29.01.2015 Views

Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website

Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website

Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-434-<br />

RESPONSE #1: The department agrees it is important to maintain adequate<br />

reimbursement for dispensing generic drugs to maintain <strong>Montana</strong> Medicaid<br />

recipient's access to pharmaceuticals and to contain costs. The department<br />

disagrees that increasing <strong>the</strong> dispensing fee is necessary to adequately reimburse<br />

pharmacies for dispensing generic drugs. <strong>Montana</strong> Medicaid's utilization rate for<br />

generics is 72.61% and its generic substitution rate is 95.52%. <strong>Montana</strong> Medicaid's<br />

current maximum dispensing fee <strong>of</strong> $5.04 is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> highest in <strong>the</strong> state for third<br />

party payors and one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> highest in <strong>the</strong> nation for state Medicaid programs.<br />

Implementing <strong>the</strong> SMAC stated in <strong>the</strong>se rules is consistent with <strong>the</strong> federal<br />

requirements to reimburse pharmacies at estimated acquisition costs and eliminate<br />

overpayments allowed by <strong>the</strong> current reimbursement methodology.<br />

COMMENT #2: It was suggested that <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> multisource drug be a drug<br />

that has three or more "A" rated <strong>the</strong>rapeutically equivalent drug products sold by<br />

different manufacturers that are readily available for purchase nationally and in<br />

<strong>Montana</strong>. Any o<strong>the</strong>r definition risks basing drug product reimbursement on an<br />

unstable pricing structure, which could reduce access to generic drugs for Medicaid<br />

recipients.<br />

RESPONSE #2: The department disagrees that <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> multisource drugs<br />

should be changed. The existing definition does not result in an unstable pricing<br />

structure. The department has addressed generic availability in its mandatory<br />

generic policy. Generic mandatory logic typically does not engage until <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

two or more "A" rated <strong>the</strong>rapeutically equivalent drug products in addition to <strong>the</strong><br />

trademarked product in <strong>the</strong> marketplace. The first generics may be available at a<br />

significantly discounted rate to pharmacies. The rule allows <strong>the</strong> department to<br />

actively monitor <strong>the</strong> <strong>Montana</strong> marketplace to calculate <strong>the</strong> Medicaid reimbursement<br />

that approximates actual acquisition cost as required by federal law.<br />

COMMENT #3: It was proposed that SMAC be calculated using drug price<br />

information obtained from multiple nationally recognized data sources because<br />

pharmacies are not appropriate sources <strong>of</strong> information for determining actual<br />

acquisition cost for setting a price based on SMAC. The commentor suggests that<br />

<strong>the</strong> department use nationally recognized data sources.<br />

RESPONSE #3: The department plans to use a variety <strong>of</strong> sources to arrive at an<br />

equitable price for generics but <strong>the</strong> actual cost <strong>of</strong> a drug to a <strong>Montana</strong> pharmacy is<br />

<strong>the</strong> best source <strong>of</strong> data. Pharmacy level data is a more appropriate source for<br />

determining acquisition costs to set a price based on SMAC than national data<br />

sources. The survey <strong>of</strong> in-state pharmacy providers is <strong>the</strong> most accurate means <strong>of</strong><br />

determining a <strong>Montana</strong> pharmacy's actual acquisition cost and <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> a<br />

product across <strong>Montana</strong>.<br />

The department's survey process is designed to be minimally disruptive to pharmacy<br />

operations. The commentor's proposal to use only nationally available pricing<br />

information would not provide <strong>Montana</strong>-specific acquisition cost or availability.<br />

<strong>Montana</strong> Administrative Register 3-2/11/10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!