Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health in Northern Districts of Rural ...

Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health in Northern Districts of Rural ... Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health in Northern Districts of Rural ...

bracresearch.org
from bracresearch.org More from this publisher
31.01.2015 Views

Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health in Northern Districts of Rural Bangladesh – Profiling the changes during 2008-2010 Md. Mahfuz Al Mamun, Masuma Billah, Sabuj Kanti Mistry, Peter Nicholls, Brendan Dineen and Hashima-E-Nasreen May 2012

<strong>Maternal</strong>, <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Child</strong><br />

<strong>Health</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Districts</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> Bangladesh<br />

– Pr<strong>of</strong>il<strong>in</strong>g the changes dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Md. Mahfuz Al Mamun, Masuma Billah, Sabuj Kanti Mistry,<br />

Peter Nicholls, Brendan D<strong>in</strong>een <strong>and</strong> Hashima-E-Nasreen<br />

May 2012


<strong>Maternal</strong>, <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Child</strong><br />

<strong>Health</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Districts</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> Bangladesh<br />

− Pr<strong>of</strong>il<strong>in</strong>g the changes dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Md. Mahfuz Al Mamun 1 , Masuma Billah 2 , Sabuj Kanti Mistry 3<br />

Peter Nicholls 4 , Brendan D<strong>in</strong>een 5 , Hashima-E-Nasreen 6<br />

May 2012<br />

1<br />

Research Associate, 2 Senior Research Associate, 3 Research Associate, BRAC, Bangladesh, 4 Senior Research Fellow,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Southampton, UK, 5 Research Fellow, University <strong>of</strong> Aberdeen, UK, 6 Research Coord<strong>in</strong>ator, BRAC, Bangladesh


Copyright © 2012 BRAC<br />

May 2012<br />

Published by:<br />

Research <strong>and</strong> Evaluation Division<br />

BRAC<br />

BRAC Centre<br />

75 Mohakhali<br />

Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh<br />

Tel: (88-02) 9881265<br />

Fax: (88-02) 8823542<br />

E-mail: nasreen.h@brac.net<br />

Website: www.brac.net/research<br />

Ipact<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Aberdeen<br />

<strong>Health</strong> Sciences Build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD<br />

United K<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />

Tel: +44(0) 1224 551897<br />

Fax: +44(0) 1224 555704<br />

E-mail: <strong>in</strong>fo@ipact-<strong>in</strong>t.com<br />

Website: www.ipact-<strong>in</strong>t.com<br />

Layout: Md. Akram Hossa<strong>in</strong><br />

Cover design: Md. Abdur Razzaque<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>ted by BRAC Pr<strong>in</strong>ters, 87-88 (old) 41 (new), Block C, Tongi Industrial area, Gazipur, Bangladesh


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

CONTENTS<br />

Abbreviation<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Executive summary<br />

Page No.<br />

viii<br />

ix<br />

x<br />

Chapter 1 Introduction 1<br />

Chapter 2 Methodology 5<br />

2.1 Study design 5<br />

2.1.1 Study sett<strong>in</strong>g 5<br />

2.2 Study population 8<br />

2.3 Sampl<strong>in</strong>g 9<br />

2.4 The survey <strong>and</strong> survey tools 10<br />

2.5 Study variables 10<br />

2.5.1 Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex 12<br />

2.6 Data process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> statistical analysis 12<br />

2.7 Ethical approval 12<br />

Chapter 3 Comparison <strong>of</strong> socio-demographic status 13<br />

3.1 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the survey respondents 13<br />

3.2 Social <strong>and</strong> demographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> respondents’ husb<strong>and</strong>s 15<br />

3.3 Household characteristics <strong>of</strong> the respondents 15<br />

3.4 Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex 17<br />

Chapter 4 <strong>Maternal</strong> health 19<br />

4.1 Reproductive history 19<br />

4.1.1 History <strong>of</strong> abortion 20<br />

4.1.1.1 Complication dur<strong>in</strong>g abortion <strong>and</strong> its management 20<br />

4.1.2 History <strong>of</strong> menstrual regulation 21<br />

4.2 Family plann<strong>in</strong>g practices 21<br />

4.2.1 Source <strong>of</strong> family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods 22<br />

4.3 Pregnancy identification 23<br />

4.4 Antenatal care (ANC) 23<br />

4.4.1 Knowledge on ANC 23<br />

4.4.2 Antenatal care practices 24<br />

4.5 Birth preparedness 25<br />

4.5.1 Knowledge on birth preparedness 25<br />

4.5.2 Practices <strong>of</strong> birth plann<strong>in</strong>g 26<br />

4.6 Delivery care 27<br />

4.7 Postnatal care 28<br />

4.8 <strong>Maternal</strong> danger signs 29<br />

4.9 Treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behavior for maternal complications 31<br />

4.9.1 Complications <strong>and</strong> treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behavior dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

antenatal period 31<br />

4.9.2 Complications <strong>and</strong> treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behavior dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

delivery period 31


Contents<br />

4.9.3 Complications <strong>and</strong> treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behavior dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

postnatal period 31<br />

4.10 Referral <strong>in</strong>formation for maternal complications 33<br />

Chapter 5 <strong>Neonatal</strong> health 35<br />

5.1 Essential newborn care 35<br />

5.1.1 Knowledge <strong>of</strong> neonatal care 35<br />

5.1.2 Practices followed for essential newborn care 37<br />

5.2 Feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the newborn <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant 38<br />

5.2.1 Knowledge <strong>of</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g children aged up to 12 months 38<br />

5.2.2 Practice <strong>of</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g children aged up to 12 months 38<br />

5.3 Birth weight 39<br />

5.3.1 Birth weight <strong>of</strong> newborn 39<br />

5.4 Thermal care for normal <strong>and</strong> low birth weight baby 40<br />

5.5 Newborn illnesses 41<br />

5.6 <strong>Neonatal</strong> danger signs 43<br />

Chapter 6 <strong>Child</strong> health 45<br />

6.1 Immunization <strong>of</strong> children 45<br />

6.1.1 Vacc<strong>in</strong>ation coverage 45<br />

6.2 Acute respiratory <strong>in</strong>fection (ARI) 47<br />

6.2.1 Prevalence <strong>of</strong> ARI 47<br />

6.2.2 Management <strong>of</strong> ARI 48<br />

6.3 <strong>Child</strong>hood diarrhoea 49<br />

6.3.1 Prevalence <strong>and</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g diarrhoea 50<br />

6.3.2 Treatment <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea 51<br />

6.4 Prevalence <strong>and</strong> management <strong>of</strong> Illnesses other than ARI <strong>and</strong> diarrhoea 51<br />

Chapter 7 Factors associated with outcomes 53<br />

7.1 Factors selected for analysis 53<br />

7.1.1 Receiv<strong>in</strong>g four or more ANC actions from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers 53<br />

7.1.2 Safe delivery (delivery by tra<strong>in</strong>ed birth attendant) 54<br />

7.1.3 Receiv<strong>in</strong>g PNC from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers 55<br />

7.1.4 Treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g from medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers for delivery<br />

complication(s) 56<br />

7.1.5 Use <strong>of</strong> modern family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods 57<br />

7.1.6 Use <strong>of</strong> modern family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods among married<br />

adolescent girls 58<br />

7.1.7 Hav<strong>in</strong>g all birth plans 59<br />

7.1.8 Received all essential newborn care actions 59<br />

7.1.9 Management <strong>of</strong> birth asphyxia by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers 60<br />

7.1.10 Management <strong>of</strong> neonatal sepsis by qualified doctors 61<br />

7.1.11 Management <strong>of</strong> ARI by medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers 61<br />

7.1.12 Management <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers 62<br />

Chapter 8 Discussion 63<br />

8.1 <strong>Maternal</strong> health 63<br />

8.1.1 Family plann<strong>in</strong>g 63<br />

8.1.2 Adolescent motherhood 63<br />

8.1.3 Abortion <strong>and</strong> menstrual regulation 64<br />

iv


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

8.1.4 Antenatal care 64<br />

8.1.5 Birth preparedness 65<br />

8.1.6 Delivery care 65<br />

8.1.7 Postnatal care 66<br />

8.1.8 <strong>Maternal</strong> danger signs, complications <strong>and</strong> management 66<br />

8.1.9 Inequity <strong>in</strong> maternity care 67<br />

8.2 Newborn care 67<br />

8.2.1 Essential newborn care 68<br />

8.2.2 Thermal care 68<br />

8.2.3 Newborn feed<strong>in</strong>g 69<br />

8.2.4 <strong>Neonatal</strong> danger signs <strong>and</strong> illnesses 69<br />

8.3 <strong>Health</strong> <strong>of</strong> children under-5 years <strong>of</strong> age 69<br />

8.3.1 Vacc<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> the under-5 children 70<br />

8.3.2 Acute respiratory <strong>in</strong>fection 70<br />

8.3.3 Diarrhoea prevalence <strong>and</strong> management 71<br />

8.3.4 Management <strong>of</strong> other illnesses among under-5 children 71<br />

8.4 Methodological considerations 71<br />

8.5 Conclusion <strong>and</strong> programmatic implications 72<br />

References 75<br />

Annexures 79<br />

LIST OF TABLES<br />

Table 2.5.1 List <strong>of</strong> variables 11<br />

Table 3.1.1 Social <strong>and</strong> demographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the respondents 14<br />

Table 3.2.1 Social <strong>and</strong> demographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> respondents’ husb<strong>and</strong> 15<br />

Table 3.3.1 Household characteristics <strong>of</strong> the respondents 16<br />

Table 4.1.1 Summary statistics for reproductive history 19<br />

Table 4.2.1 Family plann<strong>in</strong>g practices 22<br />

Table 4.3.1 Pregnancy identification 23<br />

Table 4.4.1 Antenatal care practices 24<br />

Table 4.5.1 Birth plann<strong>in</strong>g practices 26<br />

Table 4.6.1 Delivery care practices 27<br />

Table 4.7.1 Postnatal care practices 28<br />

Table 4.8.1 Information on maternal danger signs <strong>of</strong> the respondents (percentages) 30<br />

Table 4.9.1 <strong>Maternal</strong> complications faced <strong>and</strong> treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour for such<br />

complications 32<br />

Table 5.1.1 Knowledge <strong>of</strong> essential neonatal care actions 36<br />

Table 5.1.2 Essential neonatal care received at last delivery 37<br />

Table 5.2.1 Feed<strong>in</strong>g practices <strong>of</strong> the newborn <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants 29<br />

Table 5.3.1 Measur<strong>in</strong>g birth weight <strong>of</strong> newborn 40<br />

Table 5.4.1 Thermal care for normal <strong>and</strong> LBW babies 41<br />

Table 5.5.1 Prevalence <strong>and</strong> management <strong>of</strong> birth asphyxia <strong>and</strong><br />

neonatal sepsis (percentages) 42<br />

Table 5.6.1 Knowledge on neonatal danger signs 43<br />

Table 6.1.1 Vacc<strong>in</strong>ation, vitam<strong>in</strong> A supplementation <strong>and</strong> De-worm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation 46<br />

Table 6.2.1 Prevalence <strong>of</strong> ARI among children aged 0-59 months 48<br />

Table 6.3.1 Information on treatment <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea 51<br />

Table 6.4.1 Prevalence <strong>of</strong> other illnesses among children aged 0-59 months 52<br />

Table 7.1.1 Multivariate logistic regression results for receiv<strong>in</strong>g 4+ ANCs from tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

provider 54<br />

Table 7.1.2 Multivariate logistic regression results for safe delivery 55<br />

v


Contents<br />

Table 7.1.3 Multivariate logistic regression results for receiv<strong>in</strong>g PNC from<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers 56<br />

Table 7.1.4 Multivariate logistic regression results for treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g from medically<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers for delivery complication(s) 57<br />

Table 7.1.5 Multivariate logistic regression results for the use <strong>of</strong> modern FP methods 58<br />

Table 7.1.6 Multivariate logistic regression results for the use <strong>of</strong> modern contraceptives<br />

among married adolescent girls 58<br />

Table 7.1.7 Multivariate logistic regression results for hav<strong>in</strong>g all birth plans 59<br />

Table 7.1.8 Multivariate logistic regression results for the practices <strong>of</strong> ENC 60<br />

Table 7.1.9 Multivariate logistic regression results for the management <strong>of</strong> birth asphyxia<br />

by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers 60<br />

Table 7.1.10 Multivariate logistic regression results for the management <strong>of</strong> neonatal<br />

sepsis by qualified doctors 61<br />

Table 7.1.11 Multivariate logistic regression results for the management <strong>of</strong> ARI by<br />

medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers 62<br />

Table 7.1.12 Multivariate logistic regression results for the management <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea by<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers 62<br />

LIST OF FIGURES<br />

Figure 2.1 District pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> survey areas 5<br />

Figure 2.2 Map <strong>of</strong> survey areas 6<br />

Figure 2.3 Study population 8<br />

Figure 3.1 Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex 17<br />

Figure 4.1 Ever had abortion 20<br />

Figure 4.2 Percentage distribution <strong>of</strong> abortion, by type <strong>in</strong> three survey areas 20<br />

Figure 4.3 Ever had MR 21<br />

Figure 4.4 Sources <strong>of</strong> modern FP methods 23<br />

Figure 4.5 Providers <strong>of</strong> ANC (tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed) 25<br />

Figure 4.6 Percentage <strong>of</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g all major birth plans<br />

(place, attendant <strong>and</strong> saved money) 26<br />

Figure 4.7 Facility delivery(Public/Private) 27<br />

Figure 4.8 Received at least one PNC from BRAC SK 29<br />

Figure 4.9 Referred for maternal complication(s) 33<br />

Figure 5.1 Knowledge <strong>of</strong> LBW baby management 36<br />

Figure 5.2 Percentage <strong>of</strong> LBW babies 39<br />

Figure 5.3 Prevalence <strong>of</strong> birth asphyxia 42<br />

Figure 6.1 Complete vacc<strong>in</strong>ation for children aged less than five years 46<br />

Figure 6.2 Prevalence <strong>of</strong> pneumonia (aged 2-59 months) 47<br />

Figure 6.3 Prevalence <strong>of</strong> severe pneumonia (aged 2-59 months) 47<br />

Figure 6.4 Management <strong>of</strong> pneumonia (aged 2-59 months) 49<br />

Figure 6.5 Management <strong>of</strong> severe pneumonia (aged 2-59 months) 49<br />

Figure 6.6 Feed<strong>in</strong>g ORS dur<strong>in</strong>g diarrhoea 50<br />

Figure 6.7 Breast feed<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g diarrhoea 50<br />

Figure 6.8 Management <strong>of</strong> other illnesses by qualified doctors 52<br />

LIST OF ANNEXURES<br />

Annex 1 Revised logical framework 79<br />

Annex 2 Pr<strong>of</strong>il<strong>in</strong>g the changes over time (2008-2010) 82<br />

Annex 2.1 Socioeconomic characteristics 82<br />

Annex 2.1a Distribution <strong>of</strong> wealth <strong>in</strong>dex by district (Nilphamari, Rangpur <strong>and</strong><br />

Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha) 82<br />

vi


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Annex 2.1b Distribution <strong>of</strong> wealth <strong>in</strong>dex by district (Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh,<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona) 82<br />

Annex 2.2 <strong>Maternal</strong> health 82<br />

Annex 2.2.1 History <strong>of</strong> abortion 82<br />

Annex 2.2.2 Complication dur<strong>in</strong>g abortion <strong>and</strong> its management 83<br />

Annex 2.2.3 History <strong>of</strong> MR 84<br />

Annex 2.2.4 Knowledge on antenatal care 85<br />

Annex 2.2.5 Knowledge on birth preparedness 85<br />

Annex 2.2.6 Respondents faced complications dur<strong>in</strong>g antenatal period 86<br />

Annex 2.2.7 Treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour for antenatal complications 87<br />

Annex 2.2.8 Complications faced dur<strong>in</strong>g delivery period 88<br />

Annex 2.2.9 Treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour for delivery complications 89<br />

Annex 2.2.10 Respondents faced complications dur<strong>in</strong>g postnatal period 90<br />

Annex 2.2.11 Treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour for postnatal complications 90<br />

Annex 2.2.12 Referrals for maternal complications 92<br />

Annex 2.3 <strong>Neonatal</strong> health 93<br />

Annex 2.3.1 Knowledge <strong>of</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g children aged up to 12 months 93<br />

Annex 2.3.2 Feed<strong>in</strong>g practices <strong>of</strong> the newborn <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants 93<br />

Annex 2.3.3 Experienc<strong>in</strong>g neonatal danger signs <strong>and</strong> its management 94<br />

Annex 2.4 <strong>Child</strong> health 95<br />

Annex 2.4.1 Management <strong>of</strong> ARI among children aged 0-59 months 95<br />

Annex 2.4.2 Prevalence <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea <strong>and</strong> related feed<strong>in</strong>g practices 95<br />

Annex 2.4.3 Treatment <strong>of</strong> other illnesses among children aged 0-59 months 96<br />

Annex 3 Univariate analysis for identify<strong>in</strong>g factors 97<br />

Annex 3.1 Identification <strong>of</strong> factors predictive <strong>of</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g 4+ANCs 97<br />

Annex 3.2 Identification <strong>of</strong> factors predictive <strong>of</strong> safe delivery 98<br />

Annex 3.3 Identification <strong>of</strong> factors predictive <strong>of</strong> PNC from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers 99<br />

Annex 3.4 Identification <strong>of</strong> factors predictive <strong>of</strong> treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g for delivery<br />

complications 100<br />

Annex 3.5 Association <strong>of</strong> different socioeconomic factors with the use <strong>of</strong><br />

modern FP methods 101<br />

Annex 3.6 Association <strong>of</strong> different socioeconomic factors with the use <strong>of</strong><br />

modern FP among married adolescent girls 102<br />

Annex 3.7 Association <strong>of</strong> different socioeconomic factors with hav<strong>in</strong>g all<br />

birth plans 103<br />

Annex 3.8 Association <strong>of</strong> different socioeconomic <strong>and</strong> maternal factors with<br />

receiv<strong>in</strong>g all essential newborn care 104<br />

Annex 3.9 Association <strong>of</strong> different socioeconomic <strong>and</strong> maternal factors with<br />

birth asphyxia managed by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers 105<br />

Annex 3.10 Association <strong>of</strong> different socioeconomic <strong>and</strong> maternal factors with<br />

neonatal sepsis managed by qualified doctors 106<br />

Annex 3.11 Association <strong>of</strong> different socioeconomic <strong>and</strong> maternal factor with<br />

management <strong>of</strong> ARI by medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers 107<br />

Annex 3.12 Association <strong>of</strong> different socioeconomic <strong>and</strong> maternal factor with<br />

management <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers 108<br />

vii


Abbreviation<br />

ABBREVIATION<br />

ANC<br />

ARI<br />

BCG<br />

BDHS<br />

BFS<br />

BHP<br />

BMRC<br />

CPR<br />

CSBA<br />

DPT<br />

EmOC<br />

ENC<br />

FP<br />

FWA<br />

FWC<br />

FWV<br />

HNPSP<br />

IEC<br />

IGA<br />

IGVGD<br />

IMNCS<br />

IUD<br />

LBW<br />

LDC<br />

MA<br />

MCWC<br />

MDG<br />

MMR<br />

MNCH<br />

MR<br />

NGO<br />

NHPSP<br />

PCA<br />

PNC<br />

RED<br />

SACMO<br />

SD<br />

SK<br />

SPSS<br />

SS<br />

SWAP<br />

TBA<br />

TT<br />

TTBA<br />

TUP<br />

UHC<br />

WHO<br />

WI<br />

Antenatal Care<br />

Acute Respiratory Infection<br />

Bacillus Calmette-Guer<strong>in</strong><br />

Bangladesh Demographic <strong>and</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Survey<br />

Bangladesh Fertility Survey<br />

BRAC <strong>Health</strong> Programme<br />

Bangladesh Medical Research Council<br />

Contraceptive Prevalence Rate<br />

Community Skilled Birth Attendant<br />

Diphtheria Polio Tetanus<br />

Emergency Obstetric Care<br />

Essential Newborn Care<br />

Family Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Family Welfare Assistant<br />

Family Welfare Center<br />

Family Welfare Visitor<br />

<strong>Health</strong>, Nutrition <strong>and</strong> Population Sector Programme<br />

Information, Education <strong>and</strong> Communication<br />

Income Generat<strong>in</strong>g Activities<br />

Income Generation for the Vulnerable Group Development<br />

Improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Maternal</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Child</strong> Survival<br />

Intra-Uter<strong>in</strong>e Death<br />

Low Birth Weight<br />

Least Developed Countries<br />

Medical Assistant<br />

<strong>Maternal</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Child</strong> Welfare Center<br />

Millennium Development Goal<br />

<strong>Maternal</strong> Mortality Ratio<br />

<strong>Maternal</strong>, <strong>Neonatal</strong> & <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Health</strong><br />

Menstrual Regulation<br />

Non-governmental Organization<br />

National <strong>Health</strong> <strong>and</strong> Population Sector Programme<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal Components Analysis<br />

Post-natal Care<br />

Research <strong>and</strong> Evaluation Division<br />

Sub-assistant Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Medical Officer<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Deviation<br />

Shasthya Kormi<br />

Statistical Package for Social Sciences<br />

Shasthya Shebika<br />

Sector Wide Approach<br />

Traditional Birth Attendant<br />

Tetanus Toxoid<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong>ed Traditional Birth Attendant<br />

Target<strong>in</strong>g the Ultra Poor<br />

Upazila <strong>Health</strong> Complex<br />

World <strong>Health</strong> Organization<br />

Wealth Index<br />

viii


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

We would like to acknowledge the immense support <strong>and</strong> extensive co-operation <strong>of</strong> Dr. Mahabub<br />

Hossa<strong>in</strong>, Executive Director, BRAC <strong>and</strong> Dr. WMH Jaim, Director, Research <strong>and</strong> Evaluation Division<br />

(RED), BRAC to accomplish the study. Deepest gratitude to Dr. Kaosar Afsana, Director, BRAC<br />

<strong>Health</strong> Programme (BHP), who helped us immensely. We are thankful to Dr. Syed Masud Ahmed,<br />

Senior Research Coord<strong>in</strong>ator, BRAC RED for review<strong>in</strong>g the report. S<strong>in</strong>cere thanks to Dr. Peter<br />

Byass, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology, University <strong>of</strong> Aberdeen <strong>and</strong> Umeå International School <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

<strong>Health</strong> for his substantial help <strong>in</strong> design<strong>in</strong>g the survey. Thanks are due to Mr. Hasan Shareef Ahmed<br />

for edit<strong>in</strong>g the manuscript. We are also <strong>in</strong>debted to Mr. Syed Suaib Ahmed for logistic <strong>and</strong><br />

management support. Special thanks to all donors for their f<strong>in</strong>ancial support. S<strong>in</strong>cere homage goes<br />

to all <strong>of</strong> the study respondents for their assistance <strong>and</strong> valuable time to provide <strong>in</strong>formation for the<br />

study.<br />

RED is supported by BRAC's core fund <strong>and</strong> funds from donor agencies, organizations <strong>and</strong><br />

governments worldwide. Current donors <strong>of</strong> BRAC <strong>and</strong> RED <strong>in</strong>clude Aga Khan Foundation Canada,<br />

AusAID, Australian High Commission, Bill <strong>and</strong> Mel<strong>in</strong>da Gates Foundation, Canadian International<br />

Development Agency, CARE-Bangladesh, Department for International Development (DFID) <strong>of</strong> UK,<br />

European Commission, Euro consult Mott Mac Donald, Global Development Network Inc (GDN),<br />

The Global Fund, GTZ (GTZ is now GIZ) (Germany), Government <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh, The Hospital for<br />

Sick <strong>Child</strong>ren, Institute <strong>of</strong> Development Studies (Sussex, UK), Inter-cooperation Bangladesh,<br />

International Labour Office (ILO), IRRI, Liverpool School <strong>of</strong> Tropical Medic<strong>in</strong>e, Manusher Jonno<br />

Foundation, Micro-Nutrient Initiative, NOVIB, Plan Bangladesh Embassy <strong>of</strong> the K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, Swiss Development Cooperation, UN Women, UNHCR, UNICEF, Unilever-UK,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, World Bank, World Food Programme, World Fish, W<strong>in</strong>rock International USA,<br />

Save the <strong>Child</strong>ren USA, Save the <strong>Child</strong>ren UK, Safer World, Rockefeller Foundation, BRAC UK,<br />

BRAC USA, Oxford University, Karol<strong>in</strong>ska University, International Union for Conservation <strong>of</strong> Nature<br />

<strong>and</strong> Natural Resources (IUCN), Emory University, Agricultural Innovation <strong>in</strong> Dryl<strong>and</strong> Africa Project<br />

(AIDA), AED ARTS, United Nations Development Program, United Nations Democracy Fund, Family<br />

<strong>Health</strong> International, The Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Sight Saver (UK), Engender<br />

<strong>Health</strong> (USA), International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) <strong>and</strong> Yale/Stanford University.<br />

ix


Executive summary<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In late 2008, BRAC <strong>in</strong>itiated a comprehensive five-year maternal neonatal <strong>and</strong> child health (MNCH)<br />

programme named ‘Improv<strong>in</strong>g maternal, neonatal <strong>and</strong> child survival (IMNCS)’ to promote maternal,<br />

neonatal <strong>and</strong> child health <strong>in</strong> three selected northern districts <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh - Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh. These <strong>in</strong>terventions are <strong>in</strong> addition to the three core BRAC programmes carried<br />

out <strong>in</strong> all districts <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh, namely micr<strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>ance, health <strong>and</strong> education. The design <strong>of</strong> these<br />

new <strong>in</strong>terventions has been guided by experience ga<strong>in</strong>ed through a pilot phase <strong>of</strong> the research<br />

which began <strong>in</strong> 2006 <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari district.<br />

The basel<strong>in</strong>e survey <strong>of</strong> 2008 was carried out before launch<strong>in</strong>g the IMNCS <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong> six districts<br />

– four <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>and</strong> two controls. In control districts – Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona, no MNCH<br />

<strong>in</strong>terventions were <strong>in</strong> place. Based upon pilot <strong>and</strong> scal<strong>in</strong>g-up experiences, <strong>in</strong> 2010, BRAC <strong>Health</strong><br />

Programme took a decision to further scale up its MNCH <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong> six additional districts <strong>of</strong><br />

Bangladesh – Faridpur, Madaripur, Rajbari, Magura (central), <strong>and</strong> Kurigram <strong>and</strong> Lalmonirhat<br />

(northern). To elucidate the type <strong>and</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> the BRAC IMNCS project <strong>in</strong>tervention, a<br />

follow-up survey has been undertaken <strong>in</strong> these 13 districts <strong>in</strong> 2010, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the similar six districts<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2008. The survey <strong>of</strong> 2010 considered Jhenaidah as a control district. Hence, survey <strong>of</strong> 2010 has<br />

been acted as midl<strong>in</strong>e for the older districts <strong>and</strong> basel<strong>in</strong>e for the new districts. This report compares<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>e (2008) <strong>and</strong> follow-up data (2010) to record the benchmark changes made <strong>in</strong> various<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> MNCH as a result <strong>of</strong> BRAC-IMNCS programme <strong>in</strong> four <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong> two control<br />

districts <strong>in</strong> northern part <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh. Nilphamari has been considered as the <strong>in</strong>dex district for<br />

assess<strong>in</strong>g changes <strong>in</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> ‘objectively verifiable <strong>in</strong>dicators’ <strong>of</strong> the logical framework<br />

developed for the BRAC IMNCS programme.<br />

METHODOLOGY<br />

This quasi-experimental study was carried out <strong>in</strong> 13 rural districts <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh, where BRAC<br />

operates its core development <strong>in</strong>itiatives i.e. micr<strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>ance, education, community empowerment,<br />

human rights <strong>and</strong> legal services (HRLS), water, sanitation <strong>and</strong> hygiene (WASH) <strong>and</strong> health. In<br />

addition, BRAC health programne (BHP) operates IMNCS programme <strong>in</strong> 10 <strong>of</strong> the aforementioned<br />

13 districts. The components <strong>of</strong> BRAC IMNCS <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>in</strong>clude improv<strong>in</strong>g awareness <strong>of</strong> family<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g, identification <strong>of</strong> pregnancy, provid<strong>in</strong>g antenatal, delivery <strong>and</strong> postnatal care, essential<br />

newborn care, management <strong>of</strong> newborn <strong>and</strong> child illnesses, referral for complications <strong>and</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical management <strong>in</strong> health facilities. Naogaon, Netrokona <strong>and</strong> Jhenaidah were however, devoid<br />

<strong>of</strong> IMNCS activities <strong>and</strong> termed as control areas.<br />

A multi-stage cluster r<strong>and</strong>om sampl<strong>in</strong>g procedure was employed, <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g r<strong>and</strong>om selection at four<br />

levels: households with<strong>in</strong> villages, villages with<strong>in</strong> unions, unions with<strong>in</strong> upazilas <strong>and</strong> upazilas with<strong>in</strong><br />

districts; <strong>and</strong> the selection <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong> control sett<strong>in</strong>gs was purposive. In 2010, the same<br />

villages that were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the 2008 survey were selected for the midl<strong>in</strong>e follow-up survey. In this<br />

light the sampl<strong>in</strong>g strategy for this research was characterized by a panel data approach.<br />

Two groups <strong>of</strong> mothers hav<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g criteria were selected for <strong>in</strong>terview:<br />

• Group 1: Mothers who have had any pregnancy outcome with<strong>in</strong> the past one year at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

survey (mother <strong>of</strong> under-1 live child; or mother <strong>of</strong> under-1 child died <strong>in</strong> the past year; or mother<br />

who experienced any abortion or MR or stillbirth or IUD <strong>in</strong> the last one year).<br />

• Group 2: Mothers <strong>of</strong> live child aged 12-59 months.<br />

Data were collected us<strong>in</strong>g a structured questionnaire adopted from that used <strong>in</strong> the recent<br />

demographic <strong>and</strong> health survey (DHS) <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>cluded socio-demographic<br />

x


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> the household, <strong>and</strong> the respondent’s knowledge <strong>and</strong> practice <strong>of</strong> family plann<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

maternal, neonatal <strong>and</strong> under-5 child healthcare.<br />

Information on ante-partum, child-birth, post-partum <strong>and</strong> newborn care was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from mothers<br />

belong<strong>in</strong>g to the group <strong>of</strong> respondents with a pregnancy outcome <strong>in</strong> the last 12 months. Mothers<br />

who have had menstrual regulation (MR), abortion, <strong>in</strong>tra-uter<strong>in</strong>e death (IUD) or whose baby had died<br />

were not asked about neonatal or child care. Mothers <strong>of</strong> children aged 12-59 months were asked<br />

several questions regard<strong>in</strong>g their youngest child <strong>in</strong> that age range, as it was possible that a given<br />

mother may have more than one child <strong>of</strong> these ages. The questions focused on key illnesses (acute<br />

respiratory <strong>in</strong>fection, diarrhoea) <strong>and</strong> their management as well as related health issues such as<br />

immunization status <strong>and</strong> vitam<strong>in</strong> A <strong>in</strong>take.<br />

The sample size was determ<strong>in</strong>ed consider<strong>in</strong>g the changes over time <strong>of</strong> log-frame <strong>in</strong>dicators, 80%<br />

statistical power, 1% level <strong>of</strong> significance <strong>and</strong> a design effect <strong>of</strong> 1.5. The f<strong>in</strong>al sample size was 720<br />

mothers per district, 420 from Group 1 <strong>and</strong> 300 from Group 2. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, the 2010 survey was<br />

carried out on 9,360 respondents <strong>in</strong> 13 districts. The survey encompassed 780 villages <strong>in</strong> 156<br />

unions with<strong>in</strong> 72 upazilas <strong>of</strong> 13 districts. A sub-total <strong>of</strong> 5,460 mothers belonged to Group 1 <strong>and</strong><br />

3,900 to Group 2.<br />

The 2008 basel<strong>in</strong>e data were merged with 2010 data, <strong>and</strong> we considered only the same six districts<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2008 basel<strong>in</strong>e survey. Then the total six districts were split <strong>in</strong>to three strata accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

length <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention: Nilphamari (<strong>in</strong>tervention began <strong>in</strong> 2006), Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh (<strong>in</strong>tervention began <strong>in</strong> 2008), <strong>and</strong> Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona (control districts, from<br />

2008). In each case, the attention had been given on the comparison between 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2010 data<br />

focus<strong>in</strong>g on the project’s log frame <strong>in</strong>dicators on the variables <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>and</strong> practice <strong>of</strong><br />

antenatal, safe delivery, post-natal, neonatal <strong>and</strong> child healthcare. Chi-square test, <strong>in</strong>dependent t-<br />

test <strong>and</strong> Mann-Whitney U test had been used to assess the statistical significance <strong>of</strong> differences, if<br />

any. Multiple logistic regression analyses were also performed to assess the simultaneous effects <strong>of</strong><br />

other variables on the project’s ma<strong>in</strong> outcome <strong>in</strong>dicators i.e utilization <strong>of</strong> 4+ ANC, PNC from tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

provider, delivery by tra<strong>in</strong>ed birth attendants, <strong>and</strong> health-seek<strong>in</strong>g from medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers <strong>in</strong><br />

the case <strong>of</strong> childhood illnesses.<br />

FINDINGS<br />

Socioeconomic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the respondents<br />

The mean age <strong>of</strong> respondents was 24 years <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> 25 years <strong>in</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the study<br />

areas. Literacy rate was 53% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> 55% elsewhere with average years <strong>of</strong> school<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 4<br />

everywhere. The respondents were mostly housewives though their <strong>in</strong>volvement with some <strong>in</strong>come<br />

generat<strong>in</strong>g activities had significantly been <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, but the percentage rema<strong>in</strong>ed low<br />

(11%) <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts. The proportion <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>less people was <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

substantially across everywhere <strong>in</strong> the course <strong>of</strong> time, with the highest l<strong>and</strong> ownership <strong>in</strong> control<br />

areas. Somewhat decreas<strong>in</strong>g trend was found <strong>in</strong> BRAC membership; most <strong>of</strong> the member <strong>of</strong> BRAC<br />

was <strong>in</strong>volved with Dabi ∗ which was highest <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (81%). The percentage <strong>of</strong> households<br />

eligible for BRAC membership had <strong>in</strong>creased 10% everywhere <strong>in</strong> the study areas.<br />

More than 98% <strong>of</strong> the households were headed by men <strong>and</strong> the average household size was 5 <strong>in</strong> all<br />

study areas. Around 6 out <strong>of</strong> 10 families were nuclear. Less than 1% respondent collected water<br />

from any source other than tubewell for both dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> cook<strong>in</strong>g purposes. The use <strong>of</strong> sanitary<br />

toilet (water seal <strong>and</strong> septic tank) decreased <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (27% to 16%) but rema<strong>in</strong>ed almost similar<br />

<strong>in</strong> elsewhere. In Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> control areas, the use <strong>of</strong> soap for h<strong>and</strong> wash<strong>in</strong>g after defecation<br />

∗ Dabi- Poverty alleviation for poor l<strong>and</strong>less women<br />

xi


Executive summary<br />

had decreased (56% <strong>in</strong> 2008 to 46% <strong>in</strong> 2010 <strong>and</strong> 50% to 41% respectively); however it rema<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

unchanged <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh.<br />

Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

The wealth <strong>in</strong>dex was calculated us<strong>in</strong>g a weighted sum <strong>of</strong> household assets. The result<strong>in</strong>g scores<br />

were then ranked <strong>and</strong> the sample was divided <strong>in</strong>to qu<strong>in</strong>tiles from one (poorest) to five (richest). The<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> wealth <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>in</strong> all the six study districts was analyzed separately. Very little changes<br />

observed over the two year period. In Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Naogaon, a slightly higher percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

people belonged to poor qu<strong>in</strong>tiles <strong>in</strong> 2010 compared to the basel<strong>in</strong>e. Across Nilphamari however,<br />

around 17% people were <strong>in</strong> the fourth qu<strong>in</strong>tile at basel<strong>in</strong>e which reached to 21% by 2010 <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

Rangpur, a slight <strong>in</strong>crease had been noticed. Conversely, poverty was found to be <strong>in</strong>tensified <strong>in</strong><br />

Netrokona over time <strong>and</strong> appeared as the poorest district (34% <strong>in</strong> the poorest qu<strong>in</strong>tile) <strong>in</strong> 2010.<br />

