30.01.2015 Views

Underneath the Golden Boy - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

Underneath the Golden Boy - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

Underneath the Golden Boy - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Franchise <strong>Law</strong> Consultation Paper 2007 249<br />

1971 Alberta Act was a registration statute that required prospective franchisors<br />

to register with <strong>the</strong> Alberta Securities Commission and to file certain<br />

documents, including a prospectus. The Act prohibited trading in a franchise<br />

without registration. Franchise salespersons were also required to register with<br />

<strong>the</strong> Commission. 73<br />

Under <strong>the</strong> 1971 Act, <strong>the</strong> Alberta Securities Commission carried out<br />

activities to oversee and regulate franchise activity, including reviewing<br />

prospectuses to determine compliance, investigating complaints and imposing<br />

sanctions for breaches <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Act. In addition, <strong>the</strong> Commission set policies that<br />

governed franchisor-franchisee conduct, covering matters such as standards for<br />

additional franchisor disclosure and for <strong>the</strong> termination <strong>of</strong> franchise<br />

agreements. 74<br />

By <strong>the</strong> late 1980s, concerns had arisen about <strong>the</strong> cost, administrative burden<br />

and delay associated with <strong>the</strong> registration and disclosure requirements. 75 The<br />

Alberta Securities Commission requested public comment on amendments to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Act in 1991, which was followed by <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> a bill to replace <strong>the</strong><br />

Act in 1992. 76 However, <strong>the</strong> 1992 bill did not receive second reading. In 1995,<br />

following fur<strong>the</strong>r public consultation and advice from a committee including<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Canadian Franchise Association, <strong>the</strong> former Alberta<br />

Franchisors’ Institute and <strong>the</strong> Franchisee Association <strong>of</strong> Alberta, 77 <strong>the</strong> Alberta<br />

Government replaced its regulatory structure with a new Franchises Act and<br />

regulations. 78<br />

73<br />

Franchises Act, R.S.A. 1980, c. F-17 (repealed).<br />

74<br />

Zaid, supra note 1 at 2-110 to 118M. Zaid argues, at 25, that with <strong>the</strong>se policies, “<strong>the</strong> Agency’s<br />

mandate [had], in some instances … been taken beyond <strong>the</strong> realm <strong>of</strong> administering and into<br />

<strong>the</strong> realm <strong>of</strong> franchise relationship legislating”.<br />

75<br />

Alberta Ministry <strong>of</strong> Consumer and Corporate Affairs, Discussion Paper on <strong>the</strong> Alberta<br />

Securities Commission (1987) in Zaid, supra note 1 at 2-114. Typical registration costs for<br />

franchisors were reported to range between $10,000 and $20,000, and <strong>the</strong>se costs, along with<br />

<strong>the</strong> inconvenience <strong>of</strong> registration, were thought to discourage potential franchisors from<br />

carrying on business in Alberta. The government also incurred costs in administering <strong>the</strong> Act.<br />

76<br />

F. Zaid, Franchise <strong>Law</strong> (2005) at 25-26; Bill 45, Franchises Act, 22 nd Legislature, 4 th Session,<br />

Alberta, 1992-93.<br />

77<br />

Zaid, supra note 5 at 26.<br />

78<br />

Franchises Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. F-23 [Alberta Act]; Franchises Regulation, Alta. Reg. 240/95<br />

[Alberta regulations]. Dillon notes that <strong>the</strong> 1995 Alberta Act closely resembles <strong>the</strong> Model<br />

Franchise Investment Act developed by <strong>the</strong> North American Securities Administrators<br />

Association [NASAA], a body that addresses <strong>the</strong> harmonization <strong>of</strong> securities laws in North<br />

America: P. M. Dillon, Ontario's Franchise Regulatory Regime: Why Ontario Should Get<br />

Active in NASAA, Siskind, Cromarty, Ivey and Dowler LLP, London, Ontario, online:<br />

(date<br />

accessed: May 8, 2007)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!