Environmental Impact Statement - radioactive monticello

Recommendations

Info

Contents Tables Table 2-1. Monticello Transmission Line Rights-of-Way ......................... 2-14 Table 2-2. Circulating Water System Operating Modes .......................... 2-16 Table 2-3. Threatened or Endangered Aquatic Species Potentially Occurring in the Vicinity of Monticello and the Associated Transmission Corridors .......... 2-23 Table 2-4. State of Minnesota Identified Natural Communities in the Vicinity of the Transmission Corridors ..................... .. 2-27 Table 2-5. Threatened or Endangered Terrestrial Species Potentially Occurring in the Vicinity of Monticello and the Associated Transmission Corridors ................ 2-28 Table 2-6. Housing Units and Housing Units Vacant (Available) by County During 1990 and 2000 ................................................ 2-31 Table 2-7.. Major Public Water Supply Systems in Wright and Sherburne Counties ..... 2-32 Table 2-8. Traffic Counts for Roads in the Vicinity of Monticello ................... 2-33 Table 2-9. Land Use in Wright County, 1980s ................................. 2-34 Table 2-10. Land Use in Sherburne County, 1991 ....................... .... 2-35 Table 2-11. Estimated Populations and Average Annual Growth Rates in Wright and Sherburne Counties from 1970 to 2040 ............................. 2-37 Table 2-12. Major Employment Facilities Within 10 mi of the Monticello Site ........... 2-38 Table 2-13. Property Taxes Paid from 1998 to 2002; Monticello Contribution to County Property Tax Revenues ......................................... 2-39 Table 3-1. Category 1 Issues for Refurbishment Evaluation ....................... 3-2 Table 3-2. Category 2 Issues for Refurbishment Evaluation ....................... 3-3 Table 4-1. Category 1 Issues Applicable to the Operation of the Monticello Cooling System During the Renewal Term ............................ 4-3 Table 4-2. Category 2 Issues Applicable to the Operation of the Monticello Cooling System During the Renewal Term ........................... 4-11 Table 4-3. Category 1 Issues Applicable to the Monticello Transmission Lines During the Renewal Term ........................................ 4-23 Table 4-4. Category 2 and Uncategorized Issues Applicable to the Monticello Transmission Lines During the Renewal Term ........................ 4-25 Table 4-5. Category 1 Issues Applicable to Radiological Impacts of Normal Operations During the Renewal Term ............................... 4-28 Table 4-6. Category 1 Issues Applicable to Socioeconomics During the Renewal Term ................................................ 4-29 Table 4-7. Environmental Justice and GElS Category 2 Issues Applicable to Socioeconomics During the Renewal Term .......................... 4-31 Table 4-8. Category 1 Issue Applicable to Groundwater Use and Quality During Table 4-9. the Renewal Term ............................................. 4-40 Category 2 Issue Applicable to Groundwater Use and Quality During the Renewal Term ............................................. 4-41 Table 4-10. Category 2 Issue Applicable to Threatened or Endangered Species in the Vicinity of Monticello During the License Renewal Term ............ 4-42 NUREG-1437, Supplement 26A X August 2006 1
Contents Table 5-1. Category 1 Issue Applicable to Postulated Accidents During the Renewal Term ........................................... 5-3 Table 5-2. Category 2 Issue Applicable to Postulated Accidents During the Renewal Term ................................................. 5-4 Table 5-3. Monticello Core Damage Frequency for Internal Events ................... 5-6 Table 5-4. Breakdown of Population Dose by Containment Release Mode ............ 5-7 Table 6-1. Category 1 Issues Applicable to the Uranium Fuel Cycle and Solid Waste Management During the Renewal Term ............................... 6-2 Table 7-1. Category 1 Issues Applicable to the Decommissioning of Monticello Following the Renewal Term ....................................... 7-2 Table 8-1. Summary of Environmental Impacts of the No-Action Alternative ........... 8-3 Table 8-2. Summary of Environmental Impacts of Coal-Fired Generation at an Alternate Greenfield Site Using Closed-Cycle Cooling ................... 