1JZGauQ

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN border guard stations allowed for new stories, new perspectives. Something that would not have been noticeable when the border guards were here crowding these spaces or something the texts and documents in the archives could never convey. This is also what we somehow ‘expect’ from an archaeological site, for the people to have left, a hangover from studying periods where people are long gone and all that remains are pieces. Here studies of a more recent past do differ from studies of earlier periods. Often we study the abandoned, such as ruins, which we in some way seem to be more comfortable with. We know what to do here, our methods just work. But what happens with those sites that are still used Archaeologists are used to dealing with the abandoned. In fact one of the criteria for protecting an archaeological site through policy and legislation in Sweden is that it has been abandoned for a considerable amount of time (varaktigt övergiven) which means it is no longer in use and will not be taken into use again (SFS 1988:950). Even though this definition may not be present as such in other countries’ heritage laws it demonstrates a general attitude within archaeology of how we deal with that which is abandoned and no longer in use. But what does this mean when we are pushing the materials that we study further and further into the present I do not believe it to be a coincidence that the sites that contemporary archaeologists, including my own research, tend to search out are the places that are deserted and uninhabited (although see Kiddey and Schofield 2011 for a different approach). This is what we are used to and what our methods generally allow us to look at. Andreasson et al. as well as Pétursdottír and DeSilvey make a very good case for how the material stands out clearer when not crowded by people. How in the abandoned we can see the ‘thingness’ of the objects left behind. But what happens in places where people are still present Where materials and humans are still acting together creating networks and connections Do we ask people to leave the scene or should we wait until a place have been abandoned Something that has become clear during my research is that we need to develop and adjust the methods that we use to allow people and objects both to take centre stage without one crowding the other. Surely this emphasis on things in a ‘material turn’ should not increase the divide between things and humans; rather it should bridge it by putting them on equal terms Of course ruins often entice our imagination. Political scientist Anca Pusca (2010) writes of how the decay of buildings is often connected with the notion of dystopia and explains that as spaces and buildings were often highly important for the communist utopia their subsequent fall and ruin 197
AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN has come to symbolise the demise of this ideology. Walking in ruins also awakens a sense of curiosity within us. Edensor describes the feeling as: “movement in ruins becomes strangely reminiscent of childhood sensory immersion and of the pleasurable negotiation of space largely denied to adults” (Edensor 2005a:838). As I walk through the abandoned border guard stations I am spurred on by my curiosity and sense of adventure and I move through the rooms and the corridors eager to find out what is hiding behind the next corner. Is this how one should react when investigating Cold War remains Should I not be more taken back by the severity of place But this is exactly the paradox that is with me through many of the visits along the former Iron Curtain. My knowledge of these places’ history and a hindsight perspective tells me that I should experience the serious reality behind the Cold War metaphor but what I mostly come across is the traces of the mundane and the everyday. Things that are easy to relate to as part of the ordinariness of life, we sleep, we eat, we have obligations and we try and entertain ourselves. The military remains we often hear about such as bunkers and fortifications, airfields, graves, nuclear research sites and missile bases are important to the understanding of war, but so are the smaller sites, the places of the everyday activities for a large part of those who participated within the war. These sites will provide an understanding of the many different angles and perspectives a war or a conflict can be experienced through. I could be criticised for producing a too ‘nice’ portrait of the Iron Curtain, that the severity and cold bloodedness of this monument and of the Cold War is understated to give way to the everyday stories of a more harmless character. But it is not a conscious decision from my side to angle the stories in this way. Instead this is the result of the material that I have encountered. I have no doubt that if I had used different sources and different focus that the picture would have been different. If I, for example, had based my research mainly on personal stories including people from all over the former Czechoslovakia or even the former Eastern Bloc in general or of those that had crossed over or have relatives and friends that have tried to cross over the border the picture of the Iron Curtain would have been a different one. But I wanted to start at the sites and at the materials and work from there to see what stories that emanated from these. This showed a slightly different side of the Iron Curtain than what we know from history writing. From the archives a few stories and pictures gave a glimpse of the horrors that these militarised borders could entail. Mostly, however, the sources provided a more mundane picture. This demonstrates the 198
Page 1 and 2:
An Archaeology of the Iron Curtain
Page 4 and 5:
An Archaeology of the Iron Curtain
Page 8 and 9:
Contents Acknowledgements 11 CHAPTE
Page 10:
The end of a journey 212 Sammanfatt
Page 13 and 14:
AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
Page 16 and 17:
CHAPTER 1 Introduction Standing on
Page 18 and 19:
1: INTRODUCTION carried out of the
Page 20 and 21:
1: INTRODUCTION they may be… It i
Page 22 and 23:
1: INTRODUCTION where the observer
Page 24 and 25:
1: INTRODUCTION former Iron Curtain
Page 26 and 27:
1: INTRODUCTION criticism from othe
Page 28 and 29:
1: INTRODUCTION itioned somewhere i
Page 30 and 31:
1: INTRODUCTION World War II dividi
Page 32 and 33:
CHAPTER 2 A physical metaphor Concr
Page 34 and 35:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR established
Page 36 and 37:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR The changing
Page 38 and 39:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR the events t
Page 40 and 41:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR As time has
Page 42 and 43:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR highly influ
Page 44:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR popular idea
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Figure 16: Postcard of the newly op
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
402 Kojsko Hum 402 THE OSIM
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Figure 50: Map demonstrating the bo
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 128 and 129:
CHAPTER 5 Case Study 2 The Czech/Au
Page 130 and 131:
5: CASE STUDY 2: THE CZECH/AUSTRIAN
Page 132 and 133:
Figure 55: Bunker near the crossing
Page 134 and 135:
Figure 59: Military map from 1980 o
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149: 5: CASE STUDY 2: THE CZECH/AUSTRIAN
Page 160 and 161: Figure 77-78: Painting inside the f
Page 188 and 189: CHAPTER 6 An archaeology of the Iro
Page 190 and 191: 6: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTA
Page 204 and 205: Figure 102: Fence and Watch Tower a
Page 216 and 217: Sammanfattning (Summary in Swedish)
Page 218 and 219: SAMMANFATTNING En fysisk metafor I
Page 220 and 221: SAMMANFATTNING komst och kunskapsf
Page 222 and 223: SAMMANFATTNING Fältstudier av läm
Page 224 and 225: SAMMANFATTNING som försöker ta si
Page 226: SAMMANFATTNING mets dilemma”. Han
Page 229 and 230: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
Page 242 and 243: Södertörn Doctoral Dissertations
Page 244 and 245: 33. Sofie Bedford, Islamic activism
Page 246 and 247: 67. Anne Kaun, Civic Experiences an
Page 248 and 249:
Stockholm Studies in Archaeology Se
Page 250 and 251:
29. LINDGREN, Christina. 2004. Män
Page 252:
The Iron Curtain was seen as the di
show all

1JZGauQ

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?