Minutes of the Pre-Bid meeting held on 24.9.12 - Stscodisha.gov.in
Minutes of the Pre-Bid meeting held on 24.9.12 - Stscodisha.gov.in
Minutes of the Pre-Bid meeting held on 24.9.12 - Stscodisha.gov.in
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
RFP .No: 3000/PRG-VII-30/2012 dated 11-09-2012<br />
Odisha Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe F<strong>in</strong>ancial Development Corporati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
Near BJB Aut<strong>on</strong>omous College, Kalpana Square, Bhubaneswar<br />
www.odisha.<strong>gov</strong>.<strong>in</strong>/stsc/<strong>in</strong>dex.htm<br />
e-mail: stscdev@gmail.com and cc to gajanandsag@gmail.com<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>M<strong>in</strong>utes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pre</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Bid</str<strong>on</strong>g> Meet<strong>in</strong>g Held for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> RFP for submit<strong>in</strong>g Project Proposals for<br />
enhancement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Livelihood <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Odisha<br />
Date: 24 th September 2012<br />
Day: M<strong>on</strong>day<br />
Time: 15:00 Hrs.<br />
Venue: C<strong>on</strong>ference Hall, OSFDC, Bhubaneswar.<br />
1. Participants List: From OSFDC<br />
Sr. No. Name <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Participants Organizati<strong>on</strong> / Designati<strong>on</strong><br />
1 Shri. S.K Popli, IFS Director cum Special Secretary, ST&SC<br />
Development Department and MD, OSFDC<br />
2 Shri. Debabrata Das, OAS G.M, OSFDC<br />
3 Shri. L<strong>in</strong>garaj Sahoo A.G.M, OSFDC<br />
4 Shri. Gajanan Rauta Project Coord<strong>in</strong>ator, PMU, ST&SC Development<br />
Department<br />
2. Participants List: From Prospective Agencies. (Refer Attendance Sheet at Annexure-I)<br />
3. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>meet<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> various queries were raised by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> participat<strong>in</strong>g agencies, for which <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
query and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> respective compliance are menti<strong>on</strong>ed below.<br />
Sr. No Reference Clarificati<strong>on</strong> Sought Comments/ Clarificati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
1 Page-I Title Page: RFP<br />
Number is miss<strong>in</strong>g<br />
RFP Number: 3000/PRG-VII-30/2012 dated 11-09-<br />
2012<br />
2 Page No.<br />
3, Po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
A.<br />
Schedule <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Invitati<strong>on</strong><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Bid</str<strong>on</strong>g> and <str<strong>on</strong>g>Bid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
acceptance.<br />
It is clarified that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> last date for submissi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
proposal is extended up to 15 th October 2012.<br />
The OSFDC is <strong>in</strong>vit<strong>in</strong>g proposals from <strong>in</strong>terested<br />
agencies for enhancement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> livelihood <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ST & SC<br />
populati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state. While submissi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
proposal, it may be kept <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that for<br />
• Projects proposed for benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> SC families<br />
<strong>on</strong>ly, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> project locati<strong>on</strong> can be anywhere<br />
with<strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Odisha.<br />
• For projects proposed for ST families <strong>on</strong>ly,<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> project locati<strong>on</strong> should be outside <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
ITDA, MADA and Cluster areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state.<br />
The List <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ITDA, MADA and Cluster areas<br />
is kept at Annexure-II.<br />
• For projects proposed for benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> SC and<br />
ST families put toge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> project locati<strong>on</strong><br />
should be outside ITDA, MADA and Cluster<br />
pockets.<br />
It is fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r clarified that although <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> date <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Page 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 11<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>M<strong>in</strong>utes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pre</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Bid</str<strong>on</strong>g> Meet<strong>in</strong>g Held for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> RFP for provid<strong>in</strong>g Project Proposals for enhancement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Livelihood <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe <strong>in</strong> areas o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than ITDAs.
