1JZGauQ
1JZGauQ 1JZGauQ
3: THE MATERIALITY OF THE BERLIN WALL of the Soviet government and the GDR government, which are actively and consistently Germany” (Harrison 2005:20). Figure 3: East German Soldiers marking the line of the Berlin Wall on the 13 August 1961 to protect the border while border fortifications were being erected. Photo: Steffen Rehm. Krushchev, however, finally approved the plan, originally given the code name ‘Rose’, a few weeks after his meeting with Kennedy. The north, west and south sides of West Berlin had been closed since 1952 and it was now time to close the border to the east, the section of the inner city of Berlin. At 2 a.m. troops moved into position to guard the eastern border and the construction work. Traffic was stopped, as were over- and underground trains that crossed the border. When the Wall was up and serving its purpose, it was to cut through 192 streets and crossing could now only take place through 14 official crossing points (Rottman 2008). The U-Bahn trains were completely severed between the two parts of the town whilst the S-Bahn still functioned but highly controlled to avoid illegal crossing. By 4 a.m. trucks had arrived with prefabricated concrete blocks and the first sections of the wall were laid across Ackerstraße near Bernauerstraße. Other materials were also used during this early building phase and the labour was often poorly executed as speed was more important than thorough construction. Soon other structures were added such as watchtowers, antivehicle obstacles and searchlights. As time went on the Berlin Wall was upgraded and updated, particularly in 1975 when a major reinforcement operation was carried out. By 1989 it had become an almost impenetrable 47
AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN barrier consisting of prefabricated L-shaped reinforced concrete slabs, reaching 3,6 m high with sewage pipes cemented to its top, making climbing almost impossible. It was accompanied by anti-vehicle obstacles and ditches, control strips, patrol roads, trip flares, dog runs, signal fences and an inner, 3–4 m high, wall (Rottman 2008) (Figure 4). Figure 4: Berlin Wall at the Potsdamer Platz 1975. Photo: Edward Valachovic. The days and weeks following the Socialist Party official Schabowski’s announcement of the opening of the border on the 9 th of November 1989 saw the start of spontaneous demolition of the wall. Pictures of people out in force, chipping away at the Berlin Wall were broadcast over the world. We connect these pictures with happiness, freedom and democracy. Few times in history have people so clearly demonstrated their hatred towards a structure and such a clear wish of its removal. The official demolition was then started in June 1990 (Klausmeier 2009:97). At this point the goal was to remove the wall in its entirety. After the wall came down and Germany unified major discussions were started of how Berlin should be developed in the future (see discussion in Huyssen 1997). A surge of redevelopment took off, eradicating the scars left in the landscape from 20 th century conflict. What we see in Berlin today is what Huyssen calls the ‘desired identity’ (Huyssen 1997:68), the result of many conscious decisions of how Berlin should look and how the past should be portrayed. The townscape was still scarred by the destruction of World War II and how to handle the redevelopment of these scars was far from clear. Discussions were also generated 48
- Page 1 and 2: An Archaeology of the Iron Curtain
- Page 4 and 5: An Archaeology of the Iron Curtain
- Page 8 and 9: Contents Acknowledgements 11 CHAPTE
- Page 10: The end of a journey 212 Sammanfatt
- Page 13 and 14: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 16 and 17: CHAPTER 1 Introduction Standing on
- Page 18 and 19: 1: INTRODUCTION carried out of the
- Page 20 and 21: 1: INTRODUCTION they may be… It i
- Page 22 and 23: 1: INTRODUCTION where the observer
- Page 24 and 25: 1: INTRODUCTION former Iron Curtain
- Page 26 and 27: 1: INTRODUCTION criticism from othe
- Page 28 and 29: 1: INTRODUCTION itioned somewhere i
- Page 30 and 31: 1: INTRODUCTION World War II dividi
- Page 32 and 33: CHAPTER 2 A physical metaphor Concr
- Page 34 and 35: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR established
- Page 36 and 37: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR The changing
- Page 38 and 39: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR the events t
- Page 40 and 41: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR As time has
- Page 42 and 43: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR highly influ
- Page 44: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR popular idea
- Page 47: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 51 and 52: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 53 and 54: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 55 and 56: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 57 and 58: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 59 and 60: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 61 and 62: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 63 and 64: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 65 and 66: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 67 and 68: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 69 and 70: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 71 and 72: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 73 and 74: Figure 16: Postcard of the newly op
- Page 75 and 76: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 77 and 78: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 79 and 80: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 81 and 82: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 83 and 84: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 85 and 86: 402 Kojsko Hum 402 THE OSIM
- Page 87 and 88: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 89 and 90: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 91 and 92: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 93 and 94: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 95 and 96: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
- Page 97 and 98: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
3: THE MATERIALITY OF THE BERLIN WALL<br />
of the Soviet government and the GDR government, which are actively and<br />
consistently Germany” (Harrison 2005:20).<br />
Figure 3: East German Soldiers marking the line of the Berlin Wall on the 13 August 1961 to<br />
protect the border while border fortifications were being erected. Photo: Steffen Rehm.<br />
Krushchev, however, finally approved the plan, originally given the code<br />
name ‘Rose’, a few weeks after his meeting with Kennedy. The north, west<br />
and south sides of West Berlin had been closed since 1952 and it was now<br />
time to close the border to the east, the section of the inner city of Berlin. At<br />
2 a.m. troops moved into position to guard the eastern border and the<br />
construction work. Traffic was stopped, as were over- and underground<br />
trains that crossed the border. When the Wall was up and serving its<br />
purpose, it was to cut through 192 streets and crossing could now only take<br />
place through 14 official crossing points (Rottman 2008). The U-Bahn<br />
trains were completely severed between the two parts of the town whilst the<br />
S-Bahn still functioned but highly controlled to avoid illegal crossing. By 4<br />
a.m. trucks had arrived with prefabricated concrete blocks and the first<br />
sections of the wall were laid across Ackerstraße near Bernauerstraße. Other<br />
materials were also used during this early building phase and the labour was<br />
often poorly executed as speed was more important than thorough construction.<br />
Soon other structures were added such as watchtowers, antivehicle<br />
obstacles and searchlights. As time went on the Berlin Wall was<br />
upgraded and updated, particularly in 1975 when a major reinforcement<br />
operation was carried out. By 1989 it had become an almost impenetrable<br />
47