30.01.2015 Views

Underneath the Golden Boy - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

Underneath the Golden Boy - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

Underneath the Golden Boy - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Response to Consultation Paper on Franchise <strong>Law</strong> 325<br />

4. New Brunswick<br />

The Provincial Legislature <strong>of</strong> New Brunswick proposed Bill 32, entitled<br />

Franchises Act, at a first reading on 23 February 2007. If passed, <strong>the</strong> bill will<br />

impose on franchisors and franchisees a duty <strong>of</strong> good faith and fair dealing. The<br />

legislation will also protect <strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong> franchisees to associate. 101 Although New<br />

Brunswick altered <strong>the</strong> order, it followed PEI’s fair dealing provision, extending<br />

<strong>the</strong> performance and enforcement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> franchise agreement to include <strong>the</strong><br />

exercises <strong>of</strong> a right under <strong>the</strong> agreement. Once again, Ontario’s association<br />

provisions were adopted verbatim.<br />

5. ULCC<br />

The Uniform Franchises Act contains <strong>the</strong> same fair dealing provision as PEI.<br />

The expansion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> section from its Ontario counterpart means that <strong>the</strong> duty<br />

<strong>of</strong> fair dealing will not only apply during <strong>the</strong> performance and enforcement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

agreement but also in <strong>the</strong> exercise <strong>of</strong> a right under it. The ULCC argues that <strong>the</strong><br />

addition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> words “in <strong>the</strong> exercise <strong>of</strong> a right” is necessary because <strong>the</strong> duty <strong>of</strong><br />

fair dealing incorporating <strong>the</strong> duty <strong>of</strong> good faith and commercial reasonableness<br />

standards in <strong>the</strong> Ontario Act does not extend to express contractual provisions<br />

granting <strong>the</strong> franchisor discretionary authority over rights to be exercised during<br />

<strong>the</strong> term <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contract that may be carried out without regard to fair dealing. 102<br />

When drafting its model act, <strong>the</strong> ULCC chose to follow Ontario’s association<br />

provisions ra<strong>the</strong>r than Alberta’s. The reason for this decision is that <strong>the</strong> Alberta<br />

Act has been drafted in <strong>the</strong> negative, that is, that a franchisor or its associate<br />

may not prohibit or restrict a franchise from forming an organization while <strong>the</strong><br />

Ontario Act has been drafted in <strong>the</strong> affirmative, where a “franchisee may<br />

associate with o<strong>the</strong>r franchisees.” 103<br />

E. Recommendation for Manitoba<br />

The question at hand is what relationship provisions Manitoba ought to adopt.<br />

The options range from Alberta’s narrower provisions to PEI, New Brunswick<br />

and <strong>the</strong> ULCC’s wider provisions; Ontario stands in <strong>the</strong> middle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spectrum.<br />

All relationship provisions pertain to <strong>the</strong> duty <strong>of</strong> good faith and <strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong><br />

franchisees to associate.<br />

101<br />

Richard Leblanc, “New Brunswick Reintroduces Franchise Legislation,” FranNews (Spring<br />

2007), online: Miller Thomson LLP, Publications, Newsletters<br />

at 1.<br />

102<br />

Uniform <strong>Law</strong> Conference <strong>of</strong> Canada, supra note 71 at 9.<br />

103<br />

Ibid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!