Globally Threatened Amphibian Species Part 1
Globally Threatened Amphibian Species Part 1
Globally Threatened Amphibian Species Part 1
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
196<br />
<strong>Threatened</strong> <strong>Amphibian</strong>s of the World<br />
VU Melanophryniscus montevidensis (Phillippi, 1902)<br />
Vulnerable A2ac; B1ab(iii,iv,v)<br />
Order, Family: Anura, Bufonidae<br />
Country Distribution: Brazil, Uruguay<br />
Current Population Trend: Decreasing<br />
© Axel Kwet<br />
Geographic Range This species is restricted to coastal Uruguay (Montevideo, Canelones, Maldonado, and Rocha<br />
Departments) and adjacent Brazil (one locality in Rio Grande do Sul state). It occurs at sea level.<br />
Population This species is in decline in some areas and extirpated in others. Nevertheless, it is still common at<br />
several localities.<br />
Habitat and Ecology It is a diurnal species inhabiting coastal sand dunes. It is an explosive breeder, and may be<br />
found in large numbers in temporary pools after heavy rains; the larvae develop in these pools. It is not tolerant of<br />
habitat disturbance.<br />
Major Threats The major threat to this species is habitat loss due to human settlements, exotic tree plantations,<br />
and the drainage of wetlands.<br />
Conservation Measures It does not occur in any protected areas, and there is a need for improved protection of<br />
sites at which this species is known to occur.<br />
Notes on taxonomy: Elevated to full species status by Klappenbach and Langone (1992).<br />
Bibliography: Klappenbach, M.A. and Langone, J.A. (1992), Langone, J.A. (1994), Maneyro, R. and Langone, J.A. (2001), Tedros, M.,<br />
Kolenc, F. and Borteiro, C. (2001)<br />
Data Providers: Jose Langone<br />
VU Melanophryniscus orejasmirandai Prigioni and Langone, 1986<br />
Vulnerable D2<br />
Order, Family: Anura, Bufonidae<br />
Country Distribution: Uruguay<br />
Current Population Trend: Stable<br />
Geographic Range The type locality of this species is Sierra de<br />
Ánimas, Maldonado Province, Uruguay, at an elevation of 350-500m<br />
asl. It occurs in an area of less than 10km².<br />
Population It is common at its only known locality, and has not<br />
undergone any change in population size in 10 years of monitoring<br />
from 1990 to 2000.<br />
Habitat and Ecology It occurs in grasslands and rocky outcrops,<br />
and reproduces in permanent small streams. Its tolerance to habitat<br />
disturbance is unknown.<br />
Major Threats Although there are currently no major threats to the<br />
species, habitat loss and degradation due to wood plantations and<br />
touristic activities might result in declines in the future.<br />
Conservation Measures It does not occur in any protected areas.<br />
This species requires continued close population monitoring particularly<br />
since it is known only from a single location.<br />
Bibliography: Langone, J.A. (1994), Maneyro, R. and Langone, J.A. (2001), Prigioni, C.M. and Langone, J.A. (1986)<br />
Data Providers: Esteban Lavilla, Jose Langone<br />
VU Metaphryniscus sosae Señaris, Ayarzaguena and Gorzula, 1994<br />
Vulnerable D2<br />
Order, Family: Anura, Bufonidae<br />
Country Distribution: Venezuela<br />
Current Population Trend: Stable<br />
Geographic Range This species is known only from the type locality,<br />
on top of Cerro Marahuaca, in Amazonas state (03° 40’N; 65° 27’W),<br />
at 2,600m asl, in Venezuela.<br />
Population The population status of this species is not known.<br />
Habitat and Ecology It inhabits high montane tepui habitat.<br />
It breeds by direct development, perhaps with internal fertilization.<br />
Major Threats There are no current major threats, but its restricted<br />
range makes it susceptible to threatening processes such<br />
as wildfire.<br />
Conservation Measures There is a population within Parque<br />
Nacional Duida-Marahuaca. There is a need for close population<br />
monitoring of this species, particularly since it is restricted to a<br />
single location.<br />
Bibliography: Barrio Amorós, C.L. (2004), La Marca, E. (1997), Señaris, J.C.,<br />
Ayarsagüena, J. and Gorzula, S. (1994)<br />
Data Providers: Enrique La Marca, Celsa Señaris<br />
