EAP - The Pacific Infrastructure Challenge - World Bank (2006).pdf
EAP - The Pacific Infrastructure Challenge - World Bank (2006).pdf
EAP - The Pacific Infrastructure Challenge - World Bank (2006).pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Youthful Population<br />
Approximately 40% of the population in most <strong>Pacific</strong> countries is under 15 years 12 .<br />
<strong>Pacific</strong> countries therefore have a comparatively small working force. This impacts<br />
the quality of infrastructure institutions, human resources capability and capacity.<br />
This also affects the priority level <strong>Pacific</strong> governments may attribute to<br />
infrastructure. In countries with high youth populations, health or education may get<br />
a higher priority than some infrastructure sectors.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Pacific</strong> Diaspora: A Solution to Capacity Problems<br />
Like many areas of the world, the <strong>Pacific</strong> has suffered from large scale emigration<br />
from the region to larger countries. Emigrants have taken with them their skills and<br />
helped aggravate the problems of lack of scale many of these countries face.<br />
<strong>The</strong> exact size of the Diaspora is difficult to gauge. Table 6.4 presents the numbers<br />
of people from three <strong>Pacific</strong> countries living in the major countries to which they<br />
have emigrated. <strong>The</strong>se figures are influenced by the immigration policies of the<br />
recipient nations: for example, New Zealand has specific quotas for Samoans, and<br />
traditional preferences for allowing emigration from the <strong>Pacific</strong> to New Zealand. <strong>The</strong><br />
pattern is not consistent: the Diaspora from Fiji looks to be relatively small, while<br />
from Samoa it is large, and relatively large from Tonga.<br />
Table 6.4: A Sample of the Diaspora from the <strong>Pacific</strong><br />
Number of <strong>Pacific</strong> People Living Abroad (‘000s)<br />
Country of Residence Fiji Samoa Tonga Total<br />
United States 13.6 133.3 36.8 183.7<br />
Australia 44.3 .. .. n.a.<br />
New Zealand 7.0 115.0 40.7 162.7<br />
TOTAL 64.9 248.3 77.5<br />
Total Population 835.0 178.0 102.0<br />
Diaspora as % of<br />
7.7% 139.5% 76.0%<br />
Total Population<br />
Source: Castalia, US Census 2000, Australian Census 2001, New Zealand Census 2001<br />
<strong>The</strong> effects of emigration are not all negative. <strong>The</strong> Diaspora provides a significant<br />
flow of income and capital for families left in the home countries, income which<br />
would not be generated within their local economies. However, how reliable these<br />
flows are in the long run is highly debatable, as the pressure to contribute a<br />
proportion of income in remittances ‘back home’ will dissipate as later generations<br />
may feel less bound to their families in the <strong>Pacific</strong>.<br />
<strong>The</strong> question to consider for the future is whether the Diaspora offers realistic<br />
opportunities for rebuilding the human capacity shortages in the region, and what<br />
policies governments could adopt to attract emigrants home for short or long term<br />
purposes.<br />
We leave this as a topic for consideration, as a possible policy response to helping<br />
overcome the scale and skills problems the <strong>Pacific</strong> countries face.<br />
6.2.3 Impact on <strong>Infrastructure</strong> Performance<br />
Figure 6.3 presents a comparison of some defining features in <strong>Pacific</strong> countries. It<br />
shows that each <strong>Pacific</strong> country has these characteristics to varying degrees.<br />
12 <strong>World</strong> Development Indicators 2003 data. By comparison, the average for the Caribbean comparators in this<br />
study was 29%<br />
29