1JZGauQ

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4: CASE STUDY 1: THE ITALIAN/SLOVENIAN BORDER Figure 34: Barbed wire across the roads San Gabriele/Erjavčeva ulica in the 1950s. Property of Musei provinciali di Gorizia, Italy. Even in places where material remains of the border itself do not linger to inform us about their previous presence we can still be reminded of its location through the imprint it has made on the landscape. Looking at Google Earth it is often easy to trace the line of the border even without the actual borderline superimposed. The cut-off point between two states can in this way often be seen through the changes it has made in the landscape, for example through different agricultural use. The agricultural fields around San Pietro/Šempeter, for example, clearly show the variation between the fields on the Slovenian and the Italian side where the border cuts through what was previously larger fields creating smaller and less regular fields around the border line itself. In other places it is represented by a previous road since discontinued on the other side of the border. This is the case near the village of San Pietro the Italian version of Šempeter, located just across the border. The two parts of what used to be one village was previously connected with a road that has since become redundant (Figure 36). 95
AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN Figure 35a (above left) and 35b (above right): Barbed wire along the border near the San Gabriele/Erjavčeva ulica crossing. Photo: Anna McWilliams 2008. Figure 36 Picture of discontinued road between Šempeter in Slovenia and San Pietro in Italy once the same village. Photo: Anna McWilliams 2011. Signs As we have seen border stones and signs had different purposes with signs aimed at informing. As movement along the borders in the study area was highly controlled it was important to inform people of what areas were restricted and which areas could be accessed. Also it was important to inform people on how to behave within the areas they could access. Although more abundant in the past the presence of signage is still apparent in the landscape and often demonstrates attempts to keep people out of the border area. These 96
Page 1 and 2:
An Archaeology of the Iron Curtain
Page 4 and 5:
An Archaeology of the Iron Curtain
Page 8 and 9:
Contents Acknowledgements 11 CHAPTE
Page 10:
The end of a journey 212 Sammanfatt
Page 13 and 14:
AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
Page 16 and 17:
CHAPTER 1 Introduction Standing on
Page 18 and 19:
1: INTRODUCTION carried out of the
Page 20 and 21:
1: INTRODUCTION they may be… It i
Page 22 and 23:
1: INTRODUCTION where the observer
Page 24 and 25:
1: INTRODUCTION former Iron Curtain
Page 26 and 27:
1: INTRODUCTION criticism from othe
Page 28 and 29:
1: INTRODUCTION itioned somewhere i
Page 30 and 31:
1: INTRODUCTION World War II dividi
Page 32 and 33:
CHAPTER 2 A physical metaphor Concr
Page 34 and 35:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR established
Page 36 and 37:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR The changing
Page 38 and 39:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR the events t
Page 40 and 41:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR As time has
Page 42 and 43:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR highly influ
Page 44:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR popular idea
Page 47 and 48: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
Page 73 and 74: Figure 16: Postcard of the newly op
Page 85 and 86: 402 Kojsko Hum 402 THE OSIM
Page 95: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
Page 109 and 110: Figure 50: Map demonstrating the bo
Page 128 and 129: CHAPTER 5 Case Study 2 The Czech/Au
Page 130 and 131: 5: CASE STUDY 2: THE CZECH/AUSTRIAN
Page 132 and 133: Figure 55: Bunker near the crossing
Page 134 and 135: Figure 59: Military map from 1980 o
Page 146 and 147:
5: CASE STUDY 2: THE CZECH/AUSTRIAN
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Figure 77-78: Painting inside the f
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
CHAPTER 6 An archaeology of the Iro
Page 190 and 191:
6: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTA
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Figure 102: Fence and Watch Tower a
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Sammanfattning (Summary in Swedish)
Page 218 and 219:
SAMMANFATTNING En fysisk metafor I
Page 220 and 221:
SAMMANFATTNING komst och kunskapsf
Page 222 and 223:
SAMMANFATTNING Fältstudier av läm
Page 224 and 225:
SAMMANFATTNING som försöker ta si
Page 226:
SAMMANFATTNING mets dilemma”. Han
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 242 and 243:
Södertörn Doctoral Dissertations
Page 244 and 245:
33. Sofie Bedford, Islamic activism
Page 246 and 247:
67. Anne Kaun, Civic Experiences an
Page 248 and 249:
Stockholm Studies in Archaeology Se
Page 250 and 251:
29. LINDGREN, Christina. 2004. Män
Page 252:
The Iron Curtain was seen as the di
show all

1JZGauQ

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?