MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge
MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge
MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES<br />
TUESDAY 27 NOVEMBER 2012<br />
Overall, it is considered that the retaining wall meets the performance criteria for the<br />
following reasons:-<br />
• retains the visual impression <strong>of</strong> the natural level <strong>of</strong> the site as viewed from the street.<br />
Building height<br />
Wall height<br />
Performance criteria:<br />
Proposed<br />
6.8-7.158 metres<br />
maximum<br />
Acceptable development<br />
provision<br />
6.5 metres<br />
Building height consistent with the desired height <strong>of</strong> buildings in the locality, and to recognise<br />
the need to protect the amenities <strong>of</strong> adjoining properties, including, where appropriate:<br />
• adequate direct sun to buildings and appurtenant open spaces;<br />
• adequate daylight to major openings to habitable rooms; and<br />
• access to views <strong>of</strong> significance.<br />
The dwelling is a two storey dwelling with a proposed ground floor finished floor level that is<br />
similar to the mid contour across the site. Due to the fall across the site from the rear to the<br />
front and the same ground floor level being maintained across the dwelling, there is a<br />
section <strong>of</strong> the elevation facing Windarra Drive which does not comply with the wall height<br />
limit, being 6.8 metres at the north west corner <strong>of</strong> the dwelling through to a maximum <strong>of</strong><br />
7.158 towards the centre <strong>of</strong> the Windarra Drive street elevation.<br />
All other portions <strong>of</strong> the dwelling comply with wall and ro<strong>of</strong> ridge height requirements. On<br />
the basis that the overheight section <strong>of</strong> wall is towards the front <strong>of</strong> the site, this part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
dwelling does not impact on adjoining properties in terms <strong>of</strong> access to light and access to<br />
views <strong>of</strong> significance.<br />
Overall, it is considered that the height <strong>of</strong> the dwelling complies with the performance criteria<br />
as the overheight section <strong>of</strong> wall is towards the front corner <strong>of</strong> the site and does not have a<br />
significant impact on access to light or views for adjoining properties.<br />
POLICY/STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS:<br />
There are no policy or statutory implications related to this report. The proposal was<br />
assessed against the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Residential Design Codes (R Codes), <strong>Town</strong> Planning<br />
Scheme No.1, and the <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme Policy Manual.<br />
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:<br />
There are no financial implications related to this report.<br />
STRATEGIC DIRECTION:<br />
Consideration <strong>of</strong> this application is consistent with the <strong>Town</strong>'s Strategic Plan 2009-2020 for<br />
the priority area 'Planning for our Community'.<br />
H:\CEO\GOV\<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES\12 MINUTES\NOVEMBER 2012\B DV.DOCX 45