dean <strong>of</strong> Academic Affairs<br />

<strong>Palmer</strong> <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chiropractic</strong>


CCE Policy 56 <strong>NBCE</strong> Performance Disclosure, Thresholds and Outcomes<br />

CCE Standards requirements concerning public disclosure <strong>of</strong> student performance on<br />

national board examinations, DCPs must:<br />

disclose up-to-date student performance on national board examinations for each<br />

campus on the program website.<br />

Scores must be posted, using the format described below, on one <strong>of</strong> the following<br />

website pages: Admissions, Academics, Prospective Students, <strong>Home</strong> page or<br />

equivalent page.<br />

The link to the scores from these pages must be direct.<br />

DCPs must update <strong>NBCE</strong> data for public disclosure within 30 days <strong>of</strong> the release <strong>of</strong><br />

the data by <strong>NBCE</strong> each year.<br />

The Council on <strong>Chiropractic</strong> Education, Inc.®<br />

CCE Manual <strong>of</strong> Policies January 2012<br />

http://cce-usa.org/uploads/2012_CCE_Manual_<strong>of</strong>_Policies.pdf


CCE <strong>NBCE</strong> Pass Rate Thresholds<br />

Part 1 – 65% (first attempt) <strong>of</strong> four most recent examinations<br />

Part 2 – 65% (first attempt) <strong>of</strong> four most recent examinations<br />

Part 3 – 70% (first attempt) <strong>of</strong> four most recent examinations<br />

Part 4 – 75% (first attempt) <strong>of</strong> four most recent examinations<br />

Performance below these thresholds, as derived from data obtained by the CCE<br />

Council, will indicate the need for further review and action as determined by the<br />

CCE Council.<br />

January 2012 Manual <strong>of</strong> Policies <strong>of</strong> The Council on <strong>Chiropractic</strong> Education, Inc.®


<strong>College</strong> <strong>NBCE</strong> Pass Rate<br />

Thresholds<br />

<strong>NBCE</strong> Parts I & II scores range from 0-800 with a national mean <strong>of</strong> 500 and<br />

a standard deviation <strong>of</strong> 100;<br />

Part III scores range from 0-800 with a national mean <strong>of</strong> 450 and a standard<br />

deviation <strong>of</strong> 100.<br />

The Part IV scores range from 0-800; the mean passing score and standard<br />

deviation vary per test.<br />

<strong>College</strong> threshold:<br />

Parts I, II, & III - 75% <strong>of</strong> students will successfully pass all sections on their<br />

first attempt;<br />

PT - 80% <strong>of</strong> all students will successfully pass all sections on their first<br />

attempt;<br />

Part IV - 90% <strong>of</strong> all students will successfully pass all sections on their first<br />

attempt.<br />

PCC 2010-11 Program Effectiveness Report: Executive Summary, Dec 2011


CCE Required format for publication<br />

The weighted arithmetic average <strong>of</strong> first-time candidate pass rates for<br />

the four most recent Part I, II, III, IV and Physiotherapy examinations.<br />

PART X<br />

<strong>College</strong> Data National<br />

# TESTED # PASS % PASS % PASS<br />

Fall 2009 62 50 80.6% 75.0%<br />

Spring 2009 48 30 62.5% 76.0%<br />

Fall 2008 76 63 82.9% 75.0%<br />

Spring 2008 50 38 76.0% 76.0%<br />

2-YR TOTAL 236 181 76.7% 75.5%<br />

The Council on <strong>Chiropractic</strong> Education, Inc.®<br />

CCE Manual <strong>of</strong> Policies January 2012


http://www.palmer.edu/uploadedFiles/<strong>Page</strong>s/Marketing/Publications/Official_<strong>College</strong>_Documents/Davenport_Campus_<strong>NBCE</strong><br />

_Scores.pdf


First Time Pass Rates<br />

<strong>NBCE</strong> Part I All <strong>Palmer</strong> Campuses (2007 - 2011)<br />

100%<br />

95%<br />

90%<br />

85%<br />

80%<br />

75%<br />

PCC Threshold<br />

70%<br />

65%<br />

CCE Threshold<br />

60%<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />

Davenport 79% 71% 76% 71% 73%<br />

Florida 67% 77% 79% 75% 75%<br />

West 77% 69% 65% 74% 62%<br />

National Average 75% 74% 76% 74% 74%


First Time Pass Rates<br />

<strong>NBCE</strong> Part II All <strong>Palmer</strong> Campuses (2007 - 2011)<br />

