29.01.2015 Views

Environmental Impact Statement - radioactive monticello

Environmental Impact Statement - radioactive monticello

Environmental Impact Statement - radioactive monticello

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong>s of Operation<br />

Monticello has a once-through heat dissipation system. However, due to a potential<br />

combination of low flows and high ambient water temperatures, Monticello has two cooling<br />

towers that can be used to meet thermal discharge standards through helper cycle mode or by<br />

complete or partial recirculation of the cooling water (NMC 2005a). The Surface Water<br />

Appropriations Permit requires that the cooling towers must be operated in partial recirculation<br />

mode when the river flow is between 240 and 860 cfs, or closed-cycle mode when the river flow<br />

is less than 240 cfs, and in accordance with allowable thermal discharge limits set forth by the<br />

MPCA in the NPDES Permit. NPDES Permit stipulations specify that the maximum daily<br />

average temperature at the end of the discharge canal cannot exceed the following limiting<br />

temperatures: 95 0 F from April through October; 85 0 F in November and March; and 80°F from<br />

December through February (MPCA 2002). However, discharge temperatures in excess of<br />

these limits is allowed, on a limited basis, when the plant is required to operate in a partial<br />

recirculation or closed-cycle mode to meet the Surface Water Appropriations Permit limitation<br />

(NMC 2005a). When reduced river flows and/or elevated ambient river temperatures limit the<br />

ability for Monticello to meet thermal discharge limits, plant procedures require a reduction in<br />

power output to maintain compliance with the State of Minnesota NPDES permit (NMC 2005a).<br />

The cooling towers are normally used when the ambient river temperature reaches 68°F or<br />

when the discharge canal temperature approaches permitted temperature limits (NMC 2005a).<br />

In partial recirculation mode, a portion of the cooled water from the cooling towers is<br />

recirculated to the intake, while the remainder is discharged to the river. When river flow is less<br />

than 860 cfs, a maximum of 75 percent of river flow at the intake may be withdrawn. Partial<br />

recirculation may used to comply with this restriction (NMC 2005a). During extreme low flow<br />

conditions, Monticello can operate as a closed system. During this operational mode, the<br />

makeup requirement is only 54 cfs (NMC 2005a). Occasionally, one cooling tower may be<br />

used during winter to provide a flow path for heated water to the intake structure when<br />

suspended ice is present in the river (NMC 2005a).<br />

Monticello has operated in a once-through or helper mode approximately 98 percent of the time<br />

(NMC 2005). The remainder of the time Monticello has operated in a partial recirculation or<br />

closed-cycle mode.<br />

In 2002, the mean ambient river temperature was 49.7 0 F while the discharge canal temperature<br />

was 77.9 0 F. In 2003, these temperatures were 50.9 0 F and 78.2 0 F, respectively (Xcel Energy<br />

2004). In winter, when ambient river temperatures were near freezing (32 0 F), the discharge<br />

temperatures generally ranged between 70 and 75°F; whereas in summer when ambient river<br />

temperatures range from approximately 70 to 80 0 F, the discharge temperatures ranged from<br />

approximately 84 to 91 *F (NSP 2004). The main body of the thermal plume is generally<br />

confined to the south bank of the river; and 30 to 70 percent of the river was unffected by the<br />

thermal plume (NMC 2005a). The 9 0 F plume is considered the immediate discharge zone,<br />

while the 3°F plume is considered the intermediate discharge zone (Afzal et al. 1975). During<br />

approximately 70 percent of the period from June through September, the 9 0 F isotherm<br />

extended less than half the river width and less than 700 ft downstream of the discharge. The<br />

August 2006 4-19 NUREG-1437, Supplement 26 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!