Environmental Impact Statement - radioactive monticello

Recommendations

Info

3.0 Environmental Impacts of Refurbishment Environmental issues associated with refurbishment activities are discussed in the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants (GELS), NUREG-1437, Volumes 1 and 2 (NRC 1996, 1 999).(a) The GElS includes a determination of whether the analysis of the environmental issues could be applied to all plants and whether additional mitigation measures would be warranted. Issues are then assigned a Category 1 or a Category 2 designation. As set forth in the GElS, Category 1 issues are those that meet all of the following criteria: (1) The environmental impacts associated with the issue have been determined to apply either to all plants or, for some issues, to plants having a specific type of cooling system or other specified plant or site characteristics. (2) A single significance level (i.e., SMALL, MODERATE, or LARGE) has been assigned to the impacts (except for collective offsite radiological impacts from the fuel cycle and from high-level waste and spent fuel disposal). (3) Mitigation of adverse impacts associated with the issue has been considered in the analysis, and it has been determined that additional plant-specific mitigation measures are likely not to be sufficiently beneficial to warrant implementation. For issues that meet the three Category 1 criteria, no additional plant-specific analysis is required in this supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) unless new and significant information is identified. Category 2 issues are those that do not meet one or more of the criteria for Category 1 and, therefore, additional plant-specific review of these issues is required. License renewal actions may require refurbishment activities for the extended plant life. These actions may have an impact on the environment that requires evaluation, depending on the type of action and the plant-specific design. Environmental issues associated with refurbishment that were determined to be Category 1 issues are listed in Table 3-1. Environmental issues related to refurbishment considered in the GElS for which these conclusions could not be reached for all plants, or for specific classes of plants, are Category 2 issues. These are listed in Table 3-2. Category 1 and Category 2 issues related to refurbishment that are not applicable to Monticello because they are related to plant design features or site characteristics not found at Monticello are listed in Appendix F. ('a The GElS was originally issued in 1996. Addendum I to the GElS was issued in 1999. Hereafter, all references to the "GEIS" include the GElS and its Addendum 1. August 2006 3-1 NUREG-1437, Supplement 26 1
Page 1 and 2:
NUREG-1437 Supplement 26 Generic En
Page 3 and 4:
Generic Environmental Impact Statem
Page 5 and 6:
Abstract The U.S. Nuclear Regulator
Page 7 and 8:
Contents Abstract........... ......
Page 9 and 10:
Contents 4.8.7 Conclusions Regardin
Page 11 and 12:
Figures Figure 2-1. Figure 2-2. Fig
Page 13:
Contents Table 5-1. Category 1 Issu
Page 16 and 17:
Executive Summary The Commission ha
Page 18 and 19:
Executive Summary NMC and the staff
Page 21 and 22:
0 degree pCi microcurie(s) pCi/mL m
Page 23 and 24:
Abbreviations/Acronyms IPE IPEEE J
Page 25:
Abbreviations/Acronyms rem REMP RHR
Page 28 and 29:
Introduction and (4) present the st
Page 30 and 31:
Introduction (1) The environmental
Page 32 and 33:
Introduction I assessment of the re
Page 34 and 35:
Introduction This definition of pur
Page 37 and 38: 2.0 Description of Nuclear Power Pl
Page 39 and 40: Description of Site and Environment
Page 67 and 68: Descfiption of Site and Environment
Page 71 and 72: Table 2-10. Land Use in Sherburne C
Page 87: Description of Site and Environment
Page 91 and 92: Environmental Impacts of Refurbishm
Page 93 and 94: 4.0 Environmental Impacts of Operat
Page 95 and 96: Environmental Impacts of Operation
Page 139 and 140:
Environmental Impacts of Operation
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
5.0 Environmental Impacts of Postul
Page 149 and 150:
Environmental Impacts of Postulated
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
6.0 Environmental Impacts of the Ur
Page 161 and 162:
Environmental Impacts of the Uraniu
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
6.2 References Environmental Impact
Page 169 and 170:
7.0 Environmental Impacts of Decomm
Page 171 and 172:
Environmental Impacts of Decommissi
Page 173 and 174:
8.0 Environmental Impacts of Altern
Page 175 and 176:
Environmental Impacts of Alternativ
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Table 8-4. (contd) Impact Category
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229:
Page 232 and 233:
