Download Full PDF - 30.01 MB - The Society of Irish Foresters
Download Full PDF - 30.01 MB - The Society of Irish Foresters Download Full PDF - 30.01 MB - The Society of Irish Foresters
6X Letters Dear Sir, A recent meeting of the local section of the New Zealand Institute of Foresters debated the question concerning the gap between researchers and practitioners. Although no concensus was reached it was evident that many practitioners feel the gap is very important. Individual views expressed were: Means of communication by the Forestry Research Institute are "a disaster". Scientists are "non-doers" as against practitioners, who are "doers" . Research reports are unreadable and have no relevance to practical forestry operations. Not enough useful results are getting to the people who want them. Much of the Forestry Research Institute's efforts in communication are examples of how not to get the message across. A lot of research results are written in specialist gobbledygook for obscure journals. Scientists have a self-perpetuating process; their research brings up more new research than results. There is no one to evaluate the results of research so it doesn't get done. Prac*ioners should be empowered to review research programmes and to have a hand in initiating them. Counter-arguments put forward were: Field foresters only take note of research when they want to . Researchers are innovators and agents of change. The job of research is to provide a range of alternative data, but the practitioner has to evaluate this before he can apply it. The field forester has to work at being a consumer of research. If researchers are not doing the right research it is the field forester's fault for not telling researchers what they want. The Research Institute bends over backwards to inform enquirers. Field foresters are stubborn and conservative. Researchers must look well ahead to find out the problems which are looming up and work on them so that when field foresters suddenly find these problems upon them the researchers can give an answer. What do Irish practitioners and researchers think Is this journal an effective means of communication M.L. Carey, Rotorua, New Zealand.
OBITUARY 09 Maurice Henry Swan The sudden death of Maurice Swan on the 4th February, 1980 came as a shock to all his friends and colleagues. Maurice was born in Worcestershire, England, but he grew up in Co. Kildare. After a short incursion into teacher training at St Patrick's, Drumcondra, he entered University College, Dublin, where he graduated with an honours degree in 1940. At that time jobs in forestry were hard to come by and Maurice started his career as a working forester with the Castlecomer Estate Co. In 1942 he entered the then Forestry Division, Department of Lands, as forester and was successively attached to Dundrum, Ossory and Killakee forests. He was appointed Assistant Junior Inspector in 1945 and served on management at Limerick, Enniscorthy, Portlaoise and Galway before being appointed as land acquisition inspector at H.Q. in 1950. His keen intellect and enquiring mind made him an automatic choice for research work when the fledgling Research Section was trying to gain its wings in 1957. Apart from another short period on land acquisition he was to spend the rest of his life associated with research as Senior Inspector and Asst. Chief Inspector. In his capacity as co-ordinator of forest research he was a firm advocate of a broadly based programme involving the Universities. The success of his work in this sphere is a lasting tribute to his dedication, tact and power of persuasion. He was a founder member of the Society of Irish Foresters and served as council member, Editor and President. Until a few years ago he was to be seen at day outings and study tours although an inherent shyness kept his voice from being heard very often in the course of discussion. Yet nobody loved a good discussion or argument more, and in the company of his friends and colleagues he took a special delight in using his sharp intellect and incisiveness of expression to advantage. There are very few who honestly can claim to have won in a debate with Maurice. Meticulous almost to a fault in everything he did, he set and demanded high standards. He had that gift, so essential in research, of understanding and reducing complex problems to their essential components. His attainments were many, but perhaps he will be best remembered for his enthusiasm, his dedication to his work and his kindness and consideration for others. He married Bridie thirtyone years ago and was very much the family man. To Bridie and to their children, Rosaleen, Margaret, Patricia and Brian we offer our deepest sympathy. P.M. Joyce
- Page 36 and 37: IX J. O'DRISCOLL region and north a
- Page 38 and 39: 2() J.O'DRISCOLL importance, in com
- Page 40 and 41: 22 J. O'DRISCOLL Forbes, A. C. 1928
