Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website
Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website
-314- surety bond and the net worth can be met by being FHA approved or as provided by rule if the applicant is not FHA approved. Response 9: Section 32-9-123, MCA provides, in relevant part: (2) (a) A mortgage broker or mortgage lender is required to maintain one surety bond for each entity license. (b) The amount of the required surety bond must be calculated by combining the annual loan production amounts for all persons originating residential mortgage loans and for all business locations of the mortgage broker or mortgage lender and must be in the following amount: (i) $25,000 for a combined annual loan production that does not exceed $50 million a year; (ii) $50,000 for annual loan production of $50 million but not exceeding $100 million a year; or (iii) $100,000 for annual loan production of more than $100 million a year. (3) (a) In lieu of a surety bond, a mortgage broker may meet a minimum net worth requirement. (b) Minimum net worth must be maintained in an amount determined by the department that reflects the dollar amount of loans originated. (c) The department shall adopt rules with respect to the requirements for minimum net worth as are necessary to accomplish the purposes of this part. (4) Evidence that a mortgage broker is approved by the department of housing and urban development to originate loans insured by the federal housing administration must be considered as satisfying the net worth requirement provided that the actual net worth determined in the department of housing and urban development's approval is equivalent to the bond amount set forth for the corresponding dollar amount range set forth in subsections (2)(b)(i) through (2)(b)(iii). The text of the statute makes it clear that a mortgage broker may meet a minimum net worth requirement in lieu of a surety bond. The statute also makes clear that evidence of a HUD certification must be considered as satisfying the net worth requirement provided that the HUD approval is equivalent to the bond amount set forth in 32-9-123(2)(b)(i) through (iii), MCA. Rules may not unnecessarily repeat the statutory language as provided in 2-4-305(2), MCA. Therefore, the department cannot repeat the language of the statute in rule. By: /s/ Janet R. Kelly Janet R. Kelly, Director Department of Administration By: /s/ Michael P. Manion Michael P. Manion, Rule Reviewer Department of Administration Certified to the Secretary of State February 1, 2010. Montana Administrative Register 3-2/11/10
-315- BEFORE THE STATE AUDITOR AND COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA In the matter of the amendment of ARM 6.6.3501, 6.6.3502, 6.6.3503, 6.6.3504, 6.6.3505, 6.6.3506, 6.6.3507, 6.6.3508. 6.6.3509, 6.6.3510, 6.6.3511, and 6.6.3512, the amendment and transfer of ARM 6.6.3513 and 6.6.3514, and the adoption of NEW RULES I through III (ARM 6.6.3515, 6.6.3516, and 6.6.3517), pertaining to Annual Audited Reports and Establishing Accounting Practices and Procedures to be Used in Annual Statements TO: All Concerned Persons ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF AMENDMENT, AMENDMENT AND TRANSFER, AND ADOPTION 1. On December 24, 2009, the State Auditor and Commissioner of Insurance published MAR Notice No. 6-186 regarding the public hearing on the proposed amendment, amendment and transfer, and adoption of the above-stated rules at page 2394 of the 2009 Montana Administrative Register, issue number 24. 2. On January 21, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., the State Auditor and Commissioner of Insurance held a public hearing to consider the proposed amendment, amendment and transfer, and adoption of the above-stated rules. There were no public attendees at the hearing. 3. The department has amended ARM 6.6.3501, 6.6.3502, 6.6.3503, 6.6.3504, 6.6.3505, 6.6.3506, 6.6.3507, 6.6.3508, 6.6.3509, 6.6.3510, 6.6.3511, and 6.6.3512, amended and transferred ARM 6.6.3513 (6.6.3520) and 6.6.3514 (6.6.3521), and adopted NEW RULES I (6.6.3515), II (6.6.3516), and III (6.6.3517) exactly as proposed. 4. The department has thoroughly considered the written comments from one commenter. A summary of the comments received and the agency's responses are as follows: COMMENT: The American Council of Life Insurers [ACLI] commented that the compliance dates for subsections (2), (3), and (4) in ARM 6.6.3513 (6.6.3520) be revised to December 31, 2010, in light that calendar year 2009 was concluded prior to the adoption of the amended and new rules. RESPONSE: The commissioner does not accept the suggested changes to certain effective dates in ARM 6.6.3513 (6.6.3520). Insurers have been required since 1993 3-2/11/10 Montana Administrative Register
- Page 15 and 16: -263- 7. Lisa Coligan, Department o
- Page 17 and 18: -265- The commentors requested furt
- Page 19 and 20: -267- submitted to Elois Johnson, P
- Page 21 and 22: -269- recodification of the de mini
- Page 23 and 24: -271- BEFORE THE BOARD OF BARBERS A
- Page 25 and 26: -273- (c) proof of high school grad
- Page 27 and 28: -275- REASON: The board determined
- Page 29 and 30: -277- (10) (g) Only only presterili
- Page 31 and 32: -279- (c) Technical instruction and
- Page 33 and 34: -281- (e) outside biological monito
- Page 35 and 36: -283- conduct. Implementation cites
- Page 37 and 38: -285- The board is also proposing g
- Page 39 and 40: -287- license) 550 (e) remains the
- Page 41 and 42: -289- 24.150.503 TRAINEESHIP REQUIR
- Page 43 and 44: -291- proof of continuing education
