MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge
MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge
MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES<br />
TUESDAY 27 NOVEMBER 2012<br />
(d)<br />
(e)<br />
(f)<br />
(g)<br />
(h)<br />
(i)<br />
(j)<br />
(k)<br />
(l)<br />
the applicant paying a cash-in-lieu <strong>of</strong> parking contribution <strong>of</strong> $100,000 to the<br />
<strong>Town</strong>, based on an 8 bay shortfall at $12,500 per bay, to be held in reserve for<br />
future parking improvements in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the subject site;<br />
all awnings are to achieve a minimum height <strong>of</strong> 2.7 metres above natural ground<br />
level;<br />
the preparation <strong>of</strong> a transport management plan for staff, visitors and residents <strong>of</strong><br />
the building to the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>. The plan is to include incentives for<br />
use <strong>of</strong> alternative modes <strong>of</strong> transport including cost subsidy for public transport<br />
fares and priority parking for car pooling;<br />
the operation <strong>of</strong>, and adherence to, the transport management plan;<br />
the provision <strong>of</strong> special architectural emphasis to clearly define the main building<br />
entry points as viewed from the street to the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>. This may<br />
include such elements as additional height, distinct ro<strong>of</strong> forms, canopies, curved<br />
walls and tower elements. Details to be provided at building licence stage.<br />
details <strong>of</strong> any signage on site being the subject <strong>of</strong> a separate development<br />
application;<br />
a detailed landscaping and reticulation plan being submitted prior to the issue <strong>of</strong><br />
a building licence showing the location and type <strong>of</strong> proposed trees, shrubs and<br />
lawns to the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>;<br />
the preparation and implementation <strong>of</strong> a Bin Waste Management Plan detailing<br />
the storage method and collection details prior to the issue <strong>of</strong> a building licence<br />
to the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>'s Infrastructure Services;<br />
a Construction Management Plan being submitted detailing how the construction<br />
<strong>of</strong> the development will be managed in order to limit the impact on the<br />
surrounding area. The plan will need to ensure that adequate space is provided<br />
within the subject site or the parking <strong>of</strong> worker's vehicles <strong>of</strong>f site. The<br />
construction management plan shall be submitted and approved by the <strong>Town</strong><br />
prior to the issue <strong>of</strong> a building licence.<br />
Concerned with the high cost <strong>of</strong> the cash-in-lieu contribution, the applicant submitted revised<br />
plans in March 2012 showing four additional car bays. The amended plans also showed the<br />
plot ratio reduced to 1.4:1 in accordance with Condition (a) and the inclusion <strong>of</strong> a bike rack,<br />
soakwells and a new bin store. The amended plans were approved under delegated<br />
authority on 16 April 2012 as the amended plans were consistent with the intent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Council’s decision. Two conditions were changed:- Condition (a) was deleted as the plans<br />
showed a plot ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.4:1, and Condition (d) was amended to require payment <strong>of</strong> a cashin-lieu<br />
contribution <strong>of</strong> $50,000 to the <strong>Town</strong>, based on a 4 bay shortfall at $12,500 per bay.<br />
With regard to Condition (i) above, in October 2012, the applicant advised after extensive<br />
consultation between parties and expensive legal fees, an access agreement was finalised<br />
in September 2012. However, the owner <strong>of</strong> the laneway then decided that he was unwilling<br />
to grant an easement and therefore sign the access agreement. The applicant has therefore<br />
amended the design to not use the rear laneway (note: whilst being identified as a 'laneway'<br />
in this report and the conditional approval, the area <strong>of</strong> land is part <strong>of</strong> No. 7 Southport Street<br />
that is used as a driveway to access the rear carparking areas <strong>of</strong> Nos. 158 and 160 Railway<br />
Parade and No. 7 Southport Street). These amended plans are the subject <strong>of</strong> the following<br />
report.<br />
H:\CEO\GOV\<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES\12 MINUTES\NOVEMBER 2012\B DV.DOCX 8