Summary and Conclusions This SEIS i
Page 234 and 235:
Summary and Conclusions This SEIS d
Page 236 and 237:
Summary and Conclusions The most si
Page 238 and 239:
Summary and Conclusions 9.3 Staff C
Page 241:
Appendix A Comments Received on the
Page 244 and 245:
Appendix A Specific comments were c
Page 246 and 247:
Appendix A The subject areas the co
Page 248 and 249:
Appendix A I feel very confident th
Page 250 and 251:
Appendix A made the commitment to k
Page 252 and 253:
Appendix A The NRC failed to provid
Page 254 and 255:
Appendix A provided the public with
Page 256 and 257:
Appendix A The GElS is available on
Page 258 and 259:
Appendix A Comment: Item 25, Nearby
Page 260 and 261:
Appendix A don't know what you're l
Page 262 and 263:
Appendix A months, -years, thousand
Page 264 and 265:
Appendix A that ionizing radiation
Page 266 and 267:
Appendix A its employees purchase n
Page 268 and 269:
Appendix A Comment: WHEREAS, the Mo
Page 270 and 271:
Appendix A And there were ten -- th
Page 272 and 273:
Appendix A of the last 50 years the
Page 274 and 275:
Appendix A instead of nuclear. You
Page 276 and 277:
Appendix A and largely outdated whe
Page 278 and 279:
Appendix A Comment: Objectively, re
Page 280 and 281:
Appendix A Each comment identified
Page 282 and 283:
Appendix A Table A-2. (contd) Comme
Page 284 and 285:
Appendix A A.2.17 Comments Concerni
Page 286 and 287:
Appendix A Response: Many of the im
Page 288 and 289:
Appendix A Response: The text in Se
Page 290 and 291:
Appendix A BEIR reports since 1972
Page 292 and 293:
Appendix A would be required to con
Page 294 and 295:
Appendix A Response: Radiological i
Page 296 and 297:
Appendix A that creates waste that
Page 298 and 299:
Appendix A expected to exceed that
Page 300 and 301:
Appendix A Response: The text in Se
Page 302 and 303:
Appendix A licensed life for operat
Page 304 and 305:
Appendix A This slide is just a qui
Page 306 and 307:
Appendix A CHIP CAMERON: All right.
Page 308 and 309:
Appendix A The Draft Impact Stateme
Page 310 and 311:
Appendix A The casks are licensed f
Page 312 and 313:
Appendix A Return-path: Received:
Page 314 and 315:
Appendix A MAY-08-2006 11:07 P.02 N
Page 316 and 317:
Appendix A MAY-9-2006 11:06 ENCLOSU
Page 318 and 319:
Appendix A t1lY-17-2fG 13:11 P.02 /
Page 320 and 321:
Appendix A MrAY-17-2006 13:12 P. su
Page 322 and 323:
MAY-31-2006 15:31 P.02 MINNE'SO'AHI
Page 325 and 326:
Appendix B: Contributors to the Sup
Page 327:
Appendix C Chronology of NRC Staff
Page 330 and 331:
Appendix C May 9, 2005 May 9, 2005
Page 332 and 333:
Appendix C May 27, 2005 May 27, 200
Page 334 and 335:
Appendix C July 27, 2005 July 28, 2
Page 336 and 337:
Appendix C May 3, 2006 Letter from
Page 339 and 340:
Appendix D: Organizations Contacted
Page 341:
Appendix E Nuclear Management Compa
Page 344 and 345:
z G) 4-. Table E-2. Federal, State,
Page 346 and 347:
z C :1) J,4 cn CD CD 0) I I Table E
Page 348 and 349:
Appendix E '0 UNITED STATES , ,, NU
Page 350 and 351:
Appendix E 0 UNITED STATES 710 NUCL
Page 352 and 353:
Appendix E Monticello Nuclear Gener
Page 354 and 355:
Appendix E . United States Departme
Page 356 and 357:
Appendix E _4 NUCLEAR UNITED STATES
Page 358 and 359:
Appendix E Biological 'Assess'ment
Page 360 and 361:
Appendix E • :................ ".
Page 362 and 363:
Appendix E discharge (NSP 2004). Am
Page 364 and 365:
Appendix E Mammals typical of the a
Page 366 and 367:
Appendix E Table 1. Monticello Tran
Page 368 and 369:
Appendix E eye pearlymussel were re
Page 370 and 371:
Appendix E The remoteness of the Mo
Page 372 and 373:
Appendix E 6.0 References '10 CFR P
Page 374 and 375:
Appendix E http:/Mww.fws.gov/mldwes
Page 376 and 377:
Appendix E gak WIN , United States
Page 379 and 380:
Appendix F: GElS Environmental Issu
Page 381:
Appendix G NRC Staff Evaluation of
Page 384 and 385:
Appendix G G.2 Estimate of Risk for
Page 386 and 387:
Appendix G include plant-specific a
Page 388 and 389:
Appendix G Table G-3. Monticello PS
Page 390 and 391:
Appendix G Based on the licensee's
Page 392 and 393:
Appendix G that the risks posed by
Page 394 and 395:
Appendix G emergency evacuation mod
Page 396 and 397:
Appendix G " The SAMA has already b
Page 398 and 399:
Appendix G the modifications evalua
Page 400 and 401:
z m G) -Al CA) -4 CD OD a (0 C) Tab
Page 402 and 403:
z CD m CD % Risk Reduction Total 'B
Page 404 and 405:
Appendix G As stated in NUREG/BR-01
Page 406 and 407:
Appendix G NMC based its calculatio
Page 408 and 409:
Appendix G cost-beneficial even if
Page 410 and 411:
Appendix G insights from the plant-
Page 412 and 413:
Appendix G U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Page 414:
Federal Recycling Program
show all

Environmental Impact Statement - radioactive monticello

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?