Underneath the Golden Boy - Robson Hall Faculty of Law
Underneath the Golden Boy - Robson Hall Faculty of Law Underneath the Golden Boy - Robson Hall Faculty of Law
436 Underneath the Golden Boy both specify as a measurement period the first year of operation of the franchise. • The New Brunswick and PEI Acts have 'hard coded' the 20% level of the threshold test into the Act, making it very difficult to change that number (both Alberta and Ontario have put the 20% number in their disclosure Regulations). If Manitoba decides to enact franchise disclosure legislation, then we recommend that the legislation include a fractional franchise exemption, but that: • The exemption not be available unless the distributor (or one of its directors, officers or others having management authority, if the distributor is an entity) has had at least two consecutive years management experience (at any time) in a business that was distributing goods and services competitive with or similar to those of the franchisor, or was of a type that ordinarily would be expected to offer such goods or services; • The measurement period for determining sales for the threshold test be the greater of the first year of operation of the franchise and the reasonably foreseeable future; and • The threshold level be coded into the disclosure regulation rather than into the disclosure statute. F. Renewal or Extension of a Franchise Agreement The Alberta Act exempts from its disclosure requirements the renewal or extension of a franchise agreement. 28 The New Brunswick, Ontario and PEI Acts impose two conditions on the availability of this "renewal" exemption: 29 • There has been no interruption in the operation of the franchisee's business, and • There has been no material change since the franchise agreement or its most recent renewal or extension was entered into. The renewal exemption has its origin in California's Franchise Investment Act. 30 The policy underlying the renewal exemption is that disclosure has little 28 Alberta Act, s. 5(1)(d). 29 New Brunswick Act, s. 5(8)(f); Ontario and PEI Acts, s. 5(7)(f). 30 California Corporations Code, supra note 7 at §31018(c): "[The terms 'offer', 'offer to sell', 'sale' and 'sell'] do not include the renewal or extension of an existing franchise where there is no interruption in the operation of the franchised business by the franchisee; provided, that a material modification of an existing franchise, whether upon renewal or otherwise, is a 'sale' within the meaning of [the statutory disclosure requirement]."
Canadian Franchise Disclosure Laws 437 utility if the business environment upon renewal is not likely to be substantially different from that in which the franchisee has been conducting his business. We have the following concerns about the two renewal exemption conditions: • Neither a starting date nor a duration for the business interruption is specified. Surely a business interruption for a few weeks that occurred some years ago for remodeling is quite irrelevant to availability of the exemption. • In any real life franchise system, a material change is likely to occur if the term of the franchise extends for more than a couple of years.31 • In our view, the two existing renewal exemption conditions virtually eliminate the availability of the renewal exemption. If Manitoba decides to enact franchise disclosure legislation, then we recommend that the legislation include a renewal exemption that is available only if: • The franchisee's operation of his franchise business was not interrupted for a period or periods exceeding a cumulative total of 60 days within the 24 months immediately preceding the renewal or extension, and • The franchisee's business environment immediately following the renewal or extension is not substantially different from that in which the franchisee has been conducting his franchise business. G. Minimal Investment Each of the four Acts exempts from its disclosure requirements the grant of a franchise involving a total annual investment by the franchisee of less than $5 000. 32 The language of the Ontario Act typifies this "minimal investment" exemption: 5(7) [The statutory disclosure obligation] does not apply to, … (g) the grant of a franchise if, 31 Especially if the franchisee operates wholly or partly in New Brunswick or Prince Edward Island, because the franchise that is to be renewed or extended could have experienced a material change during the term. See the definitions of "material change" in New Brunswick Act, s. 1(1); PEI Act, s. 1(1)(k). The Alberta and Ontario Act definitions do not include changes to the franchise. 32 Alberta Act, s. 5(1)(e) and Alberta Regulation, s. 6; Ontario Act, s. 5(7)(g)(i) and Ontario Regulation, s. 9; PEI Act, s. 5(7)(e) and P.E.I. Reg. EC2006-231, s. 7; New Brunswick Act, s. 5(8)(g). New Brunswick has not completed drafting its disclosure Regulation, but we presume that Regulation will also specify a $5,000 amount.
- Page 395 and 396: Franchise Legislation and Associati
- Page 397 and 398: Franchise Legislation and Associati
- Page 399 and 400: Franchise Legislation and Associati
- Page 401 and 402: Franchise Legislation and Associati
- Page 403 and 404: Franchise Legislation and Associati
- Page 405 and 406: Franchise Legislation and Associati
- Page 407 and 408: Franchise Legislation and Associati
- Page 409 and 410: Franchise Legislation and Associati
- Page 411 and 412: Franchise Legislation and Associati
- Page 413 and 414: Something Old, Something New: A Com
- Page 415 and 416: Something Old, Something New 405 Ac
- Page 417 and 418: Something Old, Something New 407 On
- Page 419 and 420: Something Old, Something New 409 Du
- Page 421 and 422: Something Old, Something New 411 ii
- Page 423 and 424: Something Old, Something New 413 ii
- Page 425 and 426: Something Old, Something New 415 5.