Reproductive history<br />

Respondent’s median age <strong>of</strong> marriage was 15 years <strong>and</strong> first conception was 17 years <strong>in</strong> all<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention areas, <strong>and</strong> the median age <strong>of</strong> first marriage was 16 years <strong>and</strong> first conception was 17<br />

years <strong>in</strong> control districts. In Nilphamari, 16% <strong>of</strong> the respondents experienced one or more under-5<br />

child death, 18% <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, <strong>and</strong> 15% <strong>in</strong> the control districts. Three-quarters<br />

<strong>of</strong> the under-5 deaths occurred dur<strong>in</strong>g the neonatal period.<br />

Abortion <strong>and</strong> menstrual regulation<br />

In Nilphamari, 9% <strong>of</strong> the respondents experienced abortion <strong>in</strong> their lifetime compared to 14% <strong>in</strong><br />

other three <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong> 16% <strong>in</strong> the control districts. Excessive bleed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> abdom<strong>in</strong>al pa<strong>in</strong><br />

were the frequently reported abortion complications. In the event <strong>of</strong> complications, more than half<br />

sought treatment from qualified doctors <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, 33% <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong> 36% <strong>in</strong><br />

control districts. Four percent <strong>of</strong> the mothers <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari experienced MR <strong>in</strong> their lifetime that was<br />

slightly <strong>in</strong>creased everywhere. In Nilphamari, 60% <strong>of</strong> MR-related complications were managed by<br />

qualified doctors, which were gone down from 50% to 18% dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008 - 2010 <strong>in</strong> other <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />

districts.<br />

Antenatal care<br />

Receiv<strong>in</strong>g at least four antenatal cares from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers was found to be <strong>in</strong>creased significantly<br />

across all the three study areas dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2010, with the highest achievement <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g from 76% to 92%. The percentage <strong>of</strong> pregnant women who received at least one ANC<br />

from a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider was >90% <strong>in</strong> all the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, far greater than that for the control<br />

districts (59%). The most common provider <strong>of</strong> ANC <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts were BRAC workers,<br />

namely Shasthya Kormi (SK) (94% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> 83% <strong>in</strong> other <strong>in</strong>tervention districts).<br />

Birth preparedness<br />

The respondents <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari were more likely to determ<strong>in</strong>e places (100% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, 92% <strong>in</strong><br />

other three <strong>in</strong>tervention, <strong>and</strong> 84% <strong>in</strong> control districts), attendants (96% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, 86% <strong>in</strong> other<br />

three <strong>in</strong>tervention, <strong>and</strong> 71% <strong>in</strong> control districts) <strong>and</strong> save money (79% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, 65% <strong>in</strong> other<br />

three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, <strong>and</strong> 40% <strong>in</strong> control districts) for emergency preparations compared to<br />

other <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong> control districts.<br />

Delivery care<br />

Facility delivery was more likely to take place <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (26%) compared to other study districts<br />

(19% <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, <strong>and</strong> 23% <strong>in</strong> control). Delivery with assistance <strong>of</strong><br />

xii


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers <strong>in</strong>creased everywhere dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010 (52% to 74% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, 33% to 54%<br />

<strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts <strong>and</strong> 43% to 55% <strong>in</strong> control districts), with highest achievement <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari. Nilphamari had achieved the universal level <strong>in</strong> cord ty<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> cutt<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g sterile<br />

<strong>in</strong>strument (97% <strong>and</strong> 99% respectively); the percentages were also high <strong>in</strong> other study areas.<br />

Postnatal care<br />

Receiv<strong>in</strong>g PNC from tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>in</strong>creased significantly <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention areas (72% to 92% <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> 17% to 65% <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts). For home deliveries, 75% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mothers <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari were provided with at least one PNC by BRAC SKs with<strong>in</strong> 48 hours <strong>of</strong><br />

delivery, whereas, it was 40% <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, 61% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

respondents <strong>in</strong> control districts received no PNC compared to 30% <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, <strong>and</strong> 5% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari.<br />

<strong>Maternal</strong> danger signs, complications <strong>and</strong> management<br />

More women (47%) reta<strong>in</strong>ed knowledge <strong>of</strong> three or more (maximum five) primary danger signs <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari compared to other areas (25% <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, <strong>and</strong> 24% <strong>in</strong><br />

control districts). Six out <strong>of</strong> every 10 women fac<strong>in</strong>g maternal danger signs sought treatment from<br />

public or private health facilities <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, which was little lower <strong>in</strong> other study areas (43% <strong>in</strong><br />

other three <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong> 50% <strong>in</strong> control districts).<br />

The reported maternal complications dur<strong>in</strong>g antenatal, delivery <strong>and</strong> postnatal period were found to<br />

be higher <strong>in</strong> control districts compared to <strong>in</strong>tervention districts. Though the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

complications <strong>in</strong>creased over the two-year period, the percentage <strong>of</strong> women seek<strong>in</strong>g treatment from<br />

medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>and</strong> health facility (hospital/cl<strong>in</strong>ic) for such complications had also been<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> all <strong>in</strong>tervention areas. The identified prime factors for not seek<strong>in</strong>g treatment for such<br />

complications <strong>in</strong>cluded respondent’s perception <strong>of</strong> treatment was not necessary <strong>and</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> money.<br />

Care <strong>of</strong> the newborn<br />

Almost universal level <strong>of</strong> achievement was observed <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> other <strong>in</strong>tervention districts <strong>in</strong><br />

the case <strong>of</strong> wip<strong>in</strong>g practice, whereas <strong>in</strong> control areas it was 88%. Among the normal weight babies,<br />

bath<strong>in</strong>g practice on or after three days decreased significantly (from 86% to 76%) <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, but<br />

slightly improved (from 61% to 65%) <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, whereas <strong>in</strong> control areas the<br />

percentage decl<strong>in</strong>ed from 80% to 70%. However, among the low birth weight (LBW) babies, bath<strong>in</strong>g<br />

practice after seven days was <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> every <strong>in</strong>tervention areas (51% to 60% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong><br />

35% to 44% <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention sett<strong>in</strong>gs), but <strong>in</strong> control districts it decreased from 67% to<br />

46%.<br />

Newborn feed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

In Nilphamari, 88% <strong>of</strong> the mother <strong>in</strong>stantiated breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> one hour <strong>of</strong> birth <strong>in</strong> 2008 which<br />

was rema<strong>in</strong>ed unchanged. A positive trend was also visible <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention areas where it<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased from 74% to 83%. In control, however the percentage rema<strong>in</strong>ed unchanged (83%). A<br />

significant <strong>in</strong>crease was observed <strong>in</strong> breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g exclusively up to six months <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari from<br />

42% <strong>in</strong> 2008 to 62% <strong>in</strong> 2010. However, a downward trend <strong>in</strong> exclusive breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g was noticed <strong>in</strong><br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh (29% <strong>in</strong> 2008 <strong>and</strong> 26% <strong>in</strong> 2010) <strong>and</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>ed unchanged <strong>in</strong><br />

control districts.<br />

<strong>Neonatal</strong> illness<br />

The percentage <strong>of</strong> neonates faced breath<strong>in</strong>g difficulties (birth asphyxia) rema<strong>in</strong>ed similar <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari (9.8% <strong>in</strong> 2008 <strong>and</strong> 9.4% <strong>in</strong> 2010) <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> other three districts (10.4% <strong>in</strong> 2008 <strong>and</strong> 10.6%<br />

xiii


Executive summary<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2010) over the two year period. One-fifth <strong>of</strong> the neonates faced neonatal sepsis <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari<br />

which rema<strong>in</strong>ed same (20.2% <strong>in</strong> 2008 <strong>and</strong> 21.1% <strong>in</strong> 2010). In Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, significant progress was observed (19% to 10%) <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g the prevalence <strong>of</strong> sepsis.<br />

But the reported prevalence <strong>in</strong>creased from 22% to 25% <strong>in</strong> control districts.<br />

Immunization coverage <strong>of</strong> under-5 children<br />

Nilphamari achieved the highest level <strong>of</strong> completed childhood immunization (89%) followed by<br />

control (82%) <strong>and</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh districts (81%). Over the two-year period,<br />

significant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> Vitam<strong>in</strong> A coverage was observed, reach<strong>in</strong>g around 90% <strong>in</strong> all study areas.<br />

Acute respiratory <strong>in</strong>fection (ARI) <strong>in</strong> under-5 children<br />

The prevalence <strong>of</strong> pneumonia <strong>of</strong> children aged 2-59 months decreased significantly to 1.6% from<br />

9.4% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, 6.0% from 12.9% <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, <strong>and</strong> 10.0% from<br />

17.0% <strong>in</strong> the control sett<strong>in</strong>g. Likewise, a significant reduction <strong>in</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong> severe pneumonia<br />

was also identified <strong>in</strong> all the <strong>in</strong>tervention sett<strong>in</strong>gs (3.1% from 12.3% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> 4.3% from<br />

10.2% <strong>in</strong> the other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts), though not <strong>in</strong> control districts. The majority <strong>of</strong><br />

pneumonia cases were managed by non-formal health providers. Management <strong>of</strong> pneumonia by<br />

medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers was shown to be <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> all <strong>in</strong>tervention areas but not <strong>in</strong> control.<br />

The percentage <strong>of</strong> children with severe pneumonia managed by medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers was<br />

found to be greater than that for pneumonia, across all the surveyed areas, though non-formal<br />

healthcare providers dom<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> the provision <strong>of</strong> care for severe pneumonia cases.<br />

<strong>Child</strong>hood diarrhoea<br />

Prevalence <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea was found to be unchanged over two years <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, although<br />

decreased (12% from 15%) <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, <strong>and</strong> the highest prevalence <strong>in</strong> control<br />

districts (15%). Greater than 80% <strong>of</strong> the children <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention districts were rehydrated with oral<br />

rehydration solution (ORS), whereas less than three-quarters <strong>of</strong> children <strong>in</strong> control districts received<br />

ORS. Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g diarrhoeal episodes rema<strong>in</strong>ed high <strong>in</strong> all survey areas.<br />

Other childhood illnesses <strong>and</strong> health-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour <strong>of</strong> under-5 children<br />

The prevalence <strong>of</strong> other conditions like sk<strong>in</strong> disease, dysentery, mouth ulcer, worm <strong>in</strong>festation, <strong>and</strong><br />

ear <strong>and</strong> eye <strong>in</strong>fections were reduced both <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong> the control districts. Fever was found<br />

to be the most commonly reported symptoms <strong>in</strong> all study areas.<br />

Factors associated with selected outcome variables<br />

Carry<strong>in</strong>g out multivariate logistic regression, wealth <strong>in</strong>dex was not found to be associated with any<br />

outcome variable <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts. In control areas, it was significantly associated with<br />

receiv<strong>in</strong>g 4+ ANCs from tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider, PNC from tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>and</strong> treatment seek<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider for delivery complication. No covariate was found to be significantly<br />

associated with management <strong>of</strong> birth asphyxia by tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>and</strong> neonatal sepsis by qualified<br />

doctor <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas. Parity was found to be associated with birth asphyxia management.<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s education <strong>and</strong> age at first marriage were associated with the management <strong>of</strong> neonatal<br />

sepsis <strong>in</strong> control areas. Husb<strong>and</strong>’s education <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, <strong>and</strong> mother’s literacy <strong>and</strong><br />

wealth <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>in</strong> control areas were found to be associated with the management <strong>of</strong> ARI among<br />

under-5 children by medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider.<br />

xiv


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Differences were observed with<strong>in</strong> the study areas over time. A notable improvement was observed <strong>in</strong><br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh. The highest achievement was found <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>in</strong><br />

receiv<strong>in</strong>g ANC <strong>and</strong> PNC from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers, birth plan, delivery by medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed birth<br />

attendant, receiv<strong>in</strong>g all essential newborn care, <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> one hour <strong>of</strong> birth,<br />

<strong>and</strong> care for LBW babies. This evidenced the effect <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention on knowledge <strong>and</strong><br />

practice regard<strong>in</strong>g MNCH issues.<br />

Though a positive trend was observed regard<strong>in</strong>g delivery by medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider, mothers<br />

receiv<strong>in</strong>g PNC from medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers <strong>and</strong> management <strong>of</strong> birth asphyxia by tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

providers <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh districts, these percentages are lower than that<br />

<strong>of</strong> the control districts. Programme need to pay more attention on these issues.<br />

More <strong>in</strong>tensive analysis <strong>of</strong> the data may draw conclusive f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> would also highlight the actual<br />

contribution <strong>of</strong> MNCH <strong>in</strong>tervention.<br />

xv


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Chapter<br />

1<br />

Introduction<br />

At least one pregnant woman dies every m<strong>in</strong>ute globally, lead<strong>in</strong>g to an estimated 358,000 maternal<br />

deaths annually due to pregnancy-related complications (WHO 2010). Estimate also <strong>in</strong>dicates that<br />

approximately 10 million under-5 child deaths are likely to occur annually given the present trends<br />

(World Vision Australia <strong>and</strong> Nossal Institute for Global <strong>Health</strong> 2008). Notably women liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> least<br />

developed countries (LDC) are 300 times more vulnerable to die <strong>in</strong> similar situation with the highest<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan <strong>and</strong> South Asia <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Bangladesh (Richards<br />

2009).<br />

The overall scenario <strong>of</strong> maternal <strong>and</strong> neonatal health <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh is characterized by relatively high<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> morbidity <strong>and</strong> mortality. The country is densely populated <strong>and</strong> approximately 3.5 million<br />

births take place each year, the great majority <strong>of</strong> which (76%) take place at home without medical<br />

assistance (BMMS 2010). Furthermore, 54% <strong>of</strong> expectant mothers receive antenatal care (ANC)<br />

from medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers whilst even far fewer women (23%) are cared for post-natally by a<br />

qualified person (BMMS 2010). As <strong>of</strong> 2009, it was estimated that the lifetime risk <strong>of</strong> maternal death<br />

<strong>in</strong> Bangladesh was very high, i.e. the probability that a 15-year old female will die eventually due to a<br />

maternal cause was one <strong>in</strong> 21 (approximately 5%). It merits highlight<strong>in</strong>g that favourable progress on<br />

maternal, neonatal <strong>and</strong> child health (MNCH) status has been achieved <strong>in</strong> recent years. The maternal<br />

mortality rate (MMR) has decl<strong>in</strong>ed from 320 live births <strong>in</strong> 2001 to 194 per 100,000 live births <strong>in</strong> 2010<br />

(BMMS 2010). It rema<strong>in</strong>s high particularly amongst adolescent mothers (Dawson et al. 2010) <strong>and</strong><br />

among those who are liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rural areas, where 75% <strong>of</strong> the total population live <strong>and</strong> almost 80% <strong>of</strong><br />

maternal deaths occur (IRIN 2010). Effective measures need to be taken to lower the MMR to<br />

143/100,000 live births by 2015, the millennium development goals (MDG) target for Bangladesh.<br />

Given the present estimated MMR nationally, achiev<strong>in</strong>g this target poses particular challenges (WHO<br />

2010).<br />

A progress has been achieved <strong>in</strong> child mortality between 2004 <strong>and</strong> 2007 hav<strong>in</strong>g fallen from 88/1,000<br />

live births to 65/1,000 live births (BDHS 2007). The neonatal mortality is still high <strong>in</strong> the country that<br />

accounts for more than half <strong>of</strong> all under-five deaths <strong>and</strong> more than two-thirds <strong>of</strong> all <strong>in</strong>fant deaths<br />

(BDHS 2007). The proportion <strong>of</strong> neonatal deaths to <strong>in</strong>fant mortality has <strong>in</strong>creased dur<strong>in</strong>g 2002 to<br />

2006, due to the lack <strong>of</strong> progress <strong>in</strong> prevent<strong>in</strong>g neonatal deaths through appropriate antenatal <strong>and</strong><br />

delivery care. Evidence <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh, nearly 80% <strong>of</strong> all newborn babies do not<br />

receive postnatal care (PNC) from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers with<strong>in</strong> six days <strong>of</strong> birth (UNICEF 2009).<br />

It is reported that the major newborn killer is neonatal sepsis (52%) followed by birth asphyxia<br />

(<strong>in</strong>ability to breathe at birth 21%). LBW (11%) also contribute substantially to the burden <strong>of</strong> poor<br />

neonatal outcomes. Women <strong>and</strong> children who survive, complications dur<strong>in</strong>g childbirth have an<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased risk <strong>of</strong> further health problems e.g. disabilities <strong>in</strong> children (UNICEF 2009).<br />

1


Introduction<br />

Evidence <strong>in</strong>dicates that maternal death carries negative impact on the likelihood <strong>of</strong> survival <strong>of</strong> the<br />

newborn child. Those children whose mother succumbed to a maternal-related cause are 10 times<br />

more likely to die with<strong>in</strong> two years <strong>of</strong> their mother’s death (WHO 2010a). The estimated lifetime risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> dy<strong>in</strong>g from pregnancy <strong>and</strong> childbirth-related causes <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh is around 100 times higher<br />

than that <strong>of</strong> high-<strong>in</strong>come countries. About 75% <strong>of</strong> the babies born to those women also die with<strong>in</strong><br />

the first week <strong>of</strong> their birth (WHO 2004).<br />

Evidence shows that 74% <strong>of</strong> all maternal deaths could be averted if all women had access to the<br />

<strong>in</strong>terventions for prevent<strong>in</strong>g or treat<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy <strong>and</strong> birth complications (Hunt <strong>and</strong> Mesquita 2010).<br />

The United Nations calls for achiev<strong>in</strong>g the MDGs by 2015 with special attention to the re<strong>in</strong>forcement<br />

<strong>of</strong> safe motherhood <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>and</strong> child survival programmes (United Nations 2010). In this light<br />

MDG 5 emphasizes the need to reduce by 2015, e.g. MMR by three-quarters from that <strong>of</strong> 1990.<br />

Likewise, MDG 4 calls for a reduction <strong>in</strong> child mortality by two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the under-five mortality rate<br />

from 1990 by 2015.<br />

By follow<strong>in</strong>g the steps <strong>of</strong> the global community, the government <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh has established its<br />

own goal to improve reproductive health as per the MDG provision by 2015. In response, the<br />

country has taken a sector wide approach (SWAP) together with poverty reduction strategies to<br />

focus on maternal <strong>and</strong> child health, for atta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the MDGs (MoHFW 2003). Keep<strong>in</strong>g pace with the<br />

MDG targets <strong>and</strong> the national strategies, different governmental <strong>and</strong> non-governmental<br />

organizations (NGO), bilateral agencies <strong>and</strong> donors have been implement<strong>in</strong>g health <strong>in</strong>terventions −<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividually or <strong>in</strong> partnership with government − to reduce maternal, neonatal <strong>and</strong> child mortality,<br />

particularly amongst the poor. In 2001, the country also launched the National Strategy for <strong>Maternal</strong><br />

<strong>Health</strong>, aim<strong>in</strong>g at reduc<strong>in</strong>g MMR by focus<strong>in</strong>g on improv<strong>in</strong>g provision <strong>of</strong> emergency obstetric care<br />

(EmOC).<br />

BRAC, the largest NGO <strong>in</strong> the world, has nearly 40 years <strong>of</strong> experience <strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g communitybased<br />

health <strong>in</strong>terventions through the BRAC <strong>Health</strong> Programme (BHP), with<strong>in</strong> both rural <strong>and</strong> more<br />

recently urban sett<strong>in</strong>gs. In 2008, BRAC has launched a comprehensive five-year MNCH Programme<br />

<strong>in</strong> rural areas. Intensify<strong>in</strong>g awareness <strong>of</strong> MNCH issues <strong>and</strong> the provision <strong>of</strong> essential medication are<br />

the key components <strong>of</strong> the MNCH programme. Through this programme, special attention is placed<br />

on ANC, delivery care <strong>and</strong> PNC. Likewise, BRAC delivers <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>and</strong> child health services particularly<br />

for acute respiratory <strong>in</strong>fections (ARI), <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g pneumonia <strong>and</strong> management <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea. These<br />

essential healthcare <strong>in</strong>terventions are provided through an extensive network <strong>of</strong> local resident<br />

women who have been tra<strong>in</strong>ed as maternal-child primary healthcare workers called the Shasthya<br />

Shebika (SS), amongst others <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> deliver<strong>in</strong>g care throughout the villages <strong>and</strong> wider<br />

community.<br />

The pilot <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>of</strong> this rural MNCH project began <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari district <strong>in</strong> August 2005. The<br />

Research <strong>and</strong> Evaluation Division (RED) <strong>of</strong> BRAC carried out a pilot study <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>in</strong> 2006<br />

(Nasreen <strong>and</strong> Rafi 2007) which provided key <strong>in</strong>sights regard<strong>in</strong>g MNCH conditions <strong>in</strong> the district. The<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> this study were used to develop the strategies <strong>and</strong> approaches <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention to be<br />

implemented. This study revealed the existence <strong>of</strong> shallow knowledge <strong>of</strong> pregnancy-related risks,<br />

<strong>and</strong> awareness about essential pregnancy, delivery <strong>and</strong> neonatal care. Likewise <strong>in</strong>adequate were<br />

health-related practices for MNCH-related practices, e.g. treatment for common childhood illnesses.<br />

While the level <strong>of</strong> immunization coverage <strong>and</strong> vitam<strong>in</strong> A <strong>in</strong>take were satisfactory, many MNCH<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators are deficient.<br />

In 2008 the project was exp<strong>and</strong>ed to three further districts <strong>of</strong> northern Bangladesh – Rangpur,<br />

Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2010 to six more districts - Faridpur, Madaripur, Rajbari,<br />

Magura, Kurigram <strong>and</strong> Lalmonirhat. Two more districts where no MNCH <strong>in</strong>terventions are planned<br />

were also identified as control districts <strong>in</strong> 2008, namely Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona <strong>and</strong> one more<br />

district <strong>in</strong> southern part <strong>of</strong> the country was also selected as control district <strong>in</strong> 2010 named<br />

2


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Jhenaidah. The basel<strong>in</strong>e survey <strong>in</strong> all six districts – four <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>and</strong> two controls - was<br />

completed <strong>in</strong> December 2008.<br />

In the follow<strong>in</strong>g two years, a comprehensive MNCH <strong>in</strong>tervention has been implemented <strong>in</strong> the four<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention districts. To elucidate the type <strong>and</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> the BRAC MNCH programme<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention, a re-survey has been undertaken <strong>of</strong> the same six districts <strong>in</strong> September 2010. This<br />

survey has served as a basel<strong>in</strong>e for six new <strong>in</strong>tervention districts where Jhenaidah district has been<br />

considered as control. This second survey has focused on key maternal, newborn <strong>and</strong> child<br />

outcomes <strong>and</strong> the possible changes that have occurred over two years <strong>of</strong> the implemented MNCH<br />

programme.<br />

The core aim <strong>of</strong> this impact evaluation is to analyze the situation <strong>of</strong> MNCH <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts<br />

at different stages <strong>of</strong> project implementation compared with the control districts by compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

results for key MNCH <strong>in</strong>dicators from the 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2010 surveys <strong>in</strong> old four <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong> two<br />

control districts. The specific objectives are to:<br />

• Identify the level <strong>of</strong> women’s knowledge <strong>and</strong> types <strong>of</strong> practices regard<strong>in</strong>g maternal health<br />

(pregnancy identification, ante-, <strong>in</strong>tra-, <strong>and</strong> post-partum care), <strong>and</strong> the health status <strong>and</strong> healthrelated<br />

practices for neonates <strong>and</strong> under-5 children<br />

• Assess the prevalence <strong>of</strong> maternal complications as well as that for the major illnesses <strong>in</strong><br />

neonates <strong>and</strong> under-5 children<br />

• Exam<strong>in</strong>e healthcare utilization for maternal, neonatal <strong>and</strong> under-five child care complications <strong>and</strong><br />

sicknesses<br />

• Identify the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> abortion (<strong>in</strong>duced/spontaneous), its management <strong>and</strong> potential<br />

complications<br />

• Identify the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> MR, potential complications <strong>and</strong> its management<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>ile the current referral networks <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g transport cont<strong>in</strong>gencies for essential MNCH<br />

services<br />

3


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Chapter<br />

2<br />

Methodology<br />

2.1 STUDY DESIGN<br />

This quasi-experimental study focused on the impact <strong>of</strong> MNCH <strong>in</strong>terventions that had been<br />

implemented through BRAC rural MNCH programme. This comprehensive health programme has<br />

been carried out <strong>in</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> selected ‘<strong>in</strong>tervention’ districts <strong>in</strong> addition to BRAC’s core<br />

development <strong>in</strong>itiatives i.e. micr<strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>ance, education, community empowerment, human rights <strong>and</strong><br />

legal services (HRLS), water, sanitation <strong>and</strong> hygiene (WASH) <strong>and</strong> health. Alternatively, <strong>in</strong> the ‘control’<br />

districts, the BRAC MNCH programme was not be<strong>in</strong>g implemented dur<strong>in</strong>g the course <strong>of</strong> the study<br />

though all other programmes were present. This study design, therefore, compared the health<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators between the <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />

<strong>and</strong> control districts over two years<br />

(2008 to 2010). Furthermore, with<strong>in</strong>district<br />

Figure 2.1. District pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> survey areas<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> the key<br />

health <strong>in</strong>dicators had also been<br />

assessed based on the 2008<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>e data compared with the<br />

2010 midl<strong>in</strong>e survey results.<br />

2006<br />

Nilphamari<br />

2008<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur<br />

2010<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur<br />

2.1.1 Study sett<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

This study was conducted <strong>in</strong> 2010 <strong>in</strong><br />

several districts <strong>in</strong> northern <strong>and</strong><br />

central region <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh. The<br />

areas surveyed <strong>in</strong>clude four old <strong>and</strong><br />

six new <strong>in</strong>tervention districts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

IMNCS programme <strong>of</strong> BRAC <strong>and</strong><br />

three control districts where the<br />

programme was not implemented<br />

(Fig. 2.1).<br />

Intervention<br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Faridpur<br />

Madaripur<br />

Rajbari<br />

Magura<br />

Kurigram<br />

The <strong>in</strong>tervention districts are:<br />

Lalmonirhat<br />

• Nilphamari <strong>in</strong> which a pilot<br />

MNCH <strong>in</strong>tervention commenced<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2005 <strong>and</strong> served as the basis<br />

for further implementation <strong>in</strong><br />

other districts <strong>of</strong> the MNCH<br />

actions.<br />

Control<br />

Naogaon<br />

Netrokona<br />

Naogaon<br />

Netrokona<br />

Jhenaidah<br />

5


Methodology<br />

• Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, where the MNCH <strong>in</strong>tervention was <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> 2008<br />

as part <strong>of</strong> ‘Improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Maternal</strong>, <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Child</strong> Survival (IMNCS)’ project follow<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the BRAC MNCH programme <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari.<br />

• Based upon experiences, <strong>in</strong> 2010, the programme was scaled up <strong>in</strong> two northern <strong>and</strong> four<br />

central districts − Kurigram, Lalmonirhat Faridpur, Madaripur, Rajbari, <strong>and</strong> Magura.<br />

Figure 2.2. Map <strong>of</strong> survey areas<br />

Intervention s<strong>in</strong>ce 2005<br />

Intervention s<strong>in</strong>ce 2008<br />

Intervention s<strong>in</strong>ce 2010<br />

Control districts<br />

6


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

The control districts for this study are Naogaon, Netrokona <strong>and</strong> Jhenaidah. These sett<strong>in</strong>gs served as<br />

the comparison districts. Geographically, all <strong>of</strong> the afore-mentioned districts are located <strong>in</strong> the north,<br />

north-western or central regions <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh. The study participants, predom<strong>in</strong>antly resident <strong>in</strong><br />

rural communities, are mostly <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> agricultural activities.<br />

The MNCH programme was <strong>in</strong>itiated along with other regular health <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari<br />

district <strong>in</strong> 2006. This was undertaken as a pilot <strong>in</strong>tervention. In 2008, the IMNCS project was built<br />

upon the model developed <strong>in</strong> the pilot programme <strong>in</strong> four districts namely Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha,<br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, <strong>and</strong> Nilphamari, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2010 <strong>in</strong> Faridpur, Madaripur, Rajbari, Magura, Kurigram <strong>and</strong><br />

Lalmonirhat. In the same time, the control districts <strong>of</strong> Naogaon, Netrokona <strong>and</strong> Jhenaidah were<br />

selected on the basis that the BRAC IMNCS programme was not implemented <strong>in</strong> those districts (Fig.<br />

2.2).<br />

BRAC’s IMNCS <strong>in</strong>tervention comprises a number <strong>of</strong> components aim<strong>in</strong>g to reduce maternal,<br />

neonatal <strong>and</strong> child mortality <strong>and</strong> morbidity, particularly among the poor <strong>and</strong> socially excluded<br />

population. The components <strong>in</strong>clude improv<strong>in</strong>g awareness on family plann<strong>in</strong>g, identification <strong>of</strong><br />

pregnancy, provid<strong>in</strong>g ANC, delivery care <strong>and</strong> PNC, birth plann<strong>in</strong>g, essential newborn care,<br />

management <strong>of</strong> newborn illnesses, management <strong>of</strong> acute respiratory <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>and</strong> diarrhoea among<br />

children aged


Methodology<br />

2.2 STUDY POPULATION<br />

The sample size for the 2010 survey <strong>in</strong> 13 old <strong>and</strong> new districts was 9,360 women <strong>and</strong> for this<br />

report 4,320 women <strong>of</strong> reproductive ages (15 to 49 years) liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the six districts be<strong>in</strong>g assessed at<br />

this stage <strong>in</strong> the IMNCS project evaluation (Fig. 2.3). Inclusion <strong>of</strong> the women was cont<strong>in</strong>gent upon<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g been married <strong>and</strong> who were identified as be<strong>in</strong>g or hav<strong>in</strong>g been a mother (<strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> a<br />

child death). Two groups hav<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g criteria were selected for the survey.<br />

Figure 2.3. Study population<br />

Study population<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon & Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

Total<br />

1 district 3 districts 2 districts 6 districts<br />

1 × 6 = 6 upazilas<br />

(6 upazilas/district)<br />

3 × 6 = 18 upazilas<br />

(6 upazila/district)<br />

2× 6 = 12 upazilas<br />

(6 upazilas/district)<br />

36 upazilas<br />

6× 2 = 12 unions<br />

(2 unions/upazila)<br />

18 × 2 = 36<br />

(2 unions/upazila)<br />

12 × 2 = 24 unions<br />

(2 unions/upazila)<br />

72 unions<br />

12 × 5 = 6 0 villages<br />

(5 villages/union)<br />

36 × 5 = 180 villages<br />

(5 villages/union)<br />

24 × 5= 120 villages<br />

(5 villages/union)<br />

360 villages<br />

60×12=720<br />

respondents (12<br />

respondents/village)<br />

180 × 12 = 2160<br />

respondents (12<br />

respondents/village)<br />

120 × 12 = 1440<br />

respondents (12<br />

respondents/village)<br />

4320 respondents<br />

Group 1. Mothers who have had any pregnancy outcome with<strong>in</strong> the study time period from<br />

06/October/2009 to 05/October/2010:<br />

• Mother <strong>of</strong> live child aged


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Group 2. Mothers <strong>of</strong> live children aged 12-59 months; these mothers did not have any pregnancy<br />

outcome <strong>in</strong> the mentioned study period<br />

2.3 SAMPLING<br />

For the determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> sample size <strong>of</strong> this midl<strong>in</strong>e survey the follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation was considered<br />

as background outl<strong>in</strong>e:<br />

• Indicators those were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the revised logical framework (Annex 1)<br />

• Assessment <strong>of</strong> change over time from the basel<strong>in</strong>e survey results to this midl<strong>in</strong>e assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

the key MNCH <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />

A simple comparison <strong>of</strong> change over time was adjusted with basel<strong>in</strong>e results through a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

sample test to determ<strong>in</strong>e the level <strong>of</strong> difference, if any, between the 2010 results <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />

<strong>and</strong> control districts from the 2008 basel<strong>in</strong>e f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs. Based on 80% power, 1% statistical<br />

significance <strong>and</strong> a design effect <strong>of</strong> 1.5, to detect a 12.5% <strong>in</strong>crease above a 20% basel<strong>in</strong>e, a sample<br />

size <strong>of</strong> at least 300 subjects for each <strong>of</strong> the two groups <strong>of</strong> mothers was determ<strong>in</strong>ed. Based on these<br />

parameters, a provisional total <strong>of</strong> 600 subjects from each district were calculated. However, to<br />

account for the approximate level <strong>of</strong> menstrual regulation (MR) <strong>and</strong> abortion that are estimated to<br />

occur dur<strong>in</strong>g a given year, the f<strong>in</strong>al sample size per district was <strong>in</strong>creased to 720 mothers per<br />

district, 420 from Group 1 <strong>and</strong> 300 from Group 2.<br />

As stated previously, six districts had been surveyed <strong>in</strong> 2008 for the basel<strong>in</strong>e survey, consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

Nilphamari as the s<strong>in</strong>gular <strong>in</strong>tervention district hav<strong>in</strong>g started <strong>in</strong> 2006; Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh from 2008; Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona which were identified as the control districts from<br />

2008.<br />

In 2008, a multi-stage cluster r<strong>and</strong>om sampl<strong>in</strong>g procedure was employed consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> districts,<br />

upazilas, unions <strong>and</strong> villages as the population strata. The selection <strong>of</strong> which districts would be the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong> control sett<strong>in</strong>gs was purposive <strong>in</strong> nature. However, at each successive stratum,<br />

r<strong>and</strong>om sampl<strong>in</strong>g was done for site selection. For <strong>in</strong>stance, with<strong>in</strong> each district six upazilas were<br />

selected r<strong>and</strong>omly. As such, <strong>in</strong> each upazila two unions were then selected r<strong>and</strong>omly <strong>and</strong>,<br />

subsequently five villages <strong>in</strong> each union were r<strong>and</strong>omly identified. In each village, complete<br />

enumeration <strong>of</strong> households was undertaken by the <strong>in</strong>terviewer to develop a sampl<strong>in</strong>g frame from<br />

which a sample <strong>of</strong> 12 households was r<strong>and</strong>omly selected.<br />

Eligibility <strong>of</strong> the mothers to be <strong>in</strong>terviewed followed the <strong>in</strong>clusion criteria for the aforementioned<br />

Groups 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 criteria. Twelve mothers (seven from Group 1 <strong>and</strong> five from Group 2) were r<strong>and</strong>omly<br />

selected as the respondents from each sampled village.<br />

In 2010, the same villages that were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the 2008 were selected for the midl<strong>in</strong>e follow-up<br />

survey. The sampl<strong>in</strong>g strategy for this research was characterized by a panel data approach. It<br />

merits po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g out that women who was surveyed <strong>in</strong> 2008 were not recruited for the 2010 study.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, the 2010 survey was carried out on 4,320 respondents <strong>in</strong> six districts. The survey<br />

encompassed 360 villages <strong>in</strong> 72 unions with<strong>in</strong> 36 upazilas <strong>of</strong> the six districts. A sub-total <strong>of</strong> 2,520<br />

mothers was Group 1 respondents <strong>and</strong> 1,800 corresponded to Group 2.<br />

If any r<strong>and</strong>omly selected respondent was found unavailable follow<strong>in</strong>g three visits to the household,<br />

that subject was replaced by another r<strong>and</strong>omly selected respondent with<strong>in</strong> the same village. This<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiative was taken to avoid non-response error.<br />

9


Methodology<br />

2.4 THE SURVEY AND SURVEY TOOLS<br />

The survey <strong>in</strong>strument was a structured questionnaire address<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>of</strong> project’s logframe.<br />

For comparison with other population-based survey data from Bangladesh, the survey<br />

questionnaire took <strong>in</strong>to account elements <strong>of</strong> data report<strong>in</strong>g from other national studies e.g. the<br />

Bangladesh Demographic <strong>and</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Survey 2007 (BDHS 2007). Further ref<strong>in</strong>ement <strong>and</strong><br />

development <strong>of</strong> the survey <strong>in</strong>strument accrued from a series <strong>of</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>gs between Ipact (University <strong>of</strong><br />

Aberdeen) <strong>and</strong> the BRAC IMNCS programme personnel. The questionnaire was used to collect<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation on the follow<strong>in</strong>g topics:<br />

• Background characteristics <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g age, education, occupation, religion, NGO <strong>in</strong>volvement,<br />

husb<strong>and</strong>’s background characteristics<br />

• Household characteristics <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong> material for floor, ro<strong>of</strong>, walls, household assets<br />