8-9 Table 8-3. Summary of Environmental Impacts of Natural Gas-Fired Generation at an Alternate Greenfield Site Using Closed-Cycle Cooling .................. 8-20 Table 8-4. Summary of Environmental Impacts of a Coal Gasification Generation Plant at an Alternate Greenfield Site Using Closed-Cycle Cooling ......... 8-28 Table 8-5. Summary of Environmental Impacts of New Nuclear Power Generation at the Monticello Site and an Alternate Site Using Closed-Cycle Cooling .... 8-36 Table 8-6. Summary of a Comparison of Environmental impacts of a New Nuclear Power Plant Sited at the Monticello Site with Once-Through Cooling ....... 8-42 Table 8-7. Summary of Environmental Impacts for an Assumed Combination of Generating (Combined-Cycle Natural Gas-Fired Generation, Wind Power and DSM) and Acquisition Alternatives at Monticello and a Greenfield Site 8-52 fable 9-1. Summary of Environmental Significance of License Renewal, the No-Action Alternative, and Alternative Methods of Generation Using Once-Through Cooling ...................................... 9-7 Table A-I. Individuals Providing Comments During Scoping Comment Period ......... A-2 Table A-2. Comments Received on the Draft SEIS ............................. A-38 Table E-1. Consultation Correspondence ................................. E-1 Table E-2. Federal, State, Local, and Regional Licenses, Permits, Consultations, and Other Approvals for Monticello ..................................... E-2 Table F-i. GElS Environmental Issues Not Applicable to Monticello ................. F-1 Table G-1. Monticello Core Damage Frequency ................................. G-3 Table G-2. Breakdown of Population Dose by Containment Release Mode ............ G-4 Table G-3. Monticello PSA Historical Summary ............................. G-6 Table G-4. SAMA Cost-Benefit Screening Analysis for Monticello .................. G-18 August 2006 xi NUREG-1437, Supplement 26 1
Page 1 and 2: NUREG-1437 Supplement 26 Generic En
Page 3 and 4: Generic Environmental Impact Statem
Page 5 and 6: Abstract The U.S. Nuclear Regulator
Page 7 and 8: Contents Abstract........... ......
Page 9 and 10: Contents 4.8.7 Conclusions Regardin
Page 11: Figures Figure 2-1. Figure 2-2. Fig
Page 16 and 17: Executive Summary The Commission ha
Page 18 and 19: Executive Summary NMC and the staff
Page 21 and 22: 0 degree pCi microcurie(s) pCi/mL m
Page 23 and 24: Abbreviations/Acronyms IPE IPEEE J
Page 25: Abbreviations/Acronyms rem REMP RHR
Page 28 and 29: Introduction and (4) present the st
Page 30 and 31: Introduction (1) The environmental
Page 32 and 33: Introduction I assessment of the re
Page 34 and 35: Introduction This definition of pur
Page 37 and 38: 2.0 Description of Nuclear Power Pl
Page 39 and 40: Description of Site and Environment
Page 63 and 64:
Description of Site and Environment
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Descfiption of Site and Environment
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Table 2-10. Land Use in Sherburne C
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87:
Page 90 and 91:
Environmental Impacts of Refurbishm
Page 92 and 93:
Environmental Impacts of Refurbishm
Page 94 and 95:
Environmental Impacts of Operation
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Environmental Impacts of Postulated
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Environmental Impacts of the Uraniu
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Environmental Impacts of Decommissi
Page 172 and 173:
Environmental Impacts of Decommissi
Page 174 and 175:
Environmental Impacts of Alternativ
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 231 and 232:
9.0 Summary and Conclusions By lett
Page 233 and 234:
Summary and Conclusions The GElS co
Page 235 and 236:
Summary and Conclusions not reached
Page 237 and 238:
z a :m G) CA, Table 9-1. Summary of
Page 239:
Summary and Conclusions U.S. Nuclea
Page 243 and 244:
Appendix A: Comments Received on th
Page 245 and 246:
Appendix A Commenter ID Commenter A
Page 247 and 248:
Appendix A A.1 Comments and Respons
Page 249 and 250:
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant
Page 251 and 252:
3. General Comments Regarding Licen
Page 253 and 254:
Appendix A nuclear power (I) and Mo
