29.01.2015 Views

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES<br />

TUESDAY 27 NOVEMBER 2012<br />

It is proposed that Council may consider reducing the requirement for car parking spaces up<br />

to a total <strong>of</strong> 20 per cent where certain criteria are met including:-<br />

• access to public transport;<br />

• cycling facilities (in addition to those required automatically under the Policy);<br />

• the development is in a centre location; or<br />

• shared or reciprocal parking is available.<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> parking for motorcycles, scooters and gophers will provide an automatic five<br />

per cent concession as part <strong>of</strong> the total 20 per cent concession.<br />

Any such reduction must be outlined in the Parking Management Plan and Transport<br />

Assessment.<br />

Offsets for on-site parking bays for alternative parking and transport arrangements<br />

The revised Parking Policy adds detail relating to alternative methods to <strong>of</strong>fset on-site<br />

parking requirements.<br />

Shared Parking and Reciprocal Parking<br />

Shared parking is where parking facilities on one site are shared concurrently by a mixed<br />

use development or separate developments, for instance, where residential parking bays are<br />

used by shoppers during the day as part <strong>of</strong> a mixed used development. Reciprocal parking is<br />

where parking facilities serve separate uses or mixed use development but not shared<br />

concurrently and not necessarily on one site, for instance, where people park in an <strong>of</strong>fice car<br />

park to go to a restaurant at night.<br />

Under the existing Parking Policy, legal assurances are necessary for shared and reciprocal<br />

parking arrangements but this can be seen as a major impediment. Alternatively, the revised<br />

Policy proposes to replace legal requirements with obtaining Council's agreement <strong>of</strong><br />

arrangements which would be detailed within Parking Management Plans (see below for<br />

further comment on Parking Management Plans). This new approach is considered to<br />

provide more flexible options to support shared parking. The revised Policy also provides<br />

more guidance on calculating peak parking demand to assist owners and operators<br />

determine the suitability <strong>of</strong> shared parking for their development and further detail to<br />

describe locations for suitable reciprocal parking to quantify distances and provide safe and<br />

direct access.<br />

Cash in lieu <strong>of</strong> Parking<br />

The existing Parking Policy provides cash in lieu provisions, however, until more recent<br />

times this has not usually been applied, largely on the basis there has been no clear plan as<br />

to how this money might be expended effectively. A further disincentive may be the high<br />

cost imposition to developers, with cash-in-lieu required for the full value <strong>of</strong> land and<br />

construction costs <strong>of</strong> parking.<br />

The Access and Parking Strategy explored options for the collection <strong>of</strong> cash in lieu and<br />

provided recommendations on the expenditure <strong>of</strong> cash in lieu funds including on-street<br />

parking bays, consolidation <strong>of</strong> disconnected parking areas and contributions to improving<br />

access and alternative transport initiatives in the <strong>Town</strong> including way-finding technologies<br />

and multi-level car parking stations in the longer term.<br />

H:\CEO\GOV\<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES\12 MINUTES\NOVEMBER 2012\B DV.DOCX 87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!