1JZGauQ
Share Embed Flag
Download ePaper

1JZGauQ

1JZGauQ 1JZGauQ

larrysa
01.02.2015 Views

Figure 102: Fence and Watch Tower at Čižov. Photo: Anna McWilliams.

AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN Arendt makes a distinction between the doer and the deeds: “The deeds are monstrous, but the doer (Eichmann) is not a monster; ‘he is terrifyingly normal’” (Bernstein 2010:133). Philosopher Richard J. Bernstein, who has suggested that Arendt’s use of the term ‘banality of evil’ has been much misunderstood in part as many has taken this to mean that she considered Eichmann to be just an innocent cog in the Nazi system, which she did not (Bernstein 2010). Her descriptions of Eichmann and of the trials clearly show that she thought he was guilty. Instead through looking at all the pieces of his life within the Nazi system she demonstrates that he is rather ordinary and that it was more out of thoughtlessness or “inability to think” (Arendt 1971:417) that he committed these crimes rather than being a monster. Bernstein also suggests that people have thought she was trying to create some sort of theory or thesis on the nature of evil to which he refers to a lecture given by Arendt in 1971, Thinking and Moral Considerations in which she claims that: “…reporting the trial of Eichmann in Jerusalem, I spoke of the “banality of evil” and meant with this no theory or doctrine but something quite factual, the phenomenon of evil deeds, committed on a gigantic scale, which could not be traced to any particularity of wickedness, pathology, or ideological conviction in the doer, whose only personal distinction was perhaps an extraordinary shallowness” (Arendt 1971:417, Bernstein 2010:133). To discover the mundane is therefore not the same as finding the trivial. It is not my intention to go into the question of guilt or where evil lies within a system as the one Eichmann functioned in as much of the discussions about Arendt’s observations have come to focus on this (for a discussion of this discourse see Bernstein 2010:131) or within the communist system in Czechoslovakia at the time. Instead my observations are to make clear that by starting with the materials themselves we can see how the networks that connect these with other materials, places, people, and events can extend in a way that we would not expect. I also want to demonstrate in what we may see as traces of the mundane and the everyday how we can also find clues that can help us understand a system from the bottom up. It is neither my intention to go into the details of what ordinary life in Czechoslovakia at the time was like or the Eastern or Western bloc more generally for that matter. What I want to demonstrate is what the materials from the sites that I have investigated reveal and that it is only by starting within these small pieces that it is possible to extend such research through the networks outwards and upwards in order not to load the materials with meanings that they are not fit to hold. It is in the discovery of 204

Figure 102: Fence and Watch Tower at Čižov. Photo: Anna McWilliams.

logo

products

Resources

Company

Terms of service
Privacy policy
Cookie policy
Cookie settings
Imprint
Change language
Made with love in Switzerland
© 2024 Yumpu.com all rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!