1JZGauQ

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CHAPTER 1 Introduction Standing on the shoreline Growing up on the east coast of Sweden a walk on the beach was like a treasure hunt where washed up plastic bottles or cans with Russian writing were like messages from another world. I could not see this other world but I was told that it was very different from my own. I did not know what the Iron Curtain was back then but the Baltic Sea most certainly felt like a big barrier in which Russian submarines would occasionally take a ‘wrong turn’ and surface a bit too close for comfort, a big barrier that separated ‘us’ from ‘them’ and which was to colour my views of Eastern and Western Europe. Years later I was working as a Heritage Consultant in London. Following guidelines such as Institute for Archaeologists (IFA) guidelines and best practice documents from English Heritage, I worked on Desk Based Assessments, Conservation Plans and Environmental Impact Assessments. I directed fieldwork to mitigate the negative impacts of roadwork, new pipelines or other construction projects. Together with my colleagues we were looking out for the heritage of our past and making sure it was preserved for future generations, if not in situ then at least through records. There was, however, little discussion in how this heritage had come to be. What factors and processes are involved in making these sites that we investigate What has come to fascinate me more and more whilst carrying out the work on my thesis are the processes involved in creating the past that we see around us. Heritage does not just happen; it is created and recreated as part of our history writing. To an archaeologist it should probably not come as a surprise how important the material is to the way we view and write our history, but somehow it still did. In this thesis I look closer at how a material part of our history that we see around us today has come to be the way it is. By looking at how the material of the Iron Curtain has developed 15
AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN over time, how it looks today and how it is viewed by people around it I hope to demonstrate one example of the kind of processes in which a materiality can be formed in history writing and in creating, or not creating as the case may be, a heritage. The materiality of the Iron Curtain The aim of this thesis is to explore what knowledge about the Iron Curtain can be reached through the material traces it has left behind as well as the effects these remains have on people around them. The aim is also to contribute to the continuous discussion and methodological development of the archaeology of the contemporary past. Why use the Iron Curtain as material Whenever you deal with Cold War history the term Iron Curtain is never far away. Sentences such as “behind the Iron Curtain” or “after the fall of the Iron Curtain” are often used. But what was it really When I had just started as a PhD student I explained to a friend of mine what my research was going to be about. He looked quite concerned and then said “But you know that the Iron Curtain never actually existed It was a metaphor.” This inconsistency, the paradox of the real and imagined Iron Curtain is what makes it such an interesting material study. On the one hand there was the metaphor of the Iron Curtain: an idea of a Europe divided by two political blocs. On the other there were a series of heavily militarised borders running through Central Europe physically dividing it. Do they tell the same story If not, does one story take precedence when we write our Cold War history How do the stories that emerge from the metaphor and the materials fit within the local and world history Another reason why this is such interesting material is that it is now in the process of becoming heritage. In some places it has already come a long way, in others it may never be seen as heritage at all. What are the processes involved in this ‘becoming’ But maybe most importantly, it is a very interesting material in itself which is well worth studying. Seeing that the term Iron Curtain is frequently used and well known to a lot of people in the western world, its physicality is little understood. Studies have been made in Germany of the materiality of the Inner German Border (Sheffer 2007 and 2008, Rottman 2008) but generally studies have mainly focussed on the social consequences inherent in a divided country. There have also been archaeological studies 16
Page 1 and 2: An Archaeology of the Iron Curtain
Page 4 and 5: An Archaeology of the Iron Curtain
Page 8 and 9: Contents Acknowledgements 11 CHAPTE
Page 10: The end of a journey 212 Sammanfatt
Page 13 and 14: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
Page 18 and 19: 1: INTRODUCTION carried out of the
Page 20 and 21: 1: INTRODUCTION they may be… It i
Page 22 and 23: 1: INTRODUCTION where the observer
Page 24 and 25: 1: INTRODUCTION former Iron Curtain
Page 26 and 27: 1: INTRODUCTION criticism from othe
Page 28 and 29: 1: INTRODUCTION itioned somewhere i
Page 30 and 31: 1: INTRODUCTION World War II dividi
Page 32 and 33: CHAPTER 2 A physical metaphor Concr
Page 34 and 35: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR established
Page 36 and 37: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR The changing
Page 38 and 39: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR the events t
Page 40 and 41: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR As time has
Page 42 and 43: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR highly influ
Page 44: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR popular idea
Page 65 and 66:
AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Figure 16: Postcard of the newly op
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
402 Kojsko Hum 402 THE OSIM
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Figure 50: Map demonstrating the bo
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 128 and 129:
CHAPTER 5 Case Study 2 The Czech/Au
Page 130 and 131:
5: CASE STUDY 2: THE CZECH/AUSTRIAN
Page 132 and 133:
Figure 55: Bunker near the crossing
Page 134 and 135:
Figure 59: Military map from 1980 o
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Figure 77-78: Painting inside the f
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
CHAPTER 6 An archaeology of the Iro
Page 190 and 191:
6: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTA
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Figure 102: Fence and Watch Tower a
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Sammanfattning (Summary in Swedish)
Page 218 and 219:
SAMMANFATTNING En fysisk metafor I
Page 220 and 221:
SAMMANFATTNING komst och kunskapsf
Page 222 and 223:
SAMMANFATTNING Fältstudier av läm
Page 224 and 225:
SAMMANFATTNING som försöker ta si
Page 226:
SAMMANFATTNING mets dilemma”. Han
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 242 and 243:
Södertörn Doctoral Dissertations
Page 244 and 245:
33. Sofie Bedford, Islamic activism
Page 246 and 247:
67. Anne Kaun, Civic Experiences an
Page 248 and 249:
Stockholm Studies in Archaeology Se
Page 250 and 251:
29. LINDGREN, Christina. 2004. Män
Page 252:
The Iron Curtain was seen as the di
show all

1JZGauQ

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?