30.01.2015 Views

R.U.D.E., or How We Get in Trouble - Metropolitan Alliance of Police

R.U.D.E., or How We Get in Trouble - Metropolitan Alliance of Police

R.U.D.E., or How We Get in Trouble - Metropolitan Alliance of Police

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chief’s Follies<br />

By: Joseph Andal<strong>in</strong>a<br />

#1 Curious Ge<strong>or</strong>ge goes<br />

bye-bye<br />

In a recent newspaper edit<strong>or</strong>ial, the Daily<br />

Herald said it best. They rep<strong>or</strong>ted that<br />

Ge<strong>or</strong>ge Ryan, <strong>in</strong> his sentenc<strong>in</strong>g hear<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

stated “when (the voters) elected me, they<br />

expected better and I let them down. F<strong>or</strong> that<br />

I apologize.”<br />

In response to that statement, the Herald<br />

made a good po<strong>in</strong>t when they op<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>in</strong><br />

referr<strong>in</strong>g to c<strong>or</strong>ruption, that it seems these<br />

politicians never have to say they are s<strong>or</strong>ry<br />

until they are fac<strong>in</strong>g jail. (I say a st<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> the<br />

can will always br<strong>in</strong>g out the rem<strong>or</strong>se that<br />

was miss<strong>in</strong>g bef<strong>or</strong>e, dur<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>or</strong> after a trial.)<br />

The Herald also said that “Ryan is just another<br />

crim<strong>in</strong>ally dishonest public <strong>of</strong>ficial whose<br />

arrogant aura <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>v<strong>in</strong>cibility was shattered by<br />

public prosecut<strong>or</strong>s.”<br />

Amen and enough said. But is there m<strong>or</strong>e to<br />

follow Can the <strong>or</strong>ange jumpsuit be <strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>of</strong>f<strong>in</strong>g to some other arrogant <strong>of</strong>ficials Only<br />

time will tell.<br />

#2. A Tale <strong>of</strong> Two Cities (with<br />

apologies to Charles Dickens and<br />

the French Revolution)<br />

This is the st<strong>or</strong>y <strong>of</strong> a man named Jed… No<br />

wait, it’s a man named Ge<strong>or</strong>ge and a man<br />

named Roger. (No, not the above named<br />

Ge<strong>or</strong>ge as <strong>in</strong> our first item.)<br />

It’s not about black gold <strong>or</strong> Texas tea, but<br />

about greenbacks. Lots <strong>of</strong> it; Frankl<strong>in</strong>s,<br />

Grants, and a few Jacksons, Hamiltons, and<br />

L<strong>in</strong>colns.<br />

Apparently May<strong>or</strong> Ge<strong>or</strong>ge Pradel is no longer<br />

content with be<strong>in</strong>g paid part-time wages<br />

f<strong>or</strong>, <strong>in</strong> his view, the time he puts <strong>in</strong> as the<br />

may<strong>or</strong> <strong>of</strong> Naperville. He believes the position<br />

should be changed to a full-time job.<br />

Pradel also wants his $20,000 part-time salary<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased because <strong>of</strong> all the time he puts <strong>in</strong><br />

as may<strong>or</strong>. He th<strong>in</strong>ks he should be paid double<br />

<strong>of</strong> what he gets now, <strong>or</strong> $40,000 smackers.<br />

(Seems reasonable to this old union guy.)<br />

But the Daily Herald, <strong>in</strong> a recent op-ed page,<br />

says Pradel, while “popular, competent, and<br />

ethical, he is not go<strong>in</strong>g to lead the city f<strong>or</strong>ever.”<br />

They feel giv<strong>in</strong>g strong may<strong>or</strong>al powers<br />

to a full time may<strong>or</strong> and its accompany<strong>in</strong>g<br />

salary could prove disastrous if Naperville has<br />

a weak may<strong>or</strong> <strong>in</strong> the future. Ouch #1. (Note:<br />

Beware all <strong>of</strong> you potential weak wanna-be<br />

may<strong>or</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Naperville—no money f<strong>or</strong> you,<br />

either!)<br />

The city, they say, is run well <strong>in</strong> its current<br />

f<strong>or</strong>m <strong>of</strong> council/city manager f<strong>or</strong>m <strong>of</strong> govern<strong>in</strong>g<br />

“with a part-time may<strong>or</strong>.”<br />

They say old Ge<strong>or</strong>ge is justified <strong>in</strong> ask<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>or</strong><br />

a raise, but the paper doesn’t th<strong>in</strong>k a $20,000<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease is reasonable f<strong>or</strong> a part-time may<strong>or</strong><br />

because obviously they are aga<strong>in</strong>st mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

him a full-time may<strong>or</strong>. They cite the fact that<br />

he already gets $5,000 as a liqu<strong>or</strong> commissioner,<br />

drives a city vehicle, and has a $10,000<br />

benefit package.<br />

So unless changes are made to make him<br />

full-time, which they see as unwise, the wage<br />

must reflect his part-time status. Ouch #2!<br />

(I bet he’s fum<strong>in</strong>g on that one!) Those old<br />

meanies on the city council. They always have<br />

a reason to deny someone a pay raise. It’s<br />

the same all over. If it’s not the cops <strong>or</strong> other<br />

public employees be<strong>in</strong>g denied a mean<strong>in</strong>gful<br />

pay raise, it’s a may<strong>or</strong>. What is go<strong>in</strong>g on here<br />

Tsk, tsk.<br />

Now, <strong>of</strong> course Ge<strong>or</strong>ge, be<strong>in</strong>g a wise man,<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>ued on page <br />

Elections<br />

Maj<strong>or</strong>ity Petition<br />

Certified<br />

DuPage County<br />

F<strong>or</strong>est Preserve<br />

MAP .......................... 18<br />

No union ...................... 0<br />

MAP WINS!<br />

(Sergeant’s <strong>in</strong>clusion to<br />

chapter pend<strong>in</strong>g hear<strong>in</strong>gs)<br />

Mount Prospect<br />

Sergeants<br />

MAP .......................... 11<br />

No union.......................0<br />

MAP WINS!<br />

<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Alliance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Police</strong><br />

Page

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!