29.01.2015 Views

Environmental Impact Statement - radioactive monticello

Environmental Impact Statement - radioactive monticello

Environmental Impact Statement - radioactive monticello

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the coal chain What about all the security threats from the nukes and all of the routine<br />

releases from the nukes and the catastrophic threats that nuclear power represents<br />

Appendix A<br />

If we're going to work out of those binds, we will need to make a transition. And CBED is a<br />

profound tool that will enable that transition to happen. Right now it's true. It's for wind, and we<br />

recognize that wind can be an intermittent resource, not a base-load resource. And we all like<br />

to have the lights turned on even when the wind isn't blowing.<br />

But it's also true that CBED projects provide an opportunity for us to now move forward to the<br />

hybrid systems where wind is married to combustion technologies. And right now -- well, there<br />

is the Public Utilities Commission meets next week, where we will be authorizing a test burn of<br />

a 2-megawatt diesel generator to a wind system in Southwest Minnesota in Rock County by<br />

Luverne.<br />

And what will happen there is we're going to figure out how, as the wind tapers off, the<br />

combustion capacity can come on. And before very long, before this year is out, we'll have a<br />

pretty good handle on how to handle about 600 megawatts of peak during the year, which will<br />

be extremely lucrative to power producers because having 600 megawatts -- 600 hours, having<br />

a megawatt available on demand for 600 hours a year, your call utility, that's worth about six or<br />

seven thousand dollars a month, in addition to the energy, to have the capacity.<br />

So we have the economic opportunity for this development to happen. And before two or three<br />

years -are up, we'll'be down on the shoulders of that peak. We'll be up to 14, 16, 1800 hours a<br />

year. And before this plant gets renewed, we're going to be swinging with a load duration curve<br />

just like Sherco 3 does. And then we're in business. (MS-D-3).<br />

Comment: And as an afterthought, we go through the IRP, the Integrated Resource Planning<br />

process, to figure something out about conservation, because that's in the public good. Well,<br />

we're going to figure out at some point it is my fondest hope -- well, maybe second fondest --<br />

that we figure out how to tie the financial health of the utility systems to what we all really want,<br />

which is the efficient use of resources, rather than the wasteful consumption..<br />

And when we do that, we're going to find that we're wasting right now well over 50, 60, 70<br />

percent of all of the kilowatt hours we consume. We don't need to if what we're focused on is<br />

how to get us the light that we want, or the refrigeration that we want, or the industrial drive that<br />

we want, rather than just selling bulk kilowatt hours.<br />

So these are changes that are coming at you, NRC, in the time period that you're looking at for<br />

renewing this license. And I'm just really, I'm confused as to how you are going .to evaluate<br />

that. (MS-D-5)<br />

Comment: But when you consider alternatives, which you need to do, I would like to urge you<br />

to consider putting coal gasification that is slated to go elsewhere in Minnesota down here<br />

August 2006 A-31 NUREG-1437, Supplement 26 I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!