100%<br />

95%<br />

90%<br />

85%<br />

80%<br />

75%<br />

PCC Threshold<br />

70%<br />

65%<br />

CCE Threshold<br />

60%<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />

Davenport 76% 75% 72% 66% 69%<br />

Florida 79% 68% 71% 67% 80%<br />

West 75% 85% 81% 76% 69%<br />

National Average 76% 75% 75% 72% 73%


First Time Pass Rates<br />

<strong>NBCE</strong> Part III All <strong>Palmer</strong> Campuses (2007 - 2011)<br />

100%<br />

95%<br />

90%<br />

85%<br />

80%<br />

75%<br />

70%<br />

PCC Threshold<br />

CCE Threshold<br />

65%<br />

60%<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />

Davenport 80% 84% 80% 77% 76%<br />

Florida 79% 83% 84% 87% 82%<br />

West 87% 89% 88% 84% 86%<br />

National Average 82% 83% 83% 81% 81%


First Time Pass Rates<br />

<strong>NBCE</strong> PTH All <strong>Palmer</strong> Campuses (2007 - 2011)<br />

100%<br />

95%<br />

90%<br />

85%<br />

80%<br />

75%<br />

PCC Threshold<br />

70%<br />

65%<br />

60%<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />

Davenport 91% 90% 83% 91% 87%<br />

Florida 87% 93% 91% 89% 87%<br />

West 95% 97% 92% 92% 83%<br />

National Average 91% 90% 89% 89% 89%


First Time Pass Rates<br />

<strong>NBCE</strong> Part IV All <strong>Palmer</strong> Campuses (2007 - 2011)<br />

100%<br />

95%<br />

90%<br />

PCC Threshold<br />

85%<br />

80%<br />

75%<br />

CCE Threshold<br />

70%<br />

65%<br />

60%<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />

Davenport 96% 94% 95% 93% 90%<br />

Florida 95% 92% 92% 87% 89%<br />

West 95% 88% 92% 88% 80%<br />

National Average 93% 88% 92% 89% 89%


Osteology <strong>of</strong> the Appendicular Skeleton<br />

500<br />

Osteology <strong>of</strong> the Appendicular Skeleton (14%)<br />

400<br />

FALL 06 SPR 07 FALL 07 SPR 08 FALL 08 SPR 09 FALL 09 SPR 10 FALL 10 SPR 11 FALL 11 SPR 12 FALL 12<br />

P:\Curriculum\Curriculum Management Committee\<strong>NBCE</strong>\Part One PCCD Fall 2011


Themes from<br />

Data Review<br />

If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu.<br />

1. Representation<br />

•“<strong>Palmer</strong>’s representation on <strong>NBCE</strong> committees could elevate <strong>Palmer</strong> student’s<br />

scores. If <strong>Palmer</strong> does not have strong representation in the future we could see<br />

a decrease in scores.”<br />

•“More representation on the <strong>NBCE</strong> may help to elevate the scores.”<br />

2. Course Sequencing<br />

•“…the students take the exam before they finish my course.”


Getting selected<br />

1. <strong>NBCE</strong> considers applicant’s:<br />

Publications (research, textbooks, etc)<br />

Courses taught / Credentials<br />

Focused content (PhD, MS) - Biochemistry<br />

Broad content (DC)– Associated Clinical<br />

Sciences<br />

Years at institution<br />

Test writing ability<br />

2. Send resume to Dean <strong>of</strong> Academic Affairs


Length <strong>of</strong> test writing assignment<br />

• Typically 3-years<br />

• May be longer to insure<br />

an experience member<br />

with new writers<br />

• In the past, assignments<br />

were longer.<br />

• <strong>NBCE</strong> now wants to rotate<br />

more frequently


Test Pool Process<br />

Questions received from<br />

colleges are reviewed by a<br />

test specialist:<br />

1. Specialist categorizes<br />

the questions (Part I, II,<br />

III and section)<br />

2. Edits and formats<br />

3. Places question into<br />

the pool<br />

http://www.nbce.org/pdfs/written_broch.pdf


Test Writing Committee Membership<br />

•Three members (each from different colleges) plus an <strong>NBCE</strong> moderator<br />