3<br />
Page No 5<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t H<br />
Page No-<br />
6,<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
Eligibility<br />
Eligibility Criteria:<br />
Technical Eligibility<br />
Whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r C<strong>on</strong>sortium<br />
is allowed or not<br />
The SC populati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> block should be<br />
more than or equal to<br />
20% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total<br />
populati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
block.<br />
The overall literacy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> block should be<br />
less than 35%.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial Eligibility:<br />
The Agency / Firm<br />
should have <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
experience <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
handl<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
resources <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> more<br />
than Rs. 50 lakhs per<br />
Annum for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> last<br />
three c<strong>on</strong>secutive<br />
years.<br />
submissi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> proposal is kept <strong>on</strong> 15 th October 2012,<br />
proposals from agencies are <strong>in</strong>vited and shall be<br />
accepted throughout <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> year. The evaluati<strong>on</strong><br />
committee at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fice <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> OSFDC shall review<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proposal <strong>on</strong> quarterly basis and communicate to<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> respective agencies.<br />
C<strong>on</strong>sortium is not allowed for submitt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
proposals. The eligibility criteria may be read as<br />
“The organizati<strong>on</strong>/Instituti<strong>on</strong> should be a not for<br />
pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>it organizati<strong>on</strong> such as Govt. registered societies,<br />
VOs, Not for pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>it mak<strong>in</strong>g agencies, Community<br />
based <strong>in</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>s/ Societies registered under <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
c<strong>on</strong>cerned Indian Laws”.<br />
It is clarified that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> blocks hav<strong>in</strong>g SC BPL families<br />
c<strong>on</strong>stitut<strong>in</strong>g 20% or more <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total should be <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
priority blocks. However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 20% SC<br />
populati<strong>on</strong> as a criteria for selecti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> blocks is<br />
removed.<br />
It is clarified that each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proposals submitted<br />
should cover at least 150-200 SC BPL families.<br />
The criteria is removed.<br />
The f<strong>in</strong>ancial Ceil<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Rs. 50 Lakh as annual turn<br />
over <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> agency for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> last three f<strong>in</strong>ancial years is<br />
reduced to Rs. 30 lakhs per annum for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> last<br />
three c<strong>on</strong>secutive years. The details <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> annual<br />
turnover and net worth duly signed by a Charted<br />
Account for different f<strong>in</strong>ancial year is to be<br />
menti<strong>on</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proposal.<br />
Documents to be<br />
submitted for<br />
verificati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
4 Page-6,<br />
Clause I<br />
CA certified P&L and<br />
balance sheet for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
last three years (2009-<br />
10,2010-11 and 2011-<br />
12). The details <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Turnover, networth,<br />
capitals and reserves<br />
need to be spelt out<br />
clearly.<br />
Sectors for<br />
<strong>in</strong>terventi<strong>on</strong><br />
Project Proposals should be formulated separately for<br />
<strong>in</strong>frastructure development needs(through<br />
Page 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 11<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>M<strong>in</strong>utes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pre</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Bid</str<strong>on</strong>g> Meet<strong>in</strong>g Held for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> RFP for provid<strong>in</strong>g Project Proposals for enhancement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Livelihood <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe <strong>in</strong> areas o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than ITDAs.
c<strong>on</strong>vergence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <strong>gov</strong>t. Scheme) & livelihood<br />
formati<strong>on</strong> scheme (through funds for ST&SC<br />
Development, Odisha and c<strong>on</strong>vergence with o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r<br />
schemes/ sources <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fund) al<strong>on</strong>g with a perspective<br />
plan which may look at 3 to 4 years time frame for<br />
implementati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
1. Agriculture<br />
2. Horticulture<br />
3. Animal Husbandry<br />
4. Dairy Development<br />
5. Fisheries<br />
6. O<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r Agriculture Programmes (Mandi<br />
Parishad, Agro-horti- forestry programme<br />
like WADI )<br />
7. IWDP (Land Devp. & Water Resources)<br />
8. M<strong>in</strong>or Irrigati<strong>on</strong><br />
9. Small Scale Industries<br />
10. Handloom, Handicraft<br />
11. Community based Eco Tourism<br />
12. NTFP/ Forest based livelihood etc.<br />
13. Self Employment, SHG/Cooperative/<br />
Producer Company based Enterprise<br />
Development<br />
5 Whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> project<br />
implementati<strong>on</strong> shall<br />
be <strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
family based or group<br />
based<br />
6 In case <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proposal is<br />
prepared where <strong>in</strong><br />
dovetail<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fund<br />
shall be d<strong>on</strong>e by<br />
c<strong>on</strong>verg<strong>in</strong>g with<br />
different <strong>gov</strong>ernment<br />
agencies/ schemes or<br />
from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fund <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> some<br />
d<strong>on</strong>or agencies. In<br />
that case, shall <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
OSFDC commit for<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fund proposed<br />
under c<strong>on</strong>vergence<br />
plan<br />
7 Whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r beneficiary<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> shall be a<br />
part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total<br />
project cost.<br />
8 In case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> villages<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g both SC and<br />
It is clarified that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>terventi<strong>on</strong>s shall be for<br />
enhancement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> livelihood and ec<strong>on</strong>omic status <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
SC&ST households. However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> projects with<br />
implementati<strong>on</strong> through SHG/Group/JLG mode shall<br />
be preferred.<br />
It is clarified that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> OSFDC shall facilitate <strong>in</strong><br />
gett<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fund from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>gov</strong>t. agencies/ schemes<br />
from where fund/ grant is proposed for. However, it<br />
does not commit <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> amount proposed under<br />
c<strong>on</strong>vergence model.<br />
The implement<strong>in</strong>g agencies have to follow up with<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cerned department/ <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fices for gett<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fund<br />
proposed under c<strong>on</strong>vergence model.<br />
Yes. The beneficiary c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> is to be <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
while work<strong>in</strong>g out <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> project cost and should be a<br />
part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total project cost. However, such<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> should be judiciously arrived at and may<br />
even <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> form <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> labour.<br />
It is clarified that <strong>in</strong> case <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proposal targets for<br />
development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> villages hav<strong>in</strong>g both SC & ST<br />
Page 3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 11<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>M<strong>in</strong>utes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pre</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Bid</str<strong>on</strong>g> Meet<strong>in</strong>g Held for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> RFP for provid<strong>in</strong>g Project Proposals for enhancement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Livelihood <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe <strong>in</strong> areas o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than ITDAs.
