MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge
MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge
MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES<br />
TUESDAY 27 NOVEMBER 2012<br />
Assessment<br />
The table below shows the comparison between the original approved plans, the approved<br />
amended plans, and current amended plans:<br />
Original approved<br />
plans (Dec 2011)<br />
Amended approved<br />
plans (March 2012)<br />
Current amended<br />
plans (Nov 2012)<br />
Undercr<strong>of</strong>t 6 car bays accessed 10 tandem car bays 7 car bays accessed<br />
from rear laneway accessed from rear from existing (widened)<br />
laneway<br />
crossover <strong>of</strong>f Southport<br />
Street<br />
Ground One tenancy and 13 car One tenancy and 13 car One tenancy and 13 car<br />
bays accessed from bays accessed from bays accessed from<br />
new driveway from new driveway from new driveway from<br />
Southport Street Southport Street Southport Street<br />
First Three tenancies Two tenancies and one<br />
balcony<br />
Two tenancies and one<br />
balcony<br />
Second Three tenancies Two tenancies and one<br />
balcony<br />
Two tenancies and one<br />
balcony<br />
Total plot 1.63:1 1.4:1 1.4:1<br />
ratio<br />
Total car<br />
parking<br />
proposed<br />
19 bays 23 bays 20 bays<br />
The original December 2011 planning approval for the development included a 0.4:1 bonus<br />
plot ratio on the basis that the proposed development would cede land (or secure via an<br />
easement) to sufficiently allow effective widening <strong>of</strong> the neighbour's accessway to allow for<br />
two-way traffic (0.2:1 bonus), and would provide parking behind street front tenancies (0.2:1<br />
bonus). Whilst the plan to cede land has not at this time been successful, the applicant has<br />
designed the development to easily allow this at a later date, by ensuring no building is<br />
located in this 2.0 metre wide area at the rear <strong>of</strong> the development, and installing only<br />
bollards separating the undercr<strong>of</strong>t parking area from the existing laneway. Should access<br />
from this laneway be granted, the applicant would revert to his amended approved plan<br />
which showed a total <strong>of</strong> ten tandem bays in the undercr<strong>of</strong>t, directly accessed from the rear<br />
laneway. Furthermore, the widened accessway would provide benefits to the adjoining<br />
properties that use the accessway. In view <strong>of</strong> these comments, it is considered acceptable<br />
to allow the bonus plot ratio <strong>of</strong> 0.4:1.<br />
With regard to car parking, the amended plans show two parallel car bays in the undercr<strong>of</strong>t<br />
parking area that are located in the 2.0 metre wide area previously set aside for the widening<br />
<strong>of</strong> the accessway. These car bays will be used by staff and/or visitors to the development,<br />
and should be counted as car bays for the purpose <strong>of</strong> assessing shortfall and therefore cash<br />
in lieu. The Council report on the original application calculated a parking requirement <strong>of</strong> 27<br />
bays after factoring an <strong>of</strong>fice car parking requirement for the restaurant, and a 20% discount<br />
for the provision <strong>of</strong> bicycle facilities and proximity to public transport and an assumption that<br />
the plot ratio would be reduced to 1.4:1. The shortfall is now 7 bays, and therefore Condition<br />
(d) has been amended to reflect this.<br />
Original Condition (i) requiring the applicant to provide confirmation <strong>of</strong> a legal right <strong>of</strong><br />
carriageway to the rear laneway has been deleted as all car parking is to be accessed from<br />
Southport Street, and Condition (a) specifying a plot ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.4:1 has been deleted as the<br />
plans show this plot ratio achieved. Conditions (b) and (c) have also been deleted as the<br />
H:\CEO\GOV\<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES\12 MINUTES\NOVEMBER 2012\B DV.DOCX 10