•equally represented across at all tests<br />

•Committee selects questions from the pool provided<br />

•Committee determines questions for all categories (subsections) within<br />

the test section.<br />

•Decides through consensus (no <strong>of</strong>ficial vote)<br />

•Moderator throws out the question if it lacks consensus<br />

•Committee looking for:<br />

•Well-constructed questions<br />

•Good content<br />

•Not looking for trivia or trick questions<br />

•Select 110 items that test core knowledge<br />

•Committee looks at the pool questions first<br />

•Test writers are required provide 20 questions each<br />

•Entered into pool<br />

•Assigned specific topic due to under representation in the<br />

pool<br />

•The test is not 60 test writer questions plus 50 pool questions


Question submission<br />

Faculty can submit a midterm or final<br />

Doesn’t need references<br />

Must have the test key attached<br />

Can still use the test in class<br />

Submit questions written specific for<br />

<strong>NBCE</strong><br />

Must have references cited<br />

Content must be found in<br />

references listed by <strong>NBCE</strong><br />

Submitters <strong>of</strong> questions selected are<br />

not notified<br />

Questions are typically edited<br />

significantly


ASSIGNMENT AND LICENSE<br />

AGREEMENT<br />

WHEREAS, the National Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chiropractic</strong> Examiners (“<strong>NBCE</strong>”) prepares and administers<br />

certain examinations for chiropractic students used in state licensure;<br />

WHEREAS, ___________ (“Author”) has prepared certain examination questions for use in<br />

academic training <strong>of</strong> chiropractic students (“Academic Examination Items”); and<br />

WHEREAS, <strong>NBCE</strong> wishes to use, and Author wishes to provide <strong>NBCE</strong>, certain Academic<br />

Examination Items for use in <strong>NBCE</strong>’s examinations;<br />

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree that:<br />

(1) Author assigns any and all right <strong>of</strong> ownership, title and interest, including all rights under the<br />

U.S. copyright laws, in the Academic Examination Items, attached as Exhibit A, to <strong>NBCE</strong> for the<br />

exclusive use <strong>of</strong> such items in <strong>NBCE</strong>’s examinations. Author further acknowledges that <strong>NBCE</strong><br />

may, in its sole discretion, modify and/or incorporate the content <strong>of</strong> such Academic<br />

Examination Items in items used on its examinations.<br />

(2) <strong>NBCE</strong> grants Author a personal, perpetual, non-exclusive and free license and right <strong>of</strong> usage<br />

to Author <strong>of</strong> the assigned Academic Examination Items for academic purposes only.


References listed<br />

1. Each test committee comments on listed<br />

references<br />

•Add/Keep/Drop<br />

2. Survey <strong>of</strong> college libraries<br />

•<strong>NBCE</strong> looks to see number <strong>of</strong> colleges using text<br />

•5-6 colleges it may make the list<br />

3. Will not use recent journal articles<br />

•Exception is a major article such as Health<br />

People 2020 (Public Health)<br />

4. Texts out <strong>of</strong> print are usually dropped<br />

5. References found at<br />

http://www.nbce.org/written/reference.html


<strong>NBCE</strong> Test Committee Members Service<br />

<strong>Palmer</strong> <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chiropractic</strong>, Davenport Campus<br />

Name Subject Service<br />

Bovée, Michael L. <strong>Chiropractic</strong> Practice 1991 - 2007<br />

Canterbury, Robin R. Diagnostic Imaging 1990 - 1992<br />

Duray, Stephen M. General Anatomy 2001 - 2005<br />

Firth, Ronnie L. Part III 2002<br />

Freedman, Louis J. Physiology 2006 - 2010<br />

Hong, Se-Pyo S. Spinal Anatomy 2001 - 2004<br />

Littrell, Tracey A. Associated Clinical Science 2009 - 2011<br />

Manley-Buser, Katherine A. General Anatomy 2011 - 2012<br />

McConnell, Elizabeth General Diagnostics 1991<br />

Morter, Jr., Harvey Spinal Anatomy 1990 - 1995<br />

Strang, Victor G. Principles <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chiropractic</strong> 2010 - 2011<br />

Tatum, Robert Part III 2007<br />

Taylor, Gregory W. Pathology 1995 - 2001<br />

Indicates Current Year Service<br />

Indicates Service in the last 5 years


Florida and West Faculty<br />

•West<br />

•Thomas Milus – Part II cut-score meeting (March 2011); part II test writing for Associated<br />

Clinical Sciences (September, 2011)<br />

•Susan St. Claire – Physiotherapy (September, 2011)<br />

•Robert Cooperstein – Pathology (2010 and 2011)<br />

•Dan Dugan – Public Health (2010)<br />

•Mohan Menon – Microbiology (2008)<br />

•Florida<br />

• Chris Meseke (Physiology -current)<br />

•Medhat Alattar (Pathology - past)<br />

•Dr. Roger Corbin (NMS Diagnosis - past)<br />

•Dr. Veronica Dishman (Pathology - past)


http://www.cceb.ca/study-guides-instructions/


http://www.cceb.ca/docs/cceb-exam-content.pdf


Frequently Asked Questions<br />

Who develops the questions<br />

Questions are developed by practicing chiropractors who are content area experts. The<br />

questions are not written by any college faculty members. Questions are then<br />

reviewed by CCEB exam and item experts. These experts confirm the content and<br />

ensure that the questions are written in a proper format that meets current standards<br />

