01.02.2015 Views

Rev Paula 1 Final 15-6-11.pdf - Waterways Forward

Rev Paula 1 Final 15-6-11.pdf - Waterways Forward

Rev Paula 1 Final 15-6-11.pdf - Waterways Forward

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Protecting Water Quality in<br />

Inland <strong>Waterways</strong><br />

Monitoring Programme and<br />

Classification Tool to Assess<br />

Ecological Potential of Canals<br />

under the<br />

Water Framework Directive


OVERVIEW<br />

• Water Framework Directive Requirements<br />

for Canals<br />

• Mitigation Measures<br />

• SNIFFER Project


Changing Face of the <strong>Waterways</strong>…


Native Protected Species<br />

Opposite-leaved Pondweed<br />

(Groenlandia densa)


The white-clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes) which is<br />

under threat t from a lethal l fungus


Objectives of the Practice<br />

• Development of WFD Monitoring Programme for<br />

Canals<br />

• Classification of Ecological Potential<br />

• Research the development of WFD<br />

Classification Tool for Canals<br />

• Development of mitigation measures to ensure<br />

the Canals meet Good Ecological Potential<br />

(GEP)<br />

• Using ecological information to improve<br />

maintenance practices


WFD OVERVIEW<br />

Water Framework<br />

Directive<br />

Good Ecological<br />

Status<br />

Good Chemical<br />

Status<br />

Quality of<br />

Biological<br />

Community<br />

Hydromorphological<br />

Characteristics<br />

Physico-Chemical<br />

Characteristics<br />

Quality Standards for<br />

Chemical<br />

Substances


Water Quality Parameters<br />

Physico- Chemical Status<br />

Parameter Threshold Source<br />

Total P<br />

mg/L<br />

MRP<br />

mg/L<br />

Ammonia<br />

mg/L<br />

≤ 0.063<br />

≤ 0.02<br />

≤ 0.12<br />

B.O.D. < 2.5<br />

Inland Fisheries - Expert Judgement<br />

Inland Fisheries - Expert Judgement<br />

SNIFFER WFD61<br />

Research project to develop tool for assigning status to<br />

canals<br />

mg/L O 2<br />

DO<br />

mg/L<br />

Total<br />

Coliforms<br />

Feacal<br />

Coliforms<br />

>5<br />


Macroinvertebrates<br />

Macroinvertebrates<br />

are the larger<br />

invertebrates<br />

visible to the eye.


Biological Status<br />

Parameter Threshold Source<br />

Macro-invertebrates 45 4.5 SNIFFER WFD61<br />

ASPT<br />

(Range 4.0 - Macroinvertebrates<br />

5.0) within range of 4-5<br />

(Average score per<br />

deemed suitable for<br />

taxon)<br />

Irish canals based<br />

on expert opinion<br />

Macrophytes<br />

Tool required, under<br />

development


WFD Monitoring Requirements for Canals<br />

Quality Elements No. of Sites Frequency<br />

General physicochemical<br />

Benthic invertebrate<br />

fauna<br />

40 (each year) 4 times per year<br />

c. 13 (per year) Once per three<br />

years<br />

Macrophytes 40 (each year) Annually<br />

Hydromorphology c. 7 (each year) Once per six years<br />

Fish c. 13 (per year) Once per three<br />

years<br />

Annex X Substances<br />

To be considered when<br />

discharged into an RBD<br />

and dthen to a canal<br />

12 times per year<br />

for 1 year in 3<br />

year cycle<br />

Annex VIII Other<br />

pollutants<br />

To be considered when<br />

discharged into an RBD<br />

and then into a canal<br />

12 times per year<br />

for 1 year in 3<br />

year cycle


Hydromorphology<br />

Parameter<br />

Source<br />

Various mitigation measures UKTAG Guidance<br />

(see detailed spreadsheets)


MITIGATION MEASURES<br />

• WFD requires member states to define by mid<br />

2008 what mitigation measures should be taken<br />

in AWBs in order to ensure the adequate<br />

mitigation of the negative impacts.<br />

• The aim is to ensure that we can identify the set<br />

of measures that support achieving MEP, GEP.