- Page 45 and 46: -293- (i) the industry product was
- Page 47 and 48: -295- REASON: ARM 24.150.502 and 24
- Page 49 and 50: -297- mail to dlibsdhad@mt.gov, and
- Page 51 and 52: -299- 24.168.402 LICENSURE REQUIREM
- Page 53 and 54: -301- Board of Optometry, 301 South
- Page 55 and 56: -303- (A) emotional stability and w
- Page 57 and 58: -305- licensee compliance with CE r
- Page 59 and 60: -307- BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMI
- Page 61 and 62: -309- Secure and Fair Enforcement f
- Page 63 and 64: -311- In Montana, mortgage broker e
- Page 65: -313- (3) "Employed by" means: (a)
- Page 69 and 70: -317- BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVI
- Page 71 and 72: -319- by the department. The applic
- Page 73 and 74: -321- NEW RULE VII (17.50.1006) FAU
- Page 75 and 76: -323- that land. The notation must,
- Page 77 and 78: -325- (c) the volume and physical a
- Page 79 and 80: -327- (2) Ground water monitoring r
- Page 81 and 82: -329- another alternative for analy
- Page 83 and 84: -331- 2 Chemical Abstract Service r
- Page 85 and 86: -333- ether; DCIP, See footnote 4 B
- Page 87 and 88: -335- Ethyldidene chloride 1,2-Dich
- Page 89 and 90: -337- Ethyl methacrylate 97-63-2 2-
- Page 91 and 92: -339- o-Nitrophenol; 2-Nitrophenol
- Page 93 and 94: -341- Vanadium (Total) Vanadium Vin
- Page 95 and 96: -343- protect human health or the e
- Page 97 and 98: -345- "existing" unit, "new" unit,
- Page 99 and 100: -347- should be rewritten to repres
- Page 101 and 102: -349- units are not existing units,
- Page 103 and 104: -351- wastes based on their environ
- Page 105 and 106: -353- RESPONSE: The application fee
- Page 107 and 108: -355- 40 CFR 257.9, which applies t
- Page 109 and 110: -357- NEW RULE XIII COMMENT NO. 31:
- Page 111 and 112: -359- COMMENT NO. 35: A commentor s
- Page 113 and 114: -361- recycling, or solid waste tre
- Page 115 and 116: -363- RESPONSE: Proposed New Rule X
-314-<br />
surety bond and <strong>the</strong> net worth can be met by being FHA approved or as provided by<br />
rule if <strong>the</strong> applicant is not FHA approved.<br />
Response 9: Section 32-9-123, MCA provides, in relevant part:<br />
(2) (a) A mortgage broker or mortgage lender is required to maintain<br />
one surety bond for each entity license.<br />
(b) The amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> required surety bond must be calculated by<br />
combining <strong>the</strong> annual loan production amounts for all persons<br />
originating residential mortgage loans and for all business locations <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> mortgage broker or mortgage lender and must be in <strong>the</strong> following<br />
amount:<br />
(i) $25,000 for a combined annual loan production that does not<br />
exceed $50 million a year;<br />
(ii) $50,000 for annual loan production <strong>of</strong> $50 million but not exceeding<br />
$100 million a year; or<br />
(iii) $100,000 for annual loan production <strong>of</strong> more than $100 million a<br />
year.<br />
(3) (a) In lieu <strong>of</strong> a surety bond, a mortgage broker may meet a<br />
minimum net worth requirement.<br />
(b) Minimum net worth must be maintained in an amount determined<br />
by <strong>the</strong> department that reflects <strong>the</strong> dollar amount <strong>of</strong> loans originated.<br />
(c) The department shall adopt rules with respect to <strong>the</strong> requirements<br />
for minimum net worth as are necessary to accomplish <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong><br />
this part.<br />
(4) Evidence that a mortgage broker is approved by <strong>the</strong> department <strong>of</strong><br />
housing and urban development to originate loans insured by <strong>the</strong><br />
federal housing administration must be considered as satisfying <strong>the</strong> net<br />
worth requirement provided that <strong>the</strong> actual net worth determined in <strong>the</strong><br />
department <strong>of</strong> housing and urban development's approval is equivalent<br />
to <strong>the</strong> bond amount set forth for <strong>the</strong> corresponding dollar amount range<br />
set forth in subsections (2)(b)(i) through (2)(b)(iii).<br />
The text <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> statute makes it clear that a mortgage broker may meet a minimum<br />
net worth requirement in lieu <strong>of</strong> a surety bond. The statute also makes clear that<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> a HUD certification must be considered as satisfying <strong>the</strong> net worth<br />
requirement provided that <strong>the</strong> HUD approval is equivalent to <strong>the</strong> bond amount set<br />
forth in 32-9-123(2)(b)(i) through (iii), MCA. Rules may not unnecessarily repeat <strong>the</strong><br />
statutory language as provided in 2-4-305(2), MCA. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> department<br />
cannot repeat <strong>the</strong> language <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> statute in rule.<br />
By: /s/ Janet R. Kelly<br />
Janet R. Kelly, Director<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Administration<br />
By: /s/ Michael P. Manion<br />
Michael P. Manion, Rule Reviewer<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Administration<br />
Certified to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Secretary</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> February 1, 2010.<br />
<strong>Montana</strong> Administrative Register 3-2/11/10