29.01.2015 Views

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES<br />

TUESDAY 27 NOVEMBER 2012<br />

In addition, the RRFA has an ability for either Party to request an Agreed Variation to amend<br />

any part <strong>of</strong> the RRFA. This mechanism could also be used by BioVision if it felt that the KPI<br />

target mechanism and/or fee abatement mechanism was inappropriate. The request for an<br />

Agreed Variation would need to be fully substantiated by BioVision and given due consideration<br />

by the MRC.<br />

Technical Argument<br />

The MRC Administration acknowledges that the technical argument put forward by BioVision<br />

for the MRC not to abate the gate fee appears to be reasonable. Consequently, the<br />

Administration has requested that BioVision provide additional supporting information to<br />

substantiate its claim. This additional information is likely to be received in November 2012.<br />

The MRC Administration is <strong>of</strong> the opinion that it is preferable to provide BioVision with sufficient<br />

"breathing space" to substantiate its technical argument and not abate the fee as opposed to<br />

abating the fee and then having to unwind the consequences if this matter is resolved in<br />

accordance with BioVision's request. This is a consistent methodology that has been used<br />

throughout the past three years to resolve the numerous contractual differences between the<br />

parties.<br />

Comment<br />

When considering this report, the MRC decision was to agree to suspend the fee abatement<br />

mechanism relating to the Compost Quality KPI until the Ordinary Council Meeting <strong>of</strong> 6<br />

December 2012 to allow parties time to address compost quality issues and the MRC<br />

administration to report back to Council.<br />

Item 8: City <strong>of</strong> Stirling Withdrawal - Submission to the Minister for Local Government<br />

This item was withdrawn and will be reconsidered at the next meeting on 6 December 2012.<br />

Item 9: RRF - Request for Relocation <strong>of</strong> Adjoining Tennant (CONFIDENTIAL REPORT)<br />

This item was previously considered at the Special Council meeting held on 20 September<br />

2012 and deferred to this meeting.<br />

For some time there has been discussion between the MRC and the tenants living in a house<br />

on the property adjacent to the RRF in Neerabup. The request is to relocate the current<br />

tenants due to alleged odour from the RRF facility causing ill health to the tenants.<br />

As this matter is confidential and subject to legal privilege, details cannot be provided. The<br />

MRC decision was that:-<br />

1. Mr Nick Trandos as the person acting on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Tulls be advised that the MRC<br />

does not accept that it is liable for the claim presented in correspondence to the MRC<br />

dated 12 April 2012 by Mr Nick Trandos on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Tulls; and<br />

H:\CEO\GOV\<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES\12 MINUTES\NOVEMBER 2012\C CR.DOCX 135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!