R.U.D.E., or How We Get in Trouble - Metropolitan Alliance of Police
R.U.D.E., or How We Get in Trouble - Metropolitan Alliance of Police
R.U.D.E., or How We Get in Trouble - Metropolitan Alliance of Police
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chief’s Follies<br />
By: Joseph Andal<strong>in</strong>a<br />
#1 Curious Ge<strong>or</strong>ge goes<br />
bye-bye<br />
In a recent newspaper edit<strong>or</strong>ial, the Daily<br />
Herald said it best. They rep<strong>or</strong>ted that<br />
Ge<strong>or</strong>ge Ryan, <strong>in</strong> his sentenc<strong>in</strong>g hear<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
stated “when (the voters) elected me, they<br />
expected better and I let them down. F<strong>or</strong> that<br />
I apologize.”<br />
In response to that statement, the Herald<br />
made a good po<strong>in</strong>t when they op<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>in</strong><br />
referr<strong>in</strong>g to c<strong>or</strong>ruption, that it seems these<br />
politicians never have to say they are s<strong>or</strong>ry<br />
until they are fac<strong>in</strong>g jail. (I say a st<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> the<br />
can will always br<strong>in</strong>g out the rem<strong>or</strong>se that<br />
was miss<strong>in</strong>g bef<strong>or</strong>e, dur<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>or</strong> after a trial.)<br />
The Herald also said that “Ryan is just another<br />
crim<strong>in</strong>ally dishonest public <strong>of</strong>ficial whose<br />
arrogant aura <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>v<strong>in</strong>cibility was shattered by<br />
public prosecut<strong>or</strong>s.”<br />
Amen and enough said. But is there m<strong>or</strong>e to<br />
follow Can the <strong>or</strong>ange jumpsuit be <strong>in</strong> the<br />
<strong>of</strong>f<strong>in</strong>g to some other arrogant <strong>of</strong>ficials Only<br />
time will tell.<br />
#2. A Tale <strong>of</strong> Two Cities (with<br />
apologies to Charles Dickens and<br />
the French Revolution)<br />
This is the st<strong>or</strong>y <strong>of</strong> a man named Jed… No<br />
wait, it’s a man named Ge<strong>or</strong>ge and a man<br />
named Roger. (No, not the above named<br />
Ge<strong>or</strong>ge as <strong>in</strong> our first item.)<br />
It’s not about black gold <strong>or</strong> Texas tea, but<br />
about greenbacks. Lots <strong>of</strong> it; Frankl<strong>in</strong>s,<br />
Grants, and a few Jacksons, Hamiltons, and<br />
L<strong>in</strong>colns.<br />
Apparently May<strong>or</strong> Ge<strong>or</strong>ge Pradel is no longer<br />
content with be<strong>in</strong>g paid part-time wages<br />
f<strong>or</strong>, <strong>in</strong> his view, the time he puts <strong>in</strong> as the<br />
may<strong>or</strong> <strong>of</strong> Naperville. He believes the position<br />
should be changed to a full-time job.<br />
Pradel also wants his $20,000 part-time salary<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased because <strong>of</strong> all the time he puts <strong>in</strong><br />
as may<strong>or</strong>. He th<strong>in</strong>ks he should be paid double<br />
<strong>of</strong> what he gets now, <strong>or</strong> $40,000 smackers.<br />
(Seems reasonable to this old union guy.)<br />
But the Daily Herald, <strong>in</strong> a recent op-ed page,<br />
says Pradel, while “popular, competent, and<br />
ethical, he is not go<strong>in</strong>g to lead the city f<strong>or</strong>ever.”<br />
They feel giv<strong>in</strong>g strong may<strong>or</strong>al powers<br />
to a full time may<strong>or</strong> and its accompany<strong>in</strong>g<br />
salary could prove disastrous if Naperville has<br />
a weak may<strong>or</strong> <strong>in</strong> the future. Ouch #1. (Note:<br />
Beware all <strong>of</strong> you potential weak wanna-be<br />
may<strong>or</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Naperville—no money f<strong>or</strong> you,<br />
either!)<br />
The city, they say, is run well <strong>in</strong> its current<br />
f<strong>or</strong>m <strong>of</strong> council/city manager f<strong>or</strong>m <strong>of</strong> govern<strong>in</strong>g<br />
“with a part-time may<strong>or</strong>.”<br />
They say old Ge<strong>or</strong>ge is justified <strong>in</strong> ask<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>or</strong><br />
a raise, but the paper doesn’t th<strong>in</strong>k a $20,000<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease is reasonable f<strong>or</strong> a part-time may<strong>or</strong><br />
because obviously they are aga<strong>in</strong>st mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
him a full-time may<strong>or</strong>. They cite the fact that<br />
he already gets $5,000 as a liqu<strong>or</strong> commissioner,<br />
drives a city vehicle, and has a $10,000<br />
benefit package.<br />
So unless changes are made to make him<br />
full-time, which they see as unwise, the wage<br />
must reflect his part-time status. Ouch #2!<br />
(I bet he’s fum<strong>in</strong>g on that one!) Those old<br />
meanies on the city council. They always have<br />
a reason to deny someone a pay raise. It’s<br />
the same all over. If it’s not the cops <strong>or</strong> other<br />
public employees be<strong>in</strong>g denied a mean<strong>in</strong>gful<br />
pay raise, it’s a may<strong>or</strong>. What is go<strong>in</strong>g on here<br />
Tsk, tsk.<br />
Now, <strong>of</strong> course Ge<strong>or</strong>ge, be<strong>in</strong>g a wise man,<br />
Cont<strong>in</strong>ued on page <br />
Elections<br />
Maj<strong>or</strong>ity Petition<br />
Certified<br />
DuPage County<br />
F<strong>or</strong>est Preserve<br />
MAP .......................... 18<br />
No union ...................... 0<br />
MAP WINS!<br />
(Sergeant’s <strong>in</strong>clusion to<br />
chapter pend<strong>in</strong>g hear<strong>in</strong>gs)<br />
Mount Prospect<br />
Sergeants<br />
MAP .......................... 11<br />
No union.......................0<br />
MAP WINS!<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Alliance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Police</strong><br />
Page