• Sanitation <strong>and</strong> dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water facility<br />

• Reproductive history <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g age at marriage <strong>and</strong> conception, number <strong>of</strong> birth, child deaths<br />

<strong>and</strong> age at death<br />

• Use <strong>of</strong> family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods<br />

• Maternity care <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g ANC, delivery care <strong>and</strong> PNC<br />

• Antenatal, delivery, postnatal complications <strong>and</strong> treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour<br />

• Newborn care, complications <strong>and</strong> their treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour<br />

• Vacc<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>and</strong> childhood illnesses <strong>and</strong> treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour<br />

Information on ante-partum, child-birth, post-partum <strong>and</strong> newborn care was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from mothers<br />

belong<strong>in</strong>g to the group <strong>of</strong> respondents with a pregnancy outcome <strong>in</strong> the last 12 months. Mothers<br />

who have had MR, abortions, IUDs or whose baby had died were not asked about neonatal or child<br />

care.<br />

Mothers <strong>of</strong> children aged 12-59 months were asked several questions regard<strong>in</strong>g their youngest child<br />

<strong>in</strong> that age range, as it was possible that a given mother may have more than one child <strong>of</strong> these<br />

ages. The questions focused on key illnesses (acute respiratory illness, diarrhoea) <strong>and</strong> their<br />

management as well as related health issues, e.g. immunization status.<br />

The questionnaire was pre-tested <strong>in</strong> Gazipur district <strong>in</strong> September 2010, followed by review <strong>and</strong><br />

revision <strong>of</strong> its content whereby feedback <strong>and</strong> observations generated from pilot study were<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to the f<strong>in</strong>al version <strong>of</strong> the questionnaire. Follow<strong>in</strong>g appropriate modification <strong>of</strong> the<br />

survey <strong>in</strong>strument, data collection was conducted from October 2010 to January 2011.<br />

Seventy eight female <strong>in</strong>terviewers were recruited for data collection. Female <strong>in</strong>terviewers were<br />

selected to ensure maximum participation <strong>of</strong> the respondents <strong>and</strong> optimal data collection. Selection<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terviewers was based on prior experience <strong>in</strong> health survey data collection <strong>and</strong> suitability to<br />

work <strong>in</strong> rural sett<strong>in</strong>g. The <strong>in</strong>terviewers were divided <strong>in</strong>to 13 groups, each headed by a male team<br />

leader to organize the logistics <strong>in</strong>volved with the rural field work as well as supervis<strong>in</strong>g data collection<br />

<strong>and</strong> the data quality. All the <strong>in</strong>terviewers <strong>and</strong> team leaders were tra<strong>in</strong>ed by experienced researchers.<br />

2.5 STUDY VARIABLES<br />

The key variables <strong>and</strong> measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicators are summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 2.5.1.<br />

10


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Table 2.5.1 List <strong>of</strong> variables<br />

Demographic <strong>and</strong><br />

socioeconomic status<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> variable<br />

• Age<br />

• Literacy <strong>of</strong> respondent <strong>and</strong> her husb<strong>and</strong><br />

• Years <strong>of</strong> completed school<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> respondent <strong>and</strong> her husb<strong>and</strong><br />

• Wealth status<br />

• Involvement <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>come generat<strong>in</strong>g activities<br />

• NGO <strong>in</strong>volvement<br />

• L<strong>and</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong> the household<br />

Reproductive history • Age at first marriage<br />

• Age at first conception<br />

• Number <strong>of</strong> pregnancy<br />

• Number <strong>of</strong> live births<br />

• Number <strong>of</strong> child deaths<br />

• Age <strong>of</strong> child at death<br />

• Number <strong>of</strong> abortion/MR/IUD<br />

• Complication dur<strong>in</strong>g abortion/MR<br />

• Complication management generated from MR/abortion<br />

Family Plann<strong>in</strong>g (FP) • Current use <strong>of</strong> FP<br />

• Source <strong>of</strong> FP methods<br />

• Side effects <strong>and</strong> management<br />

• Reason for absenteeism<br />

Pregnancy identification • Month <strong>of</strong> pregnancy identification<br />

• Person identified the pregnancy<br />

Antenatal Care (ANC) • Number <strong>and</strong> tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> ANC visits<br />

• Source <strong>of</strong> ANC services<br />

• Birth preparedness<br />

• Complication faced, management, <strong>and</strong> referral<br />

Delivery care • Place <strong>of</strong> delivery<br />

• Attendant at delivery<br />

• Delivery outcome<br />

• Cord cutt<strong>in</strong>g practices<br />

• Complications <strong>and</strong> management dur<strong>in</strong>g delivery<br />

Postnatal Care (PNC) • Number <strong>and</strong> tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> PNC visits<br />

• Source <strong>of</strong> PNC services<br />

• Complications, management <strong>and</strong> referral dur<strong>in</strong>g PNC period<br />

<strong>Maternal</strong> danger sign • Knowledge on maternal danger sign<br />

• Occurrence <strong>and</strong> management <strong>of</strong> maternal danger signs<br />

<strong>Neonatal</strong> danger sign • Knowledge on neonatal danger sign<br />

• Occurrence <strong>and</strong> management <strong>of</strong> neonatal danger signs<br />

Newborn care • Essential newborn care<br />

• Birth weight<br />

• Management <strong>of</strong> low birth weight babies<br />

• Initiation <strong>of</strong> breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Newborn feed<strong>in</strong>g practices<br />

• Birth asphyxia <strong>and</strong> its management<br />

• <strong>Neonatal</strong> sepsis <strong>and</strong> its management<br />

Under-5 child care • Knowledge <strong>and</strong> practices regard<strong>in</strong>g ARI<br />

• Knowledge <strong>and</strong> practices regard<strong>in</strong>g Diarrhoea<br />

• Immunization<br />

• Vitam<strong>in</strong> A <strong>in</strong>take<br />

11


Methodology<br />

2.5.1 Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

In l<strong>in</strong>e with the socioeconomic data presented <strong>in</strong> the Demographic <strong>and</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Survey (DHS) reports,<br />

this study collected similar <strong>in</strong>formation on similar key variables <strong>of</strong> this type. However, <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g traditional economic measures such as consumption expenditure was not collected.<br />

Rather, data on ownership <strong>of</strong> durable assets (e.g. radio, television, bicycle, cell phone etc.), <strong>and</strong><br />

household characteristics (e.g. material used for the floor <strong>of</strong> the dwell<strong>in</strong>g, the ro<strong>of</strong> material <strong>and</strong> the<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> the toilet facilities) were collected. Access to services such as electricity supply <strong>and</strong> the<br />

source <strong>of</strong> dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water, domestic fuel use <strong>and</strong> the ownership <strong>of</strong> livestock were also identified.<br />

With this set <strong>of</strong> socioeconomic data a wealth <strong>in</strong>dex was developed follow<strong>in</strong>g the programme<br />

objective to provide services to all, particularly poor. Thus, through the development <strong>of</strong> a wealth<br />

<strong>in</strong>dex, analysis <strong>of</strong> MNCH <strong>in</strong>dicators would take <strong>in</strong>to account the socioeconomic data. Construction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the wealth <strong>in</strong>dex was based on pr<strong>in</strong>cipal components analysis (PCA) <strong>of</strong> key socioeconomic<br />

variables (Ruste<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> Johnson 2004). Each variable was then given a weight based on its load<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

the first general factor identified <strong>in</strong> the PCA. The result<strong>in</strong>g score for each household (HH) was<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ardized with a mean ‘0’ <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation ‘1’ (Gwatk<strong>in</strong> et al. 2007). Households were<br />

then ranked <strong>and</strong> assigned a score <strong>in</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> one to five. A score equal to one was identified as<br />

the poorest house hold (HH) <strong>and</strong> score <strong>of</strong> five identified the richest HH. The wealth <strong>in</strong>dex was f<strong>in</strong>ally<br />

used to compare the antenatal, safe delivery <strong>and</strong> post-natal status <strong>of</strong> respondents across the five<br />

wealth-related groups.<br />

2.6 DATA PROCESSING AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS<br />

The 2010 survey data were verified, edited, coded <strong>and</strong> entered <strong>in</strong>to a customized database. Data<br />

quality was ensured by clean<strong>in</strong>g the data <strong>in</strong>consistencies. Data were analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g SPSS version<br />

17 <strong>and</strong> EPI <strong>in</strong>fo version 6.<br />

The survey data was comprised <strong>of</strong> the 2008 basel<strong>in</strong>e data merged with the 2010 data. Then the<br />

total six districts were split <strong>in</strong>to three strata, as follows:<br />

• Nilphamari (<strong>in</strong>tervention began <strong>in</strong> 2006)<br />

• Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh (<strong>in</strong>tervention began <strong>in</strong> 2008)<br />

• Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona (control districts, from 2008)<br />

Both univariate <strong>and</strong> multivariate statistical techniques were used for analyz<strong>in</strong>g the 2010 survey data.<br />

Univariate analysis was carried out to assess the relationship between key <strong>in</strong>dividual MNCH<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>and</strong> specific <strong>in</strong>dependent variables. This statistical test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volved chi-square tests for<br />

calculat<strong>in</strong>g differences <strong>of</strong> proportions between groups, <strong>in</strong>dependent sample t-tests for mean<br />

differences <strong>and</strong> Mann-Whitney U test for the median differences. Multiple logistic regression<br />

analyses were also performed to assess the relationship, if any, <strong>of</strong> selected <strong>in</strong>dependent variables on<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle dependent variables when controll<strong>in</strong>g for the simultaneous effects <strong>of</strong> other variables <strong>in</strong> the<br />

regression model.<br />

2.7 ETHICAL APPROVAL<br />

The ethical clearance was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the Bangladesh Medical Research Council. The purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

study was verbally described to the participants. Moreover, the <strong>in</strong>terviews were conducted after<br />

obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formed consent. The respondents were ensured <strong>of</strong> the confidentiality <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

provided.<br />

12


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Chapter<br />

3<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> socio-demographic<br />

status<br />

This chapter scanned the <strong>in</strong>formation on demographic <strong>and</strong> socioeconomic characteristics <strong>of</strong> survey<br />

respondents <strong>and</strong> their husb<strong>and</strong>s. Besides, the chapter <strong>in</strong>tended to describe their household<br />

characteristics. By us<strong>in</strong>g the household assets <strong>and</strong> belong<strong>in</strong>gs, a wealth <strong>in</strong>dex was constructed to<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate the economic status <strong>of</strong> the households.<br />

3.1 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SURVEY RESPONDENTS<br />

Table 3.1.1 shows the socio-demographic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the respondents. The mean age <strong>of</strong> the<br />

respondents <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari was 24 <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the study areas it was 25 which are similar to<br />

the earlier survey <strong>of</strong> 2008. One-third <strong>of</strong> the respondents came from the 20-34 years age group. The<br />

number <strong>of</strong> respondents <strong>in</strong> the younger cluster was highest <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (20%), <strong>in</strong> the rest it was not<br />

more than 15%. However, <strong>in</strong> all study areas the population <strong>of</strong> this age group was found higher than<br />

the previous year. In 2008, the age was ranged from 13 to 50, whereas <strong>in</strong> 2010 it ranged from 14 to<br />

48 years. The population was predom<strong>in</strong>antly Muslim everywhere. However, the other religion was<br />

highest <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> accounted for almost double than other study areas. Very few divorced,<br />

separated <strong>and</strong> widowed were found <strong>and</strong> almost 99% <strong>of</strong> the respondents were currently married.<br />

Literacy status improved significantly everywhere; 53% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> 55% elsewhere. Mean year<br />

<strong>of</strong> school<strong>in</strong>g was 4 everywhere that gives a common picture <strong>of</strong> school atta<strong>in</strong>ment. On an average<br />

not more than 7% <strong>of</strong> the respondents completed secondary or higher education.<br />

The respondents were mostly housewife though their <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>come generat<strong>in</strong>g activities<br />

(IGA) was found to be significantly <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (p= 0.006), but the percentage was<br />

lowest (11%) <strong>in</strong> other <strong>in</strong>tervention districts. The proportion <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>less people <strong>in</strong>creased substantially<br />

everywhere over time; l<strong>and</strong> ownership was highest <strong>in</strong> control areas. BRAC membership was found<br />

decreas<strong>in</strong>g. However, most <strong>of</strong> the BRAC members was <strong>in</strong>volved with Dabi, highest be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari (81%). The percentage <strong>of</strong> households eligible for BRAC membership was at least 10%<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased everywhere <strong>in</strong> the study areas.<br />

13


Comparison <strong>of</strong> socio-demographic status<br />

Table 3.1.1. Social <strong>and</strong> demographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the respondents<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value<br />

N 1200 720 3600 2158 2400 1440<br />

Age<br />

• ≤ 19 years 17.7 20.1 .199 13.8 15.7 .107 14.8 15.3 .558<br />

• 20-34 years 76.0 75.0 76.9 75.7 76.8 77.3<br />

• ≥ 35 years 6.3 4.9 9.4 8.6 8.4 7.4<br />

Mean age (SD) 24.39 24.29 .690 25.73 25.22 .001 25.23 25.11 .541<br />

(5.39) (5.33) (5.96) (5.08)<br />

(5.84) (5.65)<br />

Religion<br />

• Muslim 75.7 78.1 .232 95.2 94.3 .118 88.9 87.9 .346<br />

• Others 24.3 21.9 4.8 5.7 11.1 12.1<br />

Marital status<br />

• Married 98.9 99.7 98.9 99.3 .140 99.0 99.2 .604<br />

• Others 1.1 0.3 1.1 0.7 1.0 0.8<br />

Literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 47.5 53.3 .013 50.8 55.5 .001 52.4 55.7 .046<br />

• Educational status<br />

• No education 35.0 26.8 .001 34.5 28.9


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

3.2 SOCIAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RESPONDENTS’<br />

HUSBANDS<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>s’ mean age was 32 years <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> 33 years elsewhere; accounted for 7-8 years<br />

higher than their wives’ mean age. Around 45 to 49% could read <strong>and</strong> write, <strong>and</strong> the average year <strong>of</strong><br />

school<strong>in</strong>g was 4. The proportion <strong>of</strong> husb<strong>and</strong>’s literacy was less than their wives. Husb<strong>and</strong>s were<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved with IGA; the highest proportion <strong>of</strong> them was day labourer <strong>and</strong> farmer. Many <strong>of</strong> them were<br />

also <strong>in</strong>volved with small bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>and</strong> pull<strong>in</strong>g rickshaw/van (Table 3.2.1).<br />

Table 3.2.1. Social <strong>and</strong> demographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> respondents’ husb<strong>and</strong>s<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona (Control)<br />

2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value<br />

N 1200 720 3600 2158 2400 1440<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s Age<br />

• ≤ 25 years 15.5 19.6 14.0 16.5 14.5 12.5<br />

• 26- 40 years 75.4 70.2 71.8 68.8 71.6 73.6<br />

• ≥ 41 years 9.1 10.2 14.2 14.7 13.9 13.9<br />

Mean age (SD) 31.9<br />

(6.53)<br />

Literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong><br />

write<br />

31.7<br />

(6.69)<br />

.585 33.4<br />

(7.35)<br />

33.2<br />

(7.75)<br />

.287 33.3<br />

(7.35)<br />

33.2<br />

(7.31)<br />

.770<br />

42.6 45.3 .252 44.8 49.0 .002 45.3 48.7 .043<br />

Educational status<br />

• No education 44.5 40.5 .292 47.0 42.6 .001 45.8 41.2


Comparison <strong>of</strong> socio-demographic status<br />

Table 3.3.1. Household characteristics <strong>of</strong> the respondents<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona (Control)<br />

2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value<br />

N 1200 720 3600 2158 2400 1440<br />

Sex <strong>of</strong> HH head<br />

• Male 98.3 99.6 97.2 97.8 97.5 98.5<br />

• Female 1.8 0.4 2.8 2.2 2.5 1.5<br />

Mean household size 5.10 5.10 .956 4.99 4.99 .963 5.12 5.08 .524<br />

(SD)<br />

(2.04) (1.99)<br />

(1.95) (1.87)<br />

(2.03) (2.24)<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> family<br />

• Nuclear 67.0 66.0 .644 71.9 68.2 .003 64.1 65.3 .454<br />

• Extended 33.0 34.0 28.1 31.8 35.9 34.7<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal type <strong>of</strong><br />

dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water<br />

• Tube well 97.9 99.3 .018 98.5 99.3 .014 98.2 98.6 .298<br />

• Others 2.1 0.7 1.5 0.7 1.8 1.4<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal type <strong>of</strong><br />

cook<strong>in</strong>g water<br />

• Tube well 97.3 99.0 .008 97.9 98.5 .118 95.9 95.8 .900<br />

• Others 2.8 1.0 2.1 1.5 4.1 4.2<br />

Sanitation facility<br />

• Sanitary (water 27.4 15.8 20.8 20.9 22.6 24.0<br />

seal & septic<br />

tank)<br />

• Broken water 34.8 49.0


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

3.4 WEALTH INDEX<br />

The distribution <strong>of</strong> wealth <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>in</strong> all the six study districts was analyzed separately. The changes<br />

between 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2010 were measured (Fig. 3.1). Little changes were observed over the period<br />

across the study districts. In Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Naogaon, a slightly higher percentage <strong>of</strong> people were<br />

found to be belonged to poor qu<strong>in</strong>tiles <strong>in</strong> 2010 compared to the basel<strong>in</strong>e. Across Nilphamari,<br />

however, around 17% <strong>of</strong> the people were found to be <strong>in</strong> the fourth qu<strong>in</strong>tile at basel<strong>in</strong>e which<br />

reached at 21% <strong>in</strong> 2010. In Rangpur, a slight <strong>in</strong>crease was noticed. Conversely, poverty was found<br />

to be <strong>in</strong>tensified <strong>in</strong> Netrokona over the time <strong>and</strong> appeared as the poorest district (34% <strong>in</strong> the poorest<br />

qu<strong>in</strong>tile) by 2010 (Annex 2.1a <strong>and</strong> Annex 2.1b).<br />

Figure 3.1 Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

120<br />

100<br />

Percentage<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

2008 2010 2008 2010 2008 2010 2008 2010 2008 2010 2008 2010<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh Naogoan Netrokona<br />

Poorest Second Middle Fourth Richest<br />

17


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Chapter<br />

4<br />

<strong>Maternal</strong> health<br />

4.1 REPRODUCTIVE HISTORY<br />

In Bangladesh, the legal age <strong>of</strong> marriage for women is 18 years though cultural practices persist,<br />

which lead women <strong>of</strong> even younger ages be<strong>in</strong>g married. Early marriage is affiliated with a high<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> young women conceiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> their teenage. Though a dramatic decl<strong>in</strong>e has been<br />

observed <strong>in</strong> the proportion <strong>of</strong> women marry<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> their early teens, the median age at marriage (15.3<br />

years) has essentially rema<strong>in</strong>ed unchanged throughout the last decade (BDHS 2007).<br />

In the study areas where the BRAC MNCH programme is be<strong>in</strong>g conducted, the median age at<br />

marriage was 15 years while the median age at first conception was 17 years. In the two control<br />

districts, the median age at first marriage was 16 years, which was higher than that for the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention districts as well as the national median. Age at first conception <strong>in</strong> Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona rema<strong>in</strong>ed the same (17 years) as <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas (Table 4.1.1).<br />

Table 4.1.1. Summary statistics for reproductive history<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value<br />

N 1200 720 3600 2158 2400 1441<br />

Median age at first 15 15 15 15 16 16<br />

marriage<br />

Median age at first 17 17 17 17 17 17<br />

conception<br />

Average number <strong>of</strong> 2.35 2.35 .901 2.54 2.39 .001 2.42 2.33 .100<br />

children ever born (SD) (1.43) (1.40)<br />

(1.61) (1.49)<br />

(1.66) (1.49)<br />

Experienced one or more 16.8 17.1 19.3 17.9 15.1 16.0<br />

child deaths<br />

Experienced one or more 16.6 16.1 .787 18.7 17.6 .270 14.8 15.4 .625<br />

under-5 child deaths<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> children died 202 123 696 387 363 230<br />

Age stratification <strong>of</strong> child<br />

death<br />

• <strong>Neonatal</strong> 74.3 75.6 .785 63.4 76.2 5 years 3.0 6.5 .128 5.6 2.8 .038 4.1 4.3 .899<br />

19


<strong>Maternal</strong> health<br />

In Nilphamari, 16% <strong>of</strong> the respondents reported at least one or more under-5 child deaths,<br />

compared to 18% <strong>in</strong> the other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts; it was slightly lower (15%) <strong>in</strong> the control<br />

districts. Moreover, three-quarters <strong>of</strong> the under-5 deaths occurred <strong>in</strong> the neonatal period (Table<br />

4.1.1).<br />

4.1.1 History <strong>of</strong> abortion<br />

It was evident that 9% <strong>of</strong><br />

the respondents <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari, 14% <strong>in</strong> other<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention areas, <strong>and</strong><br />

16% <strong>in</strong> control areas had<br />

abortion (Fig. 4.1). Most <strong>of</strong><br />

them experienced not<br />

more than one abortion <strong>in</strong><br />

their life time (Annex 2.2.1).<br />

Induced abortion is not<br />

legal <strong>in</strong> the country unless<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ically recommended.<br />

However, 14% <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari, 23% <strong>in</strong> other<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention areas, <strong>and</strong><br />

10% <strong>in</strong> control areas<br />

among all abortion were<br />

recorded as <strong>in</strong>duced.<br />

Everywhere the percentage<br />

went downward than the<br />

<strong>in</strong>cidence happened <strong>in</strong><br />

2008 (Fig. 4.2).<br />

4.1.1.1 Complication<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g abortion <strong>and</strong> its<br />

management<br />

Figure 4.1. Ever had abortion<br />

Percentage<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

2008 2010 2008 2010 2008 2010<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Figure 4.2. Percentage distribution <strong>of</strong> abortion, by<br />

type <strong>in</strong> three survey areas<br />

Percentage<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Control<br />

Spontaneous<br />

Induced<br />

2008 2010 2008 2010 2008 2010<br />

Complication was not an<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha Control<br />

uncommon phenomena<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

created through abortion;<br />

48% <strong>of</strong> women <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, 44% <strong>in</strong> other <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, <strong>and</strong> 70% <strong>in</strong> control areas<br />

experienced complications due to abortion (Annex 2.2.2). More complications were occurred <strong>in</strong> the<br />

cases <strong>of</strong> spontaneous abortion than that <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>duced cases. The most commonly faced abortion<br />

complication was excessive bleed<strong>in</strong>g (3 out <strong>of</strong> 4). Abdom<strong>in</strong>al pa<strong>in</strong> was reported <strong>in</strong> half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

abortion cases. No action was taken <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> complications for 7% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, 9% <strong>in</strong><br />

other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, <strong>and</strong> 17% <strong>in</strong> control areas.<br />

Increas<strong>in</strong>g number <strong>of</strong> women <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari was go<strong>in</strong>g to qualified doctor while fac<strong>in</strong>g complications<br />

due to abortion, but it was lower <strong>in</strong> other three districts <strong>and</strong> control areas. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the<br />

popularity <strong>of</strong> village doctor had gradually been <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g. In Nilphamari, it was evident that more<br />

women than the previous year (5 to 19%) were go<strong>in</strong>g to district hospitals <strong>and</strong> UHC/MCWC/FWC (10<br />

to 14%).<br />

20


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

4.1.2 History <strong>of</strong> menstrual regulation (MR)<br />

About 4% <strong>of</strong> the respondents acknowledged that they had undergone at least one MR <strong>in</strong> their<br />

lifetime; however, it <strong>in</strong>creased slightly everywhere (Fig. 4.3). The complication faced due to MR was<br />

substantially <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (p=0.029) (Annex 2.2.3). In a similar way <strong>of</strong> abortion-related<br />

complications, most <strong>of</strong> the women experienced excessive bleed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> abdom<strong>in</strong>al pa<strong>in</strong> due to MR.<br />

Figure 4.3. Ever had MR<br />

Percentage<br />

5<br />

4.5<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

2008 2010 2008 2010 2008 2010<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Control<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> MR complications <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, all the respondents sought services from the health<br />

service providers, while it was 89% <strong>in</strong> other <strong>in</strong>tervention areas. In Nilphamari, 60% <strong>of</strong> the cases were<br />

managed by qualified doctors, while it was found to be lower <strong>in</strong> other <strong>in</strong>tervention areas that gone<br />

down from 50 to 18% dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008 to 2010. (Annex 2.2.3)<br />

4.2 FAMILY PLANNING PRACTICES<br />

The contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR) was higher <strong>in</strong> Rajshahi Division (65.9%) compared to 56%<br />

nationally (BDHS 2007). At basel<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the BRAC MNCH <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>in</strong> 2008 <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, the CPR<br />

was 65.8%. By 2010 the CPR had <strong>in</strong>creased to nearly 70% (Table 4.2.1). In other three <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />

districts, the CPR had decreased over time to nearly 60%, a ‘borderl<strong>in</strong>e’ significant reduction<br />

(p=0.052). Use <strong>of</strong> any form <strong>of</strong> family plann<strong>in</strong>g method had also dropped <strong>in</strong> the control districts <strong>in</strong><br />

2010 result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>termediary CPR compared to the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> modern family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods <strong>in</strong> the surveyed areas was notable, as the difference<br />

between the use <strong>of</strong> any contraceptive method <strong>and</strong> modern methods was substantially less than the<br />

difference reported nationally. Furthermore, <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> use <strong>of</strong> modern methods had observed <strong>in</strong> all<br />

the survey areas, especially <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (p=0.01) s<strong>in</strong>ce 2008 (Table 4.2.1).<br />

Nilphamari reported the highest proportion <strong>of</strong> adolescent girls giv<strong>in</strong>g birth amongst the districts<br />

surveyed. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, compared to the other districts surveyed, <strong>in</strong> 2010, girls <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari were<br />

about 60% more likely to have given birth than their counterparts <strong>in</strong> the other <strong>in</strong>tervention districts<br />

(OR=1.64; 95% CI 1.26-2.14) as well as be<strong>in</strong>g nearly twice as likely to have had a delivery than<br />

adolescents <strong>in</strong> the control districts (OR=1.9; 95% CI 1.5-2.5) (data not shown). In related manner,<br />

Nilphamari reported the highest level <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> modern family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods amongst married<br />

adolescent girls <strong>in</strong> the districts surveyed. In all the districts, more than half <strong>of</strong> married adolescent<br />

women were us<strong>in</strong>g modern family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods (Table 4.2.1).<br />

21


<strong>Maternal</strong> health<br />

Table 4.2.1. Family plann<strong>in</strong>g practices<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value<br />

N 1200 720 3600 2158 2400 1440<br />

Currently us<strong>in</strong>g any 65.8 69.9 .063 62.4 59.9 .052 65.6 63.8 .249<br />

family plann<strong>in</strong>g (FP)<br />

method<br />

Currently us<strong>in</strong>g modern 61.3 67.1 .011 55.6 56.3 .581 59.8 60.0 .878<br />

FP method 1<br />

N 600 420 1800 1258 1200 840<br />

Married adolescent girls 24.8 27.4 .361 19.4 19.3 .930 19.8 19.4 .847<br />

giv<strong>in</strong>g birth<br />

N 212 145 495 338 355 220<br />

Current use <strong>of</strong> modern 50.5 56.6 .258 51.5 51.2 .925 58.0 52.7 .213<br />

FP method 1 among<br />

married adolescent girls<br />

N 411 217 1352 866 826 522<br />

Reasons for not us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

any FP method*<br />

• Not <strong>in</strong> a partnership 4.4 0.9 .003 7.9 4.3


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Figure 4.4. Sources <strong>of</strong> modern FP methods<br />

120<br />

Percentage<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

2008 2010 2008 2010 2008 2010<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Control<br />

Pharmacy/shops<br />

BRAC field<br />

workers<br />

NGO/Private<br />

Satellite cl<strong>in</strong>ic<br />

Public facility<br />

Govt. field<br />

workers<br />

4.3 PREGNANCY IDENTIFICATION<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> a woman be<strong>in</strong>g pregnant as early as possible <strong>in</strong> the first trimester is important to<br />

promote ANC for her. BRAC SS/SK work<strong>in</strong>g at community level identified more than half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pregnancies <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (51%) <strong>in</strong> the first trimester. This compared favourably with the much lower<br />

percentages <strong>of</strong> identification for other <strong>in</strong>tervention (16.8%), <strong>and</strong> control districts (1.4%) (Table 4.3.1).<br />

Table 4.3.1. Pregnancy identification<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value<br />

N 600 420 1800 1258 1200 840<br />

Pregnancy identified<br />

by SS/SK <strong>in</strong> the 1 st - 51.0 - - 16.8 - 0.0 1.4 -<br />

trimester 1<br />

1<br />

With<strong>in</strong> first three months <strong>of</strong> pregnancy<br />

4.4 ANTENATAL CARE (ANC)<br />

The healthcare that a woman receives dur<strong>in</strong>g her pregnancy is generally termed as antenatal care or<br />

ANC. Study shows that ANC visit is closely associated with safe motherhood <strong>and</strong> with the wellbe<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> newborn too. As a signatory to the UN MDGs, Bangladesh is committed to reduce maternal<br />

mortality by 75% by the year 2015, compared to its level from 1990. ANC is an essential component<br />

for reduc<strong>in</strong>g the risk <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality (BDHS 2007). The World <strong>Health</strong> Organization (WHO)<br />

recommends at least four ANC visits for all pregnant women. In the 2010 survey, women who gave<br />

a live birth or a stillbirth <strong>in</strong> previous year were considered eligible for respond<strong>in</strong>g to questions<br />

concern<strong>in</strong>g the ANC they may have received dur<strong>in</strong>g the pregnancy.<br />

4.4.1 Knowledge on ANC<br />

The respondents were asked <strong>in</strong>itially whether they knew about the necessity <strong>of</strong> ANC visits. The 2010<br />

study revealed that knowledge about the importance <strong>of</strong> ANC was universal. In Nilphamari, the most<br />

23


<strong>Maternal</strong> health<br />

commonly cited reasons for ANC were for the purposes <strong>of</strong> ensur<strong>in</strong>g a safe delivery <strong>and</strong>, to a lesser<br />

extent, to know the position <strong>of</strong> the fetus. Early recognition <strong>of</strong> possible complications with pregnancy<br />

was also cited as a reason for ANC. However, <strong>in</strong> other districts, both <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong> control areas,<br />

the ma<strong>in</strong> two reasons were <strong>in</strong>verted, i.e. know the position <strong>of</strong> the fetus was most commonly noted<br />

<strong>and</strong> to a lesser extent for safe delivery purposes (Annex 2.2.4).<br />

4.4.2 Antenatal care (ANC) practices<br />

The percentage <strong>of</strong> pregnant women received at least four ANCs <strong>in</strong>creased significantly <strong>in</strong> all the<br />

three study areas between 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2010. Nilphamari achieved the highest level amongst all the<br />

districts, <strong>in</strong>creased from 76 to 92% (p=0.001) dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010. The most notable improvement<br />

was observed <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts <strong>of</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh over the twoyear<br />

period. At basel<strong>in</strong>e, ANC was low (15%), whereas by 2010 a significant <strong>in</strong>crease was observed<br />

(p


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Attend<strong>in</strong>g for ANC early <strong>in</strong> pregnancy, especially <strong>in</strong> the first trimester, is an important <strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong><br />

effective maternal health programmes. The median number <strong>of</strong> months when the first ANC visit<br />

occurred was assessed. Nilphamari was shown to have the earliest first ANC visit (with<strong>in</strong> three<br />

months) compared to other areas. Reductions <strong>in</strong> the time to the <strong>in</strong>itial ANC visit were found <strong>in</strong> all the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention clusters over the two-year period. However, no improvement <strong>in</strong> the control districts was<br />

noted, where<strong>in</strong> the median first ANC visit took place at five months <strong>in</strong> 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2010.<br />

ANC practices were found to be delivered by different cadres <strong>of</strong> tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g BRAC<br />

Shasthya Kormi (SK), family welfare visitors (FWV), nurses, midwives, paramedics <strong>and</strong> qualified<br />

doctors. The most common provider <strong>of</strong> ANC <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts was the SKs. More than<br />

90% <strong>of</strong> the pregnant women received at least one ANC from tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>in</strong> all the <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />

districts, which was 59% for the control districts (Table 4.4.1).<br />

There was disparity between the <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong> control districts regard<strong>in</strong>g women received at least<br />

four ANCs from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers. From 2008 to 2010 <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas, a significant <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

(p=0.001) was identified <strong>in</strong> the proportion <strong>of</strong> women received at least four ANCs from tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

providers. Thus, pregnant women <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari were highly more likely to receive at least four ANCs<br />

from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers than those from Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona (OR 36.4; 95% CI 24.7-53.7) as<br />

were women from Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh compared with those from the control<br />

districts (OR 8.6; 95% CI 6.8-10.9) (data not shown). Provision <strong>of</strong> ANC from medically qualified<br />

persons was far less common <strong>in</strong> those districts though it was the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal source <strong>of</strong> ANC <strong>in</strong> the<br />

control districts (Fig. 4.5).<br />

Figure 4.5. Providers <strong>of</strong> ANC (tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed)<br />

Percentage<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

2008 2010 2008 2010 2008 2010<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Control<br />

Received at least four ANCs from medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider<br />

Received at least four ANCs from tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider<br />

4.5 BIRTH PREPAREDNESS<br />

BRAC MNCH programme pay importance on birth preparedness to ensure pregnant women <strong>and</strong><br />

their families to be prepared with a package <strong>of</strong> birth plan. In general, there are three major<br />

preparation needs to be done for birth preparedness. For <strong>in</strong>stances, determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> place <strong>and</strong><br />

attendant for delivery, <strong>and</strong> also to save money for immediate expenses.<br />

4.5.1 Knowledge on birth preparedness<br />

The respondents were ranked accord<strong>in</strong>g to their knowledge. There was no one <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari who<br />

did not have any knowledge regard<strong>in</strong>g birth plann<strong>in</strong>g (Annex 2.2.5). In the other <strong>in</strong>tervention areas,<br />

more than half <strong>of</strong> the respondents had knowledge <strong>of</strong> 1-2 birth plans. The respondents were<br />

25


<strong>Maternal</strong> health<br />

substantially aware about decid<strong>in</strong>g the place <strong>and</strong> attendant, half <strong>of</strong> them <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention had<br />

awareness regard<strong>in</strong>g sav<strong>in</strong>g money.<br />

4.5.2 Practices <strong>of</strong> birth plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Almost three-fourth <strong>of</strong> the respondents <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari prepared themselves for delivery by<br />

determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g place <strong>and</strong> attendant <strong>and</strong> also saved money. In other <strong>in</strong>tervention areas, a substantial<br />

improvement also found (p


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

4.6 DELIVERY CARE<br />

Information on delivery care was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from mothers who have had a live or still birth <strong>in</strong> the<br />

preced<strong>in</strong>g year. Delivery at home was found to be common practice <strong>in</strong> the study areas. A little<br />

higher facility delivery was observed <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> cited with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g phenomena. One-fourth<br />

<strong>of</strong> the deliveries <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> one-fifth <strong>in</strong> other <strong>in</strong>tervention areas took place <strong>in</strong> facility<br />

(public/private) (Fig. 4.7). In the study areas, generally 9 out <strong>of</strong> 10 deliveries were recorded as normal<br />

(Table 4.6.1). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the percentage <strong>of</strong> c-section delivery had risen almost double from<br />

4 to 8% from 2008 to 2010; while the national rate <strong>of</strong> such is 7.5% (BDHS 2007).<br />

Figure 4.7. Facility delivery (Public/Private)<br />

30<br />

25<br />

Percentage<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

2008 2010 2008 2010 2008 2010<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Control<br />

Table 4.6.1. Delivery care practices<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value<br />

N 544 384 1571 1104 1040 716<br />

Place <strong>of</strong> delivery<br />

• Home 79.2 73.7 86.1 80.3 81.7 75.6<br />

• On the way 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.8 1.5<br />

• Public facility 14.7 18.2 6.8 12.1 8.8 11.9<br />

• Private facility or others 5.9 7.6 6.5 7.2 8.7 11.0<br />

• Facility delivery<br />

20.6 25.8 .063 13.2 19.4


<strong>Maternal</strong> health<br />

Sterile blade was used commonly for cord cutt<strong>in</strong>g for almost all cases <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, more than 93%<br />

cases <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, <strong>and</strong> 85% <strong>in</strong> control districts. Ty<strong>in</strong>g cord with sterile thread<br />

was also commonly practiced <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari with an <strong>in</strong>creased trend. The similar trend was also<br />

observed <strong>in</strong> other <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, but not <strong>in</strong> the control districts (Table 4.6.1).<br />

