EAP - The Pacific Infrastructure Challenge - World Bank (2006).pdf
EAP - The Pacific Infrastructure Challenge - World Bank (2006).pdf
EAP - The Pacific Infrastructure Challenge - World Bank (2006).pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Competition<br />
<strong>Pacific</strong> countries – like most countries in the world – have a history of monopoly<br />
service provision. However, unlike the comparator countries, the region has been<br />
slow to introduce private sector involvement and competition.<br />
<strong>Pacific</strong> countries have mainly government operated telecommunications providers.<br />
Competition is limited to the following countries and services:<br />
Tonga – in mobile services and internet service provision<br />
Papua New Guinea – in internet service provision<br />
Samoa – in internet service provision<br />
In Samoa, Telecom Samoa Cellular has an exclusive license to provide mobile<br />
services. SamoaTel, the fixed line operator is employing GSM technology to provide<br />
‘wireless local loop’ services to remote villages to meet their universal service<br />
obligations. This use of mobile technology is being contested by Telecom Samoa<br />
Cellular.<br />
Where competition has been introduced, there appear to be benefits. <strong>The</strong> relatively<br />
low mobile tariffs in Tonga and the fall in internet charges in Samoa after the<br />
introduction of competing internet service providers indicate that these countries can<br />
benefit from liberalization. <strong>The</strong> population size and the level of GDP in both Samoa<br />
and Tonga is comparable to that of other <strong>Pacific</strong> countries.<br />
Competition has not been introduced to international telecommunication services in<br />
any of the <strong>Pacific</strong> countries reviewed. <strong>The</strong> experience in the Caribbean countries was<br />
that market liberalization in this sector led to lower costs and improved service<br />
quality, although local rates had to rise as cross-subsidies were removed.<br />
85