A combined discrete–continuous model describing the lag phase of ...

A combined discrete–continuous model describing the lag phase of ... A combined discrete–continuous model describing the lag phase of ...

smas.chemeng.ntua.gr
from smas.chemeng.ntua.gr More from this publisher
30.01.2015 Views

174 R.C. McKellar, K. Knight / International Journal of Food Microbiology 54 (2000) 171 –180 Table 1 Kinetic parameters for Listeria monocytogenes determined using a the Bioscreen Trial t m t S.D. % Growth d L L (n520) A 20.35 1.04 5.86 0.783 60 B 21.32 0.876 4.12 0.814 65 a 21 t d, Time to detection (h); m, specific growth rate (h ); t L, mean individual cell lag phase duration (h); S.D. L, standard deviation of the mean individual lag phase duration; % growth, percent of wells showing growth. single cell per well can be calculated from a Poisson Fig. 1. Determination of specific growth rate (m) and lag phase duration (t L) for Listeria monocytogenes using time to detection distribution: (t ) data obtained from the Bioscreen. Experimental data (d), 2b i d e b simulated data (j). P(X 5 i) 5 ]] i! (2) where P(X5i) is the probability of finding i cells in It is also possible to calculate m from cell counts a randomly chosen well, and b is the expected value obtained by using either quadratic (McClure et al., of that cell number. 1993) or cubic (Stephens et al., 1997) calibration Using the observation that 12/20 or 60% of wells curves to convert Bioscreen absorbance data; how- contain one or more cells, the value of b may be ever, this method was not employed in the present calculated from the following equation: study. Calculation of m using a serial dilution method is independent of the absolute numbers of cells present. 2b P(X . 0) 5 1 2 e 5 0.6 (3) However, it is more difficult to calculate the in- Substituting b (0.916) in Eq. (2), it is possible to dividual cell lag phase duration (t L). It was assumed calculate the probability of finding one (37%) or two that the dilution giving the largest td was equal to ln (17%) cells per well. Thus, as many as five of the 12 cfu/well50 (Fig. 1). The calculated m was used in wells showing growth could have arisen from more the HPM to predict the time required to detect than one cell. This suggests that the S.D. L values growth from a defined number of cells where the must be considered only as estimates for single cells. 6 detection limit of the Bioscreen is 3.510 cfu/well. A more direct method (such as microscopic examina- The detection limit was confirmed by means of a tion) is needed to obtain accurate distributions of calibration curve (data not shown). Fig. 1 shows that single cell tL values. © simulated values for t underestimated the ex- The simulation software, ModelMaker , was used d perimental td by an amount equivalent to t L. Note to develop a combined discrete–continuous model that for each dilution, tL was constant, thus was which can account for the behavior of individual independent of cell numbers. Replicate values of t cells, and is described in the diagram in Fig. 2. Note L were calculated from 20 wells by subtracting the that the various blocks in Fig. 2 are of different simulated value for td from the replicate experimen- shape depending on their function: compartment tal values, and the resulting mean tL and standard blocks are rectangular, and the values change with deviations (S.D. ) are given in Table 1 for two trials. time according to user-defined differential equations; L S.D. L values are based on ,20 wells giving growth; variable blocks have rounded ends, and values are in the two trials reported here 12 and 13 wells, calculated at each time interval according to userrespectively, showed growth. defined explicit equations; defined value blocks have The S.D. L values in trial A (Table 1) are based on pointed ends, and values are assigned at t0 or at the supposition that all 12 wells showing growth particular times during the simulation; independent arise from a single cell. The probability of finding a event blocks are hexagonal, and are activated at a

R.C. McKellar, K. Knight / International Journal of Food Microbiology 54 (2000) 171 –180 175 © Fig. 2. Discrete–continuous model designed with ModelMaker to simulate td and standard deviation of individual cell lag times (S.D. L) based on kinetic parameters derived from Bioscreen data. pre-defined time; and component event blocks are variation in individual cell lag times, t L, whereas square, and are activated in response to other com- S.D. refers to the variation between wells observed ponents in the model. with any defined number of cells per well. When the model run is initiated, the AssignLag The model described in Fig. 2 was extended to block (an independent event block activated at t 0) allow the simulation of a complete growth curve. uses a random number generator based on a trun- The discrete adaptation function was retained, and cated (positive values only) normal distribution with combined with the HPM to provide the continuous mean tL and S.D. L from Table 1 to assign tL values growth function (Fig. 4). In this model, the Adaptato each of up to 64 cells. These values are stored in tion block moves one cell from the NonGrowing to the defined value Triggers block. The Adaptation the Growing compartment at each of the Trigger block reads these values, and adds a single cell to the times. This preserves the initial number of cells in Growing compartment at each time corresponding to the model. The blocks to calculate the log of the cell an individual cell t L. Once in the Growing compart- numbers are provided to assist in the visualization of ment, cells start growing immediately according to a the growth curve. logistic equation (McKellar, 1997): The output of this model for a total of 64 cells is shown in Fig. 5. Note that values of the the Growing dG G compartment are not shown where the number of ] 5 Gm S1 2 ]] D (4) dx N max cells was zero. These results show that the simulated values for the NonGrowing cells decreased as the where G is the number of cells in the Growing numbers of Growing cells increased. When the total compartment and Nmax is the maximum population density. The LogGrowing block calculates the log cfu, and at each time increment the component event Monitor block tests to see if the value of LogGrowing has 6 exceeded the detection limit (defined as 3.510 cfu/well). The defined value TimetoDetection block holds the calculated t d. The model in Fig. 2 was used to simulate values for td corresponding to up to 32 cells per well. The simulated S.D. values were derived from a total of 20 simulations for each of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 or 32 cells per well. Fig. 3 shows that both the simulated td and S.D. values are in close agreement with the ex- Fig. 3. Comparison of t d (s) and S.D. L (h) from experimental perimental findings. Note that S.D. refers to the data (open symbols) or simulated data (closed symbols). L