4.7 POSTNATAL CARE (PNC)<br />

Postnatal Care (PNC) is <strong>in</strong>deed a crucial part <strong>of</strong> safe motherhood that mother receives with<strong>in</strong> 42<br />

days <strong>of</strong> delivery. Here the results <strong>of</strong> PNC are articulated from the <strong>in</strong>formation obta<strong>in</strong>ed from those<br />

mothers who have had a live birth only.<br />

The percentage <strong>of</strong> women received at least three PNCs has <strong>in</strong>creased significantly across the three<br />

study areas between 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2010. Nilphamari achieved the highest level amongst all the districts,<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g from 28 to 58% (p


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

The BRAC MNCH programme is <strong>in</strong>tended to ensure first PNC with<strong>in</strong> 48 hours <strong>of</strong> delivery for home<br />

delivery. A substantial <strong>in</strong>crease was cited everywhere <strong>in</strong> programme areas hav<strong>in</strong>g at least one PNC<br />

from a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider by this time l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g with 50 to 77% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> 2 to 41%<br />

elsewhere. It is a successful endeavour <strong>of</strong> BRAC SKs who were provid<strong>in</strong>g PNC for almost all such<br />

cases (Fig. 4.8).<br />

Figure 4.8. Received at least one PNC from BRAC SKs<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

Percentage<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

2008 2010 2008 2010<br />

Niphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

In the contrary, the percentage <strong>of</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g no PNC was also substantially decreased <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari<br />

<strong>and</strong> it happened only for 5% cases. In other <strong>in</strong>tervention areas, the case <strong>of</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g no PNC was 77%<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2008 <strong>and</strong> now it gone down at 30% <strong>in</strong> 2010 whether it was 61% <strong>in</strong> control areas (Table 4.7.1).<br />

4.8 MATERNAL DANGER SIGNS<br />

The signs <strong>of</strong> deadly diseases those are usually faced by a woman dur<strong>in</strong>g the pregnancy, delivery or<br />

after delivery are termed as maternal danger signs. Five danger signs were identified as maternal<br />

danger signs <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g excessive bleed<strong>in</strong>g/reta<strong>in</strong>ed placenta, convulsion, prolonged labour/h<strong>and</strong> or<br />

leg prolapsed, edema/severe headache/blurred vision, <strong>and</strong> high fever with foul smell<strong>in</strong>g discharge.<br />

The mothers who had a live birth or any other birth outcome (abortion/MR/still birth/IUD) <strong>in</strong> last one<br />

year preced<strong>in</strong>g the survey were asked about knowledge, prevalence <strong>and</strong> treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g<br />

behaviour on maternal danger signs.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the data <strong>of</strong> maternal danger signs were not collected for 2008, only the data for 2010 were<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> Table 4.8.1. Table 4.8.1 shows that 30% <strong>of</strong> the mothers were aware <strong>of</strong> at least three<br />

maternal danger signs <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh which was much higher (47%) <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari. However, a lower percentage (24%) was reported <strong>in</strong> the control districts though the<br />

median knowledge was identical (2) <strong>in</strong> all three study areas. A high percentage (95%) <strong>of</strong> the mothers<br />

reported to have knowledge on go<strong>in</strong>g to hospital while maternal danger signs were identified <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari compared to elsewhere. A considerable percentage (12%) <strong>of</strong> the mother also reported to<br />

have the knowledge to call the BRAC SS/SK <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari aga<strong>in</strong>st a very low percentage <strong>in</strong> other<br />

study areas.<br />

29


<strong>Maternal</strong> health<br />

Edema, blurred vision, <strong>and</strong> severe headache were shown to be the most predom<strong>in</strong>ant danger signs<br />

faced dur<strong>in</strong>g this period <strong>in</strong> all three study areas (Table 4.8.1). Around 38% <strong>of</strong> the mothers <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari reported to face these danger signs, whilst it was one out <strong>of</strong> five mothers <strong>in</strong> Rangpur,<br />

Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh were found to face maternal danger signs; even higher percentage<br />

(42%) observed <strong>in</strong> control areas. More than half <strong>of</strong> the mothers fac<strong>in</strong>g maternal danger signs sought<br />

treatment from public or private health facility <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari which was a little bit lower <strong>in</strong> other study<br />

areas.<br />

Table 4.8.1. Information on maternal danger signs <strong>of</strong> the respondents (percentages)<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona (Control)<br />

2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value<br />

N - 383 - 1091 - 700<br />

Knowledge on maternal danger<br />

signs<br />

• None (0) - 1.0 - 6.6 - 5.3<br />

• Poor (1-2) - 52.5 - 63.7 - 61.9<br />

• Moderate (3) - 38.1 - 25.0 - 23.8<br />

• Good (4-5) - 8.4 - 4.7 - 2.0<br />

Median knowledge on maternal<br />

danger signs<br />

- 2<br />

(0-5)<br />

- 2<br />

(0-5)<br />

- 2<br />

(0-4)<br />

N - 379 - 1019 - 663<br />

Know what to do when danger<br />

signs identified*<br />

• Know/have BRAC referral<br />

mobile number<br />

3.2 9.9 2.1<br />

• Know to go to hospital/Referral 94.5 81.8 78.9<br />

place<br />

• Know to call BRAC SS/SK 12.4 0.5 0.3<br />

N 383 1091 700<br />

Faced maternal danger signs 46.7 32.6 58.1<br />

Individual maternal danger signs<br />

faced*<br />

• Excessive bleed<strong>in</strong>g/Reta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

placenta<br />

- 7.3 - 10.0 - 17.3<br />

• Convulsion - 2.1 - 1.6 - 5.3<br />

• Prolonged labour/H<strong>and</strong> or leg - 6.3 - 8.3 - 18.0<br />

prolapsed<br />

• Edema/Severe<br />

- 38.4 - 20.7 - 42.4<br />

headache/Blurred vision<br />

• High fever with foul smell<strong>in</strong>g - 0.8 - 3.0 - 6.7<br />

discharge<br />

N 179 356 407<br />

Action taken on recogniz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

maternal danger signs<br />

• No action taken - 5.0 - 21.6 - 14.5<br />

• Help from BRAC staff - 9.5 - 6.2 - 1.5<br />

• Help from facility (public or<br />

private)<br />

• Others (Village doctor,<br />

Homeopath, Pir/Fakir,<br />

traditional healer,<br />

drug seller, etc)<br />

* Multiple response questions<br />

- 59.8 - 43.0 - 49.9<br />

- 25.7 - 29.2 - 34.2<br />

30


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

4.9 TREATMENT-SEEKING BEHAVIOUR FOR MATERNAL COMPLICATIONS<br />

<strong>Maternal</strong> morbidity or mortality is a consequence <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> complications usually takes place<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g antenatal, delivery or postnatal period. To control for the maternal death we must have to<br />

concentrate on the management <strong>of</strong> these complicated disorders, the underly<strong>in</strong>g causes <strong>of</strong> maternal<br />

death. This section provides <strong>in</strong>formation on the prevalence <strong>and</strong> treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour <strong>of</strong><br />

some commonly occurred maternal complications <strong>in</strong> our study areas.<br />

4.9.1 Complications <strong>and</strong> treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour dur<strong>in</strong>g antenatal period<br />

The percentage <strong>of</strong> mothers with complications dur<strong>in</strong>g antenatal period <strong>in</strong>creased over time <strong>in</strong> all<br />

study areas. Edema, severe headache, high fever, blurred vision, lower abdom<strong>in</strong>al pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> anemia<br />

was cont<strong>in</strong>ued to be the most frequent complications dur<strong>in</strong>g antenatal period <strong>in</strong> 2010 with highest<br />

percentage been reported for severe headache across all study areas (24% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, 18% <strong>in</strong><br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh <strong>and</strong> 38% <strong>in</strong> the control areas <strong>of</strong> Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona)<br />

(Annex 2.2.6).<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the women who faced complications dur<strong>in</strong>g antenatal period found to seek treatment from<br />

healthcare providers <strong>and</strong> the proportion <strong>in</strong>creased over time <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas (Annex 2.2.7).<br />

However, the percentage <strong>of</strong> women with complications sought treatment from qualified doctors,<br />

hospital/cl<strong>in</strong>ics <strong>and</strong> medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers was found to be <strong>in</strong>creased only <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (Table<br />

4.9.1 <strong>and</strong> Annex 2.2.7).<br />

4.9.2 Complications <strong>and</strong> treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour dur<strong>in</strong>g delivery period<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the delivery period, the most prevalent complications were found to be substantial bleed<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

high fever, severe headache, <strong>and</strong> prolonged <strong>and</strong> obstructed labour which were not changed<br />

substantially over the two-year period (Annex 2.2.8). Percentage <strong>of</strong> women received treatment from<br />

healthcare providers for complications was found to be <strong>in</strong>creased over the two-year period. In 2008,<br />

around 83% women suffer<strong>in</strong>g from delivery complications <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari sought treatment from<br />

healthcare providers which <strong>in</strong>creased up to 90% <strong>in</strong> 2010; an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g trend (75 to 83%) was also<br />

observed <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh (Annex 2.2.9). However, treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

complications dur<strong>in</strong>g delivery period from medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers rema<strong>in</strong>ed to be unchanged <strong>in</strong><br />

all <strong>in</strong>tervention areas whereas <strong>in</strong> control areas it was found to be decl<strong>in</strong>ed (Table 4.9.1).<br />

4.9.3 Complications <strong>and</strong> treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour dur<strong>in</strong>g postnatal period<br />

Irrespective <strong>of</strong> the study areas <strong>and</strong> time <strong>of</strong> the survey, severe headache, blurry vision, high fever <strong>and</strong><br />

abdom<strong>in</strong>al pa<strong>in</strong> were found to be the most frequently occurred complications dur<strong>in</strong>g postnatal<br />

period (Annex 2.2.10). At basel<strong>in</strong>e, one-fourth <strong>of</strong> the mothers with postnatal complications received<br />

treatment from medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers which reached up to 29% by 2010 <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> also<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased from the basel<strong>in</strong>e (20 to 26%) <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh. But this rema<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

fairly unchanged <strong>in</strong> control areas (Table 4.9.1). Receiv<strong>in</strong>g treatment <strong>in</strong> UHC/MCWC/FWC was found<br />

to be <strong>in</strong>creased from 11 to 15% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (Annex 2.2.11). Though not such big <strong>in</strong>crease was<br />

observed <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, the trend was positive.<br />

31


<strong>Maternal</strong> health<br />

Table 4.9.1. <strong>Maternal</strong> complications faced <strong>and</strong> treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour for such<br />

complications<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value<br />

N 544 384 1571 1104 1040 716<br />

Complication faced 37.3 52.9


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

4.10 REFERRAL INFORMATION FOR MATERNAL COMPLICATIONS<br />

This section presents <strong>in</strong>formation on referrals for complications dur<strong>in</strong>g antenatal, delivery <strong>and</strong><br />

postnatal period. The percentages <strong>of</strong> women referred for maternal complications show a slight<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas, particularly <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (Fig. 4.9). Referral to hospital for maternal<br />

complications <strong>in</strong>creased from 12% <strong>in</strong> 2008 to 17% <strong>in</strong> 2010 <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> from 5 to 7% <strong>in</strong> other<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention districts (Annex 2.2.12). However, no change was noted <strong>in</strong> control districts. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

complicated mothers were referred to by BRAC workers (38% <strong>in</strong> 2008 <strong>and</strong> >50% <strong>in</strong> 2010) <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari. Although village doctors were found to be the most prom<strong>in</strong>ent persons for referral <strong>in</strong><br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh <strong>in</strong> 2010, referral by BRAC workers <strong>in</strong>creased considerably (2<br />

to 23%) dur<strong>in</strong>g the two-year period. Increas<strong>in</strong>gly mothers were referred to UHC/MCWC/FWC <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention areas <strong>and</strong> received treatment. Surgery, c-section, blood transfusion <strong>and</strong> episiotomy<br />

rates were found to be <strong>in</strong>creased over the two-year period <strong>in</strong> all study areas. Start<strong>in</strong>g from 26% <strong>in</strong><br />

2008 the percentage was reached 40% by 2010 <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> a relatively smaller <strong>in</strong>crease (31<br />

to 40%) was observed <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh.<br />

Figure 4.9. Referred for material complication(s)<br />

20<br />

15<br />

Percent<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

2008 2010<br />

Nilphamarai<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha & Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Control<br />

33


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Chapter<br />

5<br />

<strong>Neonatal</strong> health<br />

5.1 ESSENTIAL NEWBORN CARE (ENC)<br />

5.1.1 Knowledge <strong>of</strong> neonatal care<br />

Essential newborn care (ENC) comprises comprehensive strategies <strong>and</strong> preventive measures that<br />

are <strong>in</strong>tended to be adm<strong>in</strong>istered immediately after the delivery <strong>of</strong> the newborn. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to WHO,<br />

ENC practices <strong>in</strong>clude clean cord care, thermal care <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiat<strong>in</strong>g breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g immediately or<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the first hour after birth. Aligned with WHO guidel<strong>in</strong>es, BRAC MNCH programme also<br />

identified five essential actions for ENC <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g hygienic cord care, thermal control (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g dry<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>and</strong> wrapp<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>and</strong> early breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itiation.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from the 2010 survey <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>in</strong>dicate that the median number <strong>of</strong> known ENC actions<br />

was 2 out <strong>of</strong> a maximum 5, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a slight decrease, from the level (three actions) that was<br />

reported <strong>in</strong> 2008. In the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts <strong>of</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, the median<br />

number <strong>of</strong> ENC knowledge <strong>of</strong> 2, rema<strong>in</strong>ed unchanged over the two years <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention. Overall<br />

knowledge status, when consider<strong>in</strong>g the proportion <strong>of</strong> mothers who knew at least one ENC action<br />

to as many as four (comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ‘poor’ <strong>and</strong> ‘medium’ knowledge levels), an <strong>in</strong>crease was noted <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari (from 88% <strong>in</strong> 2008 to 97% <strong>in</strong> 2010) (Table 5.1.1). For these comb<strong>in</strong>ed categories, a<br />

decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g trend was noticed for the other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts as well as for the two control<br />

clusters.<br />

LBW baby management is one <strong>of</strong> the major challenges to ensure proper care <strong>of</strong> neonatal health <strong>and</strong><br />

the programme def<strong>in</strong>ed the proper management <strong>of</strong> LBW baby through a) frequent breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>and</strong> b) proper wrapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> neonates. The 2010 survey revealed that <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, 4 <strong>of</strong> 10 women<br />

had proper knowledge <strong>of</strong> both aspects <strong>of</strong> LBW baby management; reflected no overall change<br />

from 2008 to 2010 with a surpris<strong>in</strong>g result <strong>of</strong> decreas<strong>in</strong>g knowledge on proper wrapp<strong>in</strong>g. In the<br />

other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, this value decreased due to a significant reduction <strong>in</strong> the<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> women report<strong>in</strong>g knowledge <strong>of</strong> frequent breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>g recommended for the<br />

LBW <strong>in</strong>fant (Fig. 5.1). This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g contrasts with the significantly <strong>in</strong>creased level <strong>of</strong> knowledge about<br />

frequent breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g amongst women <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (p=0.002) (Table 5.1.1). Overall decrease <strong>in</strong><br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> the management <strong>of</strong> LBW <strong>in</strong>fants was found <strong>in</strong> the control districts, reflect<strong>in</strong>g large<br />

deficits <strong>in</strong> awareness about proper care <strong>of</strong> such children.<br />

35


<strong>Neonatal</strong> health<br />

Figure 5.1. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> LBW baby management<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

Percentage<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

2008 2010 2008 2010 2008 2010<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Control<br />

Frequent breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Proper wrapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Table 5.1.1. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> essential neonatal care actions<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value<br />

N 539 383 1553 1091 1026 700<br />

Median no. <strong>of</strong> Known 3(0-5) 2(0-5)


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

5.1.2 Practices followed for essential newborn care<br />

Almost universal level <strong>of</strong> achievement was atta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> wip<strong>in</strong>g practice.<br />

Moreover, Almost 9 out <strong>of</strong> 10 respondents used sterile blade for ty<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> cutt<strong>in</strong>g cord, <strong>and</strong> 8 out <strong>of</strong><br />

10 <strong>in</strong>itiated breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> one hour <strong>of</strong> birth <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari. In Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, significant achievement was found <strong>in</strong> all five ENC actions. Three <strong>in</strong> 10 newborns<br />

received ENC from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>in</strong> 2008, which was found to be <strong>in</strong>creased to 7.<br />

Similar positive change had also been observed <strong>in</strong> other <strong>in</strong>tervention areas though not faster like<br />

pilot <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari. ENC provided by BRAC SS <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> home delivery covered<br />

60% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> 18% elsewhere (Table 5.1.2). The level <strong>of</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g all essential newborn care<br />

<strong>in</strong> Nilphamari rema<strong>in</strong>ed unchanged.<br />

In the other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts <strong>of</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, certa<strong>in</strong><br />

improvements were noted regard<strong>in</strong>g the ENC received, e.g. <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> one<br />

hour <strong>of</strong> birth (p


<strong>Neonatal</strong> health<br />

5.2 FEEDING OF THE NEWBORN AND INFANT<br />

5.2.1 Knowledge <strong>of</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g children aged up to 12 months<br />

Initiation <strong>of</strong> breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g as soon as possible after delivery, preferably with<strong>in</strong> the first hour <strong>of</strong> life is<br />

recommended. Across all the three survey areas, ≥75% <strong>of</strong> women was aware <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

early breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g. However, <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, a decrease <strong>in</strong> knowledge on this issue was noted<br />

counteracted by an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the belief that breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g should be <strong>in</strong>itiated after one hour postdelivery.<br />

Conversely, <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh significant progress <strong>in</strong> awareness<br />

about early breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g was noted compared to that reported <strong>in</strong> 2008 (Annex 2.3.1).<br />

As regards children be<strong>in</strong>g exclusively breast-fed for six months, significant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> knowledge on<br />

this issue was identified <strong>in</strong> all the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts <strong>in</strong> 2010, with approximately 92% <strong>of</strong> women <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari (p=0.001) <strong>and</strong> two-thirds <strong>of</strong> those <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh (p=0.004)<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g aware <strong>of</strong> this recommendation (Annex 2.3.1). Despite the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> knowledge <strong>in</strong> Rangpur,<br />

Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, the level <strong>of</strong> knowledge reported <strong>in</strong> those three areas was similar to<br />

that reported <strong>in</strong> the control districts.<br />

Similar knowledge levels were noted <strong>in</strong> 2010 across the three survey groups concern<strong>in</strong>g the time to<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiate complementary food, i.e. after six months, though no significant <strong>in</strong>creases were observed<br />

from that <strong>in</strong> 2008. Once aga<strong>in</strong>, more than 90% <strong>of</strong> the women surveyed <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari correctly<br />

reported that <strong>in</strong>fants should commence complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g once complet<strong>in</strong>g six months <strong>of</strong> life<br />

(Annex 2.3.1).<br />

5.2.2 Practices <strong>of</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g children aged up to 12 months<br />

Table 5.2.1 presents comprehensive data regard<strong>in</strong>g breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> wean<strong>in</strong>g food practices <strong>of</strong><br />

newborn <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants. In terms <strong>of</strong> the major f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>dicative <strong>of</strong> differences from 2008 to 2010, a<br />

significant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> colostrums immediately after birth was observed <strong>in</strong> Rangpur,<br />

Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh (p94% <strong>of</strong> the mothers <strong>in</strong> all the six districts surveyed.<br />

Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> the first hour <strong>of</strong> birth <strong>in</strong>creased significantly <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh (p


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Table 5.2.1. Feed<strong>in</strong>g practices <strong>of</strong> the newborn <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value<br />

N 539 383 1553 1091 1026 700<br />

Fed colostrums 95.4 94.8 .849 89.1 93.6


<strong>Neonatal</strong> health<br />

Approximately 1 <strong>in</strong> every 4 newborns had LBW <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari. This was the highest reported<br />

prevalence amongst the three survey areas. However, due to the absence <strong>of</strong> data for large numbers<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> the other survey areas, caution should be exercised when <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g this f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Rather than be<strong>in</strong>g suggestive <strong>of</strong> a disproportionately high level <strong>of</strong> LBW exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, one<br />

should consider the reported figure as a potentially valid estimation <strong>of</strong> this condition given the lack <strong>of</strong><br />

birth weight data <strong>in</strong> the other districts, especially <strong>in</strong> Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona (Table 5.3.1).<br />

Table 5.3.1. Measur<strong>in</strong>g birth weight <strong>of</strong> newborn<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value<br />

N 539 383 1153 1091 1026 700<br />

Weight taken after<br />

birth<br />

• With<strong>in</strong> 48 hrs 56.8 74.7


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

hair <strong>of</strong> the baby after one month (p=0.004) <strong>and</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> a ‘baby jacket’ though this practice was<br />

utilized <strong>in</strong> a very limited number <strong>of</strong> cases (Table 5.4.1).<br />

Table 5.4.1. Thermal care for normal <strong>and</strong> LBW babies<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value<br />

N (Normal weight 289 233 119 561 105 93<br />

baby)<br />

Thermal care for 54.7 59.7 .253 20.2 21.7 .703 32.4 28.0 .499<br />

normal weight baby 1<br />

• Wip<strong>in</strong>g baby with 97.9 100.0 .027 98.3 98.2 .939 100 94.6 .016<br />

clean dry cloth<br />

• Bath<strong>in</strong>g on or 85.5 78.1 .029 60.5 64.7 .386 80.0 69.9 .100<br />

after 3 days<br />

• Shav<strong>in</strong>g hair after 61.6 63.1 .726 29.4 27.6 .694 38.1 34.4 .590<br />

1 month<br />

N (LBW baby) 74 55 17 112 12 11<br />

Thermal care for LBW 25.7 29.1 .666 5.9 17.0 .239 8.3 9.1 .949<br />

baby 2<br />

• Wip<strong>in</strong>g 97.3 100.0 .219 100.0 93.8 .289 100.0 81.0 .122<br />

• Kangaroo mother 62.2 58.2 .647 58.8 72.3 .255 50.0 45.5 .827<br />

care/ Used baby<br />

jacket<br />

• Bath<strong>in</strong>g after 7 51.4 60.0 .329 35.3 43.8 .511 66.7 45.5 .305<br />

days<br />

• Shav<strong>in</strong>g hair after 62.2 85.5 .004 23.5 33.0 .433 25.0 54.5 .147<br />

1 month<br />

Special care for LBW 89.2 83.6 .356 82.4 73.2 .421 66.7 72.7 .752<br />

babies (Frequent<br />

breast feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong><br />

proper wrapp<strong>in</strong>g)<br />

• Frequent<br />

91.9 96.4 .298 82.4 79.5 .782 91.7 90.9 .949<br />

breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Proper wrapp<strong>in</strong>g 94.6 85.5 .077 94.1 89.3 .537 75.0 72.7 .901<br />

1<br />

Wip<strong>in</strong>g the baby, bath<strong>in</strong>g on or after 3 days, shav<strong>in</strong>g hair after 1 month<br />

2<br />

Wip<strong>in</strong>g the baby, kangaroo mother care, bath<strong>in</strong>g after 7 days, shav<strong>in</strong>g hair after 1 month<br />

5.5 NEWBORN ILLNESSES<br />

Birth asphyxia <strong>and</strong> neonatal sepsis dom<strong>in</strong>ate as the commonest cause <strong>of</strong> neonatal death; birth<br />

asphyxia accounts for 45% <strong>and</strong> sepsis causes 12% <strong>of</strong> all neonatal deaths (Chowdhury et al. 2010).<br />

The percentage <strong>of</strong> neonates fac<strong>in</strong>g breath<strong>in</strong>g difficulties (birth asphyxia) rema<strong>in</strong>ed similar <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> other three districts over the two-year period <strong>and</strong> was not higher than 10% (Fig. 5.3).<br />

Qualified doctors were found as the most popular care provider for birth asphyxia treatment <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari. The care-seek<strong>in</strong>g from qualified doctors <strong>in</strong>creased massively from 9.4% <strong>in</strong> 2008 to<br />

58.3% <strong>in</strong> 2010 <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (p


<strong>Neonatal</strong> health<br />

significant <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g sepsis (p


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

5.6 NEONATAL DANGER SIGNS<br />

The mothers who had birth outcome <strong>in</strong> the preced<strong>in</strong>g year <strong>in</strong>terviewed for neonatal danger signs.<br />

The eight danger signs were listed by the MNCH programme which are related to suck<strong>in</strong>g milk,<br />

hypothermia, chest <strong>in</strong>-draw<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong> eyes, unconsciousness/lethargic status <strong>of</strong> children,<br />

convulsion, umbilical <strong>in</strong>fection, <strong>and</strong> frequent vomit<strong>in</strong>g. The mothers were ranked accord<strong>in</strong>g to their<br />

responses; 3-5 responses were ranked as hav<strong>in</strong>g moderate knowledge while >5 responses were<br />

termed as good knowledge. The median number <strong>of</strong> knowledge the mothers had was 3 <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari, 2 <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh <strong>and</strong> 1 <strong>in</strong> control districts hav<strong>in</strong>g maximum 4.<br />

In Nilphamari 95% had the knowledge <strong>of</strong> go<strong>in</strong>g to hospital or referral places after fac<strong>in</strong>g those<br />

danger signs while this awareness was found among 70% elsewhere (Table 5.6.1).<br />

Fever <strong>and</strong> hypothermia were the mostly faced complications everywhere followed by chest <strong>in</strong>draw<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> them went to public or private facility for treatment (Annex 2.3.3).<br />

Table 5.6.1. Knowledge on neonatal danger signs<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

N - 383 - 1091 1026 700<br />

Knowledge on neonatal<br />

danger signs<br />

• None - 1.8 - 11.3 - 13.0<br />

• Poor (1-2) - 43.3 - 73.3 - 73.0<br />

• Moderate (3-5) - 54.8 - 15.4 - 14.0<br />

• Good (6-8) - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0<br />

Median knowledge on - 3 (0-4) - 2 (0-4) - 1 (0-4)<br />

neonatal danger signs<br />

N - 376 - 968 609<br />

Know what to do when<br />

danger signs identified<br />

• Know/have BRAC<br />

referral mobile<br />

number<br />

• Know to go to<br />

hospital/Referral<br />

place<br />

• Know to call BRAC<br />

SS/SK<br />

3.2 8.0 1.1<br />

94.9 70.2 61.2<br />

9.8 0.6 0.5<br />

43


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Chapter<br />

6<br />

<strong>Child</strong> health<br />

6.1 IMMUNIZATION OF CHILDREN<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to WHO criteria, children are considered completely immunized if they received one dose<br />

<strong>of</strong> BCG, three doses <strong>of</strong> DPT, three doses <strong>of</strong> polio vacc<strong>in</strong>e (exclud<strong>in</strong>g polio vacc<strong>in</strong>e given at birth),<br />

<strong>and</strong> one dose <strong>of</strong> measles vacc<strong>in</strong>e. In 2009, pentavalent, a comb<strong>in</strong>ed vacc<strong>in</strong>e dose conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g DPT,<br />

Hepatitis B <strong>and</strong> Pneumonia (Hib) vacc<strong>in</strong>es was <strong>in</strong>troduced; <strong>and</strong> therefore, considered accord<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

while calculat<strong>in</strong>g the coverage <strong>of</strong> DPT <strong>and</strong> also the complete vacc<strong>in</strong>ation status.<br />

6.1.1 Vacc<strong>in</strong>ation coverage<br />

Table 6.1.1 presents <strong>in</strong>formation on immunization status <strong>of</strong> the children aged 98%) were found to have received at least one vacc<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the three study areas<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2010 though lower levels <strong>of</strong> complete immunization existed <strong>in</strong> all the survey areas. Although no<br />

significant changes <strong>in</strong> complete vacc<strong>in</strong>ation coverage occurred with<strong>in</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the districts from the<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>e to midl<strong>in</strong>e surveys, important differences <strong>in</strong> coverage across the survey district sett<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

were noted <strong>in</strong> 2010. Nilphamari had the highest level <strong>of</strong> complete childhood immunization followed<br />

by the control <strong>and</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh districts (Fig. 6.1). Moreover, children <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari were more likely to be fully immunized compared to those from Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh (OR=1.9; 95% CI 1.3-2.9), <strong>and</strong> Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona (OR=1.8; 95% CI 1.2-2.8).<br />

Coverage was similar for each <strong>of</strong> the specific vacc<strong>in</strong>es across all <strong>of</strong> the districts, e.g. BCG hav<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

highest percentage among the five vacc<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> all three survey areas. Significant <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong><br />

Hepatitis B immunization coverage were identified for all districts, reach<strong>in</strong>g 96.3% (p


<strong>Child</strong> health<br />

Figure 6.1. Complete vacc<strong>in</strong>ation for children aged less than five years<br />

percentage<br />

90<br />

88<br />

86<br />

84<br />

82<br />

80<br />

78<br />

76<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur,<br />

Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

2008 2010<br />

Control<br />

Table 6.1.1. Vacc<strong>in</strong>ation, vitam<strong>in</strong> A supplementation <strong>and</strong> De-worm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> children 600 300 1800 900 1200 600<br />

12 –59 months<br />

<strong>Child</strong>ren with at least 99.2 98.0 .133 97.9 98.0 .923 98.3 98.7 .590<br />

one vacc<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Card available 71.8 73.0 .263 57.7 62.6 .048 62.8 65.5 .507<br />

<strong>Child</strong>ren with<br />

87.2 89.0 .429 81.7 80.9 .624 83.4 82.0 .451<br />

complete vacc<strong>in</strong>ation 1<br />

• BCG 98.2 97.7 .614 96.8 96.3 .495 96.9 97.3 .622<br />

• Polio3 94.5 95.3 .596 89.8 91.4 .167 91.9 89.0 .042<br />

• DPT3 94.2 95.7 .345 89.1 89.9 .567 91.3 88.5 .055<br />

• Hepatitis–B 76.5 96.3


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

6.2 ACUTE RESPIRATORY INFECTION (ARI)<br />

Interviewers asked mothers if their children suffered from acute respiratory <strong>in</strong>fection (ARI) with<strong>in</strong> three<br />

months before the survey. ARI is classified accord<strong>in</strong>g to the specific symptoms: ‘Cough <strong>and</strong> cold<br />

only’ is classified separately, ‘cough <strong>and</strong> cold accompanied with fast breath<strong>in</strong>g’ is termed as<br />

pneumonia, while ‘cough <strong>and</strong> cold accompanied with both fast breath<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> chest <strong>in</strong>-draw<strong>in</strong>g’ is<br />

termed as severe pneumonia. Symptoms such as be<strong>in</strong>g unable to eat, experienc<strong>in</strong>g convulsions,<br />

dizz<strong>in</strong>ess, breath<strong>in</strong>g problems, exhibit<strong>in</strong>g wheez<strong>in</strong>g sounds when breath<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g fever/<br />

hypothermia are examples <strong>of</strong> very severe diseases.<br />

6.2.1 Prevalence <strong>of</strong> ARI<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce ARI is even more deadly for young children, the prevalence <strong>and</strong> management were presented<br />

separately for children aged


<strong>Child</strong> health<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention areas (p


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

group, it is hard to comment on the changes that occurred over the two-year period between<br />

surveys. However, notable <strong>in</strong>crease was observed <strong>in</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g treatment from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers for<br />

severe pneumonia <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh where an <strong>in</strong>crease from 33 to 84%<br />

observed (Annex 2.4.1).<br />

As regards the treatment <strong>of</strong> pneumonia <strong>in</strong><br />

older children, aged 2 to 59 months, the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> cases were managed by nonmedical<br />

persons <strong>in</strong> both the <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />

<strong>and</strong> control districts (Annex 2.4.1). Medically<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider was found to be <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

<strong>in</strong> all the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas but not <strong>in</strong> the<br />

control areas where it was actually reduced<br />

(Fig. 6.4). At basel<strong>in</strong>e, 21% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pneumonia affected children was treated by<br />

medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>in</strong> Rangpur,<br />

Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, by the end <strong>of</strong><br />

2010 which was reached to 23%. However,<br />

most dramatic <strong>in</strong>crease was observed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention areas <strong>of</strong> Nilphamari where<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>e percentage <strong>of</strong> 18 was raised up to<br />

30% over a 2-year period (Fig. 6.4).<br />

Figure 6.4. Management <strong>of</strong> pneumonia<br />

(aged 2-59 months)<br />

Percentage<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

2008 2010<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Control<br />

The percentages <strong>of</strong> children with severe pneumonia managed by medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers were<br />

found to be greater than that for pneumonia across all the surveyed areas. Despite this, nonmedically<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed persons dom<strong>in</strong>ate the<br />

care for severe pneumonia cases <strong>in</strong> all the<br />

districts (Annex 2.4.1). Be<strong>in</strong>g treated for<br />

severe pneumonia by medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

personnel was highest <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari. As<br />

such a child was twice as likely to be<br />

treated by a tra<strong>in</strong>ed person <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari<br />

compared to other <strong>in</strong>tervention districts<br />

decreased <strong>in</strong> both the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas <strong>of</strong><br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh <strong>and</strong><br />

the control areas <strong>of</strong> Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona. Nevertheless, the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

children with severe pneumonia <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari was found to be <strong>in</strong>creased from<br />

36 to 45% over the study period (Fig. 6.5).<br />

6.3 CHILDHOOD DIARRHOEA<br />

Figure 6.5. Management <strong>of</strong> severe<br />

pneumonia (aged 2-59 months)<br />

Percentage<br />

After <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g oral rehydration solution (ORS) <strong>and</strong> recent <strong>in</strong>vention <strong>of</strong> Z<strong>in</strong>c <strong>in</strong> diarrhoea treatment<br />

throughout the country <strong>in</strong> a large scale, diarrhoea prevalence has reduced considerably <strong>in</strong><br />

Bangladesh. Nonetheless, approximately 5% <strong>of</strong> child deaths <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh are still attributable to<br />

diarrhoea. This section provides <strong>in</strong>formation about the prevalence <strong>and</strong> management <strong>of</strong> childhood<br />

diarrhoea.<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

2008 2010<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Control<br />

49


<strong>Child</strong> health<br />

6.3.1 Prevalence <strong>and</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g diarrhoea<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the 2010 survey, the mothers were asked if their under-5 children suffered from diarrhoea <strong>in</strong><br />

the preced<strong>in</strong>g three months. Annex 2.4.2 presents the prevalence <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea <strong>and</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

diarrhoea. Even if the prevalence was found to be rema<strong>in</strong>ed unchanged over the two years <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari, a significant decrease (p


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

6.3.2 Treatment <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea<br />

An <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the percentage <strong>of</strong> children received treatment for diarrhoea occurred between 2008<br />

<strong>and</strong> 2010 across all study areas. The <strong>in</strong>crease to 95.7% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari was statistically significant<br />

(p=0.04) while substantial <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> the other districts also identified. Overall, it was reported that<br />

approximately 9 out <strong>of</strong> every 10 children with diarrhoea received treatment (Table 6.3.1).<br />

Treatment provision from a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider was found to have been greater <strong>in</strong> the control districts<br />

compared to <strong>in</strong>tervention areas. One-third <strong>of</strong> young children with diarrhoea <strong>in</strong> Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona received treatment from personnel tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the management <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea whereas one<br />

<strong>in</strong> every five children <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts received such treatment. A similar differential was<br />

identified regard<strong>in</strong>g treatment from a medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider across the districts. F<strong>in</strong>ally, very few<br />

children with diarrhoea were treated by BRAC SS/SK <strong>in</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the sett<strong>in</strong>gs. This is also conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that more people were seek<strong>in</strong>g treatment from a medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider over time. The<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> children received treatment from medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers <strong>in</strong>creased from 16 to<br />

18% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>in</strong> two years. Aga<strong>in</strong>st a decrease <strong>in</strong> control areas, the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas <strong>of</strong><br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh experienced a little <strong>in</strong>crease (Table 6.3.1).<br />

Table 6.3.1. Information on treatment <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value<br />

