29.01.2015 Views

Planners Report.pdf - Hutt City Council

Planners Report.pdf - Hutt City Council

Planners Report.pdf - Hutt City Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Site history<br />

3.11 The existing warehouse and office building at 350 Jackson Street was granted<br />

building permit in 1985. Resource consent for signage was granted in 2005.<br />

3.12 The existing building at 352 Jackson Street is contained within the heritage building<br />

inventory that was undertaken in 2006. Construction date for this building dates<br />

c1920s. The style of the building is stripped classical. Strengthening works were<br />

undertaken by the owner and signed off by <strong>Council</strong> in 1998 and the building was<br />

consequently removed from the earthquake risk register.<br />

3.13 Resource consent was granted in 1999 to paint the building at 352 Jackson Street.<br />

Subdivision consent was granted in 2000 that created the titles for 352 Jackson Street<br />

and 43 Tory Street. Land use consent was granted in 2000 for partial demolition and<br />

to replace doors and windows for restoration purposes.<br />

3.14 43 Tory Street was created by the two lot subdivision of 352 Jackson Street in 2000<br />

and has been used as an informal car park since.<br />

4.0 Consents sought<br />

4.1 The appropriate planning instrument for assessing the proposed activity is the <strong>City</strong> of<br />

Lower <strong>Hutt</strong> District Plan. The site is within the Petone Commercial Activity Area (Area<br />

1). The relevant rules are contained within Chapters 5B, 14A, 14F, and 14I.<br />

4.2 The activity status of the proposal is discretionary in accordance with Rule 5B 2.1.3<br />

(a) which states:<br />

Except where stated in the General Rules, any Permitted Activity which fails to comply<br />

with any of the Permitted Activity Conditions<br />

4.3 The proposal does not comply with the following rules of the District Plan:<br />

4.4 Rule 5B 2.1.1.1 (b) Maximum Height of Buildings and Structures: 10.0m.<br />

The proposed stairwells will result in the new building having a maximum height of up<br />

to 11.0m.<br />

4.5 Rule 5B 2.1.1.1 (d) Sites abutting residential activity areas:<br />

Where a site abuts a residential activity area the following conditions shall apply:<br />

The maximum height of buildings is 10 metres. All buildings and structures shall<br />

comply with the recession plane requirements of the abutting residential activity area.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!