30.01.2015 Views

Underneath the Golden Boy - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

Underneath the Golden Boy - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

Underneath the Golden Boy - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

246 <strong>Underneath</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Golden</strong> <strong>Boy</strong><br />

applies, but even in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> ambiguity a contract <strong>of</strong> adhesion is<br />

interpreted strictly against <strong>the</strong> party presenting it. 62<br />

As well, many o<strong>the</strong>r areas <strong>of</strong> law may affect a franchise, depending on <strong>the</strong><br />

circumstances and <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> business conducted; <strong>the</strong>se may include<br />

competition, consumer protection, privacy, tax, bankruptcy, intellectual<br />

property, and personal property security law. 63<br />

3. Manitoba Experience<br />

There do not appear to be reliable data on <strong>the</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> franchisors and<br />

franchisees in Manitoba. A review <strong>of</strong> court decisions does illustrate <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong><br />

some disputes that reached resolution through litigation. For example, <strong>the</strong><br />

recent case <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hall</strong>igan v. Liberty Tax Service Inc. 64 provides a glaring example <strong>of</strong><br />

franchisor intimidation tactics. The franchisor had decided to change <strong>the</strong> name<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> franchise, and pressured <strong>the</strong> franchisee to change its business name. The<br />

franchisee refused, as he was entitled to do under <strong>the</strong> franchise agreement. The<br />

franchisor <strong>the</strong>n withdrew its funding for tax discounting services without notice,<br />

purported to terminate <strong>the</strong> franchise agreement, and established its own tax<br />

services within <strong>the</strong> franchisee’s exclusive territories. The franchisor breached a<br />

court injunction that restrained it from acting in a manner inconsistent with <strong>the</strong><br />

franchisee’s rights and harassed <strong>the</strong> franchisee in a manner that <strong>the</strong> court noted<br />

“is indicative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> disdain Liberty has shown for <strong>Hall</strong>igan and <strong>the</strong> court process<br />

throughout.” 65 The court found that <strong>the</strong>re was an attempt by <strong>the</strong> franchisor to<br />

“bludgeon <strong>Hall</strong>igan into submission,” 66 along with flagrant and repetitive<br />

breaches <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> injunction. Liberty’s actions were outrageous and high-handed<br />

and <strong>the</strong> imbalance <strong>of</strong> power was stark. In light <strong>of</strong> this, in addition to<br />

compensatory damages <strong>of</strong> nearly $85 000, <strong>the</strong> court granted punitive damages <strong>of</strong><br />

$200 000.<br />

The case <strong>of</strong> Prairie Petroleum Products Ltd. v. Husky Oil Ltd. 67 dealt with a<br />

unilateral change to business operations by an oil company. 68 A change in<br />

62<br />

See <strong>the</strong> discussion in <strong>Hall</strong>igan v. Liberty Tax Service Inc., [2003] M.J. 289 (Man. QB) at<br />

paragraphs. 15-16.<br />

63<br />

For a thorough discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se areas <strong>of</strong> law as <strong>the</strong>y may impact on a franchise, see Zaid,<br />

supra note 7, and Snell and Weinberg, eds., Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> Franchising – Canada (2005). See<br />

also J. Rogers and A. Frith, “Piling On: O<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Law</strong>s Affecting Franchising” (Paper presented to<br />

The Domino Effect: 6 th Annual Franchising Conference, Ontario Bar Association, November<br />

16, 2006).<br />

64<br />

<strong>Hall</strong>igan v. Liberty Tax Service Inc., supra note 52 and supplementary judgment [2006] 8<br />

W.W.R. 97 (Man. Q.B.).<br />

65<br />

Supra note 52 at paragraph. 11.<br />

66<br />

Supra note 52 at paragraph. 2.<br />

67<br />

[2006] 11 W.W.R. 606 (QB).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!