29.01.2015 Views

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES<br />

TUESDAY 27 NOVEMBER 2012<br />

Assessment<br />

The table below shows the comparison between the original approved plans, the approved<br />

amended plans, and current amended plans:<br />

Original approved<br />

plans (Dec 2011)<br />

Amended approved<br />

plans (March 2012)<br />

Current amended<br />

plans (Nov 2012)<br />

Undercr<strong>of</strong>t 6 car bays accessed 10 tandem car bays 7 car bays accessed<br />

from rear laneway accessed from rear from existing (widened)<br />

laneway<br />

crossover <strong>of</strong>f Southport<br />

Street<br />

Ground One tenancy and 13 car One tenancy and 13 car One tenancy and 13 car<br />

bays accessed from bays accessed from bays accessed from<br />

new driveway from new driveway from new driveway from<br />

Southport Street Southport Street Southport Street<br />

First Three tenancies Two tenancies and one<br />

balcony<br />

Two tenancies and one<br />

balcony<br />

Second Three tenancies Two tenancies and one<br />

balcony<br />

Two tenancies and one<br />

balcony<br />

Total plot 1.63:1 1.4:1 1.4:1<br />

ratio<br />

Total car<br />

parking<br />

proposed<br />

19 bays 23 bays 20 bays<br />

The original December 2011 planning approval for the development included a 0.4:1 bonus<br />

plot ratio on the basis that the proposed development would cede land (or secure via an<br />

easement) to sufficiently allow effective widening <strong>of</strong> the neighbour's accessway to allow for<br />

two-way traffic (0.2:1 bonus), and would provide parking behind street front tenancies (0.2:1<br />

bonus). Whilst the plan to cede land has not at this time been successful, the applicant has<br />

designed the development to easily allow this at a later date, by ensuring no building is<br />

located in this 2.0 metre wide area at the rear <strong>of</strong> the development, and installing only<br />

bollards separating the undercr<strong>of</strong>t parking area from the existing laneway. Should access<br />

from this laneway be granted, the applicant would revert to his amended approved plan<br />

which showed a total <strong>of</strong> ten tandem bays in the undercr<strong>of</strong>t, directly accessed from the rear<br />

laneway. Furthermore, the widened accessway would provide benefits to the adjoining<br />

properties that use the accessway. In view <strong>of</strong> these comments, it is considered acceptable<br />

to allow the bonus plot ratio <strong>of</strong> 0.4:1.<br />

With regard to car parking, the amended plans show two parallel car bays in the undercr<strong>of</strong>t<br />

parking area that are located in the 2.0 metre wide area previously set aside for the widening<br />

<strong>of</strong> the accessway. These car bays will be used by staff and/or visitors to the development,<br />

and should be counted as car bays for the purpose <strong>of</strong> assessing shortfall and therefore cash<br />

in lieu. The Council report on the original application calculated a parking requirement <strong>of</strong> 27<br />

bays after factoring an <strong>of</strong>fice car parking requirement for the restaurant, and a 20% discount<br />

for the provision <strong>of</strong> bicycle facilities and proximity to public transport and an assumption that<br />

the plot ratio would be reduced to 1.4:1. The shortfall is now 7 bays, and therefore Condition<br />

(d) has been amended to reflect this.<br />

Original Condition (i) requiring the applicant to provide confirmation <strong>of</strong> a legal right <strong>of</strong><br />

carriageway to the rear laneway has been deleted as all car parking is to be accessed from<br />

Southport Street, and Condition (a) specifying a plot ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.4:1 has been deleted as the<br />

plans show this plot ratio achieved. Conditions (b) and (c) have also been deleted as the<br />

H:\CEO\GOV\<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES\12 MINUTES\NOVEMBER 2012\B DV.DOCX 10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!