30.01.2015 Views

Shielding Calculation: Radiographic Room

Shielding Calculation: Radiographic Room

Shielding Calculation: Radiographic Room

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Shielding</strong> <strong>Calculation</strong>:<br />

<strong>Radiographic</strong> <strong>Room</strong><br />

Jerry Williams


What you need to know<br />

• <strong>Room</strong> use and layout<br />

– DAP workload<br />

– DAP averaged kV<br />

– Distance to barrier<br />

• Construction details<br />

– Walls<br />

– Ceilings/ floors<br />

• Surrounding areas<br />

– <strong>Room</strong>s above or below<br />

– Occupancy


DAP Workload<br />

Two approaches:<br />

1. Predict clinical usage and use typical<br />

DAP values per exam<br />

2. Assume typical total DAP values


Method 1: DAP data<br />

• UK Dose Surveys<br />

– HPA-RPD-029<br />

– http://www.hpa.org.uk/radiation/<br />

– <strong>Room</strong> doses for 50 – 90 kg patient sub-set set<br />

–Mean<br />

–Min/ max<br />

– 25 th / 50 th / 75 th percentile values<br />

– kV and mAs values<br />

• National Diagnostic Reference Levels<br />

– Based on 3 rd quartile values<br />

– “Boundary between good and normal practice and<br />

bad and abnormal practice”


Radiography doses (1)<br />

Projection<br />

No of<br />

rooms<br />

DAP<br />

Gy cm 2<br />

Skull PA/AP 20 0.78<br />

Skull Lat 19 0.49<br />

Chest PA 210 0.11<br />

Chest AP 12 0.12<br />

Chest Lat 23 0.31<br />

Thoracic spine AP 36 0.93<br />

Thoracic spine Lat 27 1.43<br />

Abdomen AP 127 2.58<br />

Lumbar spine AP 118 160 1.60<br />

Lumbar spine Lat 120 2.44<br />

LSJ 25 2.59<br />

Pelvis AP 150 2.12<br />

IVU 35 13.60<br />

Source: HPA-RPD Report 029 (2007)


Radiography doses (2)<br />

Anatomical region<br />

DAP<br />

Gy cm 2<br />

Cervical Spine 0.05<br />

Femur 004 0.04<br />

Knee 0.04<br />

Lower leg 0.02<br />

Foot/ Ankle 0.02<br />

Toes 0.005<br />

Shoulder 0.05<br />

Elbow/ forearm/ upper arm 0.02<br />

Hand/ wrist 0.01<br />

Finger 0.005<br />

Source: Personal data


<strong>Radiographic</strong> workload (UK)<br />

Frequency 0% 10% 20% 30% 40%<br />

DAP<br />

Head<br />

Chest<br />

Abdomen<br />

Pelvis<br />

Spine<br />

Upper extremity<br />

Lower extremity<br />

Data from:<br />

UK examination frequencies – in NRPB Report W4 (2002)<br />

DAP data * HPA-RPD Report 029 (2007)<br />

* personal data (extremities)


<strong>Radiographic</strong> workload (UK)<br />

Frequency 0% 10% 20% 30% 40%<br />

DAP<br />

Head<br />

Chest<br />

Abdomen<br />

Pelvis<br />

Spine<br />

Upper extremity<br />

Lower extremity<br />

• Abdo/ pelvis/ spine<br />

– 23% frequency<br />

– 87% DAP<br />

• Chest<br />

– 35% frequency<br />

– 8% DAP<br />

• Extremities<br />

– 37% frequency<br />

– 1.5% DAP<br />

• Conclusion<br />

– To predict DAP workload<br />

– estimate number of abdomen/ spine/ pelvis examinations<br />

– Ignore extremities<br />

– Chest workload only required for primary beam shielding


Method 2:<br />

DAP workload in typical rooms<br />

• Survey data from 10 CR consoles<br />

– Collection period: 9 to 43 weeks<br />

– Number/ type of examination<br />

– Number of patients<br />

• Assumption<br />

– Images processed on console correspond to<br />

specific X-ray room<br />

– Average DAP values


Workload survey<br />

DAP (Gy cm 2 / week)<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Patient ts/ week<br />

2.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

Examinations per patient<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


Workload<br />

DAP (Gy<br />

cm 2 / week)<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Patien nts/ week<br />

• DAP per patient<br />

– Ave: 0.75 Gy cm<br />

2<br />

– Range: 0.20 – 1.42 Gy cm 2<br />

• Typical workload<br />

– No of patients: 180<br />

– DAP: 150<br />

• Exceptional workload<br />

– 24/7 room<br />

2.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

Examinations per patient<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />

– No of patients: 800<br />

– DAP: 500<br />

• Examinations per patient<br />

– Ave: 1.32<br />

– Range: 1.10 – 1.82


DAP averaged kV<br />

kV<br />

DAP<br />

averaged<br />

90<br />

88<br />

86<br />

84<br />

82<br />

80<br />

78<br />

76<br />

74<br />

72<br />

70<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />

Weighted average: 78.2 kV


Construction details<br />

• Floors/ ceilings<br />

– Concrete thickness<br />

– Profile<br />

• Wall construction<br />

– Stud partition<br />

– Blockwork


Adjacent areas<br />

• Occupancy<br />

– New buildings – assume 100%<br />

•Layout


<strong>Radiographic</strong> <strong>Room</strong><br />

1.5 m<br />

1 m<br />

3.5 m<br />

3 m<br />

6.3 m<br />

6m


Lead shielding vs DAP workload<br />

Lead<br />

shielding mm<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

d = 1 m<br />

d = 1.5 m<br />

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700<br />

DAP w orkload Gy cm 2<br />

Occupancy = 100%<br />

• Typical room (DAP = 150 Gy cm 2 )<br />

– 0.45 mm (d = 1.5 m)<br />

– 0.6 mm (d = 1 m)<br />

• Exceptional room (DAP = 500 Gy cm 2 )<br />

– 0.7 mm (d = 1.5 m)<br />

– 0.9 mm (d = 1 m)


