Tagging and Graffiti - Victoria University of Wellington
Tagging and Graffiti - Victoria University of Wellington
Tagging and Graffiti - Victoria University of Wellington
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Tagging</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Graffiti</strong>: attitudes <strong>and</strong> experiences <strong>of</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>ers<br />
Without graffiti there would be no glittering bright spots in our decaying trash riddin<br />
inner cities. The colours can inspire a little happiness to the darkest <strong>of</strong> places.(Online<br />
survey respondent)<br />
Cos they think the city is ugly. They want to make it beautiful by writing their<br />
name all over it. Colourful. (Focus group participant)<br />
Creative expression, expressing sentiments, <strong>and</strong> sharing opinions were reasons highlighted by<br />
the online survey respondents for doing graffiti writing..<br />
I find it an easy way to express how I am feeling about current economic time <strong>and</strong><br />
the current government. (Online survey respondent)<br />
Why stop expressing myself I do it to share an opinion or art, not to destroy.<br />
(Online survey respondent)<br />
Comments like those above also clearly highlight the divisions between different types <strong>of</strong><br />
graffiti <strong>and</strong> those who engage in these kinds <strong>of</strong> activities. As with many criminological issues,<br />
graffiti writers are a diverse population <strong>and</strong> there is no simple ‘one size fits all’ solution to the<br />
perceived problems surrounding graffiti.<br />
While Māori <strong>and</strong> Pacific respondents were also more likely to report ‘creative expression’ as<br />
the main reason for their participation in graffiti, they were more likely than other ethnic<br />
groups to report that their involvement was attributable to being ‘part <strong>of</strong> a group culture’ <strong>and</strong><br />
the desire to ‘get my name up’.<br />
Respondents also referred to the informal rules surrounding the location <strong>of</strong> graffiti writing <strong>and</strong><br />
noted that some venues were strictly prohibited for ‘genuine’ graffiti writers. Those who<br />
broke these informal rules were seen as engaging in v<strong>and</strong>alism <strong>and</strong> highly disapproved <strong>of</strong>.<br />
One focus group participant summarised the informal criteria surrounding the location <strong>of</strong><br />
graffiti thus:<br />
There are rules, you know, even the graffiti guys have rules – so when someone<br />
breaks them it’s the pits. You know, the OG writers don’t tag churches or private<br />
property, schools. But people break those rules, most <strong>of</strong> the time it’s just hooligans.<br />
Those who were more engaged in graffiti were more likely to report that they would<br />
participate in future graffiti activity. Table 9 shows that more than two-thirds <strong>of</strong> that group<br />
would participate in future, compared to 26.9 per cent <strong>of</strong> those who reported that they had<br />
‘sometimes’ written graffiti. That past performance might be a guide to future activity is<br />
further suggested by the finding that 44.8 per cent <strong>of</strong> those who had sometimes participated<br />
in graffiti answered that they might write again in future.<br />
34