Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website
Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website
-406- BEFORE THE BOARD OF DENTISTRY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY STATE OF MONTANA In the matter of the amendment of ARM 24.138.508 dental anesthetic certification, 24.138.509 dental permits, and 24.138.2106 exemptions - continuing education TO: All Concerned Persons ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF AMENDMENT 1. On July 16, 2009, the Board of Dentistry (board) published MAR Notice No. 24-138-66 regarding the public hearing on the proposed amendment of the above-stated rules, at page 1068 of the 2009 Montana Administrative Register, issue no. 13. 2. On November 12, 2009, the board published a notice extending the comment period at page 2091 of the 2009 Montana Administrative Register, Issue no. 21. 3. On August 11, 2009, a public hearing was held on the proposed amendment of the above-stated rules in Helena. Several comments were received by the extended November 16, 2009, deadline. 4. The board has thoroughly considered the comments received. A summary of the comments received and the board's responses are as follows: Comments 1 and 2 pertain to ARM 24.138.508: COMMENT 1: One commenter stated that requiring written verification of an applicant's experience in administering local anesthetic agents could create unforeseen problems in certification and suggested the board allow the verification be done by the applicants themselves. RESPONSE 1: Following discussion, the board agreed with the commenter and is amending the rule accordingly. COMMENT 2: A commenter stated that an applicant should not be required to reapply for exceeding the six-month application period and should be allowed a reasonable time to respond to board requests. RESPONSE 2: The board notes that the six-month application period is consistent with current application processes and is not an absolute deadline for applicants. Staff will continue to work with any applicant trying to complete an application but nearing the end of the six-month period. Montana Administrative Register 3-2/11/10
-407- Comments 3 through 16 pertain to ARM 24.138.509: COMMENT 3: Several commenters opposed adding the Paris Gibson Education Center (center) as a board-accepted additional public health facility for limited access permit (LAP) practice. The commenters asserted that dental offices are within walking distance of the center and in a safe neighborhood. The commenters stated that there is no issue with access to dental care for the center and offering LAP services may confuse students and their families into thinking they will receive a full diagnosis and complete dental care. A commenter opined that ten dentists practice within a half-mile of the center, six of them are Medicaid providers, and three of those are accepting new Medicaid patients. RESPONSE 3: The board notes that 37-4-405(5)(c), MCA, allows limited access permit holders to provide dental hygiene services to patients who are unable to receive regular dental care due to age, infirmity, disability, or financial constraints. The board concluded that the statute does not limit LAP services based upon access to dental care or location of or patient proximity to a dental office. COMMENT 4: One commenter asserted that because LAP services may only be provided to patients or residents of facilities or programs who, due to age, infirmity, disability, or financial constraints, are unable to receive regular dental care, the board lacks the statutory authority to allow LAP services at the center. The commenter stated there has been no proof that the student population at the center has difficulty gaining access to dental care and believes that the center's students are not "unable to receive regular dental care." The commenter also stated that the local Community Health Care Center (CHCC) provides dental care for low income and uninsured patients. RESPONSE 4: The board received additional documentation during the extended comment period and since this comment was submitted. Following consideration of the additional information, the board concluded that at a minimum, there exists a financial constraint on the young mothers and their children who are the population of the center. The board notes that documentation indicates the population may also be limited in getting regular dental care by age and infirmity. The board also notes that the CHCC does not offer or provide any regular preventative dental hygiene services. COMMENT 5: A commenter stated that the major national pediatric health organizations advise that children have a "dental home" so that dental care is provided or supervised by qualified child dental health specialists. RESPONSE 5: The board acknowledges the need for a dental home, but concluded that a LAP holder is an important part of this setting. Further, the LAP dental hygienist may only provide the limited dental hygiene services as outlined in 37-4- 405(4), MCA. 3-2/11/10 Montana Administrative Register
