29.01.2015 Views

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES<br />

TUESDAY 27 NOVEMBER 2012<br />

The existing path on the west side, between Alderbury Street and Oceanic Drive, may be partly<br />

classified as a shared path since it meets the minimum <strong>of</strong> 2.0 metres width for most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

length. However, its utility as a shared path is reduced by rubbish bins placed on the path for<br />

rubbish pick up and car-doors opening on to the path. If its width is increased to 3.0 metres<br />

then there will be the required 2.0 metres space around doors and bins. The existing parking<br />

lane is required for visitor parking since the steep verge is difficult to drive on to and <strong>of</strong>f again.<br />

There appears to be three options for providing a better shared path 3.0 metres wide on the<br />

west side that will satisfy the requirements <strong>of</strong> the grant from Department <strong>of</strong> Transport.<br />

Option 1: Widen the existing path to 3.0 metres. The existing 2.0 metres wide path will remain<br />

and a 1 metre wide strip added to the west side <strong>of</strong> the path. The crossovers to eight properties<br />

will require replacing to provide a trafficable entry to the property. This is the most viable option<br />

and will improve the accessibility to these properties. Some verge areas are steep which will<br />

make construction difficult. Most trees are 1.7 metres from the existing path. It is also<br />

highlighted in the section between Oakdale Street and Oceanic Drive that the existing verge<br />

area narrows and one transmission pole has a clearance <strong>of</strong> only 2.1 metres.<br />

Option 2: Widen the existing path to 3.0 metres on the road side. The existing kerb will be<br />

removed and a new kerb laid 1 metre away. The existing brown asphalt cycle lane will be<br />

removed and the existing parking lane will be moved 1 metre east. The problem with this<br />

option is that the cycle lane is no longer continuous, the shared path will have a vee shaped<br />

cross-section and the parking lane will be 2.4 metres wide next to a 3.1 metres wide traffic lane.<br />

Normal design practice for this class <strong>of</strong> road requires a 2.5 metres wide parking lane and a<br />

3.5m wide traffic lane. The existing 2.0 metres wide median could be narrowed or moved<br />

eastwards to make more space but the cost <strong>of</strong> this is difficult to justify relative to Option 1.<br />

Option 3: Widen the 1.5 metre wide path on the east side to 3.0 metres. The problems with<br />

this option are that the shared path will be on the other side <strong>of</strong> Brookdale Street from the new<br />

path between Underwood Avenue and Alderbury Street adjacent the Perry Lakes Stadium<br />

Development. Furthermore, the existing 14 street trees will have to be removed and replaced<br />

in another location on the verge.<br />

POLICY/STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS:<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> on-road bicycle facilities and shared paths is in accordance with Council’s<br />

policy to enhance and encourage bicycle and pedestrian facilities throughout the <strong>Town</strong>.<br />

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:<br />

This project is included in the 2012/13 Budget with total funding <strong>of</strong> $100,000 and includes<br />

$25,000 grant funding. The estimated cost <strong>of</strong> Option 1 for widening the existing path on the<br />

west side, colouring the path brown and reconstructing 8 crossovers is $90,000 and is within<br />

budget.<br />

STRATEGIC DIRECTION:<br />

The recommendation in this report includes elements that will complement the <strong>Town</strong>'s strategic<br />

direction, namely:-<br />

• Transport choice;<br />

• A wide range <strong>of</strong> quality, accessible recreation facilities;<br />

• Services that meet the needs <strong>of</strong> ratepayers, residents and visitors;<br />

• Community infrastructure and facilities that are well used and maintained;<br />

H:\CEO\GOV\<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES\12 MINUTES\NOVEMBER 2012\C CR.DOCX 126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!