N 153 93 493 228 217 190<br />

Treatment received 88.2 95.7 .047 88.8 93.0 .083 83.9 88.9 .138<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g diarrhoea<br />

Treatment received 15.6 18.0 .633 19.2 20.8 .636 27.5 26.6 .859<br />

provider 1<br />

from medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

Treatment received 25.9 20.2 .326 21.0 21.2 .948 34.1 33.1 .854<br />

from tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider 2<br />

Treatment received<br />

from BRAC SS/SK<br />

0.7 2.2 .337 0.2 0.0 .486 0.5 0.6 .958<br />

1<br />

Qualified doctor, nurse<br />

2<br />

Qualified doctor, nurse, FWV, FWA, MA/SACMO, BRAC SS/SK<br />

6.4 PREVALENCE AND MANAGEMENT OF ILLNESSES OTHER THAN ARI AND<br />

DIARRHOEA<br />

Due to the <strong>in</strong>creased prevalence <strong>of</strong> fever reported <strong>in</strong> 2010, the percentage <strong>of</strong> the children


<strong>Child</strong> health<br />

Table 6.4.1. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> other illnesses among children aged 0-59 months<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value<br />

<strong>Child</strong>ren aged 0-59 1111 674 3284 1946 2184 1276<br />

months<br />

<strong>Child</strong>ren suffered 37.1 80.4


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Chapter<br />

7<br />

Factors associated with outcomes<br />

7.1 FACTORS SELECTED FOR ANALYSIS<br />

In this chapter, the results that are presented deal with the analysis undertaken to identify which<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent variables were associated with key <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>of</strong> maternal, newborn <strong>and</strong> under-5 care.<br />

In the first <strong>in</strong>stance the results are based on univariate analysis, conducted by means <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong><br />

chi-square tests for <strong>in</strong>dependence. The list <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent variables (reference category) that were<br />

taken <strong>in</strong>to account for the chi-square tests were:<br />

• Literacy status <strong>of</strong> the mother (Can’t read <strong>and</strong> write)<br />

• Literacy status <strong>of</strong> her husb<strong>and</strong> (Can’t read <strong>and</strong> write)<br />

• Educational level achieved by the mother (No education or primary <strong>in</strong>complete)<br />

• Educational level achieved by her husb<strong>and</strong> (No education or primary <strong>in</strong>complete)<br />

• The amount <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> owned by the family (No l<strong>and</strong>)<br />

• Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex status (The poorest)<br />

• BRAC eligibility (Not eligible)<br />

• Age <strong>of</strong> the mother at first marriage (≤ 17 years)<br />

• Age <strong>of</strong> the mother when first conceiv<strong>in</strong>g (≤ 19 years)<br />

• Parity (Primiparous)<br />

• Hav<strong>in</strong>g received at least four antenatal care actions from tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider dur<strong>in</strong>g last pregnancy<br />

(No)<br />

• Hav<strong>in</strong>g one (or more) <strong>of</strong> the mother’s children die (No child death)<br />

The aforementioned variables were analyzed for their association with twelve key outcome<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators. The detailed results are presented <strong>in</strong> tables found <strong>in</strong> Annex 3.1 – Annex 3.12. The<br />

narrative provided highlights the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the univariate analysis, show<strong>in</strong>g which <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

variables are associated with the specific outcome <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest. The analysis was<br />

undertaken on a district-specific basis on the 2010 data only, so as to reflect the present day<br />

situation <strong>and</strong> possibly impact <strong>of</strong> the maternal-child health <strong>in</strong>terventions provided.<br />

7.1.1 Receiv<strong>in</strong>g four or more ANC actions from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the univariate analyses performed, the educational level achieved by the<br />

women was the only <strong>in</strong>dependent covariate to be significantly positively associated with receiv<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

least four ANC services from the tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari district. The mother <strong>and</strong> her<br />

husb<strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g literate, the educational level achieved by each <strong>of</strong> them <strong>and</strong> one’s position on the<br />

wealth <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>in</strong>dicator were significantly associated with receiv<strong>in</strong>g four or more ANC services from a<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>in</strong> the other <strong>in</strong>tervention districts. All accounted key <strong>in</strong>dicators except age at first<br />

53


Factors associated with outcomes<br />

conception were found to be highly significantly associated with go<strong>in</strong>g for at least four antenatal<br />

visits to a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>in</strong> the two control districts (Annex 3.1).<br />

However, upon carry<strong>in</strong>g out logistic regression model<strong>in</strong>g for receiv<strong>in</strong>g 4 or more ANCs, by district(s),<br />

very few variables were found to be <strong>in</strong>dependently associated with this outcome when controll<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

other variables. In Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> three other <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, a higher level <strong>of</strong> educational<br />

achievement <strong>of</strong> the respondent’s husb<strong>and</strong> was found to be the only covariate to be positively<br />

associated with receiv<strong>in</strong>g 4+ ANCs. In the two control districts, the mothers who are literate <strong>and</strong><br />

who belong to the fourth <strong>and</strong> richest wealth qu<strong>in</strong>tile were found to be significantly positively<br />

associated with receiv<strong>in</strong>g 4+ ANCs (Table 7.1.1).<br />

Table 7.1.1. Multivariate logistic regression results for receiv<strong>in</strong>g 4+ ANCs from tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

providers<br />

Associated factors<br />

Mother’s Literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong><br />

write<br />

p-<br />

value<br />

4+ANCs received from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

OR (95% CI ) p- OR (95% CI) p- OR (95% CI)<br />

value<br />

value<br />

– – – – .000 2.52 (1.51 – 4.19)<br />

Mother’s education<br />

• Primary or higher .019 2.19 (1.14 – 4.21) .000 1.6 (1.23 – 2.06) – –<br />

Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

• Second – – – – .099 1.93 (.88 – 4.23)<br />

• Middle – – – – .161 1.75 (.80 – 3.84)<br />

• Fourth – – – – .000 3.81 (1.86 – 7.8)<br />

• Richest – – – – .000 4.66 (2.26 – 9.58)<br />

7.1.2 Safe delivery (delivery by tra<strong>in</strong>ed birth attendant)<br />

The mother <strong>and</strong> her husb<strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g literate, the educational level achieved by each <strong>of</strong> them <strong>and</strong> the<br />

mother hav<strong>in</strong>g received at least four ANC sessions from a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider were significantly<br />

associated with undergo<strong>in</strong>g safe delivery. These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were identified <strong>in</strong> all three <strong>of</strong> the survey<br />

areas (Annex 3.2).<br />

Primiparity was also shown to be associated with safe delivery, most especially <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari where<br />

the vast majority <strong>of</strong> primiparous women (85.8%) were attended by a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider as compared<br />

to approximately two-thirds <strong>of</strong> multiparous women <strong>in</strong> that district <strong>in</strong> 2010. Marriage <strong>of</strong> the mother at<br />

18 years <strong>of</strong> age or older was also associated with a safe delivery <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> the two control<br />

districts. Women liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the control districts <strong>of</strong> Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona who were >19 years at first<br />

conception were more likely to have a safe delivery compared to their younger counterparts.<br />

However, this was not shown to be the case <strong>in</strong> the other <strong>in</strong>tervention districts (Annex 3.2).<br />

A statistically significant higher percentage <strong>of</strong> women who were not eligible for BRAC programmes<br />

underwent a safe delivery <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh <strong>and</strong> the two control districts<br />

compared to those who were eligible. However, this was not the case <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari where it was<br />

found that similar percentages <strong>of</strong> BRAC eligible (74.2%) <strong>and</strong> non-eligible (73.8%) women accessed<br />

safe delivery. In fact, the highest level <strong>of</strong> safe delivery was reported <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (74%) compared to<br />

other two sett<strong>in</strong>gs, even when compared to those who were not BRAC eligible from the other<br />

districts surveyed (Annex 3.2).<br />

54


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Similarly, safe delivery was associated with be<strong>in</strong>g relatively wealthier as <strong>in</strong>dicated by a) the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

l<strong>and</strong> owned <strong>and</strong> b) one’s position on the wealth <strong>in</strong>dex. The l<strong>in</strong>k between safe delivery <strong>and</strong> greater<br />

wealth was identified <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh districts <strong>and</strong> the control districts<br />

though not <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, where<strong>in</strong> neither the amount <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> owned nor one’s wealth <strong>in</strong>dex position<br />

were predictors <strong>of</strong> safe delivery, based on the univariate analyses performed.<br />

In summary, several predictor variables were shown to be associated with delivery attended by a<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>in</strong> all or most <strong>of</strong> the districts, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the univariate analyses<br />

performed (Annex 3.2).<br />

However, upon carry<strong>in</strong>g out logistic regression for safe delivery, by district(s), very few variables were<br />

found to be <strong>in</strong>dependently associated with this outcome when controll<strong>in</strong>g for other variables (Table<br />

7.1.2). In the case <strong>of</strong> Nilphamari, a higher level <strong>of</strong> educational achievement <strong>of</strong> the husb<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

primiparous status <strong>of</strong> the mother were significantly associated with undergo<strong>in</strong>g safe delivery. For<br />

other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, literacy status <strong>of</strong> the mother, educational achievement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

husb<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g received at least four ANC actions from a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider were associated with<br />

safe delivery. In the two control districts, not be<strong>in</strong>g eligible for BRAC, be<strong>in</strong>g aged 18 years or older<br />

when the woman was married <strong>and</strong> the educational achievement <strong>of</strong> the husb<strong>and</strong> were <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

variables associated with be<strong>in</strong>g attended by a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider at the last delivery.<br />

Table 7.1.2. Multivariate logistic regression results for safe delivery<br />

Associated factors<br />

Mother’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong><br />

write<br />

p-<br />

value<br />

Nilphamari<br />

OR (95% CI ) p-<br />

value<br />

Safe delivery<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

OR (95% CI) p-<br />

value<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

OR (95% CI)<br />

– – .02 1.39 (1.06 – 1.82) – –<br />

Mother’s education<br />

• Primary or higher .001 2.38 (1.46 – 3.93) .009 1.43 (1.09 – 1.87) .012 1.49 (1.09 – 2.04)<br />

BRAC eligibility<br />

• Eligible – – – – .001 .60 (.44 - .82)<br />

Age at first marriage<br />

• > 17 years – – – – .011 1.63 (1.12 – 2.38)<br />

Parity<br />

• Multiparous .004 .420 (.24 - .76) – – – –<br />

4+ ANCs by tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

provider<br />

• Yes – – .000 1.78 (1.38 – 2.30) – –<br />

7.1.3 Receiv<strong>in</strong>g PNC from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the univariate analyses performed, no covariate was found to be<br />

significantly associated with receiv<strong>in</strong>g PNC from a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (Annex 3.3).<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, the husb<strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g literate, the educational<br />

level achieved by both the mother <strong>and</strong> her spouse <strong>and</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> owned were all<br />

significantly associated with undergo<strong>in</strong>g PNC from a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider. In the control districts, all<br />

covariates were highly significantly associated with PNC seek<strong>in</strong>g from tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider with the<br />

exception <strong>of</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g four or more ANC practices from a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider (Annex 3.3).<br />

55


Factors associated with outcomes<br />

Carry<strong>in</strong>g out multiple logistic regression for seek<strong>in</strong>g PNC, it was found that higher educational level<br />

<strong>of</strong> the husb<strong>and</strong>, multiparity, <strong>and</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g received at least four ANCs from tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider were<br />

significantly associated with seek<strong>in</strong>g PNC from tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (Table 7.1.3). In the<br />

other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, hav<strong>in</strong>g received at least four ANC services from a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider<br />

was the only significant covariate. In the two control districts, mother’s literacy, experienc<strong>in</strong>g first<br />

conception after the age <strong>of</strong> 19, <strong>and</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g four or more ANC visits from a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider were<br />

significantly positively associated with receiv<strong>in</strong>g PNC from tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider whereas multiparity was<br />

negatively associated.<br />

Table 7.1.3. Multivariate logistic regression results for receiv<strong>in</strong>g PNC from tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

providers<br />

Associated factors<br />

Mothers literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong><br />

write<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s<br />

education<br />

• Primary or<br />

Receiv<strong>in</strong>g postnatal care from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

p-value OR (95% CI ) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI)<br />

– – – – .007 1.82 (1.17 – 2.81)<br />

.011 3.25 (1.32 – 1.03) – – – –<br />

higher<br />

Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

• Second – – – – .055 1.82 (.99 – 3.35)<br />

• Middle – – – – .010 2.21 (1.21 – 4.02)<br />

• Fourth – – – – .643 1.16 (.61 – 2.22)<br />

• Richest – – – – .000 6.52 (3.54 – 12.0)<br />

Age at first<br />

conception<br />

• > 19 years – – – – .019 1.75 (1.10 – 2.80)<br />

Parity<br />

• Multiparous .045 2.31 (1.02 – 5.23) – – .008 .59 (.40 - .87)<br />

4+ ANCs by<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider<br />

• Yes .020 3.09 (1.19 – 8.02) .000 4.23 (3.24 – 5.53) .001 2.13 (1.35 – 3.36)<br />

7.1.4 Treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g from medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers for delivery complication(s)<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the univariate analyses performed, receiv<strong>in</strong>g four or more ANCs from a<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider was found to be the only <strong>in</strong>dependent covariate to be significantly associated with<br />

seek<strong>in</strong>g care from a medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (Annex 3.4). There were no differences<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to other characteristics <strong>of</strong> the mother <strong>and</strong> her husb<strong>and</strong> which <strong>in</strong>fluenced hav<strong>in</strong>g sought<br />

treatment for a delivery complication <strong>in</strong> the district.<br />

However, <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, all the key variables, exclud<strong>in</strong>g any<br />

‘child death ever’, were significantly associated with treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour for delivery<br />

complication. Similar results were found <strong>in</strong> the two control districts though age at first conception<br />

was found not to be associated with such treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour (Annex 3.4).<br />

Carry<strong>in</strong>g out logistic regression for treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour for delivery complications(s), it was<br />

found <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari that be<strong>in</strong>g married at 18 years <strong>of</strong> age or older has a positive association with<br />

care-seek<strong>in</strong>g for a delivery complication (Table 7.1.4). Conversely, receiv<strong>in</strong>g four or more ANCs from<br />

a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider was negatively associated with care-seek<strong>in</strong>g for delivery complication <strong>in</strong> this<br />

56


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

district. In the case <strong>of</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh districts, a higher level <strong>of</strong> education <strong>of</strong><br />

the husb<strong>and</strong>, be<strong>in</strong>g older when the woman is married <strong>and</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g received at least four ANC visits by<br />

a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider were statistically positively associated with care-seek<strong>in</strong>g from medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

provider for delivery complications. In the two control districts, a higher level <strong>of</strong> education <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mother, hav<strong>in</strong>g relatively better economic conditions (second, middle, fourth <strong>and</strong> richest wealth<br />

qu<strong>in</strong>tile status) <strong>and</strong> four or more ANC visits from a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider were significantly positively<br />

associated with care-seek<strong>in</strong>g from medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider for delivery complications (Table 7.1.4).<br />

Table 7.1.4. Multivariate logistic regression results for treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g from medically<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers for delivery complication(s)<br />

Treatment seek<strong>in</strong>g from medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers for delivery complication(s)<br />

Associated factors Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

p- OR (95% CI ) p- OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI)<br />

value<br />

value<br />

Mother’s education .038 1.66 (1.03 – 2.67)<br />

• Primary or – – – –<br />

higher<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s<br />

education<br />

Primary or – – .014 1.69 (1.15 – 2.58) – –<br />

higher<br />

Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

• Second – – – – .097 1.84 (0.89 – 3.76)<br />

• Middle – – – – .041 2.08 (1.03 – 4.18)<br />

• Fourth – – – – .034 2.2 4.63)<br />

• Richest – – – – .000 5.58 (2.7 – 11.4)<br />

Age at first<br />

marriage<br />

• > 17 years .038 2.47 (1.05 – 5.82) .013 1.80 (1.13 – 2.85) – –<br />

4+ ANC by tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

provider<br />

• Yes .007 0.11(.02 - .55) .040 1.55 (1.02 – 2.34) .007 2.08 (1.22 – 3.52)<br />

7.1.5 Use <strong>of</strong> modern family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods<br />

The age <strong>of</strong> respondents <strong>and</strong> wealth <strong>in</strong>dex were the two covariates found to be significantly<br />

associated with us<strong>in</strong>g modern family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (Annex 3.5). In Rangpur,<br />

Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, the mothers be<strong>in</strong>g literate, <strong>of</strong> a higher level <strong>of</strong> education, own<strong>in</strong>g more<br />

l<strong>and</strong>, not be<strong>in</strong>g eligible for BRAC membership, be<strong>in</strong>g wealthier, younger at first conception, <strong>and</strong> not<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g experienced a child death were significantly associated with us<strong>in</strong>g modern FP methods.<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g the control districts, the maternal age group, the mothers be<strong>in</strong>g literate, the couple both<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a higher educational level, be<strong>in</strong>g relatively wealthier, younger at first hav<strong>in</strong>g conception, <strong>and</strong><br />

had one or more child died were significantly associated with the use <strong>of</strong> modern contraception<br />

(Annex 3.5).<br />

Carry<strong>in</strong>g out multiple logistic regressions for us<strong>in</strong>g modern FP methods, we found no variable to be<br />

associated with this outcome amongst mothers <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (Table 7.1.5). In Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, be<strong>in</strong>g relatively older (20-34 years or 35 years or older) was positively associated<br />

with the use <strong>of</strong> modern FP methods. Wealth status was also significantly associated as those who<br />

were wealthier were more likely to use modern FP methods. Be<strong>in</strong>g younger (≤20 years), be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

younger when first conceived, <strong>and</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g had one (or more) child died were negatively associated<br />

with the use <strong>of</strong> modern family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods <strong>in</strong> these three districts. In the two control districts,<br />

57


Factors associated with outcomes<br />

the age group <strong>of</strong> 20-34 years <strong>and</strong> ≥35 years, BRAC eligible, <strong>and</strong> the higher wealth qu<strong>in</strong>tiles were<br />

significantly positively associated with the use <strong>of</strong> modern FP methods (Table 7.1.5). Age at first<br />

conception, multiparity, <strong>and</strong> one or more child deaths were negatively associated with the use <strong>of</strong><br />

modern family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods.<br />

Table 7.1.5. Multivariate logistic regression results for the use <strong>of</strong> modern FP methods<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> modern family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods<br />

Associated<br />

factors<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

p-value OR (95% CI ) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI)<br />

Age group<br />

• 20 – 34 years – – .009 1.39 (1.09 – 1.77) .000 2.21 (1.56 – 3.13)<br />

• ≥ 35 years – – .004 1.77 (1.21 – 2.6) .001 2.56 (1.47 – 4.48)<br />

BRAC eligibility<br />

• Yes – – – – .035 1.29 (1.02 – 1.65)<br />

Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

• Second – – .632 1.07 (.81 – 1.41) .030 1.44 (1.04 – 1.99)<br />

• Middle – – .014 1.41 (1.07 – 1.86) .029 1.47 (1.04 – 2.04)<br />

• Fourth – – .021 1.39 (1.05 – 1.83) .000 1.94 (1.37 – 2.74)<br />

• Richest – – .000 1.90 (1.42 – 2.53) .001 1.87 (1.29 - )<br />

Age at<br />

conception<br />

• > 19 – – .000 .59 (.47 - .75) .000 .48 (.36 - .65)<br />

Parity<br />

• Multiparous – – – – .012 .69 (.51 - .92)<br />

<strong>Child</strong> death<br />

• One or more – – .001 .68 (.54 - .85) .013 .68 (.50 - .92)<br />

7.1.6 Use <strong>of</strong> modern family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods among married adolescent girls<br />

In all the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, not hav<strong>in</strong>g experienced a child death was associated with the use <strong>of</strong><br />

modern family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods among married adolescent girls (Annex 3.6). Furthermore, <strong>in</strong><br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, the mothers hav<strong>in</strong>g primary or higher education <strong>and</strong> the<br />

husb<strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g literate were associated with the use <strong>of</strong> modern family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods among<br />

married adolescent girls. However, no particular covariate was found to be related with this <strong>in</strong>dicator<br />

<strong>in</strong> the two control districts.<br />

Carry<strong>in</strong>g out multiple logistic regression for us<strong>in</strong>g modern FP methods among married adolescent<br />

girls revealed that the respondents who had one or more children died were less likely to use<br />

modern contraceptives <strong>in</strong> both <strong>in</strong>tervention areas (Table 7.1.6). However, no particular variable was<br />

found to be significant <strong>in</strong> the control districts.<br />

Table 7.1.6. Multivariate logistic regression results for the use <strong>of</strong> modern contraceptives<br />

among married adolescent girls<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> modern contraceptives among married adolescent girls<br />

Associated factors Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

p-value OR (95% CI ) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI)<br />

<strong>Child</strong> death<br />

• One or more .010 .13 (.03 - .62) .009 .32 (.14 - .75) – –<br />

58


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

7.1.7 Hav<strong>in</strong>g all birth plans<br />

In the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, the literacy <strong>and</strong> educational level achieved for both the mother <strong>and</strong> her<br />

husb<strong>and</strong> were significantly associated with hav<strong>in</strong>g all three birth plans. As well lack <strong>of</strong> BRAC<br />

eligibility, the position on the wealth <strong>in</strong>dex, <strong>and</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g four or more ANC visits from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

were associated with this outcome. In Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona, maternal education <strong>and</strong> literacy<br />

status, not be<strong>in</strong>g eligible for BRAC, <strong>and</strong> wealth <strong>in</strong>dex were related to hav<strong>in</strong>g birth plans (Annex 3.7).<br />

The multiple logistic regression <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari shows that a mother hav<strong>in</strong>g a literate husb<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong><br />

received four or more ANC services from a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider was more likely to have made all three<br />

birth plans before delivery (Table 7.1.7). The l<strong>in</strong>k between hav<strong>in</strong>g the birth preparations <strong>in</strong> place <strong>and</strong><br />

greater wealth (as <strong>in</strong>dicated by one’s position on the wealth <strong>in</strong>dex) was also identified as be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

significant <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh. Complete birth preparation was also<br />

associated with mothers hav<strong>in</strong>g a higher level <strong>of</strong> education, <strong>and</strong> received at least 4 ANCs from a<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>in</strong> these <strong>in</strong>tervention areas. However, <strong>in</strong> the two control districts, mothers’ hav<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

higher level <strong>of</strong> education was the only covariate found to be significantly associated with birth<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Table 7.1.7. Multivariate logistic regression results for hav<strong>in</strong>g all birth plans<br />

Associated<br />

factors<br />

Mother’s<br />

education<br />

• Primary or<br />

higher<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s<br />

literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong><br />

p-<br />

value<br />

Nilphamari<br />

OR (95% CI ) p-<br />

value<br />

Hav<strong>in</strong>g all birth plans<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

OR (95% CI) p-<br />

value<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

OR (95% CI)<br />

– – .003 1.54 (1.16 – 2.03) .001 1.69 (1.23 – 2.33)<br />

.011 1.93 (1.16 – 3.23) – – – –<br />

write<br />

Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

• Second – – .051 1.48 (1.0 – 2.18) – –<br />

• Middle – – .054 1.50 (1.0 – 2.25) – –<br />

• Fourth – – .000 2.74 (1.75 – 4.30) – –<br />

• Richest – – .001 2.27 (1.40 – 3.68) – –<br />

Received 4+ ANC<br />

from tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

provider<br />

• Yes .000 6.98 (3.51 – 13.91) .000 2.93 (2.25 – 3.83) – –<br />

7.1.8 Received all essential newborn care actions<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the univariate analyses performed, parity was the only factor associated<br />

with receiv<strong>in</strong>g all five essential newborn care actions <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (Annex 3.8). The mother <strong>and</strong> her<br />

husb<strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g literate, the educational level achieved by each <strong>of</strong> them, be<strong>in</strong>g relatively wealthier as<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated by a) the amount <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> owned <strong>and</strong> b) one’s position on the wealth <strong>in</strong>dex, age at first<br />

conception, hav<strong>in</strong>g child death, <strong>and</strong> the mother received at least four ANC sessions from a tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

provider were significantly associated with receiv<strong>in</strong>g all five ENC actions <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh. The husb<strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g literate, the educational level achieved, <strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g older when first<br />

conceived were found to be associated for the control districts.<br />

59


Factors associated with outcomes<br />

However, carry<strong>in</strong>g out multiple logistic regressions for ENC practices revealed that be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

primiparous was associated with ENC <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (Table 7.1.8). Higher education level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mother, first conception after the age <strong>of</strong> 19, <strong>and</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g four or more ANCs from a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider<br />

were positively associated with ENC <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh. Hav<strong>in</strong>g more l<strong>and</strong><br />

was negatively associated with receiv<strong>in</strong>g all 5 ENCs <strong>in</strong> these districts. In the control districts, the<br />

husb<strong>and</strong>’s educational level <strong>and</strong> delayed first conception after 18 years were associated with ENC.<br />

Table 7.1.8. Multivariate logistic regression results for the practices <strong>of</strong> ENC<br />

Associated factors<br />

p-<br />

value<br />

Received all essential newborn care actions<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona<br />

OR (95% CI ) p-<br />

value<br />

OR (95% CI) p-<br />

value<br />

(Control)<br />

OR (95% CI)<br />

Mother’s education<br />

• Primary or higher – – .000 1.68 (1.31 – 2.17) – –<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s education<br />

• Primary or higher – – – – .000 1.75 (1.28 – 2.39)<br />

Amount <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong><br />

• 1- 50 decimals – – .008 .59 (.40 - .87) – –<br />

• > 50 decimals – – .002 .49 (.31 - .77) – –<br />

Age at first conception<br />

• > 19 years – – .008 1.53 (1.12 – 2.09) .022 .61 (.40 - .93)<br />

Parity<br />

• Multiparous 0.025 .60 (.39 - .94) – – – –<br />

Sought 4+ ANCs from<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider<br />

Yes – – .000 1.73 (1.33 – 2.24) – –<br />

7.1.9 Management <strong>of</strong> birth asphyxia by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Birth asphyxia be<strong>in</strong>g managed by a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider was not found to be significantly associated<br />

with any <strong>in</strong>dependent variable <strong>in</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts. In the two control areas, mother’s<br />

literacy, the husb<strong>and</strong>’s level <strong>of</strong> education, parity, wealth <strong>in</strong>dex status, <strong>and</strong> a history <strong>of</strong> child death<br />

were significantly associated with management <strong>of</strong> birth asphyxia by tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider (Annex 3.9).<br />

As regards management <strong>of</strong> birth asphyxia by a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider, primiparous women were more<br />

likely to have management <strong>of</strong> birth asphyxia provided by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers <strong>in</strong> the control areas (Table<br />

7.1.9).<br />

Table 7.1.9. Multivariate logistic regression results for the management <strong>of</strong> birth asphyxia<br />

by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Associated<br />

factors<br />

Management <strong>of</strong> birth asphyxia by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

p-value OR (95% CI ) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI)<br />

Parity<br />

• Multiparous – – – – .009 .28 (.11 - .72)<br />

60


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

7.1.10 Management <strong>of</strong> neonatal sepsis by qualified doctors<br />

No covariate was found to be significantly associated with neonatal sepsis management <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari. The husb<strong>and</strong>’s level <strong>of</strong> education was the only variable associated with sepsis<br />

management by qualified doctors <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh. In the control districts,<br />

literacy <strong>and</strong> higher educational achievement for both the mother <strong>and</strong> her husb<strong>and</strong> were associated<br />

with neonatal sepsis management be<strong>in</strong>g provided by a qualified doctor. Likewise management <strong>of</strong><br />

neonatal sepsis was associated with be<strong>in</strong>g relatively wealthier as <strong>in</strong>dicated by a) the amount <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong><br />

owned <strong>and</strong> b) one’s position on the wealth <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>in</strong> the control districts (Annex 3.10).<br />

No <strong>in</strong>dependent covariates were identified for management <strong>of</strong> neonatal sepsis by a qualified doctor<br />

upon carry<strong>in</strong>g out multiple logistic regression <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas. However, <strong>in</strong> the control<br />

districts, optimal newborn sepsis management was more likely when the husb<strong>and</strong> had higher level<br />

<strong>of</strong> education though hav<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>termediate amount <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> (1 to 50 decimals) was negatively<br />

associated with obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g this level <strong>of</strong> care <strong>in</strong> those two districts (Table 7.1.10).<br />

Table 7.1.10. Multivariate logistic regression results for the management <strong>of</strong> neonatal<br />

sepsis by qualified doctors<br />

Management <strong>of</strong> neonatal sepsis by qualified doctors<br />

Associated factors Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

p-value OR (95% CI ) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI)<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s education<br />

• Primary or higher – – – – .003 4.10 (1.64 – 10.26)<br />

Amount <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong><br />

• 1- 50 decimals – – – – .023 .12 (.02 - .74)<br />

7.1.11 Management <strong>of</strong> ARI by medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

The educational level achieved by the respondent’s husb<strong>and</strong>s was significantly associated with<br />

treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour for the management <strong>of</strong> ARI <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (Annex 3.11). The<br />

respondents, whose husb<strong>and</strong>s are more educated, were supposed to go for a medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

provider to seek treatment if her baby had faced ARI. In Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, no<br />

covariate was found to be <strong>in</strong>dependently significant with seek<strong>in</strong>g treatment from medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

provider for the management <strong>of</strong> ARI.<br />

The mother <strong>and</strong> her husb<strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g literate <strong>and</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g higher level <strong>of</strong> education, not be<strong>in</strong>g eligible for<br />

BRAC, <strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g relatively wealthier as <strong>in</strong>dicated by a) the amount <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> owned <strong>and</strong> b) one’s<br />

position on the wealth <strong>in</strong>dex were found to be significantly associated with the ARI management by<br />

medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>in</strong> the two control areas (Annex 3.11).<br />

Multiple logistic regression revealed that the respondent’s husb<strong>and</strong>s be<strong>in</strong>g literate was associated<br />

for the management <strong>of</strong> ARI <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (Table 7.1.11). In the control districts, obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g adequate<br />

ARI management was associated with mothers’ literacy <strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the richest wealth status<br />

category.<br />

61


Factors associated with outcomes<br />

Table 7.1.11. Multivariate logistic regression results for the management <strong>of</strong> ARI by<br />

medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Associated factors<br />

p-<br />

value<br />

ARI management by medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh (Control)<br />

OR (95% CI ) p- OR (95% CI) p- OR (95% CI)<br />

value<br />

value<br />

Mothers literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write – – – – .035 1.84 (1.05 – 3.23)<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s education<br />

• Primary or higher .010 5.57 (1.42 – 20.45) – – – –<br />

Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

• Richest – – – – .003 3.45 (1.52 – 7.83)<br />

7.1.12 Management <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Univariate analyses shows that maternal literacy status, educational level <strong>of</strong> the mother, <strong>and</strong> amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> owned were significantly associated with the treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour for the<br />

management <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (Annex 3.12). All these three variables were found to have<br />

positive effect on the management <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers. No covariate was associated<br />

with this outcome variable <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh. The mother be<strong>in</strong>g both literate<br />

<strong>and</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g achieved a higher level <strong>of</strong> education, not be<strong>in</strong>g eligible for BRAC, <strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g relatively<br />

wealthier as <strong>in</strong>dicated by a) the amount <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> owned <strong>and</strong> b) one’s position on the wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

were found to be significantly associated with the management <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea by tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>in</strong><br />

the two control areas.<br />

Carry<strong>in</strong>g out multiple logistic regressions for the management <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea by tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider<br />

identified <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari that literate mothers <strong>and</strong> higher education level atta<strong>in</strong>ed by the mothers <strong>in</strong> the<br />

control districts were significantly associated with adequate management <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea (Table<br />

7.1.12). No association between any <strong>of</strong> the covariates <strong>and</strong> diarrhoea management by a tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

provider was found <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh.<br />

Table 7.1.12. Multivariate logistic regression results for the management <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea by<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Associated factors<br />

Mothers literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong><br />

write<br />

p-<br />

value<br />

Diarrhoea managed by tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

OR (95% CI ) p- OR (95% CI) p- OR (95% CI)<br />

value<br />

value<br />

.007 6.21 (1.65 –<br />

23.29)<br />

Mother’s education<br />

• Primary or higher .000 4.22 (2.13 – 8.34)<br />

62


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Chapter<br />

8<br />

Discussion<br />

This report compares basel<strong>in</strong>e (2008) <strong>and</strong> follow-up data (2010) to record the benchmark changes<br />

made <strong>in</strong> various aspects <strong>of</strong> MNCH as a result <strong>of</strong> BRAC-MNCH programme <strong>in</strong> four <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong><br />

two control districts <strong>in</strong> northern part <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh. This study followed the previous study that was<br />

carried out <strong>in</strong> the same sett<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> 2008. The district <strong>of</strong> Nilphamari has been considered as the <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

district for assess<strong>in</strong>g changes <strong>in</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> ‘objectively verifiable <strong>in</strong>dicators’ <strong>of</strong> the logical<br />

framework developed for the BRAC MNCH programme. Results are discussed on the aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

maternal, neonatal <strong>and</strong> under-5 health.<br />

8.1 MATERNAL HEALTH<br />

8.1.1 Family plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Family plann<strong>in</strong>g method is the key to reduce fertility <strong>and</strong> unwanted pregnancies, to <strong>in</strong>crease birth<br />

spac<strong>in</strong>g, to improve women’s health, <strong>and</strong> to decrease population growth with measured<br />

developmental benefits (Morel<strong>and</strong> et al. 2010, Glasier et al. 2006). Consistent with a research <strong>in</strong><br />

northern part <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh (Ahmed <strong>and</strong> Rana 2009), the result <strong>of</strong> the mid-term survey 2010<br />

revealed that the contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR) <strong>of</strong> 60-70% was found to be higher <strong>in</strong> all<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention districts compared to the national average <strong>of</strong> 56% (BDHS 2007). Use <strong>of</strong> modern family<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g method <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas was also found to be notable. However, CPR (modern<br />

methods) has <strong>in</strong>creased from 61 to 67% dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010 <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, but a borderl<strong>in</strong>e significant<br />

reduction has observed <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh. These three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts are also lagged beh<strong>in</strong>d compared to the control<br />

districts. It may not be due to the facts <strong>of</strong> lack<strong>in</strong>g awareness, but due to concerns <strong>and</strong> negative<br />

attitudes towards some methods, particularly the permanent methods. Our f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs are also<br />

consistent with this <strong>and</strong> show that permanent methods cont<strong>in</strong>ued to play a m<strong>in</strong>or role <strong>in</strong>dicated by<br />

lower use rate <strong>of</strong> ligation <strong>and</strong> vasectomy <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (5%), other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts (2%)<br />

<strong>and</strong> control districts (9%) <strong>and</strong> also rema<strong>in</strong>ed unchanged dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010. Government field<br />

workers were the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal source <strong>of</strong> contraceptive provision <strong>and</strong> BRAC field workers were<br />

contribut<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a smaller range. Moreover, a significant proportion <strong>of</strong> women were found to report<br />

side-effects <strong>of</strong> the family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods. Most <strong>of</strong> them did noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> a negligible percentage<br />

reported to stop us<strong>in</strong>g methods or switch to another method. Hence, appropriate behaviour change<br />

communication (BCC) needs to be undertaken to remove negative perception <strong>of</strong> permanent<br />

methods <strong>and</strong> on proper management <strong>of</strong> side effects with special emphasis <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh.<br />

8.1.2 Adolescent motherhood<br />

Bangladesh has one <strong>of</strong> the world's highest rates <strong>of</strong> adolescent motherhood based on the proportion<br />

<strong>of</strong> women under the age <strong>of</strong> 20 giv<strong>in</strong>g birth every year. Twenty-eight percent <strong>of</strong> adolescent women<br />

63


Discussion<br />

(age 15-19) are already mothers with at least one child <strong>and</strong> another 5% are pregnant (BMMS 2001).<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> deaths among adolescent mothers is double the national average. Comparable to<br />

the national adolescent fertility rate <strong>of</strong> 26%, the impact assessment survey 2010 <strong>in</strong>dicates that<br />