CR Nectophrynoides asperginis Poynton, Howell, Clarke and Lovett, 1999 “1998”<br />
KIHANSI SPRAY TOAD<br />
Critically Endangered B1ab(ii,iii,v)+2ab(<br />
ii,iii,v)<br />
Order, Family: Anura, Bufonidae<br />
Country Distribution: Tanzania<br />
Current Population Trend: Decreasing<br />
CITES: Appendix I<br />
© Timothy A. Herman / Toledo Zoological Society<br />
Geographic Range This species is only known from the Kihansi Falls, in the Kihansi Gorge, in the Udzungwa<br />
Mountains, eastern Tanzania, at 600-940m asl. Its global range covers a tiny area of just two hectares around the<br />
Kihansi Falls, and searches for it around other waterfalls on the escarpment of the Udzungwa Mountains have not<br />
located any additional populations.<br />
Population It was formerly abundant in a tiny area, with a population of around 17,000 animals. Reports indicate<br />
that the species fluctuated naturally in its population size. The population appeared to be at a high in May 1999, at a<br />
low in 2001 and 2002 (when the population was estimated at 1,000 animals), and at a high again in June 2003, when<br />
perhaps as many as 20,000 individuals survived. However, subsequently the population went into steep decline, and<br />
by mid-January 2004, only three individuals could be seen and just two males were heard calling. There were a few<br />
records of calling animals during the rest of 2004, and an unconfi rmed report from January 2005, but there are no<br />
records of any individuals since, despite surveys, and the species might now be extinct in the wild.<br />
Habitat and Ecology It lives only in soaked herbaceous vegetation in the spray zone of the Kihansi Falls. It breeds<br />
by internal fertilization, the females retaining the larvae internally in the oviduct until little toadlets are born.<br />
Major Threats The serious decline of this species appears related to the Lower Kihansi Hydropower Project, involving<br />
the construction of a dam in 2000 upstream on the Kihansi River, which cut off 90% of the original water flow to the<br />
gorge, thereby hugely reducing the volume of spray, particularly in the dry season, as well as altering the vegetational<br />
composition. An artificial gravity-fed sprinkler system was set up to mimic the natural spray of the Kihansi ecosystem<br />
with the remaining water flow. Unfortunately, the sprinkler system was not ready by the time the water was cut off in<br />
2000, and by the time the sprinklers came on nine months later the ecosystem had already dried up (see Krajick 2006).<br />
Later, during the dry season in 2003, the artificial sprinkler system failed for a while. Around this time, the fungal<br />
disease chytridiomycosis was confirmed in dead animals of this species, and this disease is probably responsible for<br />
the final population crash. It is possible that the drought caused by the failure of the sprinkler system resulted in stress<br />
to the animals that rendered them susceptible to the disease. There are also reports that the 2003 crash coincided<br />
with a brief opening of the dam’s fl oodgates to flush sediments; tests showed that these contained pesticides used<br />
in maize farming operations upstream, in concentrations sufficient to kill the toads (Krajick 2006).<br />
Conservation Measures It is not known from any protected areas. Sufficient minimum bypass flow from the dam<br />
is required to maintain the spray habitat. An artificial sprinkler system is in place, and this is especially important in<br />
the dry season. Captive breeding is ongoing in Toledo and New York Bronx Zoos. The captive population has fluctuated<br />
as husbandry problems have been encountered and addressed (animals were initially plagued with various<br />
infections and nutritional deficiencies), but currently stands at about 300 individuals. Investigations are urgently<br />
needed to determine whether or not any individuals survive in the wild, and whether or not chytridiomycosis is still<br />
present in any remaining individuals.<br />
Bibliography: Krajick, K. (2006), Poynton, J.C. (1998), Poynton, J.C. (2003b), Poynton, J.C. et al. (1998), Quinn, C.H. et al. (2005),<br />
Zippel, K. (2005)<br />
Data Providers: John Poynton, Kim Howell, Alan Channing, Simon Loader, Michele Menegon