31.01.2015 Views

EAP - The Pacific Infrastructure Challenge - World Bank (2006).pdf

EAP - The Pacific Infrastructure Challenge - World Bank (2006).pdf

EAP - The Pacific Infrastructure Challenge - World Bank (2006).pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

system reduces cargo handling efficiency. <strong>The</strong> number of containers handled per hour is half<br />

the level of containers handled ports with good container crane operations.<br />

Dili Port, Timor-Leste 79<br />

Work is currently underway to reconstruct and convert Dili port into an international port<br />

handling container cargo. Some of the existing infrastructure is over 40 years old and has<br />

been poorly maintained. It is estimated that in the future, operations at Dili port will be<br />

congested due to capacity constraints and proposals have been made to develop a new cargo<br />

port at Tibar to the west of Dili.<br />

Security<br />

A number of new codes and practices have been introduced recently, of which the most<br />

significant for <strong>Pacific</strong> ports is the International Marine Organization’s (IMO) International<br />

Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS). Samoa, Pohnpei, Port Vila and Betio Port in<br />

Kiribati all reported that ISPS requirements have already been met. Despite the significant<br />

costs (especially for smaller ports like Betio), this suggests that most ports are meeting these<br />

requirements because losing the shipping traffic is simply not an option.<br />

Other security requirements include the US Maritime Transport Security Act (2002) which<br />

allows for the US to assess security at foreign ports, and the US Customs and Border<br />

Protection’s Container Security Initiative (CSI), which provides for export country container<br />

security measures. Under the CSI, restrictions can be imposed on, or entry denied to, vessels<br />

with cargo from ports that do not have effective anti-terrorist measures. Ports that export<br />

goods to the US or export goods on US-bound ships have to comply with these Acts.<br />

Port Charges<br />

Figure A.32 compares tariffs at selected <strong>Pacific</strong> ports for a vessel of 18,391 gross registered<br />

tons and184.9m and 6,030 gross registered tons and 113.2m calling.<br />

Figure A.32: Comparison of Port Charges<br />

Charge (AUD) for a ship of 18,391 grt and 184.9m long calling<br />

16,000<br />

14,000<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

2,000<br />

-<br />

Honiara, Solomon<br />

Islands<br />

Apia, Samoa Port Moresby, PNG Port Vila, Vanuatu Suva, Fiji<br />

Charge (AUD) for a ship of 6,030grt and 113.12m long calling<br />

7,000<br />

6,000<br />

5,000<br />

4,000<br />

3,000<br />

2,000<br />

1,000<br />

-<br />

Honiara,<br />

Solomon Islands<br />

Apia, Samoa<br />

Port Moresby,<br />

PNG<br />

Santo, Vanuatu<br />

Port Vila,<br />

Vanuatu<br />

Suva, Fiji<br />

Source: <strong>Pacific</strong> Regional Transport Study 2004<br />

79 Sources: “Transport Sector Masterplan for East Timor” ADB, May 2002 and “<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Transport Sector<br />

Investment Plan for Timor-Leste”, May 2004<br />

128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!