EAP - The Pacific Infrastructure Challenge - World Bank (2006).pdf
EAP - The Pacific Infrastructure Challenge - World Bank (2006).pdf
EAP - The Pacific Infrastructure Challenge - World Bank (2006).pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
system reduces cargo handling efficiency. <strong>The</strong> number of containers handled per hour is half<br />
the level of containers handled ports with good container crane operations.<br />
Dili Port, Timor-Leste 79<br />
Work is currently underway to reconstruct and convert Dili port into an international port<br />
handling container cargo. Some of the existing infrastructure is over 40 years old and has<br />
been poorly maintained. It is estimated that in the future, operations at Dili port will be<br />
congested due to capacity constraints and proposals have been made to develop a new cargo<br />
port at Tibar to the west of Dili.<br />
Security<br />
A number of new codes and practices have been introduced recently, of which the most<br />
significant for <strong>Pacific</strong> ports is the International Marine Organization’s (IMO) International<br />
Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS). Samoa, Pohnpei, Port Vila and Betio Port in<br />
Kiribati all reported that ISPS requirements have already been met. Despite the significant<br />
costs (especially for smaller ports like Betio), this suggests that most ports are meeting these<br />
requirements because losing the shipping traffic is simply not an option.<br />
Other security requirements include the US Maritime Transport Security Act (2002) which<br />
allows for the US to assess security at foreign ports, and the US Customs and Border<br />
Protection’s Container Security Initiative (CSI), which provides for export country container<br />
security measures. Under the CSI, restrictions can be imposed on, or entry denied to, vessels<br />
with cargo from ports that do not have effective anti-terrorist measures. Ports that export<br />
goods to the US or export goods on US-bound ships have to comply with these Acts.<br />
Port Charges<br />
Figure A.32 compares tariffs at selected <strong>Pacific</strong> ports for a vessel of 18,391 gross registered<br />
tons and184.9m and 6,030 gross registered tons and 113.2m calling.<br />
Figure A.32: Comparison of Port Charges<br />
Charge (AUD) for a ship of 18,391 grt and 184.9m long calling<br />
16,000<br />
14,000<br />
12,000<br />
10,000<br />
8,000<br />
6,000<br />
4,000<br />
2,000<br />
-<br />
Honiara, Solomon<br />
Islands<br />
Apia, Samoa Port Moresby, PNG Port Vila, Vanuatu Suva, Fiji<br />
Charge (AUD) for a ship of 6,030grt and 113.12m long calling<br />
7,000<br />
6,000<br />
5,000<br />
4,000<br />
3,000<br />
2,000<br />
1,000<br />
-<br />
Honiara,<br />
Solomon Islands<br />
Apia, Samoa<br />
Port Moresby,<br />
PNG<br />
Santo, Vanuatu<br />
Port Vila,<br />
Vanuatu<br />
Suva, Fiji<br />
Source: <strong>Pacific</strong> Regional Transport Study 2004<br />
79 Sources: “Transport Sector Masterplan for East Timor” ADB, May 2002 and “<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Transport Sector<br />
Investment Plan for Timor-Leste”, May 2004<br />
128