UK/ NCRP Comparison


• Example<br />

– NCRP ‘busy’ room<br />

• 160 patients/week<br />

– Wall at 1.5 m<br />

– 100% occupancy<br />

– NCRP: 2.5 mA min/ patient<br />

– UK: 0.75 Gy cm 2 / patient


Scatter dose @ 1m<br />

Side scatter<br />

NCRP 147<br />

3.4x10 -2 mGy/ patient<br />

5.4 mGy/ week<br />

Back/ forward scatter<br />

4.8x10 -2 mGy / patient<br />

7.77 mGy/ week<br />

UK<br />

Max scatter<br />

5.0 µGy (Gy cm 2 ) -1<br />

0.6 mGy/ week<br />

Factor 10 difference


<strong>Shielding</strong> calculation<br />

l<br />

NCRP<br />

• Dose constraint = 20 µSv<br />

• B < 0.02/5.4 002/54 x 1.5 15 2<br />

= 0.8%<br />

• <strong>Shielding</strong> @ workload<br />

weighted kV<br />

= 0.81 mm Pb<br />

UK<br />

• Dose constraint = 6 µSv<br />

• B < 0.006/0.6 006/0 6 x 1.5 2<br />

= 2.3%<br />

• <strong>Shielding</strong> @ 80 kV<br />

= 0.41 mm Pb


Differences<br />

• Scatter model<br />

• Field area assumption<br />

• Patient workload data<br />

• Dose constraints<br />

t<br />

• Transmission data


Scatter model<br />

2 )<br />

-1<br />

µGy (Gy cm<br />

S<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

UK<br />

Scatter fraction (S) @ 85 kV<br />

NCRP 147<br />

MonteCarlo<br />

0 30 60 90 120 150 180<br />

Angle<br />

S max analysis<br />

kV UK NCRP<br />

50 4.05 4.10<br />

70 4.67 4.41<br />

85 514 5.14 464 4.64<br />

100 5.60 4.87<br />

125 6.38 5.26


Field area<br />

•NCRP<br />

F = 1000 cm<br />

2<br />

•UK<br />

F incorporated into DAP<br />

Plate size<br />

F cm 2<br />

8" x 10" 20 x 24 cm 2 480<br />

10" x 12" 24 x 30 cm 2 720<br />

14" x 17" 35 x 43 cm 2 1505<br />

2


Patient workload data<br />

• NCRP 147<br />

– 2.5 mA min/ patient<br />

• UK data<br />

– HPA-RPD-029<br />

•kV/ mAs<br />

– Dundee (Dave Sutton)<br />

• Downloaded from RIS<br />

• 8 rooms<br />

HPA-RPD<br />

Dundee<br />

Skull PA/AP<br />

Chest PA<br />

Chest Lat<br />

Thoracic spine AP<br />

Thoracic spine Lat<br />

Abdomen AP<br />

Lumbar spine AP<br />

Lumbar Spine Lat<br />

Pelvis/ hip AP<br />

mAs per examination<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70


Patient workload data<br />

• NCRP 147<br />

– 2.5 mA min/ patient<br />

• UK data<br />

– HPA-RPD-029<br />

• kV/ mAs high dose exams<br />

– Dundee (Dave Sutton)<br />

• Downloaded from RIS<br />

• 8 rooms<br />

– Combined with CR workload data<br />

– 0.27 mA min/ patient<br />

Factor of 10


Patient workload data<br />

• Examinations per patient<br />

– US: 3.37<br />

– UK: 1.32<br />

⇒US: UK Ratio = 2.5<br />

• Types of examination<br />

ESD (normalised to 1986)<br />

• Period of survey<br />

– US: early 1990s<br />

– UK: early 2000s<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

1986<br />

60% 1996<br />

2002<br />

40%<br />

2007<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

Lat Skull PA Chest AP Lumbar<br />

spine<br />

Lat Lumbar<br />

spine<br />

AP Pelvis


Dose constraints<br />

•NCRP<br />

– 20 µGy (100 µGy Radiology staff)<br />

•UK<br />

– 6 µGy


Transmission factors<br />

• NCRP<br />

• UK<br />

– Workload weighted transmission factors<br />

– Workload weighted kV<br />

• For this analysis 78 kV<br />

B NCRP 80 kV<br />

0.05 0.34 0.27<br />

0.02 0.54 0.43<br />

0.01 0.74 0.56<br />

0.005 0.96 0.71<br />

0.002 1.29 0.92<br />

0.001 1.55 1.08


WARNING!<br />

• UK workload data apply only in UK<br />

• UK workload drivers<br />

– Legislation<br />

• Justification/ Optimisation<br />

– Public Healthcare provision<br />

Derive your own workload data


• Standard specification:<br />

– 1 mm lead for all radiographic rooms

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!