31.01.2015 Views

2002 - University of Washington Bone and Joint Sources

2002 - University of Washington Bone and Joint Sources

2002 - University of Washington Bone and Joint Sources

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Optimizing the Intrinsic Stability <strong>of</strong> the Glenoid Fossa With<br />

Non-Prosthetic Glenoid Arthroplasty<br />

EDWARD J. WELDON III, M.D., RICHARD S. BOORMAN, M.D., M.SC., KEVIN L. SMITH, M.D.,<br />

AND FREDERICK A. MATSEN III, M.D.<br />

In shoulders requiring arthroplasty,<br />

the extant glenoid may provide<br />

insufficient intrinsic stability for<br />

the humeral head - for example if the<br />

glenoid is flat or biconcave. In such<br />

cases the surgeon can restore the<br />

desired intrinsic stability using a<br />

glenoid prosthesis with a known surface<br />

geometry. Alternatively, the surgeon<br />

can modify the surface <strong>of</strong> the glenoid<br />

to a geometry that provides the desired<br />

intrinsic stability. This study explores<br />

the feasibility, reliability <strong>and</strong><br />

predictability with which glenoid<br />

intrinsic stability can be restored<br />

through spherical reaming <strong>of</strong> the<br />

glenoid bone around the glenoid<br />

centerline. It tests the hypothesis that<br />

the intrinsic stability <strong>of</strong> reamed<br />

glenoids can match that <strong>of</strong> clinically<br />

used polyethylene glenoid components.<br />

Figure 1: Balance stability angles. a) Consider a glenoid that has a centerline “C” perpendicular to<br />

the surface at the center <strong>of</strong> the glenoid <strong>and</strong> that has a radius <strong>of</strong> curvature “R” as well as a width “W”<br />

in a specified direction from center to edge. b) Consider an unattached humeral head component<br />

articulating with this glenoid for which the sum <strong>of</strong> all forces acting on it is F, the net humeral joint<br />

reaction force. The vector F makes an angle with the centerline, C, <strong>of</strong> Ø. If the humeral head is free<br />

to move under the influence <strong>of</strong> gravity, F becomes the gravitational force vector <strong>and</strong> is always vertical.<br />

By tipping the glenoid, Ø can be progressively increased. c) As Ø is increased, it reaches a value at<br />

which the humeral head dislocates over the edge <strong>of</strong> the glenoid. This value for Ø is known as the<br />

balance stability angle, or BSA. If R <strong>and</strong> W are known, Ø can be predicted from sine Ø = W/R, or Ø =<br />

arc sine W/R.<br />

Figure 2: The glenoidogram. a) The glenoidogram in a given direction is the path traced by the humeral<br />

head as it travels across the glenoid surface in the direction <strong>of</strong> interest. b) The width (W) <strong>and</strong> depth (D)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the effective concavity can be seen on the glenoidogram. The maximal slope <strong>of</strong> the glenoidogram<br />

(S) is the tangent <strong>of</strong> the balance stability angle. [Matsen, 1994 #7][PEMS, R <strong>and</strong> M chapter on stability].<br />

METHODS<br />

The intrinsic stability provided by<br />

the glenoid in a given direction can be<br />

characterized by the maximal angle the<br />

humeral joint reaction force can make<br />

with the glenoid centerline before the<br />

humeral head dislocates; this quantity<br />

is defined as the balance stability angle<br />

(BSA) in the specified direction (Figure<br />

1). The BSA can be calculated by<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the shape <strong>of</strong> the glenoid<br />

surface (Figure 2). The BSA can also be<br />

measured directly by placing an<br />

unconstrained humeral head loaded<br />

only by gravity within the glenoid<br />

oriented with the centerline vertical <strong>and</strong><br />

then tipping the glenoid until the<br />

humeral head dislocates (Figure 1). In<br />

this study, the balance stability angles<br />

were both calculated <strong>and</strong> measured in<br />

8 different directions for 3 unused<br />

polyethylene glenoid components <strong>and</strong><br />

11 cadaveric glenoids in 4 different<br />

states: 1) native without capsule or<br />

rotator cuff, 2) denuded <strong>of</strong> cartilage <strong>and</strong><br />

labrum, 3) after reaming the glenoid<br />

surface around the glenoid centerline<br />

using a spherical reamer with a radius<br />

<strong>of</strong> 25.0 millimeters, <strong>and</strong> 4) after<br />

reaming around the glenoid centerline<br />

using a spherical reamer with a radius<br />

<strong>of</strong> 22.5 millimeters (Figure 3). We also<br />

attempted to predict the BSAs<br />

achievable with reaming to each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

two different radii from measurement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the width <strong>of</strong> the glenoid before it was<br />

reamed.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Denuding the glenoids <strong>of</strong> their<br />

articular cartilage reduced the intrinsic<br />

stability, especially in the posterior<br />

direction (Figure 4 <strong>and</strong> Table 1).<br />

Reaming the glenoid restored the<br />

intrinsic stability back to values<br />

comparable to those <strong>of</strong> the normal<br />

glenoid. For example, the average<br />

calculated BSA in the posterior<br />

direction for all eleven glenoids was:<br />

native = 24°± 9°, denuded = 14°± 6°,<br />

reamed to radius 25.0 millimeter = 25°<br />

± 5°, reamed to radius 22.5 millimeter<br />

= 33° ± 6°. The BSAs for the<br />

<strong>2002</strong> ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH REPORT 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!