ST families, can <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
proposal for ST be<br />
submitted<br />
9 It is menti<strong>on</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
RFP, clause I, page<br />
No. 6 that <strong>on</strong>ly <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Project Management<br />
cost is limited to 6%<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total project<br />
cost. Is this 6% will<br />
be <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fund<br />
proposed under SCA-<br />
SCSP or SCA-TSP or<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> whole project<br />
cost<br />
10 What is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> maximum<br />
ceil<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total<br />
project cost<br />
families and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y are taken as beneficiaries <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
project, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> project cost is to be proposed for <str<strong>on</strong>g>meet<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
under two different sources.<br />
1. For SC beneficiaries, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fund<strong>in</strong>g source shall<br />
be from SCA-SCSP.<br />
2. For ST beneficiaries, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fund<strong>in</strong>g source shall<br />
be from SCA-TASP.<br />
It is to be clearly menti<strong>on</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> project cost sheet<br />
al<strong>on</strong>gwith detailed number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> beneficiaries covered<br />
<strong>in</strong> each category.<br />
It is clarified that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 6% adm<strong>in</strong>istrative cost shall be<br />
calculated as 6% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> project cost proposed under<br />
SCA-TSP and/or SCA-SCSP. In case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> proposals<br />
submitted <strong>in</strong> c<strong>on</strong>vergence model, it is to be<br />
proporti<strong>on</strong>ately proposed under <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> schemes. In case,<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>verged scheme does not have a provisi<strong>on</strong> for<br />
adm<strong>in</strong>istrative cost, for good quality proposals, based<br />
<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir feasibility <strong>on</strong> case to case basis, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
adm<strong>in</strong>istrative cost may be <strong>in</strong>creased up to 10% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cost proposed under SCA-TSP and/or SCA-<br />
SCSP.<br />
It is clarified that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total project cost is to be<br />
derived by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> agencies and no such ceil<strong>in</strong>g is fixed.<br />
However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fund requisiti<strong>on</strong> under SCA-TSP and/or<br />
SCA-SCSP under <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same proposal shall be limited<br />
to 50 lakh <strong>on</strong>ly.<br />
Meet<strong>in</strong>g ended with thanks to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> chair.<br />
Page 4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 11<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>M<strong>in</strong>utes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pre</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Bid</str<strong>on</strong>g> Meet<strong>in</strong>g Held for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> RFP for provid<strong>in</strong>g Project Proposals for enhancement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Livelihood <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe <strong>in</strong> areas o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than ITDAs.
Annexure-I<br />
Page 5 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 11<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>M<strong>in</strong>utes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pre</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Bid</str<strong>on</strong>g> Meet<strong>in</strong>g Held for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> RFP for provid<strong>in</strong>g Project Proposals for enhancement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Livelihood <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe <strong>in</strong> areas o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than ITDAs.
Page 6 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 11<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>M<strong>in</strong>utes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pre</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Bid</str<strong>on</strong>g> Meet<strong>in</strong>g Held for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> RFP for provid<strong>in</strong>g Project Proposals for enhancement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Livelihood <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe <strong>in</strong> areas o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than ITDAs.
Page 7 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 11<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>M<strong>in</strong>utes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pre</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Bid</str<strong>on</strong>g> Meet<strong>in</strong>g Held for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> RFP for provid<strong>in</strong>g Project Proposals for enhancement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Livelihood <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe <strong>in</strong> areas o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than ITDAs.
Page 8 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 11<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>M<strong>in</strong>utes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pre</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Bid</str<strong>on</strong>g> Meet<strong>in</strong>g Held for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> RFP for provid<strong>in</strong>g Project Proposals for enhancement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Livelihood <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe <strong>in</strong> areas o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than ITDAs.