Page 255 and 256:
Appendix A scoping process. If an i
Page 257 and 258:
Appendix A Comment: The NRC does no
Page 259 and 260:
Appendix A Comment: The EIS needs t
Page 261 and 262:
Appendix A Comment: The EIS needs t
Page 263 and 264:
Appendix A cognitive impairment. We
Page 265 and 266:
Appendix A Despite available eviden
Page 267 and 268:
Appendix A Comment: The Hospital Di
Page 269 and 270:
Appendix A Comment: The NRC also fa
Page 271 and 272:
Appendix A The NRC fails to acknowl
Page 273 and 274:
the coal chain What about all the s
Page 275 and 276:
gasification generation balanced ag
Page 277 and 278:
Appendix A 14. Comments Concerning
Page 279 and 280:
Appendix A Part II Comments Receive
Page 281 and 282:
Appendix A Table A-2. (contd) Comme
Page 283 and 284:
Appendix A Table A-2. (contd) Comme
Page 285 and 286:
Appendix A A.2.4 General Comments i
Page 287 and 288:
Appendix A Comment: Page 2-7, Line
Page 289 and 290:
Appendix A turns out that we don't
Page 291 and 292:
Appendix A A.2.12 Comments Concerni
Page 293 and 294:
Appendix A Response: As described a
Page 295 and 296:
information in the Final SEIS as pa
Page 297 and 298:
Appendix A Response: The impacts to
Page 299 and 300:
Appendix A Response: The text in Se
Page 301 and 302:
aging management aspects of the lic
Page 303 and 304:
Appendix A A-2 PURVES TODD: Just ba
Page 305 and 306:
Appendix A PURVES TODD: Thank you v
Page 307 and 308:
Appendix A So you don't look for wh
Page 309 and 310:
Appendix A Yes CHUCK HOSTOVSKY: I t
Page 311 and 312:
Appendix A information a little bit
Page 313 and 314:
Appendix A Return-path: Received:
Page 315 and 316:
Appendix A tAY-W8-2006 11! 07 'ENCL
Page 317 and 318:
Appendix A ta W.Y United States Dep
Page 319 and 320:
Appendix A MAY-17-206 13:11 P.04 U.
Page 321 and 322:
Appendix A IMAY-17-20O6 13:12 P.06
Page 323:
Appendix B Contributors to the Supp
Page 326 and 327:
Appendix B Name Karen McWilliams Na
Page 329 and 330:
Appendix C: Chronology of NRC Staff
Page 331 and 332:
Appendix C May 27, 2005 May 27, 200
Page 333 and 334:
Appendix C June 1,2005 June 2, 2005
Page 335 and 336:
Appendix C January 23, 2006 Februar
Page 337:
Appendix D Organizations Contacted
Page 340 and 341:
Appendix D Wright County Assessor,
Page 343 and 344:
Appendix E: Nuclear Management Comp
Page 345 and 346:
Cn N0 Table E-2. (contd) Expiration
Page 347 and 348:
Appendix E UNITED STATES -" NUCLEAR
Page 349 and 350:
Appendix E N. Archabal -2- potentia
Page 351 and 352:
Appendix E D. Stinnett -2- miles of
Page 353 and 354:
Appendix E FIGURE 2.1-3 SITE BOUNDA
Page 355 and 356:
Appendix E Common Name Scientific N
Page 357 and 358:
Appendix E A. Stinnet : -2- ' !We a
Page 359 and 360:
Appendix E 1.0 Introdution. The U.S
Page 361 and 362:
Appendix E 6-M.LE SITE VICINITY Fig
Page 363 and 364:
Appendix E agriculture and industri
Page 365 and 366:
Appendix E -" .. " MWNTICELLO 345-K
Page 367 and 368:
Appendix E Table 2. Terrestrial and
Page 369 and 370:
Appendix E During the June 2005 sit
Page 371 and 372:
Appendix E Vegetation management ma
Page 373 and 374:
Appendix E Lehman, R.N. 2001. Rapto
Page 375 and 376:
Appendix E MAY-31-206 15:31 P.02 MI
Page 377:
Appendix F GElS Environmental Issue
Page 380 and 381:
Appendix F References 10 CFR Part 5
Page 383 and 384:
Appendix G: NRC Staff Evaluation of
Page 385 and 386:
Appendix G Table G-1. Monticello Co
Page 387 and 388:
Appendix G * The MACCS2 analyses pe
Page 389 and 390:
Appendix G relative risk significan
Page 391 and 392:
" Permanently posting an operator a
Page 393 and 394:
Appendix G accident sequences to em
Page 395 and 396:
Appendix G The staff noted that the
Page 397 and 398:
Appendix G (testing of the boron in
Page 399 and 400:
somewhat higher than what would act
Page 401 and 402:
C Cn N, a) % Risk Reduction Total B
Page 403 and 404:
Appendix G G.6 Cost-Benefit Compari
Page 405 and 406:
Appendix G monetary equivalent of u
Page 407 and 408:
Appendix G * SAMA 16- provide passi
Page 409 and 410:
Appendix G several other SAMAs, res
Page 411 and 412:
Appendix G Generating Plant, Docket
Page 413 and 414:
NRC FORM 335 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATOR
show all

Environmental Impact Statement - radioactive monticello

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?