MITIGATION MEASURES<br />

Covers mitigation measures for:<br />

• maintenance and operation of existing waterway<br />

channels (including dredging, bank protection, water<br />

control, aquatic weed control, use by boats),<br />

• maintenance of existing waterway structures and<br />

customer facilities (including bridges, locks, weirs,<br />

wharves, moorings and marinas),<br />

• construction of new waterway structures and customer<br />

facilities,<br />

• restoration of abandoned waterways to navigable<br />

condition,<br />

• construction of new lengths of waterway.


Elodea canadensis & nuttalli<br />

Canadian & Nuttalls Pondweed<br />

Fallopia japonica<br />

Japanese Knotweed


RBD AWB Interim Ecological Pot.<br />

ROYAL CANAL<br />

EA (ERBD) GEP<br />

SH (ShRBD) East of Lough Owel GEP by Extrapolation<br />

SH<br />

(ShRBD) West of Lough Owel<br />

Less than GEP. Under<br />

Restoration.<br />

SH Lough Owel Feeder GEP by Extrapolation<br />

SH Longford Branch Non-functional<br />

GRAND CANAL<br />

EA (ERBD) East of Lowtown GEP<br />

SE (SERBD) East of Lowtown GEP<br />

SE (SERBD) West of Lowtown GEP<br />

EA (ERBD) West of Lowtown GEP<br />

SH (ShRBD) GEP<br />

EA Naas & Corbally Branch GEP<br />

EA Edenderry Branch GEP by Extrapolation<br />

EA Grand Canal Basin Poor<br />

BARROW<br />

SE Milltown Feeder & Old Barrow Line GEP<br />

SE Barrow Line GEP<br />

SE Barrow Navigation (<strong>15</strong> canal cuts)<br />

Less than GEP Assigned<br />

based on River Barrow<br />

SHANNON-ERNE<br />

NW Shannon Erne Waterway (NWRBD) GEP<br />

SH Shannon Erne Waterway (ShRBD) GEP


SNIFFER PROJECT<br />

• Scottish and Northern Ireland Forum For<br />

Environmental Research (SNIFFER)<br />

-Project to develop a WFD compliant canal<br />

classification tool.<br />

• EPA and <strong>Waterways</strong> Ireland co-funded this<br />

project along with British <strong>Waterways</strong>, SEPA and<br />

EA.<br />

• Dr. Nigel Wilby, University of Stirling, Scotland


SNIFFER PROJECT<br />

• Devised a canal classification tool that will be used to<br />

classify canal waterbodies by comparing their ecological<br />

l<br />

condition to their expected ecological potential.<br />

• Will provide sufficient information to determine GEP of a<br />

canal water body based on the relevant biological,<br />

hydromorphological and physico-chemical quality<br />

elements as defined by the WFD-standardised sampling<br />

• Boat traffic integral component<br />

• Outputs from this project including the classification<br />

tool and monitoring gprotocols will influence how<br />

canals are managed for WFD in Ireland.


Lessons Learnt from<br />

Best Practice<br />

• Cooperation by government agencies is essential in<br />

implementation of WFD<br />

• Acknowledgement of importance of canal primarily as<br />

navigation system and obtaining i the necessary balance<br />

with WFD objectives<br />

• Cooperative research to solve common problems<br />

• New insights into ecological value of resource<br />

• New insights into enhancing maintenance practices to<br />

meet WFD objectives<br />

• New insights into the variety of ecosystems in canals in<br />

different countries


An Assessment of the Potential ti Environmental Impact of Proposed Dry Dredging<br />

on Grand Canal – Circular Line:<br />

A Report Prepared for <strong>Waterways</strong> Ireland

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!