<strong>of</strong> psychometric testing.<br />

How do you select your exam questions<br />

Our blueprint for all three exam components is derived from a job analysis survey <strong>of</strong><br />

practicing chiropractors in Canada. The Component A blueprint is also<br />

supplemented with a curriculum survey <strong>of</strong> Canadian, US, and international<br />

chiropractic colleges. The questions selected for each exam are reviewed by the Item<br />

Review Committee, which is comprised <strong>of</strong> practicing chiropractors from a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

colleges and with varied practice experience.<br />

Who are the examiners<br />

All examiners have been in active practice in Canada for a minimum <strong>of</strong> 3 years and do<br />

not include college faculty. These examiners have been appointed and trained by the<br />

CCEB and are selected to represent a range <strong>of</strong> experience, type <strong>of</strong> practice, region,<br />

and education (Canada, US, International).<br />

http://www.cceb.ca/faq/


Frequently Asked Questions<br />

Does the Canadian graduate have an advantage<br />

Exam statistics indicate a difference in pass percentages between different<br />

colleges; however, the CCEB has taken many steps to ensure that this is not due to<br />

any bias in the exams.<br />

The CCEB exams are designed to test for the competencies required to practice<br />

chiropractic in Canada. Our blueprint for all three exam components is derived<br />

from a job analysis survey <strong>of</strong> practicing chiropractors in Canada. The Component A<br />

blueprint is also supplemented with a curriculum survey <strong>of</strong> Canadian, US, and<br />

international chiropractic colleges.<br />

All <strong>of</strong> our exam committees consist <strong>of</strong> chiropractors who have been practicing for a<br />

minimum <strong>of</strong> one year in Canada, and include an equal number <strong>of</strong> representatives<br />

who have graduated from Canadian and non-Canadian chiropractic colleges.<br />

Component C examiners are also selected to provide an equal representation <strong>of</strong><br />

graduates from different schools.<br />

We do not provide any additional study tools or information to any college, beyond<br />

what is posted on the CCEB website. Students or graduates <strong>of</strong> Canadian colleges<br />

do not receive any further information than that which is provided to all<br />

candidates and posted on the website.<br />

Would studying old CCEB exam questions help me<br />

CCEB exam questions are constantly created, revised, and retired. The chances <strong>of</strong><br />

any one question appearing on a current exam is less than 0.05%.<br />

http://www.cceb.ca/faq/


Component A<br />

Consists <strong>of</strong> multiple‐choice items each with four alternatives, and is based on the<br />

underlying causes <strong>of</strong> pain and diseases.<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> the items are presented in a clinical context (that is, patient‐centered).<br />

However, some items are presented in a factual context stripped <strong>of</strong> reference to a<br />

patient.<br />

The Component A exam consists <strong>of</strong> approximately 270 items written<br />

in two sections with three hours to complete each section.<br />

http://www.cceb.ca/docs/cceb-exam-content.pdf


http://www.cceb.ca/docs/cceb-exam-content.pdf


Component B<br />

Tests the candidate’s ability to make decisions and diagnoses in a clinical<br />

context.<br />

Mainly uses a multiple‐choice format with four alternatives per item.<br />

Contains radiographic images with three to four questions pertaining to each<br />

image.<br />

Consists <strong>of</strong> two sections with a total <strong>of</strong> approximately 200 items and 3 hours<br />

for the completion <strong>of</strong> each section.<br />

http://www.cceb.ca/docs/cceb-exam-content.pdf


http://www.cceb.ca/docs/cceb-exam-content.pdf


Component C<br />

Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) that tests a candidate’s clinical skills in a<br />

clinic‐like environment.<br />

Exam consists <strong>of</strong> 10, 12‐minute stations and up to 23 different patient presentations.<br />

It uses actors to portray the role <strong>of</strong> a patient and uses trained examiners to evaluate<br />

each station.<br />

http://www.cceb.ca/docs/cceb-exam-content.pdf


http://www.cceb.ca/docs/cceb-exam-content.pdf


What can we do<br />

1. March 2012 Student Survey<br />

a) How far in advance do students begin studying for the<br />

<strong>NBCE</strong> exams<br />

b) How many total hours do they estimate preparing for<br />

<strong>NBCE</strong> exams<br />

c) How effective do they perceive different preparation<br />

methods (class notes, group study, review programs,<br />

etc)<br />

d) What recommendations do they have to improve <strong>NBCE</strong><br />

preparation <br />

e) What advice would they give fellow students <br />

2. Faculty submit <strong>NBCE</strong> questions – deadline April 23, 2012<br />

3. Increase college representation – submit vitae


Thank you<br />

Questions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!