29.01.2015 Views

Environmental Impact Statement - radioactive monticello

Environmental Impact Statement - radioactive monticello

Environmental Impact Statement - radioactive monticello

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong>s of Operation<br />

Tax revenue can affect land use because it enables local jurisdictions to be able to provide the<br />

public services (e.g., transportation and utilities) necessary to support development.<br />

Section 4.7.4.1 of the GElS states that the assessment of tax-driven land use impacts during<br />

the license renewal term should consider (1) the size of the plant's payments relative to the<br />

community's total revenues, (2) the nature of the community's existing land use pattern, and<br />

(3) the extent to which the community already has public services in place to support and guide<br />

development. If the plant's tax payments are projected to be small relative to the community's<br />

total revenue, tax-driven land use changes during the plant's license renewal term would be<br />

SMALL, especially where the community has pre-established patterns of development and has<br />

provided adequate public services to support and guide development. Section 4.7.2.1 of the<br />

GElS states that if tax payments by the plant owner are less than 10 percent of the taxing<br />

jurisdictions revenue, the significance level would be SMALL. If the plant's tax payments are<br />

projected to be medium to large relative to the community's total revenue, new tax-driven land<br />

use changes would be MODERATE. If the plant's tax payments are projected to be a dominant<br />

source of the community's total revenue, new tax-driven land use changes would be LARGE.<br />

This would be especially true where the community has no pre-established pattern of<br />

development or has not provided adequate public services to support and guide development.<br />

Northern States Power Company (NSP) is assessed annual property taxes for the Monticello<br />

site by Wright.County, the City of Monticello, School District 882, and the Monticello-Big Lake<br />

Hospital District. NSP is also assessed the State General Tax. Property taxes are paid directly<br />

to Wright County, which in turn distributes the money to the aforementioned taxing jurisdictions..<br />

Property taxes fund local government services such as highway maintenance, education, public<br />

health, public safety, public libraries, and various other social services (NMC 2005a).<br />

From 1994 to 2001, NSP's largest annual property tax contributions for Monticello went to<br />

School District 882. Payments during the period from 1998 to 2002 decreased by 70.2 percent<br />

as a result of the passage of a tax bill by the State in 2001 which replaced the State Assessed<br />

School Levy with the State General Tax. Assessments under the State General Tax are paid<br />

into the State General Fund and redistributed by a State-determined formula to school districts<br />

statewide in part based on student numbers. The State Assessed School Levy had been<br />

included in School District 882 payments prior to year 2002. Contributions to School District<br />

882 accounted for 20.4 percent of the school district's total revenues and 18.5 percent of the<br />

total operating budget in 1999. By 2002, payments for Monticello represented a much smaller<br />

percentage of both the school district's total revenues and total operating budget, 5.2 percent<br />

and 5.5 percent, respectively (NMC 2005a).<br />

Annual property tax payments to Wright County decreased from approximately 3.2 to 2.0 million<br />

dollars from 1998 to 2002, a 36.9 percent decrease. These contributions represented 6.9 to<br />

3.4 percent of the county's total annual revenues during the period.<br />

Annual payments to the hospital district decreased 30 percent during the period from 1998 to<br />

2003. These payments represented an increasingly smaller percentage of total revenues from<br />

1998 to 2002, 1.4 to 0.5 percent. When viewed in relation to total Wright County property tax<br />

August 2006 4-33 NUREG-1437, Supplement 26 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!