- Page 427 and 428: Something Old, Something New 417 fr
- Page 429 and 430: Something Old, Something New 419 i.
- Page 431 and 432: Something Old, Something New 421 (3
- Page 433 and 434: Something Old, Something New 423 a
- Page 435 and 436: Something Old, Something New 425 iv
- Page 437 and 438: Canadian Franchise Disclosure Laws:
- Page 439 and 440: Canadian Franchise Disclosure Laws
- Page 441 and 442: Canadian Franchise Disclosure Laws
- Page 443 and 444: Canadian Franchise Disclosure Laws
- Page 445: Canadian Franchise Disclosure Laws
- Page 449 and 450: Canadian Franchise Disclosure Laws
- Page 451 and 452: Canadian Franchise Disclosure Laws
- Page 453 and 454: Canadian Franchise Disclosure Laws
- Page 455 and 456: Canadian Franchise Disclosure Laws
- Page 457 and 458: Appendix A Bills Passed in the 1 st
- Page 459 and 460: Bill Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B
- Page 461 and 462: Bill Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B
- Page 463 and 464: Bill Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B
- Page 465 and 466: Bill Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B
- Page 467 and 468: Bill Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B
- Page 469 and 470: Bill Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B
- Page 471 and 472: Bill Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B
- Page 473 and 474: Bill Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B
- Page 475 and 476: Appendix B Bills Passed in the 2 nd
- Page 477 and 478: No. Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B.
- Page 479 and 480: No. Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B.
- Page 481 and 482: No. Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B.
- Page 483 and 484: No. Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B.
- Page 485 and 486: No. Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B.
- Page 487 and 488: No. Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B.
- Page 489 and 490: No. Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B.
- Page 491 and 492: No. Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B.
- Page 493 and 494: No. Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B.
- Page 495 and 496: No. Title Sponsor Type Noted 1 H.B.
436 <strong>Underneath</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Golden</strong> <strong>Boy</strong><br />
both specify as a measurement period <strong>the</strong> first year <strong>of</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
franchise.<br />
• The New Brunswick and PEI Acts have 'hard coded' <strong>the</strong> 20% level <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> threshold test into <strong>the</strong> Act, making it very difficult to change that<br />
number (both Alberta and Ontario have put <strong>the</strong> 20% number in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
disclosure Regulations).<br />
If Manitoba decides to enact franchise disclosure legislation, <strong>the</strong>n we<br />
recommend that <strong>the</strong> legislation include a fractional franchise exemption, but<br />
that:<br />
• The exemption not be available unless <strong>the</strong> distributor (or one <strong>of</strong> its<br />
directors, <strong>of</strong>ficers or o<strong>the</strong>rs having management authority, if <strong>the</strong><br />
distributor is an entity) has had at least two consecutive years<br />
management experience (at any time) in a business that was<br />
distributing goods and services competitive with or similar to those <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> franchisor, or was <strong>of</strong> a type that ordinarily would be expected to<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer such goods or services;<br />
• The measurement period for determining sales for <strong>the</strong> threshold test be<br />
<strong>the</strong> greater <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first year <strong>of</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> franchise and <strong>the</strong><br />
reasonably foreseeable future; and<br />
• The threshold level be coded into <strong>the</strong> disclosure regulation ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />
into <strong>the</strong> disclosure statute.<br />
F. Renewal or Extension <strong>of</strong> a Franchise Agreement<br />
The Alberta Act exempts from its disclosure requirements <strong>the</strong> renewal or<br />
extension <strong>of</strong> a franchise agreement. 28 The New Brunswick, Ontario and PEI Acts<br />
impose two conditions on <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> this "renewal" exemption: 29<br />
• There has been no interruption in <strong>the</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> franchisee's<br />
business, and<br />
• There has been no material change since <strong>the</strong> franchise agreement or its<br />
most recent renewal or extension was entered into.<br />
The renewal exemption has its origin in California's Franchise Investment<br />
Act. 30 The policy underlying <strong>the</strong> renewal exemption is that disclosure has little<br />
28<br />
Alberta Act, s. 5(1)(d).<br />
29<br />
New Brunswick Act, s. 5(8)(f); Ontario and PEI Acts, s. 5(7)(f).<br />
30<br />
California Corporations Code, supra note 7 at §31018(c): "[The terms '<strong>of</strong>fer', '<strong>of</strong>fer to sell', 'sale'<br />
and 'sell'] do not include <strong>the</strong> renewal or extension <strong>of</strong> an existing franchise where <strong>the</strong>re is no<br />
interruption in <strong>the</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> franchised business by <strong>the</strong> franchisee; provided, that a<br />
material modification <strong>of</strong> an existing franchise, whe<strong>the</strong>r upon renewal or o<strong>the</strong>rwise, is a 'sale'<br />
within <strong>the</strong> meaning <strong>of</strong> [<strong>the</strong> statutory disclosure requirement]."