29.01.2015 Views

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES<br />

TUESDAY 27 NOVEMBER 2012<br />

Overall, it is considered that the retaining wall meets the performance criteria for the<br />

following reasons:-<br />

• retains the visual impression <strong>of</strong> the natural level <strong>of</strong> the site as viewed from the street.<br />

Building height<br />

Wall height<br />

Performance criteria:<br />

Proposed<br />

6.8-7.158 metres<br />

maximum<br />

Acceptable development<br />

provision<br />

6.5 metres<br />

Building height consistent with the desired height <strong>of</strong> buildings in the locality, and to recognise<br />

the need to protect the amenities <strong>of</strong> adjoining properties, including, where appropriate:<br />

• adequate direct sun to buildings and appurtenant open spaces;<br />

• adequate daylight to major openings to habitable rooms; and<br />

• access to views <strong>of</strong> significance.<br />

The dwelling is a two storey dwelling with a proposed ground floor finished floor level that is<br />

similar to the mid contour across the site. Due to the fall across the site from the rear to the<br />

front and the same ground floor level being maintained across the dwelling, there is a<br />

section <strong>of</strong> the elevation facing Windarra Drive which does not comply with the wall height<br />

limit, being 6.8 metres at the north west corner <strong>of</strong> the dwelling through to a maximum <strong>of</strong><br />

7.158 towards the centre <strong>of</strong> the Windarra Drive street elevation.<br />

All other portions <strong>of</strong> the dwelling comply with wall and ro<strong>of</strong> ridge height requirements. On<br />

the basis that the overheight section <strong>of</strong> wall is towards the front <strong>of</strong> the site, this part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

dwelling does not impact on adjoining properties in terms <strong>of</strong> access to light and access to<br />

views <strong>of</strong> significance.<br />

Overall, it is considered that the height <strong>of</strong> the dwelling complies with the performance criteria<br />

as the overheight section <strong>of</strong> wall is towards the front corner <strong>of</strong> the site and does not have a<br />

significant impact on access to light or views for adjoining properties.<br />

POLICY/STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS:<br />

There are no policy or statutory implications related to this report. The proposal was<br />

assessed against the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Residential Design Codes (R Codes), <strong>Town</strong> Planning<br />

Scheme No.1, and the <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme Policy Manual.<br />

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:<br />

There are no financial implications related to this report.<br />

STRATEGIC DIRECTION:<br />

Consideration <strong>of</strong> this application is consistent with the <strong>Town</strong>'s Strategic Plan 2009-2020 for<br />

the priority area 'Planning for our Community'.<br />

H:\CEO\GOV\<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES\12 MINUTES\NOVEMBER 2012\B DV.DOCX 45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!