Nilphamari is fac<strong>in</strong>g the worst situation <strong>in</strong> adolescent motherhood recognized by the level <strong>of</strong> fertility<br />

among adolescent girls <strong>of</strong> 27% (BDHS 2007). Other districts have lower adolescent fertility rates<br />

compared to national average. The proportion <strong>of</strong> adolescent mothers has <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari<br />

over time compared to other <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong> control areas where no change was observed. The<br />

results also <strong>in</strong>dicate a low use <strong>of</strong> modern family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods (51-57%) among adolescent<br />

mothers compared to the national rate <strong>of</strong> 65% (BDHS 2007). Hence the family plann<strong>in</strong>g programme<br />

needs re<strong>in</strong>vigoration, with service delivery focus<strong>in</strong>g outreach more on newly married couples <strong>in</strong> all<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention districts particularly <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari.<br />

8.1.3 Abortion <strong>and</strong> menstrual regulation<br />

Unsafe abortion is one <strong>of</strong> the major causes <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality (UNICEF 2009a, WHO 1996).<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to WHO, 13% <strong>of</strong> all maternal deaths occur due to unsafe abortion (WHO 2007). The<br />

result <strong>of</strong> mid-term survey revealed high rates <strong>of</strong> abortion (lifetime) <strong>in</strong> all study areas (9% <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari, 14% <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention, <strong>and</strong> 16% <strong>in</strong> control districts) with the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

spontaneous. Induced abortion decreased <strong>in</strong> all the three study areas dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010 with the<br />

control area reported the lowest (10%) <strong>and</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh experienced the<br />

highest (23%) level. Furthermore, complications faced by the respondents after abortion were also<br />

high (44 to 70%). It is alarm<strong>in</strong>g that the percentage has risen <strong>in</strong> all the study areas <strong>and</strong> most <strong>of</strong> them<br />

sought treatment from private chamber <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>formal sector. It is understood that the MNCH<br />

programme is not fully address<strong>in</strong>g abortion care. However, adequate attention should be given to<br />

improve maternal health. Family plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> MR services need to be readily available to prevent<br />

unwanted pregnancies <strong>and</strong> unsafe abortion.<br />

8.1.4 Antenatal care (ANC)<br />

ANC is an important determ<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>of</strong> safe delivery <strong>and</strong> a strategy to reduce maternal mortality (Bloom<br />

et al. 1999, Nura<strong>in</strong>i <strong>and</strong> Parker 2005). <strong>Health</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>and</strong> services <strong>of</strong>fered through ANC can<br />

significantly improve health <strong>of</strong> women <strong>and</strong> their <strong>in</strong>fants (WHO <strong>and</strong> UNICEF, 2003). Empirical<br />

evidence suggests that four visits are sufficient for uncomplicated pregnancies <strong>and</strong> more are<br />

necessary only <strong>in</strong> the cases <strong>of</strong> complications (Villar et al. 2001). BRAC rural MNCH survey shows a<br />

remarkable achievement regard<strong>in</strong>g ANC practices <strong>in</strong> all the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts. The proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

receiv<strong>in</strong>g recommended four or more ANC visits ranged between 68-92% <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts<br />

which is substantially higher than the national average <strong>of</strong> 23% (BMMS 2010). Look<strong>in</strong>g at the change<br />

over period (2008-2010), compared to the national median <strong>of</strong> 3, we see that significant <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g median number <strong>of</strong> ANC takes place <strong>in</strong> both Nilphamari (7) <strong>and</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />

districts (5) with most notable <strong>in</strong>crease has observed <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

districts; while the control districts experienced no change.<br />

Another noteworthy f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the 2010 survey <strong>in</strong>dicates <strong>of</strong> improvement <strong>in</strong> seek<strong>in</strong>g ANC earlier <strong>in</strong><br />

gestational week compared to 2008. In 2010, the median months <strong>of</strong> pregnancy when the first ANC<br />

visit occurred was three <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> four <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh; both <strong>of</strong><br />

them are lower compared to five months as observed at national data (BMMS 2010). These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

have important public health implications for essential diagnosis <strong>of</strong> pregnancy complications <strong>and</strong><br />

their treatment regimens, <strong>and</strong> to become risk-free <strong>of</strong> anemia <strong>and</strong> STI (AbouZahr <strong>and</strong> Wardlaw 2003).<br />

Another notable achievement <strong>of</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g ANC from a tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>in</strong> all the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas<br />

has been observed. It may be the fact that <strong>in</strong> BRAC MNCH <strong>in</strong>tervention areas, ANCs are provided<br />

by BRAC SKs. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs also revealed that the mothers <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention areas who went to tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

care providers to seek ANC, most <strong>of</strong> them went for recommended four visits. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that<br />

women are able <strong>and</strong> will<strong>in</strong>g to seek ANC, but not about the quality <strong>of</strong> care that may be a further<br />

research agenda.<br />

64


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

8.1.5 Birth preparedness<br />

It is anticipated that from antenatal care, women are assisted to develop a birth plan that ensures<br />

birth preparedness <strong>and</strong> read<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> the eventuality <strong>of</strong> pregnancy or childbirth complication<br />

[McPherson et al. 2006, Johns Hopk<strong>in</strong>s Programme for International Education <strong>in</strong> Gynecology <strong>and</strong><br />

Obstetrics (JHPIEGO) 2001]. Such a birth plan is expected to assist women <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g choices that<br />

would contribute to good pregnancy outcome. The key elements <strong>of</strong> the birth plan package <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> danger signs, a plan for a birth attendant, a plan for the place <strong>of</strong> delivery, sav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

money for transport <strong>and</strong> other costs <strong>in</strong> case the need arises, identification <strong>of</strong> a potential blood<br />

donors <strong>and</strong> a decision maker (JHPIEGO 2001; Kaye et al. 2003).<br />

Our study shows a positive trend <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention areas regard<strong>in</strong>g prepar<strong>in</strong>g mothers for delivery by<br />

determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g place <strong>and</strong> attendant <strong>and</strong> also sav<strong>in</strong>g money for emergency or complications. Nilphamari<br />

achieved the highest level (76%) but the most significant improvement was achieved <strong>in</strong> Rangpur,<br />

Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010 (46% <strong>in</strong> 2008 <strong>and</strong> 60% <strong>in</strong> 2010). On the other h<strong>and</strong>,<br />

a significant decrease has been observed <strong>in</strong> the control districts. Except for arrang<strong>in</strong>g transport, the<br />

remarkable positive changes have been observed for place, attendant <strong>and</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>g money <strong>in</strong> all the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention areas. While <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g percentage <strong>of</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g place was an encourag<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

the disappo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g fact was that the mothers who determ<strong>in</strong>ed place <strong>of</strong> birth, 90% had determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

home as the possible place <strong>of</strong> delivery <strong>and</strong> hence no changes has been observed for hospital<br />

delivery over the two years. The study provides relevant <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>of</strong> birth preparedness <strong>and</strong><br />

complication read<strong>in</strong>ess for women <strong>in</strong> rural areas, <strong>and</strong> identifies missed opportunities for <strong>in</strong>terventions<br />

to improve emergency obstetric care (EmOC). The opportunity for develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

birth plan is <strong>of</strong>ten missed such that pregnant women are ill-equipped to make appropriate choices <strong>in</strong><br />

the case <strong>of</strong> pregnancy complications.<br />

8.1.6 Delivery care<br />

Ensur<strong>in</strong>g skilled attendance at delivery is a proxy <strong>in</strong>dicator for monitor<strong>in</strong>g progress <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

maternal <strong>and</strong> per<strong>in</strong>atal mortality (AbouZahr <strong>and</strong> Wardlaw 2001). The likelihood <strong>of</strong> the mother or the<br />

baby becom<strong>in</strong>g ill or dy<strong>in</strong>g is reduced when childbirth takes place <strong>in</strong> a properly equipped health<br />

facility with the assistance <strong>of</strong> a skilled birth attendant, who also checks regularly on the mother <strong>and</strong><br />

baby <strong>in</strong> the 24 hours after delivery (UNICEF, WHO, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNDP, UNAIDS, WFP <strong>and</strong><br />

the World Bank 2010). The impact assessment survey results revealed that delivery at home has<br />

been the commonest practice throughout the study area though the frequency <strong>of</strong> home delivery<br />

decreases over two years (79 to 73% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, 86 to 80% <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention). However,<br />

the rate <strong>of</strong> decrease seems to be slow <strong>and</strong> the percentage <strong>of</strong> home delivery is still very high (>70%)<br />

<strong>in</strong> both <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong> control areas. Consequently, a slow progress was observed <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />

facility delivery (public/private) with the highest level achievement <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari.<br />

Although birth is recommended under the supervised care by skilled birth attendants (United Nations<br />

2010), the impact assessment f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were not so encourag<strong>in</strong>g, but, even then an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g trend<br />

<strong>of</strong> delivery by medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed birth attendants was observed <strong>in</strong> all the survey areas. In 2010,<br />

Nilphamari has the highest achievement (27%) compared to all the surveyed areas (21-24%), but,<br />

the state <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease over the two-year period s<strong>in</strong>ce 2008 was not statistically significant. The most<br />

notable <strong>in</strong>crease was observed <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh from 15% <strong>in</strong> 2008 to 21%<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2010. Cord ty<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> cutt<strong>in</strong>g practices with the use <strong>of</strong> sterile <strong>in</strong>strument was found to be universal<br />

<strong>in</strong> Nilphamari. Although not significant, improvement has also been observed <strong>in</strong> the other<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong> control districts.<br />

As facility delivery has <strong>in</strong>creased, it would be expected that birth with skilled attendance would<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease. To meet the targets <strong>of</strong> MDG 5 by 2015, the government <strong>and</strong> NGOs <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g BRAC has<br />

undertaken a comprehensive programme on community skilled birth attendants (CSBA) to have a<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ued role <strong>in</strong> serv<strong>in</strong>g communities with difficult access. However, it is highly unlikely that even a<br />

65


Discussion<br />

strengthened CSBA programme can contribute substantially towards the 50% MDG 5 targets for a<br />

skilled birth attendance. Further research on knowledge <strong>and</strong> practices <strong>of</strong> CSBA at community levels<br />

need to have an immediate consideration.<br />

8.1.7 Postnatal care (PNC)<br />

The percentage <strong>of</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g three or more PNC visits has been <strong>in</strong>creased across the study areas<br />

between 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2010, with the notable achievement <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari. As an estimated two-thirds <strong>of</strong><br />

maternal deaths occur dur<strong>in</strong>g late pregnancy through 48 hours after delivery (AbouZahr 1998), the<br />

first two days follow<strong>in</strong>g delivery is very crucial for assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> treat<strong>in</strong>g complications aris<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

the delivery as well as ensur<strong>in</strong>g newborn survival (Campbell <strong>and</strong> Graham 2006). Results show that,<br />

the first PNC visit with<strong>in</strong> 48 hours <strong>of</strong> delivery was found to be high <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (85%) compared to<br />

other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, also notable <strong>in</strong>crease between 2008 to 2010 <strong>in</strong> all districts<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g encourag<strong>in</strong>g performance. Furthermore, early PNC is critical to promote health household<br />

practices such as exclusive breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g family plann<strong>in</strong>g. Moreover, the use <strong>of</strong> SBA<br />

guarantees the care <strong>in</strong> the immediate postpartum is available. However, to achieve MDG 5 target,<br />

the programme should achieve the universal level <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g both immediate <strong>and</strong> subsequent<br />

PNCs.<br />

8.1.8 <strong>Maternal</strong> danger signs, complications <strong>and</strong> management<br />

The high frequency <strong>of</strong> home delivery <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>sufficient birth preparedness <strong>in</strong>dicates poor women are<br />

exposed to higher risks <strong>and</strong> complications along with delay <strong>in</strong> referral to facilities. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Biswas, reduction <strong>in</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> maternal deaths requires timely access to effective, affordable<br />

<strong>and</strong> appropriate EmOC services (Biswas et al. 2005). Efforts to support an EmOC strategy <strong>in</strong><br />

programme such as the MNCH programme have mostly focused on rais<strong>in</strong>g families’ awareness <strong>of</strong><br />

danger signs with <strong>in</strong>formation, education <strong>and</strong> communication (IEC) on <strong>in</strong>stitut<strong>in</strong>g birth preparedness<br />

<strong>and</strong> facilitat<strong>in</strong>g referral. Assessment <strong>of</strong> IEC <strong>in</strong>terventions suggest that this method is not effective at<br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g delays, partly because the danger sign messages are complex (Stanton 2004). The survey<br />

results reveal that more women (47%) have reta<strong>in</strong>ed knowledge <strong>of</strong> three or more (maximum five)<br />

primary danger signs <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari compared to other areas (25% <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, <strong>and</strong> 24% <strong>in</strong> control districts). A small proportion <strong>of</strong> women <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts<br />

knew the BRAC referral mobile number or call<strong>in</strong>g BRAC SS/SK for management <strong>of</strong> maternal danger<br />

signs. But, most <strong>of</strong> them (95% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, 82% <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention, <strong>and</strong> 79% <strong>in</strong> control)<br />

know about the referral places or hospital to go when any complication arises. About half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mothers <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari reported to face these danger signs whilst it was one <strong>in</strong> three mothers <strong>in</strong><br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh <strong>and</strong> even higher (58%) <strong>in</strong> control areas. More than half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mother fac<strong>in</strong>g maternal danger signs sought treatment from public or private health facilities <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari while the negligible proportion <strong>in</strong> other study areas.<br />

Consistent with the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from the maternal mortality survey 2010, the impact assessment survey<br />

reveals that a substantial proportion <strong>of</strong> women suffered from maternal complications dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

antenatal, delivery <strong>and</strong> postnatal period, which has <strong>in</strong>creased from 2008 to 2010. This maybe<br />

because BRAC-MNCH <strong>in</strong>tervention not only aware women on the issue, but also <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

community health workers’ capacity to detect complications. The percentage <strong>of</strong> women seek<strong>in</strong>g<br />

treatment from medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider <strong>and</strong> health facility for such complications also <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong><br />

all the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas. This maybe an effect <strong>of</strong> BRAC-MNCH programme referral system that<br />

tends to tra<strong>in</strong> the community health workers to recognize complication <strong>and</strong> to refer the complicated<br />

cases to appropriate referral facilities as early as possible. Although BRAC workers <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari<br />

have made significant number <strong>of</strong> referral compared to other <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> referral from 2008 to 2010, f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from the impact assessment survey are not<br />

conclusive enough to judge the quality <strong>and</strong> timel<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>of</strong> referral. Nonetheless, model for effective<br />

referral system <strong>of</strong> BRAC urban MNCH <strong>in</strong>tervention (Manoshi) exhibits that women-focused<br />

development <strong>in</strong>tervention reduces first <strong>and</strong> second delays, but not the third delays <strong>in</strong> access<strong>in</strong>g<br />

66


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

EmOC <strong>in</strong> urban slums <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh (Nahar et al. 2011). Hence, to make a programme to be<br />

successful, there must be a comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> effective referral as well as functional referral<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure.<br />

Still more than one-third <strong>of</strong> women sought care from <strong>in</strong>formal sectors (village doctor, drug seller,<br />

traditional healers, <strong>and</strong> homeopaths). The impact assessment surveys revealed some factors for not<br />

access<strong>in</strong>g the formal care or go<strong>in</strong>g to the referral centre. These are costs, perceived dissatisfaction<br />

with formal care, <strong>and</strong> disapproval from family members. Keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d these barriers, the<br />

programme may th<strong>in</strong>k to address husb<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> mothers-<strong>in</strong>-law through its IEC component.<br />

8.1.9 Inequity <strong>in</strong> maternity care<br />

Poorer groups with<strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries use less healthcare (Gwatk<strong>in</strong> et al. 2000) <strong>and</strong> poor-rich<br />

<strong>in</strong>equalities <strong>in</strong> maternity care <strong>and</strong> maternal mortality have been described (Gwatk<strong>in</strong>. 2004; Graham et<br />

al. 2004). Poor-rich <strong>in</strong>equalities might also be larger when services require action at a specific time.<br />

For <strong>in</strong>stances, deliveries have a short time-w<strong>in</strong>dow <strong>in</strong> which care can be sought compared to ANC<br />

(Amopti-Kaguna <strong>and</strong> Nuwaha 2000), for which there is more time to seek care. Moreover, the onset<br />

<strong>and</strong> tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> labour is less predictable.<br />

The impact assessment survey 2010 suggests that, <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari district MNCH health status <strong>and</strong><br />

service utilization levels were not conditioned by membership <strong>of</strong> a certa<strong>in</strong> group (e.g. literate mother)<br />

compared to its counterpart (mothers who could not read <strong>and</strong> write). One such example was related<br />

to treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g for delivery complications. No socio-demographic variables were predictive <strong>of</strong><br />

access<strong>in</strong>g treatment for delivery complications, for <strong>in</strong>stance literacy status, wealth <strong>in</strong>dex position,<br />

parity, <strong>in</strong>ter alia amongst women <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari. This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g contrasts with those for the other<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong> control districts. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly differentials were identified across a series <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent variables which were <strong>in</strong>dicative <strong>of</strong> higher levels <strong>of</strong> access<strong>in</strong>g care for delivery<br />

complications depend<strong>in</strong>g on, for <strong>in</strong>stance, the literacy status <strong>of</strong> the mother, wealth status, <strong>and</strong> age<br />

<strong>of</strong> first conception. In the control districts, highly significant results were obta<strong>in</strong>ed for the associations<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent variables with outcome variables on univariate <strong>and</strong> further multiple logistic regression<br />

analysis. Such results highlighted the disadvantage <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> MNCH posed by certa<strong>in</strong> groups (e.g.<br />

illiterate mothers) <strong>in</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> the BRAC MNCH programme.<br />

Consistent with the <strong>in</strong>cidence from other least developed countries (Kobil<strong>in</strong>sky et al. 1999; Victoria et<br />

al. 2010), BRAC MNCH <strong>in</strong>tervention appears to have achieved relatively similar health status <strong>and</strong><br />

service utilization levels <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>in</strong>dependent <strong>of</strong> one’s literacy, wealth or reproductive pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />

However, this is clearly not the case <strong>in</strong> the control districts as better health status <strong>and</strong> service<br />

utilization are conditioned by several socio-demographic, wealth <strong>and</strong> reproductive pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

characteristics. This suggests that supply factors play an important role <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the poor-rich<br />

<strong>in</strong>equalities <strong>in</strong> maternity care <strong>in</strong> rural Bangladesh. Because a large number <strong>of</strong> BRAC outreach health<br />

workers are ensur<strong>in</strong>g home-based maternity care <strong>and</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g subsidy to the poor <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong><br />

referred EmOC.<br />

8.2 NEWBORN CARE<br />

Receiv<strong>in</strong>g newborn care on the day <strong>of</strong> birth would reduce the risk <strong>of</strong> neonatal mortality by two-thirds<br />

among neonates who survived the first day <strong>of</strong> life, <strong>and</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g the care on the second day reduce<br />

the risk <strong>of</strong> mortality by 64% (Baqui et al. 2009). Newborns lack<strong>in</strong>g appropriate care are at high risk <strong>of</strong><br />

poor health <strong>and</strong> reduced productivity <strong>in</strong> childhood <strong>and</strong> later life. Prevent<strong>in</strong>g newborn death beg<strong>in</strong>s<br />

with the health <strong>of</strong> mother to be provided dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy, labour <strong>and</strong> delivery, <strong>and</strong> postnatal<br />

period. Consistent with a community-based home care strategy to promote an <strong>in</strong>tegrated package<br />

<strong>of</strong> preventive <strong>and</strong> curative care <strong>in</strong> Sylhet, Bangladesh (Baqui et al. 2009), our f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs show that<br />

community-based <strong>in</strong>terventions, such as health education to improve neonatal care practices, ENC<br />

<strong>and</strong> care for illnesses are effective <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g neonatal health.<br />

67


Discussion<br />

8.2.1 Essential newborn care (ENC)<br />

A key <strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong> ENC is skilled attendance at delivery which has <strong>in</strong>creased from 30 to 71% <strong>in</strong><br />

Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> 15 to 34% <strong>in</strong> other three districts dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008 to 2010. This is promis<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce it<br />

speculates that skilled attendance at delivery provides the best opportunity to address the neonatal<br />

death due to birth asphyxia at community sett<strong>in</strong>g. It has greater public health implications as birth<br />

asphyxia causes one-fifth <strong>of</strong> neonatal death (BDHS 2004). The median knowledge regard<strong>in</strong>g ENC is<br />

almost equal everywhere out <strong>of</strong> a maximum possible five 1 knowledge. The knowledge scale reflect a<br />

positive <strong>in</strong>crease while ‘poor’ 2 <strong>and</strong> ‘medium’ 3 knowledge levels are amalgamated; progress goes<br />

almost 100 from 88% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari; though a slight decrease is observed <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />

<strong>and</strong> control clusters. Another remarkable success at the practice level <strong>of</strong> ENC has flagged the<br />

advancement <strong>of</strong> BRAC’s MNCH <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>and</strong> draws the critical attention on enormous<br />

contribution <strong>and</strong> successful replications <strong>of</strong> lessons that has been learned way back s<strong>in</strong>ce 2006.<br />

Receiv<strong>in</strong>g all ENC has <strong>in</strong>creased significantly <strong>in</strong> three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts (from 42 to 55%), but a<br />

slight decrease was found <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> a substantial decrease <strong>in</strong> control cluster.<br />

Studies show that home visits by tra<strong>in</strong>ed community health workers has brought some events <strong>in</strong><br />

newborn lives, for <strong>in</strong>stances home visits <strong>in</strong> the first two days <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>fant’s life can significantly reduce<br />

the risk <strong>of</strong> neonatal mortality by two-thirds (Baqui et al. 2009). Another study revealed that the village<br />

women who are tra<strong>in</strong>ed on maternal <strong>and</strong> neonatal care contribute on reduc<strong>in</strong>g 60% neonatal death<br />

<strong>in</strong> the remote areas <strong>of</strong> central India (T<strong>in</strong>ker et al. 2010). Here <strong>in</strong> BRAC’s <strong>in</strong>tervention, 60% case <strong>of</strong><br />

home delivery has ensured ENC services through BRAC SS <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> 18% <strong>in</strong> other three<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention districts.<br />

8.2.2 Thermal care<br />

Thermal care is important for all newborns, especially vital for LBW babies as to risk <strong>of</strong> acquir<strong>in</strong>g<br />

hypothermia. The South-East Asian region has a high prevalence <strong>of</strong> babies born with weight<br />


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

8.2.3 Newborn feed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g tradition <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh is the best <strong>in</strong> the world (Ted 1997). The Bangladesh<br />

fertility survey (BFS) <strong>in</strong> 1975-76 found that 98% <strong>in</strong>fants are breastfeed <strong>and</strong> the rate is reported similar<br />

<strong>in</strong> BDHS 2007. Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> an hour or with<strong>in</strong> two hours <strong>of</strong> delivery is associated with the<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> longer <strong>and</strong> more successful breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> exclusive breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g (Holman<br />

<strong>and</strong> Grimes 1993). However, challenge exists <strong>in</strong> the tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g immediately<br />

after birth, <strong>and</strong> perhaps it is usually substituted by so called pre-lacteal feed<strong>in</strong>g. Initiation <strong>of</strong><br />

breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g as soon as possible after delivery, preferably with<strong>in</strong> the first hour <strong>of</strong> life is widely<br />

recommended. Our survey revealed that 95% <strong>of</strong> the mothers fed colostrum immediately after birth<br />

across the <strong>in</strong>tervention area which is a bit higher than the national average (92%) (BDHS 2007).<br />

Four <strong>in</strong> every 10 women exclusively breastfeed their babies <strong>and</strong> no improvement was observed <strong>in</strong><br />

exclusive breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g practices over time <strong>in</strong> the country (BDHS 2007). However, our survey<br />

revealed an <strong>in</strong>creased trend (from 47% <strong>in</strong> 2008 to 62% <strong>in</strong> 2010) <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, but a decreased<br />

trend <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts which seems less than the national average (26%). On the<br />

other h<strong>and</strong>, delay<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> complementary food was seen <strong>in</strong> all the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas.<br />

Hence, the programme needs to provide attention to promote exclusive breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

8.2.4 <strong>Neonatal</strong> danger signs <strong>and</strong> illnesses<br />

Research <strong>in</strong>dicates that the primary causes <strong>of</strong> neonatal mortality <strong>in</strong> low <strong>in</strong>come countries are<br />

<strong>in</strong>fections <strong>and</strong> birth asphyxia (Baqui et al. 2009). The situation on neonatal danger signs <strong>and</strong><br />

illnesses are quite impressive <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari, but not <strong>in</strong> other three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts. The<br />

knowledge about neonatal danger sign was quite high <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari (55%) <strong>in</strong>dicated by the level <strong>of</strong><br />

moderate knowledge (recognized 2-3 danger sign). Almost 95% <strong>of</strong> women knew that they need to<br />

go to hospital or referral place once a danger sign was detected, <strong>and</strong> a gradual <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> the<br />

awareness to call BRAC SS/SKs through mobile <strong>in</strong> emergency.<br />

The Lancet series on neonatal health reported that the direct causes <strong>of</strong> neonatal death <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

severe <strong>in</strong>fections (36%) [sepsis/pneumonia (26%), tetanus (7%), <strong>and</strong> diarrhoea (3%)] <strong>and</strong><br />

complications <strong>of</strong> asphyxia (23%) (MoHFW 2009). Birth asphyxia accounts one <strong>in</strong> every five neonatal<br />

deaths <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh (UNICEF 2009a). In our <strong>in</strong>tervention areas, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> reported birth<br />

asphyxia to be 10%, whereas 67% <strong>of</strong> the cases <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari <strong>and</strong> 44% <strong>in</strong> other three districts are<br />

managed by tra<strong>in</strong>ed care providers (Qualified doctor/nurse/SS/FWV/MA/SACMO). Only 6-7% cases<br />

<strong>of</strong> birth asphyxia are treated by BRAC SS <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas. A study <strong>in</strong> central remote India<br />

shows that a significant number <strong>of</strong> birth asphyxia is be<strong>in</strong>g successfully managed by the communitybased<br />

health workers with a limited tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (Baqui et al. 2009). The neonatal sepsis is reduced<br />

significantly <strong>in</strong> three <strong>in</strong>tervention areas but it rema<strong>in</strong>s same <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari. Half <strong>of</strong> the neonatal sepsis<br />

is treated by the medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers (MBBS doctor, MA/SACMO, nurse, paramedic) <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention areas is <strong>in</strong>deed a remarkable achievement. However, based on lessons learned from<br />

other studies (Baqui et al. 2009, Bang et al. 2005), it is recommended that programme would act<br />

more vibrantly to engage its SS to recognize as well as manage the newborn illnesses.<br />

8.3 HEALTH OF CHILDREN UNDER-5 YEARS OF AGE<br />

Reduc<strong>in</strong>g childhood mortality <strong>and</strong> morbidity is critical because healthy children attribute to the<br />

security, economic growth <strong>and</strong> civil stability <strong>of</strong> a nation. In this study, prevalence <strong>and</strong> management<br />

strategies <strong>of</strong> ARI, diarrhoea <strong>and</strong> other illnesses <strong>of</strong> under-5 children <strong>and</strong> immunization attributes are<br />

explored.<br />

69


Discussion<br />

8.3.1 Vacc<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> the under-5 children<br />

Worldwide, immunization helps avert more than three million deaths annually from vacc<strong>in</strong>e<br />

preventable diseases <strong>and</strong> tends to save millions suffer<strong>in</strong>g from illness <strong>and</strong> disability (WHO 2009).<br />

Bangladesh has experienced tremendous advances to complete vacc<strong>in</strong>ation coverage over the last<br />

two decades when they <strong>of</strong>ficially started EPI programme accept<strong>in</strong>g WHO m<strong>and</strong>ate, reach<strong>in</strong>g 76% <strong>in</strong><br />

2007 among the children aged 12-59 months (BDHS 2007) <strong>and</strong> this needs to be susta<strong>in</strong>ed. The<br />

impact assessment survey 2010 <strong>in</strong>dicates that, one <strong>of</strong> the most notable achievements <strong>in</strong> child health<br />

is vacc<strong>in</strong>ation coverage, particularly <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari where it was found to be <strong>in</strong>creased to 89%<br />

start<strong>in</strong>g from 87 <strong>in</strong> 2008. However, no such change has been observed <strong>in</strong> other <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />

districts. BRAC’s vacc<strong>in</strong>ation-mobilization strategy at community level needs to be strengthened <strong>in</strong><br />

these districts to reach the target <strong>of</strong> MDG 4 by 2015.<br />

It is important to have the vacc<strong>in</strong>ation card s<strong>in</strong>ce parental recall <strong>of</strong> vacc<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

gives erroneous results (Suarez et al.1997). Though not statistically significant, the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

children with vacc<strong>in</strong>ation card has been <strong>in</strong>creased from 58 to 63% <strong>in</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, <strong>and</strong> 72 to 73% <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2010. Although the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

children with vacc<strong>in</strong>ation card is still low <strong>in</strong> all study areas, it is higher than that <strong>of</strong> the national figure<br />

(58%) (BDHS 2007). Overall, vitam<strong>in</strong> A <strong>in</strong>take was found to be satisfactory, nearly n<strong>in</strong>e out <strong>of</strong> every<br />

ten children were given oral vitam<strong>in</strong> A capsule on 26 May 2010 which is consistent to the national<br />

achievement <strong>of</strong> 88% (BDHS 2007).<br />

8.3.2 Acute respiratory <strong>in</strong>fection (ARI)<br />

ARI is one <strong>of</strong> the most predom<strong>in</strong>ant causes <strong>of</strong> childhood death after the first month <strong>of</strong> life <strong>in</strong><br />

Bangladesh (BDHS 2007). The prevalence <strong>of</strong> different forms <strong>of</strong> ARI such as pneumonia <strong>and</strong> severe<br />

pneumonia was found to be decreased among the children aged


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

8.3.3 Diarrhoea prevalence <strong>and</strong> management<br />

Introduction <strong>of</strong> ORS <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh results a tremendous decrease <strong>in</strong> diarrhoea prevalence (Rux<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> Joshua 1994). In 1975-1977, diarrhoea was the most significant cause <strong>of</strong> under-5 child death<br />

(15 children per 1000 live births) (Chen et al.1980). By the year 2007, only five deaths per 1000 live<br />

births occurred due to diarrhoea <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh (United Nations 2010). This signifies the accelerated<br />

use <strong>of</strong> ORS over time <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh. The MNCH midl<strong>in</strong>e survey <strong>of</strong> 2010 found the same pattern<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated by 8 <strong>in</strong> every 10 diarrhoea affected children <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention areas received ORS for the<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea. This signifies the importance <strong>of</strong> community-based health <strong>and</strong> nutrition<br />

education programme through community health workers as done <strong>in</strong> IMNCS project (Pahwa et al.<br />

2010). This high level <strong>of</strong> ORS <strong>in</strong>take <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas together with <strong>in</strong>creased awareness <strong>and</strong><br />

improved quality treatment may result <strong>in</strong> lower prevalence <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea over time compared to the<br />

control area where actually the diarrhoea prevalence <strong>in</strong>creased over the last two years.<br />

Z<strong>in</strong>c treatment is recommended along with ORS for treat<strong>in</strong>g diarrhoea. A study <strong>in</strong>dicated that around<br />

92% <strong>of</strong> the caregiver <strong>of</strong> the diarrhoea-affected children was will<strong>in</strong>g to pay the required amount <strong>of</strong><br />

money for z<strong>in</strong>c treatment (Akhter <strong>and</strong> Larson 2010). However, the impact assessment survey<br />

showed that the <strong>in</strong>take <strong>of</strong> z<strong>in</strong>c for diarrhoea was low <strong>in</strong> 2008 <strong>and</strong> that the situation did not improve<br />

over time. It has been postulated that breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g protects the baby from diarrhoea (Feachem <strong>and</strong><br />

Kobl<strong>in</strong>sky 1984). However, it is promis<strong>in</strong>g that breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g rate supposed to be very high, around<br />

90% among all diarrhoea-affected children <strong>in</strong> our study areas.<br />

8.3.4 Management <strong>of</strong> other illnesses among under-5 children<br />

Except fever, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> other common childhood diseases <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sk<strong>in</strong> diseases,<br />

dysentery, mouth ulcer, <strong>and</strong> worm <strong>in</strong>festation was found to be reduced <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas over<br />

time, which is similar to that <strong>in</strong> other parts <strong>of</strong> the country (BDHS 2007). Consistent with other studies<br />

(Mahmood et al. 2010) <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly more children are gett<strong>in</strong>g treatment from village doctors which<br />

may be due to the same reasons <strong>of</strong> low cost, <strong>and</strong> proximity as found for ARI <strong>and</strong> diarrhoea.<br />

However, positive trend <strong>of</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g treatment from qualified doctors <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention districts further<br />

expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

8.4 METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS<br />

The quasi-experimental nature <strong>of</strong> this study presents certa<strong>in</strong> limitations <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> conclusively<br />

affiliat<strong>in</strong>g the observed changes <strong>in</strong> MNCH status <strong>and</strong> health service utilization across the <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />

<strong>and</strong> control sett<strong>in</strong>gs with the implementation (or not) <strong>of</strong> the BRAC MNCH programme. This limitation<br />

is predicated on the fact that <strong>in</strong> the control districts similar maternal <strong>and</strong> child health services were<br />

available through m<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> health facilities as well as be<strong>in</strong>g provided by NGOs with<strong>in</strong> the districts<br />

under study.<br />

As we <strong>in</strong>tend to observe the changes among population on MNCH issues, <strong>and</strong> r<strong>and</strong>omization was<br />

followed from sub-district to household level <strong>in</strong> each district, it is possible to generalize the results for<br />

rural population <strong>in</strong> northern <strong>and</strong> central Bangladesh, but does not represent the urban scenario.<br />

Structured face-to-face <strong>in</strong>terviews with pre-tested questionnaires were used to elicit <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

from the respondents. Several biases are common <strong>in</strong> this k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terview survey. Recall bias may<br />

arise <strong>in</strong> many cases when the reports were retrospective, such as abortion, MR, etc. Interviewer bias<br />

may occur when certa<strong>in</strong> characteristics such as experience <strong>and</strong> knowledge base <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terviewers,<br />

<strong>and</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terviewer-respondent <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>in</strong>fluence the responses. There may also be<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation bias due to respondent answer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a certa<strong>in</strong> way to please the <strong>in</strong>terviewer (Hardon et<br />

al. 2001). To reduce these biases, several strategies were adopted. These <strong>in</strong>clude, recruitment <strong>of</strong><br />

experienced <strong>in</strong>terviewers, st<strong>and</strong>ardized tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g on questionnaire contents, <strong>in</strong>terview algorithm,<br />

prob<strong>in</strong>g techniques, strategies to establish rapport <strong>and</strong> neutrality essential to complete <strong>and</strong> accurate<br />

71


Discussion<br />

data collection, <strong>and</strong> avoidance <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ter-observer variation <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviewer bias. We also used early<br />

deployment <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviewers <strong>in</strong> the field to allow time for rapport build<strong>in</strong>g activities <strong>and</strong> assur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

respondents <strong>of</strong> confidentiality <strong>of</strong> data for <strong>in</strong>formation bias. F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>in</strong>tensive supervision, on-the-spot<br />

check<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>consistencies, <strong>and</strong> a r<strong>and</strong>om post-enumeration survey <strong>of</strong> 5% <strong>of</strong> the households<br />

surveyed <strong>in</strong> the 72 hours were carried out.<br />

However, the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> this report support the benefits <strong>of</strong> the BRAC MNCH Programme. This is<br />

substantiated throughout the report when observ<strong>in</strong>g the positive changes that have taken place<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008 to 2010 <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas. One limitation <strong>in</strong> the presentation <strong>of</strong> results has been<br />

the conglomeration <strong>of</strong> the data <strong>in</strong> the three <strong>in</strong>tervention districts <strong>of</strong> Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, on the basis that the BRAC MNCH programme was <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to these areas <strong>in</strong> the<br />

same year (2008). The same observation <strong>and</strong> limitation exists vis-à-vis the two control districts<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona which have been treated for analysis purposes as a s<strong>in</strong>gle sett<strong>in</strong>g, despite<br />

their non-contiguous geographical location, among other potential differences.<br />

By hav<strong>in</strong>g presented the results on a ‘study group’ rather than ‘district-specific’ basis, the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

may not have adequately reflected differences between districts <strong>in</strong> either the <strong>in</strong>tervention or control<br />

districts, respectively. One such important issue may have been access to <strong>in</strong>stitutional delivery or<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> ARI <strong>in</strong> young children by qualified doctors. The distribution <strong>of</strong> healthcare service delivery<br />

is not homogenous across various districts yet the pool<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> data from the districts <strong>in</strong>to larger<br />

group<strong>in</strong>gs may have precluded identification <strong>of</strong> relevant f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs for the study.<br />

