Underneath the Golden Boy - Robson Hall Faculty of Law
Underneath the Golden Boy - Robson Hall Faculty of Law Underneath the Golden Boy - Robson Hall Faculty of Law
230 Underneath the Golden Boy
Franchise Law: Consultation Paper 2007 MANITOBA LAW REFORM COMMISSION CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION A. Background to the Project he Manitoba Law Reform Commission has noted that franchising is a Tgrowing and relatively unregulated field of business activity; there has been occasional media attention focusing on the inequality between franchisors and franchisees and recently, on alleged franchising frauds in Manitoba. 1 In recent years, three provinces and several countries have enacted new or revised franchise legislation. In January 2006, the Commission received a suggestion that a review of possible reforms to franchise law would be valuable in Manitoba, 2 and the Commission agreed to undertake the project. B. Scope This paper considers whether the regulation of franchises is desirable in Manitoba. It provides an introduction to the history and various models of franchising, an overview of existing franchise regulation in Canada and other countries and a comparison of the elements of Canadian legislative regimes. Finally, it asks whether franchise legislation is needed in Manitoba, and if so, what elements should be included in the legislation. 1 For example, A. Paul, “City man burned by pizza franchise scam” Winnipeg Free Press (February 12, 2007); P. Turenne, “Bitter business tale: Pizza franchise turned out to be scam” Winnipeg Sun (February 12, 2007). See also T. Davis, “A town tackles a giant” Winnipeg Free Press (June 17, 1995) A17; residents of the Town of Oakville organized a rally to protest a new General Motors policy that was forcing a dealer to close his dealership and to press for legislation that would make it more difficult for franchisors to dictate terms to franchisees. According to the report, GM was requiring dealers to undertake expensive renovations, and had refused approval for the Oakville dealer to sell his dealership instead. In the article, NDP MLA Jim Maloway and the President of the Manitoba Motor Dealers Association advocated for franchise legislation in Manitoba. 2 The review was suggested by A.L. Weinberg, Q.C., Myers Weinberg LLP, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
- Page 189 and 190: Apology Legislation: Bill 202 179 (
- Page 191 and 192: Apology Legislation: Bill 202 181 F
- Page 193 and 194: Apology Legislation: Bill 202 183 l
- Page 195 and 196: Apology Legislation: Bill 202 185 a
- Page 197 and 198: Apology Legislation: Bill 202 187 m
- Page 199 and 200: Apology Legislation: Bill 202 189 I
- Page 201 and 202: Apology Legislation: Bill 202 191 f
- Page 203 and 204: The Employment Standards Code Amend
- Page 205 and 206: The Employment Standards Code Amend
- Page 207 and 208: The Employment Standards Code Amend
- Page 209 and 210: The Employment Standards Code Amend
- Page 211 and 212: The Employment Standards Code Amend
- Page 213 and 214: The Employment Standards Code Amend
- Page 215 and 216: The Employment Standards Code Amend
- Page 217 and 218: The Employment Standards Code Amend
- Page 219 and 220: The Employment Standards Code Amend
- Page 221 and 222: The Registered Retirement Savings P
- Page 223 and 224: The Registreed Retirement Savings P
- Page 225 and 226: The Registreed Retirement Savings P
- Page 227 and 228: The Registreed Retirement Savings P
- Page 229 and 230: The Registreed Retirement Savings P
- Page 231 and 232: The Registreed Retirement Savings P
- Page 233 and 234: The Registreed Retirement Savings P
- Page 235 and 236: The Registreed Retirement Savings P
- Page 237 and 238: The Registreed Retirement Savings P
- Page 239: 2008 Franchise Law Symposium W ith
- Page 243 and 244: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 245 and 246: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 247 and 248: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 249 and 250: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 251 and 252: F. The Franchise Legal Relationship
- Page 253 and 254: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 255 and 256: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 257 and 258: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 259 and 260: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 261 and 262: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 263 and 264: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 265 and 266: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 267 and 268: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 269 and 270: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 271 and 272: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 273 and 274: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 275 and 276: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 277 and 278: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 279 and 280: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 281 and 282: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 283 and 284: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 285 and 286: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 287 and 288: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
- Page 289 and 290: Franchise Law Consultation Paper 20
Franchise <strong>Law</strong>: Consultation Paper 2007<br />
MANITOBA LAW REFORM COMMISSION<br />
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION<br />
A. Background to <strong>the</strong> Project<br />
he Manitoba <strong>Law</strong> Reform Commission has noted that franchising is a<br />
Tgrowing<br />
and relatively unregulated field <strong>of</strong> business activity; <strong>the</strong>re has been<br />
occasional media attention focusing on <strong>the</strong> inequality between franchisors and<br />
franchisees and recently, on alleged franchising frauds in Manitoba. 1 In recent<br />
years, three provinces and several countries have enacted new or revised<br />
franchise legislation. In January 2006, <strong>the</strong> Commission received a suggestion that<br />
a review <strong>of</strong> possible reforms to franchise law would be valuable in Manitoba, 2 and<br />
<strong>the</strong> Commission agreed to undertake <strong>the</strong> project.<br />
B. Scope<br />
This paper considers whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> regulation <strong>of</strong> franchises is desirable in<br />
Manitoba. It provides an introduction to <strong>the</strong> history and various models <strong>of</strong><br />
franchising, an overview <strong>of</strong> existing franchise regulation in Canada and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
countries and a comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> elements <strong>of</strong> Canadian legislative regimes.<br />
Finally, it asks whe<strong>the</strong>r franchise legislation is needed in Manitoba, and if so,<br />
what elements should be included in <strong>the</strong> legislation.<br />
1<br />
For example, A. Paul, “City man burned by pizza franchise scam” Winnipeg Free Press<br />
(February 12, 2007); P. Turenne, “Bitter business tale: Pizza franchise turned out to be scam”<br />
Winnipeg Sun (February 12, 2007). See also T. Davis, “A town tackles a giant” Winnipeg Free<br />
Press (June 17, 1995) A17; residents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Town <strong>of</strong> Oakville organized a rally to protest a new<br />
General Motors policy that was forcing a dealer to close his dealership and to press for<br />
legislation that would make it more difficult for franchisors to dictate terms to franchisees.<br />
According to <strong>the</strong> report, GM was requiring dealers to undertake expensive renovations, and<br />
had refused approval for <strong>the</strong> Oakville dealer to sell his dealership instead. In <strong>the</strong> article, NDP<br />
MLA Jim Maloway and <strong>the</strong> President <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Manitoba Motor Dealers Association advocated<br />
for franchise legislation in Manitoba.<br />
2<br />
The review was suggested by A.L. Weinberg, Q.C., Myers Weinberg LLP, Winnipeg, Manitoba.