- Page 42 and 43: JOHN J. GARDINER In this context it
- Page 44 and 45: 26 JOHN J. GARDINER 80 % 60 - --- P
- Page 46 and 47: JOHN J. GARDINER profit in its twel
- Page 48 and 49: 30 JOHN J. GARDINER 10 Styan, G. E
- Page 50 and 51: 32 P. McCUSKER the audience is enha
- Page 52 and 53: 34 P. McCUSKER you can introduce hu
- Page 54 and 55: Swedish Forestry A Question of Bala
- Page 56 and 57: 38 E. P. FARRELL growing stock was
- Page 58 and 59: 40 E. P. FARRELL During the late 19
- Page 60 and 61: 42 E. P. FARRELL production in the
- Page 62 and 63: 44 E. P. FARRELL ,+50,000 in the 19
- Page 64 and 65: 46 E. P. FARRELL stimulate the fore
- Page 66 and 67: 48 Whole Tree Harvesting in Sitka S
- Page 68 and 69: )0 M. L. CAREY METHODS Field: The c
- Page 70 and 71: Table 2 Diameter Breast Height, Bas
- Page 72 and 73: 54 M. L. CAREY (Carey and O'Brien,
- Page 74 and 75: Table 4 Chemical Analyses Used in N
- Page 76 and 77: 5H M. L. CAREY Table 5 Regression E
- Page 78 and 79: (,0 M. L. CAREY However most of the
- Page 80 and 81: 02 M. L. CAREY idea to consider har
- Page 82 and 83: 64 Notes and News The Increasing De
- Page 84 and 85: 66 NOTES AND NEWS This forest, the
- Page 88 and 89: 70 Book Reviews IRISH FORESTRY POLI
- Page 90 and 91: 72 BOOK REVIEWS Water by Dr Drew. i
- Page 92 and 93: 74 Society Activities ANNUAL GENERA
- Page 94 and 95: SOCIETY OF IRISH FORESTERS STATEMEN
- Page 96 and 97: 7S SOCIETY ACTIVITIES Other Busines
- Page 98 and 99: ...................................
- Page 100 and 101: FORESTRY COMMISSION PUBLICATIONS Re
- Page 102 and 103: I • • WOODFAB •••••
- Page 104 and 105: The Irish Timber Growers Associatio
- Page 106 and 107: TREE -- PROBLEMS • SOUTHERN TREE
OBITUARY 09<br />
Maurice Henry Swan<br />
<strong>The</strong> sudden death <strong>of</strong> Maurice Swan on the 4th February, 1980 came<br />
as a shock to all his friends and colleagues.<br />
Maurice was born in Worcestershire, England, but he grew up in<br />
Co. Kildare. After a short incursion into teacher training at St<br />
Patrick's, Drumcondra, he entered University College, Dublin,<br />
where he graduated with an honours degree in 1940. At that time<br />
jobs in forestry were hard to come by and Maurice started his career<br />
as a working forester with the Castlecomer Estate Co. In 1942 he<br />
entered the then Forestry Division, Department <strong>of</strong> Lands, as<br />
forester and was successively attached to Dundrum, Ossory and<br />
Killakee forests. He was appointed Assistant Junior Inspector in<br />
1945 and served on management at Limerick, Enniscorthy,<br />
Portlaoise and Galway before being appointed as land acquisition<br />
inspector at H.Q. in 1950.<br />
His keen intellect and enquiring mind made him an automatic<br />
choice for research work when the fledgling Research Section was<br />
trying to gain its wings in 1957. Apart from another short period on<br />
land acquisition he was to spend the rest <strong>of</strong> his life associated with<br />
research as Senior Inspector and Asst. Chief Inspector. In his<br />
capacity as co-ordinator <strong>of</strong> forest research he was a firm advocate <strong>of</strong><br />
a broadly based programme involving the Universities. <strong>The</strong> success<br />
<strong>of</strong> his work in this sphere is a lasting tribute to his dedication, tact<br />
and power <strong>of</strong> persuasion.<br />
He was a founder member <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Irish</strong> <strong>Foresters</strong> and<br />
served as council member, Editor and President. Until a few years<br />
ago he was to be seen at day outings and study tours although an<br />
inherent shyness kept his voice from being heard very <strong>of</strong>ten in the<br />
course <strong>of</strong> discussion. Yet nobody loved a good discussion or<br />
argument more, and in the company <strong>of</strong> his friends and colleagues he<br />
took a special delight in using his sharp intellect and incisiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
expression to advantage. <strong>The</strong>re are very few who honestly can claim<br />
to have won in a debate with Maurice.<br />
Meticulous almost to a fault in everything he did, he set and<br />
demanded high standards. He had that gift, so essential in research,<br />
<strong>of</strong> understanding and reducing complex problems to their essential<br />
components. His attainments were many, but perhaps he will be<br />
best remembered for his enthusiasm, his dedication to his work and<br />
his kindness and consideration for others. He married Bridie thirtyone<br />
years ago and was very much the family man. To Bridie and to<br />
their children, Rosaleen, Margaret, Patricia and Brian we <strong>of</strong>fer our<br />
deepest sympathy.<br />
P.M. Joyce