8.5 CONCLUSION AND PROGRAMMATIC IMPLICATIONS<br />

Ultimate target <strong>of</strong> IMNCS programme <strong>of</strong> BRAC is to contribute achiev<strong>in</strong>g MDGs 4 <strong>and</strong> 5 <strong>and</strong> BRAC<br />

is help<strong>in</strong>g the government to fulfill the commitment. This report identifies that <strong>in</strong> BRAC-IMNCS areas,<br />

there are remarkable improvement <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> maternal health <strong>in</strong>dicators, such as receiv<strong>in</strong>g 4+ ANCs<br />

<strong>and</strong> ANCs from tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider, birth preparedness, delivery by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers, receiv<strong>in</strong>g PNC<br />

from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers <strong>and</strong> also with<strong>in</strong> 48 hours <strong>of</strong> delivery, etc.; neonatal health <strong>in</strong>dicators on<br />

management <strong>of</strong> birth asphyxia <strong>and</strong> neonatal sepsis; <strong>and</strong> under-5 child-health on management <strong>of</strong> ARI<br />

<strong>and</strong> diarrhoea by medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers. The 2010 survey also recognizes the gaps <strong>and</strong><br />

challenges, <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>s factors beh<strong>in</strong>d the current maternal, neonatal <strong>and</strong> child healthcare<br />

practices. These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs have a number <strong>of</strong> programmatic implications as follows:<br />

<strong>Maternal</strong> health<br />

1. Consider<strong>in</strong>g persistent early marriage <strong>and</strong> early childbear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas over time,<br />

the family plann<strong>in</strong>g programme needs re<strong>in</strong>vigoration, target<strong>in</strong>g more on newly married couples<br />

<strong>and</strong> adolescent mothers. The programme needs to focus on educat<strong>in</strong>g people on<br />

misconceptions about long-term family plann<strong>in</strong>g methods. Husb<strong>and</strong>s must be particularly<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the education process.<br />

2. The rate <strong>of</strong> abortion <strong>and</strong> the subsequent complications has been found to be reasonably high,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the least proportion <strong>of</strong> complications is managed by qualified service providers. Hence the<br />

threat <strong>of</strong> malpractice always exists. IMNCS programme thus needs to <strong>in</strong>tegrate the abortion<br />

care services particularly BCC, management <strong>and</strong> referral <strong>of</strong> complications to the appropriate<br />

facilities.<br />

3. Now that achievement has been made on frequency <strong>of</strong> ANC visits, attention should be given to<br />

its content <strong>and</strong> improve quality <strong>of</strong> ANC services.<br />

4. The programme has made an overall impact on birth plann<strong>in</strong>g. But a hidden threat rema<strong>in</strong>s as<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> women prefer their home as their birth place <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> hospital or any healthcare<br />

facility. Therefore, an extended effort is required to promote <strong>in</strong>stitutional delivery <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh.<br />

72


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

5. Deliveries by skilled attendance <strong>in</strong>creased but the lower percentages rem<strong>in</strong>d us about the<br />

challenge <strong>of</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g the situation. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, deliveries by tra<strong>in</strong>ed attendant<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased substantially, but still rema<strong>in</strong>s as a challenge.<br />

6. Over time, the programme has achieved success <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g the number <strong>of</strong> PNC visits. But<br />

more attention need to be paid on the tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> PNC, as less success is <strong>in</strong>dexed on first PNC<br />

visit with<strong>in</strong> 48 hours <strong>of</strong> delivery. This is crucial because this visit provides opportunity for all<br />

newborn receiv<strong>in</strong>g the ENC that supposed to reduce the risk <strong>of</strong> neonatal mortality by two-thirds<br />

(Baqui et al. 2009).<br />

7. Though the maternal complications <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention areas over time, seek<strong>in</strong>g<br />

treatment from medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider also <strong>in</strong>creased which may conclude the programme’s<br />

achievement. However, the programme should be cont<strong>in</strong>ued to lessen complications. Proper<br />

programmatic actions to improve knowledge <strong>of</strong> family <strong>and</strong> community members may be helpful<br />

<strong>in</strong> this regard.<br />

8. The 2010 survey results reveal that half <strong>of</strong> the women had no or very poor knowledge about<br />

maternal danger signs <strong>and</strong> a very low number <strong>of</strong> women <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention districts know the<br />

BRAC referral mobile number where more <strong>in</strong>itiatives need to be taken immediately. The<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> people who knew about the referral place or hospital or BRAC cell phone number<br />

is respond<strong>in</strong>g passionately; <strong>in</strong>dicates that the exist<strong>in</strong>g referral system might give good result if<br />

the message could be dissem<strong>in</strong>ated widely.<br />

<strong>Neonatal</strong> health<br />

1. Knowledge on ENC rema<strong>in</strong>s stagnant s<strong>in</strong>ce last two years. The <strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong> thermal care for<br />

LBW babies is still <strong>in</strong> a critical state, <strong>and</strong> hence a massive attention or better health promotion is<br />

required.<br />

2. In the three new <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, the progress <strong>of</strong> ENC coverage <strong>of</strong>fered by the tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>and</strong><br />

skilled health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals has been <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a less stipulate fashion where faster progress<br />

would be ensured, otherwise the progress that already been achieved might give a phase <strong>of</strong> dim<br />

advancement.<br />

3. The programme needs to work more <strong>in</strong> record<strong>in</strong>g birth weight particularly for births that occur at<br />

home.<br />

4. Critical challenge still exists on breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g immediately after birth; perhaps it is usually<br />

substituted by pre-lacteal feed<strong>in</strong>g. The programme may contribute <strong>in</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g practice arena<br />

through community mobilization.<br />

Under-5 child health<br />

1. The programme has made successful achievement on significant reduction <strong>in</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

pneumonia but challenge rema<strong>in</strong>s on its management. A substantial proportion <strong>of</strong> pneumonia<br />

<strong>and</strong> ARI cases are managed by the non-formal health providers <strong>in</strong> the programme areas. The<br />

programme ought to emphasize strengthen<strong>in</strong>g health system support parallel to the awareness<br />

ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the community.<br />

2. Fever is the prom<strong>in</strong>ent illness that the children have experienced frequently <strong>in</strong> programme areas<br />

compared to any other illness. The programme needs to pay more attention on it.<br />

3. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the lower immunization coverage <strong>in</strong> the new <strong>in</strong>tervention districts, the programme<br />

should pay special attention <strong>in</strong> community mobilization <strong>and</strong> campaign<strong>in</strong>g before the vacc<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

day.<br />

73


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

References<br />

AbouZahr CL (1998). <strong>Maternal</strong> mortality overview. In: Murray CJL <strong>and</strong> Lopez AD (Editors). <strong>Health</strong> dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />

sex <strong>and</strong> reproduction. Boston: Harvard School <strong>of</strong> Public <strong>Health</strong>.<br />

AbouZahr CL <strong>and</strong> Wardlaw TM (2001). <strong>Maternal</strong> mortality at the end <strong>of</strong> the decade: signs <strong>of</strong> progress Bull<br />

WHO 79(6):561-73.<br />

AbouZahr CL <strong>and</strong> Wardlaw TM (2003). Antenatal care <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries: promises, achievements <strong>and</strong><br />

missed opportunities: an analysis trends, levels <strong>and</strong> differentials, 1990-2001. Geneva: WHO <strong>and</strong><br />

UNICEF. 36p<br />

Ahmed SM <strong>and</strong> Rana AKM (2009). <strong>Health</strong>, health services <strong>and</strong> health-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour. In: Pathways out <strong>of</strong><br />

extreme poverty: f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from round I survey <strong>of</strong> CFPR phase II. Dhaka: BRAC.73-94.<br />

Akhter S <strong>and</strong> Larson CP (2010). Will<strong>in</strong>gness to pay for z<strong>in</strong>c treatment <strong>of</strong> childhood diarrhoea <strong>in</strong> a rural<br />

population <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh. <strong>Health</strong> Policy Plann 25(3):230-6.<br />

Amopti-Kaguna B <strong>and</strong> Nuwaha F (2000). Factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g choice <strong>of</strong> delivery sites <strong>in</strong> Rakai district <strong>of</strong> Ug<strong>and</strong>a.<br />

Soc Sci Med 50(2):203-13.<br />

Arifeen SE, et al. (2004). Integrated management <strong>of</strong> childhood illness (IMCI) <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh: early f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from a<br />

cluster-r<strong>and</strong>omized study. Lancet 364(9445):1595-602.<br />

Baqui AH, Ahmed S, Arifeen SE, et al. (2009). Effect <strong>of</strong> tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> first postnatal care home visit on neonatal<br />

mortality <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh: an observational cohort study. BMJ 339:b2826.<br />

Bang AT, Bang RA <strong>and</strong> Reddy HM (2005). Home-based neonatal care: Summary <strong>and</strong> applications <strong>of</strong> the field<br />

trial <strong>in</strong> rural Gadchiroli, India (1993 to 2003). J Per<strong>in</strong>atol 25(Suppl 1):S108-22.<br />

BDHS (2004). Bangladesh Demographic <strong>and</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Survey 2004. Dhaka <strong>and</strong> Calverton: National Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Population Research <strong>and</strong> Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (NIPORT), Mitra <strong>and</strong> Associates, <strong>and</strong> ORC Macro. 338p<br />

BDHS (2007). Bangladesh Demographic <strong>and</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Survey 2007. Dhaka <strong>and</strong> Calverton: National Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Population Research <strong>and</strong> Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (NIPORT), Mitra <strong>and</strong> Associates, <strong>and</strong> Macro International.<br />

Biswas AB, Das DK, Misra R, Roy RN, Ghosh D <strong>and</strong> Mitra K (2005). Availability <strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> emergency obstetric<br />

care services <strong>in</strong> four districts <strong>of</strong> West Bengal, India. J <strong>Health</strong> Popul Nutr 23(3):266-74.<br />

Bloom S, Lippeveld T <strong>and</strong> Wypij D (1999). Does antenatal care make a difference to safe delivery A study <strong>in</strong><br />

urban Uttar Pradesh, India. <strong>Health</strong> Policy Plann 14(1):38–48.<br />

BMMS (2001). Bangladesh <strong>Maternal</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Service <strong>and</strong> <strong>Maternal</strong> Mortality Survey 2001. Dhaka <strong>and</strong> Calverton:<br />

NIPORT, ORC Macro, Johns Hopk<strong>in</strong>s University <strong>and</strong> ICDDR,B.<br />

BMMS (2010). Bangladesh maternal mortality <strong>and</strong> health care survey 2010 (prelim<strong>in</strong>ary results). Dhaka <strong>and</strong><br />

USA: NIPORT, ICDDRB, MEASURE Evaluation <strong>and</strong> UNC-CH.<br />

Campbell OM <strong>and</strong> Graham WJ (2006). Strategies for reduc<strong>in</strong>g maternal mortality: gett<strong>in</strong>g on with what works.<br />

Lancet 368 (9543):1284-99.<br />

Chen LC, Rahman M <strong>and</strong> Sarder AM (1980). Epidemiology <strong>and</strong> causes <strong>of</strong> death among children <strong>in</strong> a rural area<br />

<strong>of</strong> Bangladesh. Int J Epidemiol 9(1):25-33.<br />

Chowdhury HR, et al. (2010). Causes <strong>of</strong> neonatal deaths <strong>in</strong> a rural subdistrict <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh: implications for<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention. J <strong>Health</strong> Popul Nutr 28(4):375-82.<br />

75


References<br />

Dawson A, Howes T, Ith P, Gray N <strong>and</strong> Kennedy E (2010). Human resources for health <strong>in</strong> maternal, neonatal<br />

<strong>and</strong> reproductive health at community level: a pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> human resources for health <strong>in</strong> ten countries <strong>in</strong> Asia<br />

<strong>and</strong> Pacific Regions. University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales.<br />

Feachem RG <strong>and</strong> Kobl<strong>in</strong>sky MA (1984). Interventions for the control <strong>of</strong> diarrhoeal diseases among young<br />

children: promotion <strong>of</strong> breast-feed<strong>in</strong>g. Bull WHO 62(2):271-291.<br />

Glasier A, Gulmezoglu AM, Moreno CG <strong>and</strong> Look PFV (2006). Sexual <strong>and</strong> reproductive health: a matter <strong>of</strong> life<br />

<strong>and</strong> death. Lancet 368(9547):1595–1607.<br />

Graham WJ, Fitzmaurice AE, Bell JS <strong>and</strong> Cairns JA (2004). The familial technique for l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g maternal death with<br />

poverty. Lancet 363(9402):23-27.<br />

Gwatk<strong>in</strong> D, Ruste<strong>in</strong> S, Johnson K, P<strong>and</strong>e R <strong>and</strong> Wagstaff A (2000). Socioeconomic differences <strong>in</strong> health,<br />

nutrition <strong>and</strong> poverty. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton: World Bank, HNP/Poverty Thematic Group <strong>of</strong> the World Bank.<br />

Gwatk<strong>in</strong> D (2004). Assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>equalities <strong>in</strong> maternal mortality. Lancet 363(9402):5.<br />

Gwatk<strong>in</strong> D, Ruste<strong>in</strong> S, P<strong>and</strong>e R <strong>and</strong> Wagstaff A (2007). Differences <strong>in</strong> health, nutrition <strong>and</strong> population <strong>in</strong><br />

Bangladesh 1996/1997, 1997/2000, 2004. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton: World Bank, Human development Network.<br />

139p.<br />

Hardon A, et al. (2001). Analysis <strong>of</strong> qualitative data. In: Applied health research manual: Anthropology <strong>of</strong> health<br />

care. Amsterdam: Het Sp<strong>in</strong>huis.<br />

Holman DJ <strong>and</strong> Grimes AM (1993). Patterns for the Initiation <strong>of</strong> Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Human. University <strong>of</strong><br />

Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, Center for studies <strong>in</strong> demography <strong>and</strong> ecology, CSDE work<strong>in</strong>g paper no. 02-02.<br />

Hunt P <strong>and</strong> Mesquita JBD (2010). Reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Maternal</strong> Mortality: The contribution <strong>of</strong> the right to the highest<br />

atta<strong>in</strong>able st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong> health. Essex: Human Rights Centre, University <strong>of</strong> Essex.<br />

IRIN (2010). Bangladesh: <strong>Maternal</strong> deaths highest <strong>in</strong> South Asia. [http://southasia.oneworld.net/Article/moreresources-needed-to-reduce-maternal<br />

mortality] [accessed on 25/10/2010].<br />

Johns Hopk<strong>in</strong>s Program for International Education <strong>in</strong> Gynecology <strong>and</strong> Obstetrics (JHPIEGO) (2001). <strong>Maternal</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> neonatal health (MNH) program. Birth preparedness <strong>and</strong> complication read<strong>in</strong>ess: A matrix <strong>of</strong> shared<br />

responsibilities. In. Baltimore: JHPIEGO.<br />

Kaye D, Mirembe F, Aziga F <strong>and</strong> Namulema B (2003). <strong>Maternal</strong> mortality <strong>and</strong> associated near-misses among<br />

emergency <strong>in</strong>trapartum obstetric referrals <strong>in</strong> Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Ug<strong>and</strong>a. East African Med J<br />

80(3):144-9<br />

Kobil<strong>in</strong>sky MA, Campbell O <strong>and</strong> Heichelheim J (1999). Organiz<strong>in</strong>g delivery care: what works for safe<br />

motherhood Bull WHO 77(5):399-406.<br />

Mahmood SS, Mohammad I, Hanifi SMA, Wahed T <strong>and</strong> Bhuiya A (2010). Are ‘Village Doctors’ <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh a<br />

curse or a bless<strong>in</strong>g BMC Int <strong>Health</strong> Human Right 10:18.<br />

McPherson RA, Khadka N, Moore JM <strong>and</strong> Sharma M (2006). Are birth-preparedness programmes effective<br />

Results From a Field Trial <strong>in</strong> Siraha District, Nepal. J <strong>Health</strong> Popul Nutr 24(4):479–488.<br />

MoHFW (2003). <strong>Health</strong>, Nutrition <strong>and</strong> Population Sector Programme: Program Implementation Plan, July 2003-<br />

June 2006. Dhaka: Plann<strong>in</strong>g W<strong>in</strong>g, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>and</strong> Family Welfare, Government <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh.<br />

MoHFW (2009). National <strong>Neonatal</strong> Strategy <strong>and</strong> Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for Bangladesh 2009. Dhaka: M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Family Welfare, Government <strong>of</strong> the People’s Republic <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh.<br />

Morel<strong>and</strong> S, Smith E <strong>and</strong> Sharma S (2010). World Population Prospects <strong>and</strong> Unmet Need for Family Plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Wash<strong>in</strong>gton: Futures Group. 62p.<br />

76


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Nasreen H <strong>and</strong> Rafi SM (2007). <strong>Maternal</strong>, <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Program <strong>in</strong> Nilphamari district: The<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>e survey. Dhaka: BRAC.<br />

Nahar S, Banu M <strong>and</strong> Nasreen H (2011). Women-focused development <strong>in</strong>tervention reduces delays <strong>in</strong><br />

access<strong>in</strong>g emergency obstetric care <strong>in</strong> urban slums <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study. BMC<br />

Pregnancy <strong>Child</strong>birth 11:11.<br />

Nura<strong>in</strong>i E <strong>and</strong> Parker E (2005). Improv<strong>in</strong>g knowledge <strong>of</strong> antenatal care (ANC) among pregnant women: a field<br />

trial <strong>in</strong> central Java, Indonesia. Asia Pacific J Public <strong>Health</strong> 17(1):3-8.<br />

Pahwa S, Kumar GT <strong>and</strong> Toteja GS (2010). Performance <strong>of</strong> a community-based health <strong>and</strong> nutrition-education<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>in</strong> the management <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea <strong>in</strong> a slum <strong>of</strong> Delhi, India. J <strong>Health</strong> Popul Nutr 28(6):553-9.<br />

Richards O (2009). Half a million women die from pregnancy complications each year.<br />

[http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/jan2009/chil-j20.shtml][accessed on 17/10/2010].<br />

Ruste<strong>in</strong> SO <strong>and</strong> Johnson K (2004). The DHS wealth <strong>in</strong>dex. Caverton: ORC Macro. 77p.<br />

Rux<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> Joshua N (1994). "Magic bullet: the history <strong>of</strong> oral rehydration therapy". Med History 38(4):363–397.<br />

Schellenberg JA, Bryce J, Savigny DD, et al. (2004). The effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated management <strong>of</strong> childhood illness<br />

on observed quality <strong>of</strong> care <strong>of</strong> under-fives <strong>in</strong> rural Tanzania. <strong>Health</strong> Policy Plann 19(1):1-10.<br />

Stanton CK (2004). Methodological issues <strong>in</strong> the measurement <strong>of</strong> birth preparedness <strong>in</strong> support to safe<br />

motherhood. Evaluation Rev 28(3):179-200.<br />

Stewart MK, Parker B, Chakraborty J <strong>and</strong> Begum H (1994). Acute respiratory <strong>in</strong>fections (ARI) <strong>in</strong> rural<br />

Bangladesh: perceptions <strong>and</strong> practices. Med Anthropol 15(4):377-394.<br />

Suarez L, Simpson DM <strong>and</strong> Smith DR (1997). Errors <strong>and</strong> correlates <strong>in</strong> parental recall <strong>of</strong> child immunizations:<br />

effects on vacc<strong>in</strong>ation coverage estimates. Pediatrics 99:E3.<br />

Ted G (1997). Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh: A review <strong>of</strong> the literature. Bangladesh J Nutr 10:1-2.<br />

T<strong>in</strong>ker A, Parker R, Lord D <strong>and</strong> Grear K (2010). Advanc<strong>in</strong>g newborn heath: The sav<strong>in</strong>g newborn lives <strong>in</strong>itiatives.<br />

Global Public <strong>Health</strong> 5(1):28-47.<br />

United Nations (2010). The Millennium Development Goals Report. New York: United Nations.<br />

UNICEF (2009). <strong>Maternal</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh. Dhaka: UNICEF Bangladesh.<br />

UNICEF (2009a). Situation assessment <strong>and</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> children <strong>and</strong> women <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh. Dhaka: UNICEF<br />

Bangladesh.<br />

UNICEF, WHO, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNDP, UNAIDS, WFP <strong>and</strong> the World Bank (2010). Facts for life. Fourth<br />

edition. New York: UNICEF.<br />

Victoria CG, et al. (2010). Measur<strong>in</strong>g impact <strong>in</strong> the Millennium Development Goal era <strong>and</strong> beyond: a new<br />

approach to large-scale effectiveness evaluations. Lancet 377(9759): 85 - 95.<br />

Villar J, et al. (2001). WHO antenatal care r<strong>and</strong>omised trial for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> a new model <strong>of</strong> rout<strong>in</strong>e antenatal<br />

care. Lancet 357(9268):1551–1564.<br />

WHO (1996). Mother-Baby Package: Implement<strong>in</strong>g safe motherhood <strong>in</strong> countries. Geneva: WHO.<br />

WHO (2004). Basic Indicators: <strong>Health</strong> Situation <strong>in</strong> South-East Asia. Geneva: World <strong>Health</strong> Organization, South-<br />

East Asia Region.<br />

WHO (2006). <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>and</strong> Per<strong>in</strong>atal mortality: Country, Regional <strong>and</strong> Global estimates. Geneva: World <strong>Health</strong><br />

Organization.<br />

77


References<br />

WHO (2007). Unsafe abortion: Global <strong>and</strong> regional estimates <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> unsafe abortion <strong>and</strong> associated<br />

mortality <strong>in</strong> 2003. Fifth edition. Geneva: World <strong>Health</strong> Organization.<br />

WHO (2009). World <strong>Health</strong> Statistics. Geneva: World <strong>Health</strong> Organization.<br />

WHO (2010). Trends <strong>in</strong> <strong>Maternal</strong> Mortality: 1990 to 2008. Geneva: WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA <strong>and</strong> the World Bank.<br />

WHO (2010a). Why do so many women still die <strong>in</strong> pregnancy or childbirth Geneva: World <strong>Health</strong> Organization.<br />

WHO <strong>and</strong> UNICEF (2003). Antenatal Care <strong>in</strong> Develop<strong>in</strong>g Countries: Promises, Achievements <strong>and</strong> Missed<br />

Opportunities: An Analysis <strong>of</strong> Trends, Levels, <strong>and</strong> Differentials: 1990–2001. Geneva <strong>and</strong> New York: WHO<br />

<strong>and</strong> UNICEF.<br />

World Vision <strong>and</strong> the Nossal Institute for Global <strong>Health</strong> (2008). Reduc<strong>in</strong>g maternal, newborn <strong>and</strong> child deaths <strong>in</strong><br />

the Asia Pacific. Australia: World Vision <strong>and</strong> the Nossal Institute for Global <strong>Health</strong>.<br />

78


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Annexures<br />

Annex 1. Revised logical framework<br />

Narrative<br />

Summary<br />

Goal:<br />

To contribute to<br />

reduction <strong>in</strong><br />

maternal,<br />

neonatal <strong>and</strong><br />

child mortality<br />

<strong>and</strong> morbidity,<br />

particularly<br />

among the poor<br />

<strong>and</strong> socially<br />

excluded<br />

population<br />

Purpose:<br />

To improve<br />

community<br />

MNCH<br />

practices <strong>and</strong><br />

utilization <strong>of</strong><br />

quality MNCH<br />

care <strong>and</strong><br />

services <strong>in</strong> the<br />

project<br />

supported<br />

districts<br />

Objectively Verifiable Indicators<br />

• Reduced maternal mortality ratio from<br />

320 to 260 per 100,000 LB<br />

• Reduced neonatal mortality from 41 to 28<br />

per 1000 LB<br />

• Reduced under-five mortality from 85 to<br />

50 per 1000 LB<br />

1. Proportion <strong>of</strong> women who received at<br />

least four ANCs <strong>in</strong>creased from 14% at<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>e to 80% by EoP<br />

2. Proportion <strong>of</strong> women delivered by skilled<br />

birth attendants <strong>in</strong>creased from 15% at<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>e to 30% by EoP<br />

3. Proportion <strong>of</strong> mothers <strong>and</strong> newborn who<br />

received a PNC by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

with<strong>in</strong> 48 hours <strong>in</strong>creased from 12% at<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>e to 80% by EoP<br />

4. Met need for EmOC: Proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

complicated pregnancies appropriately<br />

managed at functional facilities <strong>in</strong> project<br />

supported districts <strong>in</strong>creased from 23%<br />

at basel<strong>in</strong>e to 50% by EoP.*<br />

5. Proportion <strong>of</strong> newborn protected with<br />

thermal care (dry<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> wrapp<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong><br />

10 m<strong>in</strong>utes) <strong>in</strong>creased from 18.5 (BDHS<br />

2007) at basel<strong>in</strong>e to 50% by EoP<br />

6. Proportion <strong>of</strong> newborn <strong>in</strong>itiated<br />

breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> one hour <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased from 51% to 85% by EoP<br />

7. Proportion <strong>of</strong> under-five children suffered<br />

from ARI managed by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased from 21% at basel<strong>in</strong>e to 75%<br />

by EoP<br />

Means <strong>of</strong><br />

Verification<br />

• Bangladesh<br />

Demographic<br />

<strong>Health</strong> survey<br />

• Bangladesh<br />

<strong>Maternal</strong><br />

Mortality<br />

survey<br />

• Project MIS<br />

data<br />

• Basel<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong><br />

End-<strong>of</strong>-<br />

Project (EoP)<br />

surveys<br />

• Pooled<br />

LQAS survey<br />

data for<br />

annual<br />

track<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• BRAC MIS<br />

data for<br />

monthly<br />

track<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• GoB HMIS<br />

Report for<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicator # 4<br />

Risks <strong>and</strong> Assumptions<br />

Assumptions<br />

• Donor commitment <strong>and</strong><br />

availability <strong>of</strong> funds<br />

• <strong>Health</strong> systems<br />

weaknesses addressed<br />

• Risks<br />

• Resource flow<br />

• Political stability<br />

• Natural disasters<br />

• Supply <strong>of</strong><br />

contraceptives is<br />

beyond BRAC’s control.<br />

• Natural disasters<br />

Assumptions<br />

• Knowledge <strong>of</strong> danger<br />

signs etc. will lead to<br />

better decision mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>and</strong> care seek<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Utilization <strong>of</strong> improved<br />

services will <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

• Access <strong>and</strong> affordability<br />

<strong>of</strong> community to<br />

services will <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

• Both private <strong>and</strong> public<br />

will <strong>of</strong>fer better quality<br />

services<br />

• MNCH human<br />

resources <strong>and</strong><br />

commodities available<br />

Risks<br />

• Social barriers<br />

• Logistics <strong>and</strong><br />

communications<br />

systems weaknesses<br />

• Political stability<br />

• Subject to GoB <strong>in</strong>itiative<br />

to tra<strong>in</strong> CSBA<br />

(Annex 1. cont<strong>in</strong>ued....)<br />

79


Annexures<br />

(.........Cont<strong>in</strong>ued Annex 1)<br />

Narrative Objectively Verifiable Indicators<br />

Summary<br />

Output: 1<br />

Increased<br />

knowledge <strong>and</strong><br />

improved<br />

MNCH<br />

practices <strong>in</strong><br />

communities<br />

Output: 2<br />

Improved<br />

provision <strong>of</strong><br />

quality MNCH<br />

services at<br />

household <strong>and</strong><br />

community<br />

levels.<br />

1. % <strong>of</strong> delivered women aware <strong>of</strong><br />

maternal danger signs knows what<br />

needs to be done (BRAC referral mobile<br />

number <strong>and</strong> hospital) rise from 7% at<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>e to 50% by EoP<br />

2. % <strong>of</strong> delivered women hav<strong>in</strong>g adequate<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> neonatal danger signs (5)<br />

know what needs to be done rise from<br />

18% at basel<strong>in</strong>e to 50% by EoP<br />

3. % <strong>of</strong> women hav<strong>in</strong>g a birth plan<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases from 2% at basel<strong>in</strong>e to 50%<br />

by EoP<br />

4. % <strong>of</strong> LBW babies received special care<br />

(frequent breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g, proper<br />

wrapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong> wash<strong>in</strong>g) rise from<br />

X% at basel<strong>in</strong>e to 60% by EoP<br />

5. % <strong>of</strong> eligible couple us<strong>in</strong>g modern<br />

contraceptive method <strong>in</strong>creased from<br />

55% at basel<strong>in</strong>e to 65% by EoP<br />

6. % <strong>of</strong> married adolescent girls giv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

birth decreased from 26.6 % at basel<strong>in</strong>e<br />

to 15% by EoP<br />

7. % <strong>of</strong> married adolescent girls us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

modern contraceptives from 52% at<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>e to 70% by EoP<br />

1. % pregnancies identified by SS/SK <strong>in</strong><br />

first trimester rises from 25% at basel<strong>in</strong>e<br />

to 60% by EoP<br />

2. % <strong>of</strong> women who received at least four<br />

ANCs from SKs <strong>in</strong>creased from 14% at<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>e to 80% by EoP<br />

3. Proportion <strong>of</strong> women delivered by<br />

skilled birth attendants <strong>in</strong>creased from<br />

15% at basel<strong>in</strong>e to 30% by EoP<br />

4. % PNC delivered by SKs with<strong>in</strong> 48<br />

hours for home deliveries rises from<br />

0.4% at basel<strong>in</strong>e to 80% by EoP<br />

5. % <strong>of</strong> neonates with sepsis received<br />

care from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

from 19% at basel<strong>in</strong>e to 70% by EoP<br />

6. % children with pneumonia managed<br />

by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers <strong>in</strong>crease from 0%<br />

at basel<strong>in</strong>e to 90% by EoP<br />

Means <strong>of</strong><br />

Verification<br />

• Basel<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong><br />

End-<strong>of</strong>-Project<br />

(EoP) surveys<br />

• Pooled LQAS<br />

survey data for<br />

annual<br />

track<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• BRAC MIS<br />

data for<br />

monthly<br />

track<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Basel<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong><br />

End-<strong>of</strong>-Project<br />

(EoP) surveys<br />

• Pooled LQAS<br />

survey data for<br />

annual<br />

track<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• BRAC MIS<br />

data for<br />

monthly<br />

track<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Risks <strong>and</strong> Assumptions<br />

Assumptions<br />

• Individual, households<br />

<strong>and</strong> community have<br />

enhanced knowledge<br />

through <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />

communications<br />

• Knowledge can lead to<br />

significantly behavior<br />

change<br />

Risks<br />

• Social stigmas<br />

• Cultural <strong>and</strong> religious<br />

barriers<br />

Assumptions<br />

• SS/SKs are properly<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed on MNCH issues<br />

• SS/SKs provide MNCH<br />

services regularly<br />

• Central BRAC <strong>in</strong>terprogramme<br />

committee<br />

meets <strong>and</strong> give<br />

necessary decisions<br />

regularly <strong>in</strong> time<br />

Risks<br />

• UN programmme starts<br />

<strong>in</strong> time<br />

• SS/SKs can not cope<br />

with new responsibilities<br />

(Annex 1. cont<strong>in</strong>ued....)<br />

80


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

(.........Cont<strong>in</strong>ued Annex 1)<br />

Narrative Objectively Verifiable Indicators<br />

Summary<br />

Output: 3<br />

Increased<br />

availability <strong>and</strong><br />

access to<br />

quality<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uum <strong>of</strong><br />

MNCH care <strong>and</strong><br />

services at<br />

facilities<br />

Output 4:<br />

Increased<br />

participation,<br />

accountability<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

responsiveness<br />

to communities’<br />

voice <strong>in</strong> MNCH<br />

services<br />

1. 60% <strong>of</strong> the project supported District<br />

Hospitals <strong>in</strong> MNCH districts provide<br />

quality services (availability <strong>of</strong> 24/7<br />

services,oxytoc<strong>in</strong>,MgSO4,antibiotic)<br />

2. Al least 80% <strong>of</strong> the target population is<br />

with<strong>in</strong> 2 hours travel from home to a<br />

CEmONC facility<br />

3. Proportion <strong>of</strong> all birth <strong>in</strong> all facilities at<br />

project supported districts rises from<br />

12.6% to at least 30 % by EoP<br />

4. CS rate at all CEmONC facilities <strong>in</strong><br />

project supported districts rises from<br />

4.8% at basel<strong>in</strong>e to 5-15% by EoP<br />

5. Case fatality rate at all EmONC facilities<br />

for maternal complications <strong>in</strong> project<br />

supported districts rema<strong>in</strong>s at


Annexures<br />

Annex 2. Pr<strong>of</strong>il<strong>in</strong>g the changes over time (2008-2010)<br />

Annex 2.1. Socioeconomic characteristics<br />

Annex 2.1a. Distribution <strong>of</strong> wealth <strong>in</strong>dex by district (Nilphamari, Rangpur <strong>and</strong> Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha)<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value<br />

N 1200 720 1200 720 1200 718<br />

Poorest 19.5 21.5 0.097 16.0 17.4 0.711 16.5 17.0 0.474<br />

Second 24.3 22.5 20.2 19.4 21.5 24.4<br />

Middle 22.2 18.6 21.3 21.1 22.8 22.7<br />

Fourth 17.4 21.3 19.8 17.8 21.0 20.3<br />

Richest 16.6 16.1 22.8 24.3 18.2 15.6<br />

Annex 2.1b. Distribution <strong>of</strong> wealth <strong>in</strong>dex by district (Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh, Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona)<br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh Naogaon Netrokona<br />

2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value<br />

N 1200 720 1200 720 1200 720<br />

Poorest 21.8 21.5 0.899 13.8 16.5 0.102 32.3 33.8 0.727<br />

Second 18.9 18.6 15.1 17.9 20.1 20.0<br />

Middle 17.7 19.3 19.4 19.9 16.5 17.6<br />

Fourth 20.4 20.4 24.2 21.3 17.6 16.9<br />

Richest 21.2 20.1 27.5 24.4 13.6 11.7<br />

Annex 2.2. <strong>Maternal</strong> health<br />

Annex 2.2.1. History <strong>of</strong> abortion<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong> Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

N 1200 720 3600 2158 2400 1440<br />

Ever had abortion 10.5 9.0 .297 13.6 13.9 .742 16.6 15.9 .574<br />

Frequency <strong>of</strong> abortion<br />

• None<br />

• 1<br />

• ≥ 2<br />

89.5<br />

8.8<br />

1.7<br />

91.0<br />

6.9<br />

2.1<br />

86.4<br />

11.6<br />

2.0<br />

86.1<br />

11.5<br />

2.4<br />

83.4<br />

14.1<br />

2.5<br />

84.1<br />

13.8<br />

2.1<br />

N 148 85 574 361 474 271<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> abortion<br />

• Induced<br />

• Spontaneous<br />

20.3<br />

79.7<br />

14.1<br />

85.9<br />

.240 30.7<br />

69.3<br />

23.0<br />

77.0<br />

.011 18.6<br />

81.4<br />

10.0<br />

90.0<br />

.002<br />

82


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Annex 2.2.2. Complication dur<strong>in</strong>g abortion <strong>and</strong> its management<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 p- 2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value<br />

value<br />

N 148 85 574 361 474 271<br />

Any complication faced after 48.0 48.2 .969 39.4 44.0 .158 43.2 69.7


Annexures<br />

Annex 2.2.3. History <strong>of</strong> MR<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

N 1200 720 3600 2158 2400 1441<br />

Ever had MR 3.2 4.2 .251 3.4 4.5 .029 2.6 4.4 .002<br />

Frequency <strong>of</strong> MR<br />

• None 96.8 95.8 96.6 95.5 .030 97.4 95.6 .004<br />

• 1 2.9 3.8 2.9 4.1 2.4 3.9<br />

• ≥ 2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.5<br />

N 43 34 146 111 66 74<br />

Any complication faced 18.6 41.2 .029 21.2 31.5 .061 30.3 36.5 .439<br />

after MR<br />

N 8 14 31 35 20 27<br />

Types <strong>of</strong> complication<br />

faced after MR<br />

• Fever 12.5 28.6 25.8 28.6 25.0<br />

• Foul smell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

0.0 0.0 19.4 0.0 10.0<br />

discharge<br />

• Vomit<strong>in</strong>g 0.0 7.1 6.5 2.9 15.0 25.9<br />

• Excessive bleed<strong>in</strong>g 37.5 64.3 51.6 48.6 45.0 0.0<br />

• Abdom<strong>in</strong>al pa<strong>in</strong> 75.0 64.3 41.9 48.6 45.0 0.0<br />