Annexure-II<br />
List <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ITDAs <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Odisha<br />
Sl.No. Name <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> District Name <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ITDAs<br />
1 BALASORE Nilgiri<br />
2 Baripada<br />
3 Kaptipada<br />
MAYURBHANJ<br />
4 Karanjia<br />
5<br />
Rairangpur<br />
6<br />
KEONJHAR<br />
Ke<strong>on</strong>jhar<br />
7<br />
Champua<br />
8 SAMBALPUR Kuch<strong>in</strong>da<br />
9 B<strong>on</strong>ai<br />
SUNDARGARH<br />
10 Panposh<br />
11<br />
Sundargarh<br />
12 GAJAPATI Parlakhemundi<br />
13 KALAHANDI Th.Rampur<br />
14<br />
KORAPUT<br />
Koraput<br />
15<br />
Jeypore<br />
16<br />
RAYAGADA<br />
Rayagada<br />
17<br />
Gunpur<br />
18 NAWARANGPUR Nawarangpur<br />
19 MALKANGIRI Malkangiri<br />
20<br />
KONDHMAL<br />
Balliguda<br />
21<br />
Phulbani<br />
List <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> MADA Pocket<br />
Sl. No Name <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> District MADA Pocket<br />
1 Baleswar Jaleswar<br />
2 Danagadi<br />
Jajpur<br />
3<br />
Suk<strong>in</strong>da-I,II,III<br />
4 Khurdha Banapur<br />
5 Ranapur<br />
6 Daspalla<br />
Nayagada<br />
7 Gania<br />
8<br />
Nuaga<strong>on</strong><br />
9 Bolangir<br />
Deoga<strong>on</strong><br />
10 Patnagarh<br />
11<br />
Khaprakhole<br />
Page 9 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 11<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>M<strong>in</strong>utes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pre</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Bid</str<strong>on</strong>g> Meet<strong>in</strong>g Held for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> RFP for provid<strong>in</strong>g Project Proposals for enhancement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Livelihood <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe <strong>in</strong> areas o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than ITDAs.
12 Muribahal<br />
13 Sa<strong>in</strong>tala<br />
14 Gudvella<br />
15 Tureikella<br />
16 Dhenkanal Kankadahada<br />
17 Athamallik<br />
Angul<br />
18<br />
Pallahada<br />
19 Anandpur-I&II<br />
20 Ke<strong>on</strong>jhar<br />
Ghasipura<br />
21<br />
Hatadihi<br />
22 Barkote<br />
Deoghar<br />
23<br />
Tileibani<br />
24 Jharabandha<br />
Bargarh<br />
25<br />
Paikamal<br />
26 Jharsuguda<br />
27 Lakhanpur<br />
28 Jharsuguda<br />
Kirimira<br />
29 Laikera<br />
30<br />
Kolabira<br />
31 Rengali<br />
32 Sambalpur<br />
Dhanakauda<br />
33<br />
Jujumura<br />
34 Ganjam Patrapur<br />
35 Gajapati Kash<strong>in</strong>agar<br />
36 Bhawanipatna<br />
37 Kes<strong>in</strong>ga<br />
38 Junagarh<br />
Kalahandi<br />
39 M.Rampur<br />
40 Jaipatna<br />
41<br />
Narla<br />
42 Boden<br />
43 Khariar I&II<br />
44 Nuapada<br />
Komna<br />
45 Nuapada I&II<br />
46<br />
S<strong>in</strong>apalli<br />
47 Boudh Boudh<br />
List <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Cluster Areas<br />
Sl. No Name <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> district Cluster Pockets<br />
1 Anugul Angul<br />
2 Dhenkanal Dhenkanal<br />
3 Ganjam<br />
Sanakhemundi<br />
4<br />
Suruda<br />
5 Sambalpur Naktideul<br />
Page 10 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 11<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>M<strong>in</strong>utes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pre</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Bid</str<strong>on</strong>g> Meet<strong>in</strong>g Held for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> RFP for provid<strong>in</strong>g Project Proposals for enhancement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Livelihood <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe <strong>in</strong> areas o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than ITDAs.
6 Bargarh Rajabora Sambar<br />
7 Bolangir Belpada<br />
8 Boudh Kantamal<br />
9 Kalahandi<br />
Bhawanipatna<br />
10 Jaipatna<br />
11<br />
Koksara-I & II<br />
12 Nuapada Nawapada<br />
13 Jajpur Barchana<br />
Page 11 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 11<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>M<strong>in</strong>utes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pre</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Bid</str<strong>on</strong>g> Meet<strong>in</strong>g Held for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> RFP for provid<strong>in</strong>g Project Proposals for enhancement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Livelihood <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe <strong>in</strong> areas o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than ITDAs.