R.C. McKellar, K. Knight / International Journal <strong>of</strong> Food Microbiology 54 (2000) 171 –180 175<br />

©<br />

Fig. 2. Discrete–continuous <strong>model</strong> designed with ModelMaker to simulate td<br />

and standard deviation <strong>of</strong> individual cell <strong>lag</strong> times (S.D.<br />

L)<br />

based on kinetic parameters derived from Bioscreen data.<br />

pre-defined time; and component event blocks are variation in individual cell <strong>lag</strong> times, t<br />

L, whereas<br />

square, and are activated in response to o<strong>the</strong>r com- S.D. refers to <strong>the</strong> variation between wells observed<br />

ponents in <strong>the</strong> <strong>model</strong>.<br />

with any defined number <strong>of</strong> cells per well.<br />

When <strong>the</strong> <strong>model</strong> run is initiated, <strong>the</strong> AssignLag The <strong>model</strong> described in Fig. 2 was extended to<br />

block (an independent event block activated at t<br />

0)<br />

allow <strong>the</strong> simulation <strong>of</strong> a complete growth curve.<br />

uses a random number generator based on a trun- The discrete adaptation function was retained, and<br />

cated (positive values only) normal distribution with <strong>combined</strong> with <strong>the</strong> HPM to provide <strong>the</strong> continuous<br />

mean tL and S.D.<br />

L<br />

from Table 1 to assign tL<br />

values growth function (Fig. 4). In this <strong>model</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Adaptato<br />

each <strong>of</strong> up to 64 cells. These values are stored in tion block moves one cell from <strong>the</strong> NonGrowing to<br />

<strong>the</strong> defined value Triggers block. The Adaptation <strong>the</strong> Growing compartment at each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Trigger<br />

block reads <strong>the</strong>se values, and adds a single cell to <strong>the</strong> times. This preserves <strong>the</strong> initial number <strong>of</strong> cells in<br />

Growing compartment at each time corresponding to <strong>the</strong> <strong>model</strong>. The blocks to calculate <strong>the</strong> log <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cell<br />

an individual cell t<br />

L. Once in <strong>the</strong> Growing compart- numbers are provided to assist in <strong>the</strong> visualization <strong>of</strong><br />

ment, cells start growing immediately according to a <strong>the</strong> growth curve.<br />

logistic equation (McKellar, 1997):<br />

The output <strong>of</strong> this <strong>model</strong> for a total <strong>of</strong> 64 cells is<br />

shown in Fig. 5. Note that values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong> Growing<br />

dG G compartment are not shown where <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />

] 5 Gm S1 2 ]] D (4)<br />

dx N max<br />

cells was zero. These results show that <strong>the</strong> simulated<br />

values for <strong>the</strong> NonGrowing cells decreased as <strong>the</strong><br />

where G is <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> cells in <strong>the</strong> Growing numbers <strong>of</strong> Growing cells increased. When <strong>the</strong> total<br />

compartment and Nmax<br />

is <strong>the</strong> maximum population<br />

density.<br />

The LogGrowing block calculates <strong>the</strong> log cfu, and<br />

at each time increment <strong>the</strong> component event Monitor<br />

block tests to see if <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> LogGrowing has<br />

6<br />

exceeded <strong>the</strong> detection limit (defined as 3.510<br />

cfu/well). The defined value TimetoDetection block<br />

holds <strong>the</strong> calculated t<br />

d.<br />

The <strong>model</strong> in Fig. 2 was used to simulate values<br />

for td<br />

corresponding to up to 32 cells per well. The<br />

simulated S.D. values were derived from a total <strong>of</strong><br />

20 simulations for each <strong>of</strong> 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 or 32 cells<br />

per well. Fig. 3 shows that both <strong>the</strong> simulated td<br />

and<br />

S.D. values are in close agreement with <strong>the</strong> ex- Fig. 3. Comparison <strong>of</strong> t<br />

d<br />

(s) and S.D.<br />

L<br />

(h) from experimental<br />

perimental findings. Note that S.D. refers to <strong>the</strong> data (open symbols) or simulated data (closed symbols).<br />

L

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!