30.01.2015 Views

Tagging and Graffiti - Victoria University of Wellington

Tagging and Graffiti - Victoria University of Wellington

Tagging and Graffiti - Victoria University of Wellington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Tagging</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Graffiti</strong>: attitudes <strong>and</strong> experiences <strong>of</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>ers<br />

Art. It is just expressing yourself.<br />

If you are pr<strong>of</strong>essional it is art.<br />

To other people it is v<strong>and</strong>alism but to us it is art.<br />

V<strong>and</strong>alism is when it is on someone’s property.<br />

If it is graffiti then it is art, if it is tagging then it is v<strong>and</strong>alism.<br />

Participants were asked to respond to a series <strong>of</strong> statements relating to potentially<br />

problematic aspects <strong>of</strong> graffiti <strong>and</strong> a similar list <strong>of</strong> positive attributes. Table 4 ranks these<br />

items according to the percentage <strong>of</strong> respondents who ‘strongly agreed’ or ‘agreed’ with the<br />

list <strong>of</strong> problems <strong>and</strong> benefits. These results reinforce the complex <strong>and</strong> contradictory<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> graffiti <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the impact that it has on individuals <strong>and</strong> society. While a clear<br />

majority agreed to some extent that graffiti is an art form there was also a strong agreement<br />

that graffiti damages property <strong>and</strong> some agreement that it impacts on perceptions <strong>of</strong><br />

neighbourhoods.<br />

Table 4: Positive <strong>and</strong> negative attributes <strong>of</strong> graffiti (number <strong>and</strong> percentages)<br />

Positive attributes<br />

Strongly agree/<br />

Agree Negative attributes<br />

Strongly agree/<br />

Agree<br />

% n % n<br />

<strong>Graffiti</strong> is a form <strong>of</strong> art 84.7 648 <strong>Graffiti</strong> damages 80.9 621<br />

people’s property<br />

<strong>Graffiti</strong> is a way for people 84.0 639 <strong>Graffiti</strong> affects how 62.1 465<br />

to express themselves<br />

people feel about the<br />

area they live<br />

<strong>Graffiti</strong> requires creative 75.2 569 <strong>Graffiti</strong> is illegal 51.5 378<br />

skills<br />

<strong>Graffiti</strong> is a way for people 52.0 390 <strong>Graffiti</strong> looks messy 45.5 345<br />

to gain status <strong>and</strong><br />

respect<br />

<strong>Graffiti</strong> is associated 40.3 303<br />

with other dangerous<br />

activities<br />

<strong>Graffiti</strong> makes places<br />

feel unsafe<br />

38.3 289<br />

Contributions to the focus group discussions tended to reinforce these findings. In particular,<br />

distinctions were frequently drawn between graffiti that is legitimate <strong>and</strong> that which is<br />

categorised as v<strong>and</strong>alism. One focus group participant reflected the ambiguity <strong>of</strong><br />

distinguishing graffiti art from v<strong>and</strong>alism, noting that graffiti is “v<strong>and</strong>alism. Well, I reckon it’s<br />

art, but in the law it is v<strong>and</strong>alism”. When asked whether graffiti is art or v<strong>and</strong>alism typical<br />

responses included:<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> it’s art; some <strong>of</strong> it’s v<strong>and</strong>alism. (Focus group participant)<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!