• Headache 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 37.0<br />

Action taken after MR<br />

complication<br />

• Did noth<strong>in</strong>g 0.0 0.0 9.7 5.7 5.0 11.1<br />

• Self treatment 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 7.4<br />

• Treatment from HCP 100.0 100.0 90.3 88.6 95.0 81.5<br />

N 8 14 28 31 19 22<br />

Treatment provider for MR<br />

complication<br />

• Village doctor 12.5 14.3 39.3 29.0 36.8 31.8<br />

• FWV/MA/SACMO/ 0.0 28.6 17.9 12.9 52.6 27.3<br />

Nurse<br />

• Homeopath 0.0 0.0 3.6 3.2 5.3 9.1<br />

• Qualified doctor 62.5 57.1 50.0 18.4 15.8 31.8<br />

• Drug seller 25.0 0.0 3.6 6.5 0.0 4.5<br />

• BRAC SS/SK 0.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Place <strong>of</strong> treatment for MR<br />

complication<br />

• District hospital 0.0 7.1 10.7 6.5 0.0 4.5<br />

• UHC/MCWC/FWC 12.5 42.9 10.7 22.6 42.1 27.3<br />

• Private hospital/Cl<strong>in</strong>ic 12.5 14.3 10.7 12.9 0.0 9.1<br />

• Other NGO cl<strong>in</strong>ic 0.0 0.0 3.6 3.2 0.0 0.0<br />

• Private chamber 62.5 28.6 42.9 25.8 26.3 45.5<br />

• Drug seller 25.0 7.1 3.6 9.7 5.3 9.1<br />

• Others (Satellite<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ic/home)<br />

0.0 7.1 25.0 19.4 36.8 4.5<br />

84


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Annex 2.2.4. Knowledge on antenatal care<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

N 544 384 1571 1104 1040 716<br />

Knows about antenatal care 99.1 99.7 .218 96.0 98.1 .002 97.8 96.9 .262<br />

(ANC)<br />

Knowledge on importance <strong>of</strong><br />

receiv<strong>in</strong>g ANC<br />

• For early recognition <strong>of</strong> 42.1 18.5 51.9 15.4 41.5 6.8<br />

complication<br />

• For safe delivery 57.0 55.7 44.0 28.6 56.3 19.6<br />

• To know the position <strong>of</strong> - 25.0 - 48.1 - 61.5<br />

baby<br />

• To know mother’s<br />

- 0.0 - 21.9 - 5.4<br />

wellness<br />

• For weakness - 0.3 - 0.1 - 0.4<br />

• For wellbe<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> mother<br />

<strong>and</strong> child<br />

- 0.0 - 0.8 - 2.5<br />

Annex 2.2.5. Knowledge on birth preparedness<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value<br />

N 544 384 1571 1104 1040 716<br />

Knowledge on birth<br />

plan<br />

• No knowledge 3.1 0.0 < .001 4.3 21.7 < .001 6.7 41.6 < .001<br />

(0 plan)<br />

• Moderate<br />

51.1 69.5 56.8 53.4 68.3 53.5<br />

knowledge<br />

(1-2 plans)<br />

• Good knowledge 45.8 30.5 38.9 24.9 25.0 4.9<br />

(maximum 3<br />

plans)<br />

Median (range) 2(0 - 4) 2(1-4) 2(0-4) 2(0-4) 2(0-4) 1(0-4)<br />

knowledge on birth<br />

plan<br />

Knowledge on<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual birth plans<br />

• Place 89.7 93.8 .031 87.0 61.6 < .001 82.2 29.1 < .001<br />

• Attendant 80.5 69.5 < .001 71.2 53.9 < .001 78.3 24.6 < .001<br />

• Save money 50.7 56.5 .083 55.1 43.3 < .001 31.7 32.4 .767<br />

85


Annexures<br />

Annex 2.2.6. Respondents faced complications dur<strong>in</strong>g antenatal period<br />

2008<br />

N =<br />

544<br />

Nilphamari<br />

2010<br />

N =<br />

384<br />

p-value 2008<br />

N =<br />

1571<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

2010<br />

N =<br />

1104<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2010 p-<br />

N = value<br />

716<br />

p-value 2008<br />

N = 1040<br />

Any complication 37.3 52.9


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Annex 2.2.7. Treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour for antenatal complications<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

2008 2010 p- 2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

value<br />

N 203 203 711 638 489 523<br />

Action taken for<br />

complication<br />

• No treatment 30.0 13.8 31.5 25.7 17.8 21.6<br />

• Self treatment 4.4 7.4 3.8 7.2 3.7 3.4<br />

• Treatment from HCP 65.5 78.8 64.7 67.1 78.5 75.0<br />

N 61 28 224 164 87 113<br />

Reasons for not tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

any action<br />

• Thought treatment<br />

was not necessary<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

73.8 46.4 50.0 60.4 52.9 46.9<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong><br />

24.6 50.0 48.2 28.0 43.7 47.8<br />

money/expensive<br />

• Others 1.6 3.6 5.8 15.9 8.0 11.5<br />

N 203 203 711 638 489 523<br />

Place <strong>of</strong> treatment*<br />

• No treatment 30.0 13.8 31.5 25.7 17.8 21.6<br />

• Self treatment 4.4 7.4 3.8 7.2 3.7 3.4<br />

• District hospital 4.9 2.0 5.1 3.0 4.9 3.3<br />

• UHC/MCWC 9.4 14.8 7.6 8.3 14.7 13.8<br />

• FWC/Satellite cl<strong>in</strong>ic 3.0 9.4 1.5 1.6 3.7 3.8<br />

• Private hospital/cl<strong>in</strong>ic 3.9 3.9 6.0 7.4 4.1 7.1<br />

• NGO cl<strong>in</strong>ic 3.9 9.9 1.8 1.9 3.7 3.3<br />

• Private<br />

30.0 25.1 36.0 30.1 44.4 46.1<br />

chamber/pharmacy<br />

• Home 16.7 20.7 8.9 16.6 8.4 3.4<br />

• Others 1.0 0.5 1.1 2.2 0.6 0.2<br />

Provider <strong>of</strong> treatment*<br />

• No treatment 30.0 13.8 31.5 25.7 17.8 21.6<br />

• Self treatment 4.4 7.4 3.8 7.2 3.7 3.4<br />

• Village doctor 19.2 12.8 19.3 19.0 20.7 19.1<br />

• BRAC (SS/SK) 4.9 11.8 1.1 4.7 1.4 0.6<br />

• Govt. health worker** 4.4 10.3 1.8 1.9 3.5 4.6<br />

• Homeopath 11.8 9.4 7.7 7.5 9.0 11.7<br />

• Traditional healer 3.0 1.0 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.0<br />

• Qualified doctor 26.1 33.5 32.3 30.3 40.9 38.4<br />

• Drug seller 2.0 0.5 1.1 3.3 3.9 1.1<br />

• Nurse/paramedics/CS 0.0 6.4 2.4 3.9 3.7 2.9<br />

BA<br />

• Others*** 2.5 7.9 0.1 0.2 0.8 1.9<br />

Treatment received*<br />

• No treatment 30.0 13.8 31.5 25.7 17.8 113(21.<br />

6<br />

• Self treatment 4.4 7.4 3.8 7.2 3.7 3.4<br />

• Counsel<strong>in</strong>g 24.6 71.4 15.6 30.3 6.3 28.7<br />

• Allopathic medic<strong>in</strong>e 47.8 61.6 53.3 48.4 68.7 49.5<br />

• Traditional treatment 3.0 1.5 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.3<br />

• Homeopathic<br />

11.8 8.4 8.2 7.7 9.0 11.5<br />

medic<strong>in</strong>e<br />

• Referred 6.4 3.0 3.2 0.3 2.9 0.0<br />

• Others 2.5 24.6 3.9 19.3 0.2 19.3<br />

(Annex 2.2.7 cont<strong>in</strong>ued......)<br />

87


Annexures<br />

(.....Cont<strong>in</strong>ued Annex 2.2.7)<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

Decision mak<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

seek<strong>in</strong>g or not seek<strong>in</strong>g<br />

care for complications<br />

• Self 15.8 2.0 17.9 16.0 13.3 10.1<br />

• Husb<strong>and</strong> 3.4 0.0 6.9 7.7 8.0 11.9<br />

• Jo<strong>in</strong>tly with husb<strong>and</strong> 50.2 80.3 57.5 57.5 56.0 58.1<br />

• Jo<strong>in</strong>tly with <strong>in</strong>-laws 20.7 14.8 10.0 9.2 12.7 11.1<br />

• In-laws 2.5 1.0 1.4 1.3 1.0 0.8<br />

• Partners/natal<br />

5.4 1.5 6.0 6.9 8.4 7.1<br />

relatives<br />

• Others(SS/SK/TBA 2.0 0.5 0.3 1.4 0.6 1.0<br />

/TTBA/FWV/FWA)<br />

* Multiple response questions * *FWV/FWA/MA/SACMO ***TTBA/TBA/other NGO worker etc.<br />

Annex 2.2.8. Complications faced dur<strong>in</strong>g delivery period<br />

Nilphamari<br />

2008 2010 P-<br />

value<br />

N N<br />

=544 =384<br />

Complication faced 165 193<br />

(30.3) (50.3)<br />

Complications*<br />

• Substantial<br />

bleed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

2008 2010 P-<br />

value<br />

N N<br />

=1571 =1104<br />

509<br />

(46.1)<br />


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Annex 2.2.9. Treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g behaviour for delivery complications<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

2008 2010 P- 2008 2010 P-<br />

value<br />

value<br />

N 165 193 452 509 338 421<br />

Action taken for<br />

complications<br />

• None 11.5 4.7 21.7 13.4 22.8 19.7<br />

• Self treatment 5.5 5.2 3.8 3.7 3.0 3.6<br />

• Treatment from HCP 83.0 90.2 74.6 82.9 74.3 76.7<br />

N 19 9 98 68 77 83<br />

Reason for not tak<strong>in</strong>g any<br />

action<br />

• Felt treatment was<br />

unnecessary<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 P-<br />

value<br />

47.4 66.7 63.3 70.6 58.4 55.4<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> money 42.1 33.3 34.7 23.5 40.3 38.6<br />

• Other 10.5 0.0 9.2 8.8 16.9 10.8<br />

N 165 193 452 509 338 421<br />

Place <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

• None 11.5 4.7 21.7 13.4 22.8 19.7<br />

• Self treatment 5.5 5.2 3.8 3.7 3.0 3.6<br />

• District hospital 5.5 6.2 6.6 8.6 7.4 5.2<br />

• UHC/MCWC/FWC 26.7 23.3 10.2 13.9 15.1 14.3<br />

• NGO cl<strong>in</strong>ics 1.2 2.6 1.1 1.4 0.9 0.2<br />

• Private hospital/cl<strong>in</strong>ic 5.5 5.7 10.6 9.0 16.9 14.7<br />

• Private chamber 3.6 0.5 7.1 4.1 4.4 7.8<br />

• Home 40.0 50.3 136.5 43.2 28.4 32.8<br />

• Other 0.6 1.6) 2.9 3.9 1.2 2.6<br />

Provider <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

• None 11.5 4.7 21.7 13.4 22.8 19.7<br />

• Self treatment 5.5 5.2 3.8 3.7 3.0 3.6<br />

• Village doctor 30.9 36.3 34.3 34.4 21.0 23.8<br />

• BRAC health worker 4.2 13.0 0.2 2.0 0.0 0.2<br />

• FWV/MA/SACMO 7.9 1.6 3.8 1.4 2.7 3.3<br />

• Homeopath 1.8 4.7 1.8 4.1 3.6 7.8<br />

• Qualified doctor 26.7 32.6 27.4 34.4 34.3 31.8<br />

• Nurse 4.2 23.3 3.3 13.2 7.1 9.7<br />

• Others 7.9 2.6 3.8 5.5 5.6 6.7<br />

Treatment received<br />

• None 11.5 4.7 21.7 13.4 22.8 19.7<br />

• Self treatment 5.5 5.2 3.8 3.7 3.0 3.6<br />

• Didn’t receive any 1.2 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

treatment<br />

• Counsel<strong>in</strong>g 16.4 72.0 10.4 21.4 1.5 22.1<br />

• Allopathic medic<strong>in</strong>e 63.0 51.8 53.5 34.2 54.7 24.9<br />

• Traditional 4.8 0.5 3.3 1.6) 0.3 1.9<br />

• Homeopathic<br />

1.8 4.7 2.0 4.1 3.8 8.3<br />

medic<strong>in</strong>e<br />

• Surgery/c-section 7.9 6.7 8.0 11.4 12.4 14.3<br />

• Sal<strong>in</strong>e 9.7 47.2 18.6 49.5 1.8 39.7<br />

• Injection 11.5 53.4 7.5 53.0 0.9 40.6<br />

• Referred 15.2 11.4 4.6 1.0 3.6 0.2<br />

• Others 1.2 4.7 3.1 5.3 6.5 4.8<br />

Decision mak<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

seek<strong>in</strong>g or not seek<strong>in</strong>g<br />

care for complications<br />

(Annex 2.2.9 cont<strong>in</strong>ued......)<br />

89


Annexures<br />

(.....Cont<strong>in</strong>ued Annex 2.2.9)<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 P-<br />

value<br />

2008 2010 P-<br />

value<br />

2008 2010 P-<br />

value<br />

• Self 4.8 0.5 .002 4.6 5.1 .001 7.7 4.<br />

• Husb<strong>and</strong> 2.4 1.6 11.1 7.3 9.8 14.0<br />

• Jo<strong>in</strong>tly with husb<strong>and</strong> 40.0 55.4 40.0 46.0 29.9 37.3<br />

• Jo<strong>in</strong>tly with <strong>in</strong>-laws 33.9 25.9 22.8 13.8 18.6 12.8<br />

• In-laws 3.6 1.6 2.9 2.2 2.7 1.7<br />

• Partners/natal<br />

9.1 13.5 16.6 22.2 27.2 28.3<br />

relatives<br />

• Others(SS/SK/TBA/T<br />

TBA/FWV/FWA)<br />

6.1 1.6 2.0 3.5 4.1 1.9<br />

Annex 2.2.10. Respondents faced complications dur<strong>in</strong>g postnatal period accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

area<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

N 539 383 1553 1091 1026 700<br />

Any complication faced 27.1 43.1


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

(.....Cont<strong>in</strong>ued Annex 2.2.11)<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

2008 2010 p-<br />

value<br />

• Husb<strong>and</strong>/mother <strong>in</strong> law 9.5 0.0 8.2 1.5 13.0 3.2<br />

disapproved<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> money 33.3 36.8 49.4 34.3 59.3 55.9<br />

• Others 4.8 0.0 3.5 4.5 3.7 3.2<br />

N 146 165 389 407 317 412<br />

Place <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

• No treatment 14.4 11.5


Annexures<br />

Annex 2.2.12. Referrals for maternal complications<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value<br />

N 544 384 1571 1104 1040 716<br />

Suffered from maternal 59.2 78.6


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Annex 2.3. <strong>Neonatal</strong> health<br />

Annex 2.3.1. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g children aged up to 12 months<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(control)<br />

2008 2010 P- 2008 2010 P- 2008 2010 P-value<br />

value<br />

value<br />

N 539 383 1553 1091 1026 700<br />

Initiation <strong>of</strong> breast<br />

feed<strong>in</strong>g after birth<br />

• With<strong>in</strong> 1 hour 81.3 74.9


Annexures<br />

Annex 2.3.3. Experienc<strong>in</strong>g neonatal danger signs <strong>and</strong> its management<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(control)<br />

2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value 2008 2010 p-value<br />

N 383 1091 700<br />

Faced neonatal danger signs<br />

• Couldn’t suckle milk 6.3 6.2 11.7<br />

• High fever/Hypothermia 11.2 13.5 22.1<br />

• Chest <strong>in</strong> draw<strong>in</strong>g 10.7 7.1 14.3<br />

• Redness <strong>of</strong> eye 1.6 2.1 3.3<br />

• Lethargic/Unconscious 2.1 3.3 6.1<br />

• Convulsion 0.5 1.4 1.9<br />

• Umbilical <strong>in</strong>fection 7.8 6.9 6.7<br />

• Swell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> abdomen<br />

/Frequent vomit<strong>in</strong>g<br />

2.1 3.3 6.1<br />

N 91 304 263<br />

Action taken on recogniz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

neonatal danger signs<br />

• No action taken 6.6 8.9 9.5<br />

• Help from BRAC stuff 12.1 6.3 1.9<br />

• Help from facility (public<br />

35.2 32.2 37.3<br />

or private)<br />

• Others (Village doctor,<br />

Homeo doctor, Pir/Fakir,<br />

traditional healer, drug<br />

seller, etc)<br />

46.2 52.6 51.3<br />

94


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Annex 2.4 <strong>Child</strong> health<br />

Annex 2.4.1. Management <strong>of</strong> ARI among children aged 0-59 months<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> <strong>Child</strong>ren aged less<br />

than 2 months with pneumonia<br />

managed by*<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 2008 2010 2008 2010<br />

2 0 8 1 6 8<br />

• Medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 37.5<br />

• Others (Homeopath/Village 100.0 0.0 75.0 100.0 100.0 75.0<br />

doctor/Drug seller)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> <strong>Child</strong>ren aged less 3 0 3 6 4 1<br />

than 2 months with severe<br />

pneumonia managed by*<br />

• Medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider 66.7 0.0 33.3 83.8 100.0 0.0<br />

• Others(Homeopath/Village<br />

doctor)<br />

66.7 0.0 66.7 66.7 25.0 100.0<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> <strong>Child</strong>ren aged<br />

102 10 417 112 364 123<br />

2 – 59 months with pneumonia<br />

managed by*<br />

• Medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider 17.6 30.0 21.3 23.2 27.2 23.6<br />

• BRAC SS/SK 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

• Others (Village<br />

73.5 80.0 77.5 90.2 67.9 67.5<br />

doctor/Homeopath/Drug<br />

seller)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> children aged<br />

133 20 328 81 236 118<br />

2-59 months with severe<br />

pneumonia managed by *<br />

• Medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider 36.1 45.0 33.5 28.4 47.5 34.7<br />

• BRAC SS/SK 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0<br />

• Others (Village<br />

70.7 70.0 72.6 86.4 55.9 73.7<br />

doctor/Homeopath/Drug<br />

seller)<br />

* Multiple responses<br />

Annex 2.4.2. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea <strong>and</strong> related feed<strong>in</strong>g practices<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha <strong>and</strong><br />

Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value 2008 2010 P-value<br />

N 1111 674 3284 1946 2184 1276<br />

<strong>Child</strong>ren suffered from 13.8 13.8 .987 15.0 11.7 .001 9.9 14.9


Annexures<br />

Annex 2.4.3. Treatment <strong>of</strong> other illnesses among children aged 0-59 months<br />

Nilphamari<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

2008 2010 P-<br />

value<br />

2008 2010 P-<br />

value<br />

2008 2010 P-<br />

value<br />

N 412 542 1234 1413 798 693<br />

Treatment received dur<strong>in</strong>g other 85.9 93.4


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Annex 3 Univariate analyses for identify<strong>in</strong>g factors<br />

Annex 3.1. Identification <strong>of</strong> factors predictive <strong>of</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g 4+ ANCs<br />

Factors<br />

Percentag<br />

e<br />

Nilphamari<br />

4+ ANC from Tra<strong>in</strong>ed provider<br />

Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong><br />

Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

p-value Percentage p-value Percentag<br />

e<br />

p-<br />

value<br />

Mother’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 91.7 .059 69.4 .005 25.5 .000<br />

• Can’t read <strong>and</strong> write 85.6 61.2 8.1<br />

Mother’s education<br />

• Primary <strong>in</strong>complete 84.6 .013 60.2 .000 9.4 .000<br />

• Primary or higher 92.3 70.5 26.3<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 89.5 .781 69.5 .011 24.9 .000<br />

• Can’t read <strong>and</strong> write 88.6 62.2 11.1<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s education<br />

• Primary <strong>in</strong>complete 87.4 .263 62.6 .013 11.3 .000<br />

• Primary or higher 91.0 69.8 26.1<br />

Amount <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong><br />

• None 92.4 .432 68.1 .116 18.2 .005<br />

• ≤50 decimal 88.8 63.7 14.8<br />

• > 50 decimal 86.9 70.5 25.1<br />

BRAC eligible<br />

• Yes 87.1 .294 64.1 .279 13.3 .003<br />

• No 90.5 67.2 21.9<br />

Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

• Poorest 88.9 .163 59.8 .020 7.2 .000<br />

• Second 92.7 65.5 12.7<br />

• Middle 81.6 61.6 14.4<br />

• Fourth 92.4 68.9 27.2<br />

• Richest qu<strong>in</strong>tile 88.7 73.6 33.8<br />

Reproductive <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />

Age at first marriage<br />

• ≤ 17 years 88.7 .784 66.2 .605 16.2 .007<br />

• > 17 years 92.1 64.2 25.5<br />

Age at first conception<br />

• ≤ 19 years 88.7 .599 66.3 .556 17.3 .131<br />

• > 19 years 92.5 64.2 23.0<br />

Parity<br />

• Primiparous 92.5 .146 67.0 .613 24.9 .002<br />

• Multiparous 87.5 65.4 15.2<br />

<strong>Child</strong> death<br />

• None 88.2 .202 67.1 .077 19.7 .025<br />

• One or more 93.7 60.7 11.0<br />

97


Annexures<br />

Annex 3.2. Identification <strong>of</strong> factors predictive <strong>of</strong> safe delivery<br />

Safe delivery (Delivery by tra<strong>in</strong>ed birth attendant)<br />

Factors<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

Percentage p-value Percentage p-value Percentage p-value<br />

Mother’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 78.8 .014 59.8


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Annex 3.3. Identification <strong>of</strong> factors predictive <strong>of</strong> PNC from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

PNC from tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Factors<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

Percentage p-value Percentage p-value Percentage p-value<br />

Mother’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 93.5 .359 67.6 .058 38.6


Annexures<br />

Annex 3.4. Identification <strong>of</strong> factors predictive <strong>of</strong> treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g for delivery<br />

complications<br />

Factors<br />

Treatment-seek<strong>in</strong>g for delivery complications<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

Percentage p-value Percentage p-value Percentage p-value<br />

Mother’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 40.3 .874 44.4 .007 48.2


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Annex 3.5. Association <strong>of</strong> different socioeconomic factors with the use <strong>of</strong> modern FP<br />

methods<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> modern FP method<br />

Factors<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

Percentage p-value Percentage p-value Percentage p-value<br />

Age group <strong>of</strong> respondent<br />

• ≤ 19 years 56.6 .009 51.2 .092 52.7 .029<br />

• 20 – 34 years 70.0 57.0 61.8<br />

• ≥ 35 years 65.7 59.7 56.1<br />

Mother’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 69.0 .239 58.5 .023 62.7 .018<br />

• Can’t read <strong>and</strong> write 64.9 53.6 56.6<br />

Mother’s education<br />

• Primary <strong>in</strong>complete 67.5 .842 52.7 .001 56.5 .009<br />

• Primary or higher 66.8 59.6 63.3<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 68.6 .485 58.4 .094 63.7 .015<br />

• Can’t read <strong>and</strong> write 66.2 54.8 57.4<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s education<br />

• Primary <strong>in</strong>complete 66.8 .741 55.1 .109 58.6 .108<br />

• Primary or higher 67.9 58.5 62.8<br />

Amount <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong><br />

• None 67.8 .456 49.8 .014 55.6 .472<br />

• 1-50 decimal 64.8 55.9 59.5<br />

• >50 decimal 69.9 60.6 61.9<br />

BRAC eligibility<br />

• Yes 63.9 .111 51.9 .001 61.4 .341<br />

• No 69.5 59.4 58.9<br />

Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

• Poorest 54.8 .003 48.5 17 years 73.4 55.6 58.1<br />

Age at first conception<br />

• ≤ 19 years 67.8 .239 57.8 .002 62.5 19 years 61.3 49.4 49.1<br />

Parity<br />

• Primiparous 66.5 .840 57.2 .613 62.1 .312<br />

• Multiparous 67.3 56.0 59.2<br />

<strong>Child</strong> death<br />

• No 67.5 5.96 57.9 .001 61.6 .005<br />

• Yes 65.0 48.8 51.7<br />

101


Annexures<br />

Annex 3.6. Association <strong>of</strong> different socioeconomic factors with the use <strong>of</strong> modern FP<br />

among married adolescent girls<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> modern FP among married adolescent girls<br />

Factors Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

Percentage p-value Percentage p-value Percentage p-value<br />

Mother’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 60.2 .166 53.7 .178 53.6 .697<br />

• Can’t read <strong>and</strong> write 47.6 45.9 50.7<br />

Mother’s education<br />

• Primary <strong>in</strong>complete 56.8 .966 41.9 .013 48.7 .377<br />

• Primary or higher 56.4 56.1 54.9<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 60.6 .387 56.8 .042 57.3 .169<br />

• Can’t read <strong>and</strong> write 53.4 45.6 47.9<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s education<br />

• Primary <strong>in</strong>complete 57.7 .844 49.4 .380 49.5 .278<br />

• Primary or higher 56.1 54.2 56.9<br />

L<strong>and</strong> ownership<br />

• None 65.0 .282 47.8 .666 57.1 .844<br />

• 1-50 decimal 57.1 53.1 51.2<br />

• >50 decimal 47.6 48.3 54.5<br />

BRAC eligibility<br />

• Yes 54.7 .687 48.3 .271 48.4 .265<br />

• No 58.0 54.3 56.0<br />

Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

• Poorest 46.2 .498 40.6 .288 45.5 .455<br />

• Second 62.1 49.4 65.0<br />

• Middle 64.3 54.1 52.0<br />

• Fourth 53.1 56.3 48.9<br />

• Richest 64.7 58.1 53.8<br />

Parity<br />

• Primiparous 59.0 .326 51.2 .978 55.8 .119<br />

• Multiparous 50.0 51.1 43.9<br />

<strong>Child</strong> death<br />

• No 60.2 .004 53.4 .008 53.8 .166<br />

• Yes 16.7 27.6 33.3<br />

102


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Annex 3.7. Association <strong>of</strong> different socioeconomic factors with hav<strong>in</strong>g all birth plans<br />

Hav<strong>in</strong>g all birth plans<br />

Factors Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

Percentage p-value Percentage p-value Percentage p-value<br />

Mother’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 80.6 .011 65.8 19 years 87.5 63.4 33.3<br />

Parity<br />

• Primiparous 81.7 .070 58.4 .626 37.1 .105<br />

• Multiparous 73.1 60.0 31.0<br />

<strong>Child</strong> death<br />

• No 76.6 .378 59.4 .837 33.3 .685<br />

• Yes 71.4 60.2 31.4<br />

Sought 4+ ANCs (Tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

provider)<br />

• Yes 77.9


Annexures<br />

Annex 3.8. Association <strong>of</strong> different socioeconomic <strong>and</strong> maternal factors with receiv<strong>in</strong>g all<br />

essential newborn care<br />

Received all essential newborn care<br />

Factors<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

Percentage p-value Percentage p-value Percentage p-value<br />

Mother’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 53.2 .422 60.3 .000 41.3 .142<br />

• Can’t read <strong>and</strong> write 49.1 48.6 35.8<br />

Mother’s education<br />

• Primary <strong>in</strong>complete 46.3 .085 48.0 .000 35.6 .085<br />

• Primary or higher 55.2 61.2 42.0<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 51.1 .865 58.4 .035 44.3 .004<br />

• Can’t read <strong>and</strong> write 52.0 52.0 33.7<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s education .9<br />

• Primary <strong>in</strong>complete 51.9 .875 52.1 .019 33.4 .001<br />

• Primary or higher 51.1 59.2 45.7<br />

L<strong>and</strong> ownership<br />

• None 53.3 .387 65.0 .041 41.9 .162<br />

• 1-50 decimal 54.1 53.4 36.3<br />

• >50 decimal 46.3 55.1 43.8<br />

Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

• Poorest 60.5 .259 48.8 .051 33.9 .337<br />

• Second 47.6 51.0 45.1<br />

• Middle 46.1 57.7 36.9<br />

• Fourth 54.9 58.9 41.2<br />

• Richest 45.3 60.7 39.5<br />

Age at first marriage<br />

• ≤ 17 years 52.5 .225 54.4 .234 40.6 .106<br />

• > 17 years 42.1 59.2 33.5<br />

Age at first conception<br />

• ≤ 19 years 51.9 .599 53.5 .021 40.7 .050<br />

• > 19 years 47.5 62.0 31.1<br />

Parity<br />

• Primiparous 59.7 .031 56.6 .560 42.2 .229<br />

• Multiparous 47.7 54.7 37.5<br />

<strong>Child</strong> death<br />

• No 52.8 .224 56.6 .064 39.0 .960<br />

• Yes 44.4 49.5 38.8<br />

Sought 4+ ANCs (Tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

provider)<br />

• Yes 48.8 .719 45.8 .000 37.8 .166<br />

• No 51.8 60.2 44.4<br />

104


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Annex 3.9. Association <strong>of</strong> different socioeconomic <strong>and</strong> maternal factors with birth<br />

asphyxia managed by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Birth asphyxia managed by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Factors<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

Percentage p-value Percentage p-value Percentage p-value<br />

Mother’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 68.2 .809 46.5 .493 58.7 .032<br />

• Can’t read <strong>and</strong> write 64.3 40.0 36.7<br />

Mother’s education<br />

• Primary <strong>in</strong>complete 66.7 1.00 40.0 .493 37.5 .021<br />

• Primary or higher 66.7 46.5 61.5<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 77.8 .157 47.5 .414 58.1 .043<br />

• Can’t read <strong>and</strong> write 55.6 40.0 37.3<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s education<br />

• Primary <strong>in</strong>complete 57.9 .238 38.1 .165 36.8 .016<br />

• Primary or higher 76.5 50.9 62.2<br />

L<strong>and</strong> ownership<br />

• None 63.6 .962 38.9 .185 57.1 .562<br />

• 1-50 decimal 68.8 39.1 42.9<br />

• >50 decimal 66.7 58.6 53.1<br />

Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

• Poorest 57.1 .198 26.3 .272 28.6 .032<br />

• Second 58.3 40.0 50.0<br />

• Middle 40.0 58.8 50.0<br />

• Fourth 83.3 43.5 44.4<br />

• Richest 100.0 54.5 80.0<br />

Age at first marriage<br />

• ≤ 17 years 62.5 .278 44.0 .985 44.7 .304<br />

• > 17 years 100.0 43.8 57.9<br />

Age at first conception<br />

• ≤ 19 years 66.7 1.00 45.1 .652 44.2 .195<br />

• > 19 years 66.7 40.0 61.1<br />

Parity<br />

• Primiparous 62.5 .635 44.1 .983 69.2<br />

• Multiparous 70.0 43.9 39.1<br />

<strong>Child</strong> death<br />

• No 70.8 .453 40.0 .109 52.6 .040<br />

• Yes 58.3 57.7 26.3<br />

Sought 4+ ANCs (Tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

provider)<br />

• Yes 65.6 1.00 40.3 .306 70.6 .034<br />

• No 75.6 50.0 42.3<br />

Delivered by tra<strong>in</strong>ed birth<br />

attendant<br />

• Yes 68.8 .588 46.4 .526 55.7 .029<br />

• No 50.0 40.4 32.4<br />

105


Annexures<br />

Annex 3.10. Association <strong>of</strong> different socioeconomic <strong>and</strong> maternal factors with neonatal<br />

sepsis managed by qualified doctors<br />

<strong>Neonatal</strong> sepsis managed by qualified doctors<br />

Factors<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

Percentage p-value Percentage p-value Percentage p-value<br />

Mother’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 50.0 .080 51.6 .491 51.0 .002<br />

• Can’t read <strong>and</strong> write 48.3 45.1 27.8<br />

Mother’s education<br />

• Primary <strong>in</strong>complete 50.0 .932 43.4 .292 28.4 .000<br />

• Primary or higher 49.0 53.3 55.0<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 55.6 .271 54.9 .195 50.0 .015<br />

• Can’t read <strong>and</strong> write 43.2 42.6 31.9<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s education<br />

• Primary <strong>in</strong>complete 40.4 .075 40.8 .040 33.3 .026<br />

• Primary or higher 60.6 61.0 50.0<br />

L<strong>and</strong> ownership<br />

• None 40.7 .540 41.7 .262 44.4 .038<br />

• 1-50 decimal 52.9 44.1 33.9<br />

• >50 decimal 55.0 60.6 54.9<br />

Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

• Poorest 44.0 .686 40.0 .439 26.8 .010<br />

• Second 47.6 40.0 38.7<br />

• Middle 35.7 51.9 40.5<br />

• Fourth 60.0 60.0 46.7<br />

• Richest 83.3 62.5 71.4<br />

Age at first marriage<br />

• ≤ 17 years 49.3 .971 46.7 .389 41.0 .816<br />

• > 17 years 50.0 57.1 38.7<br />

Age at first conception<br />

• ≤ 19 years 48.7 .675 50.6 .478 39.9 .656<br />

• > 19 years 60.0 42.9 44.4<br />

Parity<br />

• Primiparous 48.3 .882 68.8 .007 52.7 .027<br />

• Multiparous 50.0 40.7 35.0<br />

<strong>Child</strong> death<br />

• No 48.5 .735 47.5 .698 42.3 .367<br />

• Yes 53.3 51.5 34.2<br />

Sought 4+ ANCs (Tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

provider)<br />

• Yes 50.0 1.00 44.6 .315 52.2 .224<br />

• No 40.0 54.2 38.8<br />

Delivered by tra<strong>in</strong>ed birth<br />

attendant<br />

• Yes 51.5 .390 61.7 .003 43.4 .346<br />

• No 38.5 34.0 36.2<br />

106


Changes <strong>of</strong> MNCH dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2010<br />

Annex 3.11. Association <strong>of</strong> different socioeconomic <strong>and</strong> maternal factor with management<br />

<strong>of</strong> ARI by medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

ARI managed by medically tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Factors<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

Percentage p-value Percentage p-value Percentage p-value<br />

Mother’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 29.6 .840 21.6 .299 30.7 .001<br />

• Can’t read <strong>and</strong> write 32.1 17.2 15.7<br />

Mother’s education<br />

• Primary <strong>in</strong>complete 30.0 .873 18.4 .540 17.4 .004<br />

• Primary or higher 32.0 20.9 30.6<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 40.0 .183 22.2 .293 30.3 .007<br />

• Can’t read <strong>and</strong> write 23.3 17.9 18.1<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong>’s education<br />

• Primary <strong>in</strong>complete 14.3 .007 19.3 .698 18.2 .003<br />

• Primary or higher 48.1 20.9 31.8<br />

L<strong>and</strong> ownership<br />

• None 20.0 .379 20.0 .915 30.4 .009<br />

• 1-50 decimal 27.6 19.3 19.4<br />

• >50 decimal 43.8 21.3 35.2<br />

BRAC eligibility<br />

• Yes 30.4 .949 17.9 .389 18.1 .008<br />

• No 31.3 21.4 30.1<br />

Wealth <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

• Poorest 33.3 .679 20.0 .331 14.4


Annexures<br />

Annex 3.12. Association <strong>of</strong> different socioeconomic <strong>and</strong> maternal factor with management<br />

<strong>of</strong> diarrhoea by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Diarrhoea managed by tra<strong>in</strong>ed providers<br />

Factors<br />

Nilphamari Rangpur, Gaib<strong>and</strong>ha<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

Naogaon <strong>and</strong> Netrokona<br />

(Control)<br />

Percentage p-value Percentage p-value Percentage p-value<br />

Mother’s literacy<br />

• Can read <strong>and</strong> write 30.6 .004 17.9 .483 42.7


Research <strong>and</strong> Evaluation Division<br />

BRAC, BRAC Centre<br />

75 Mohakhali<br />

Dhaka 1212<br />

Bangladesh<br />

T : 88-02-9881265, 8824180-87<br />

F : 88-02-8823542, 8823614<br />

E : nasreen.h@brac.net<br />

W : www.brac.net/research<br />

Ipact<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Aberdeen<br />

<strong>Health</strong> Sciences Build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Foresterhill<br />

Aberdeen AB25 2ZD<br />

United K<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />

T : +44(0) 1224 551897<br />

F : +44(0) 1224 555704<br />

E : <strong>in</strong>fo@ipact-<strong>in</strong>t.com<br />

W : www.ipact-<strong>in</strong>t.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!