EAP - The Pacific Infrastructure Challenge - World Bank (2006).pdf
EAP - The Pacific Infrastructure Challenge - World Bank (2006).pdf
EAP - The Pacific Infrastructure Challenge - World Bank (2006).pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure A.31: TEU Throughput Levels per capita<br />
0.300<br />
0.250<br />
TEU Throughput per Capita<br />
0.200<br />
0.150<br />
0.100<br />
0.050<br />
0.000<br />
Port Moresby, PNG<br />
Pohnpei, FSM<br />
Santo, Vanuatu<br />
Lae Port, PNG<br />
Suva, Fiji<br />
Betio, Kiribati<br />
Nuku'alofa, Tonga<br />
Apia, Samoa<br />
Castries, St Lucia<br />
Bridgetown, Barbados<br />
Source: TEU throughput data as per Figure A.30.. Population data from WDI indicators for same years as TEU throughput<br />
Efficiency<br />
Aside from the TEU throughput data shown in above, publicly available performance data<br />
for ports is extremely limited, and we have been unable to construct meaningful indicators.<br />
In addition, comparator ports have shore-based container crane, while <strong>Pacific</strong> ports do not,<br />
relying instead on slower ship lifting gear, so comparisons on cargo handling productivity<br />
rates are not meaningful.<br />
While smaller ports, such as those in Federated States of Micronesia and Kiribati may not<br />
have the throughput volumes to justify installing shore based cranes, it is surprising that<br />
larger ports like those in Papua New Guinea, Suva and even Apia do not have this<br />
superstructure in place. <strong>The</strong>ir TEU throughput volumes are at least as high as the<br />
comparator ports of St Lucia and Barbados which do have container cranes. Investing in a<br />
container crane would help to improve port efficiency levels and would therefore help to<br />
encourage more traffic. This would also help to establish these ports as <strong>Pacific</strong> region ‘minitransshipment<br />
hubs’, a goal identified by both the Samoa and Fiji port authorities.<br />
Operational efficiency at <strong>Pacific</strong> ports is constrained by outdated design and equipment 73 .<br />
This problem is compounded by poor maintenance. Capital city wharves serving coastal and<br />
inter-island trade are “cramped, lack adequate cargo sheds and passenger handling facilities,<br />
possess little or nothing in the way of cargo handling facilities and are poorly maintained.” 74 .<br />
We provide detailed descriptions of efficiency at some <strong>Pacific</strong> ports below:<br />
73 <strong>The</strong> AusAid <strong>Pacific</strong> Regional Transport Study notes that many of the port facilities in the <strong>Pacific</strong> were built<br />
prior to containerization. Existing assets are not conducive to improved port efficiency. (AusAid, June 2004)<br />
74 “<strong>Pacific</strong> Regional Transport Study – Final Report Volume 1”, June 2004<br />
126