- Page 107 and 108: -355- 40 CFR 257.9, which applies t
- Page 109 and 110: -357- NEW RULE XIII COMMENT NO. 31:
- Page 111 and 112: -359- COMMENT NO. 35: A commentor s
- Page 113 and 114: -361- recycling, or solid waste tre
- Page 115 and 116: -363- RESPONSE: Proposed New Rule X
- Page 117 and 118: -365- regulations and should be del
- Page 119 and 120: -367- has revised New Rule XXXIII t
- Page 121 and 122: -369- XXXVII(2), which contains the
- Page 123 and 124: -371- Applied Research Foundation D
- Page 125 and 126: -373- COMMENT NO. 51: A commentor n
- Page 127 and 128: -375- Comment No. 6. The department
- Page 129 and 130: -377- the department to be necessar
- Page 131 and 132: -379- NEW RULE XLI COMMENT NO. 57:
- Page 133 and 134: -381- In 40 CFR 258.57 and 40 CFR 2
- Page 135 and 136: -383- pursuant to (3), that complia
- Page 137 and 138: -385- stricken, and the phrases use
- Page 139 and 140: -387- scientific studies. Sen. Keat
- Page 141 and 142: -389- found in the first paragraph
- Page 143 and 144: -391- licensee "review the operatio
- Page 145 and 146: -393- CFR 258.55(h) and (i) without
- Page 147 and 148: -395- BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF JUST
- Page 149 and 150: -397- in accordance with 50-61-120
- Page 151 and 152: -399- BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF LABO
- Page 153 and 154: -401- Worker in districts 1 and 3,
- Page 155 and 156: -403- Response 12: The department n
- Page 157: -405- /s/ MARK CADWALLADER Mark Cad
- Page 161 and 162: -409- RESPONSE 11: The board apprec
- Page 163 and 164: -411- BEFORE THE BOARD OF DENTISTRY
- Page 165 and 166: -413- BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF LIVE
- Page 167 and 168: -415- (f) file a monthly form regar
- Page 169 and 170: -417- RESPONSE #10: At the time of
- Page 171 and 172: -419- producer flexibility to test
- Page 173 and 174: -421- COMMENT #29: What is an accep
- Page 175 and 176: -423- BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF MILI
- Page 177 and 178: -425- plan eligible individuals who
- Page 179 and 180: -427- (2) remains as proposed. AUTH
- Page 181 and 182: -429- RESPONSE #11: The department
- Page 183 and 184: -431- RESPONSE #23: The department
- Page 185 and 186: -433- BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBL
- Page 187 and 188: -435- COMMENT #4: It was requested
- Page 189 and 190: -437- BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBL
- Page 191 and 192: -439- (a) NWE has executed a power
- Page 193 and 194: -441- 20. Third, the Commission mus
- Page 195 and 196: -443- NOTICE OF FUNCTION OF ADMINIS
- Page 197 and 198: -445- HOW TO USE THE ADMINISTRATIVE
- Page 199 and 200: -447- Unacceptable Assets - Proof o
- Page 201 and 202: -449- 17.55.102 and other rules - D
- Page 203 and 204: -451- (Board of Architects and Land
- Page 205 and 206: -453- 24.210.301 and other rules -
- Page 207 and 208: -455- 37.86.3501 and other rules -
-407-<br />
Comments 3 through 16 pertain to ARM 24.138.509:<br />
COMMENT 3: Several commenters opposed adding <strong>the</strong> Paris Gibson Education<br />
Center (center) as a board-accepted additional public health facility for limited<br />
access permit (LAP) practice. The commenters asserted that dental <strong>of</strong>fices are<br />
within walking distance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> center and in a safe neighborhood. The commenters<br />
stated that <strong>the</strong>re is no issue with access to dental care for <strong>the</strong> center and <strong>of</strong>fering<br />
LAP services may confuse students and <strong>the</strong>ir families into thinking <strong>the</strong>y will receive a<br />
full diagnosis and complete dental care. A commenter opined that ten dentists<br />
practice within a half-mile <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> center, six <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m are Medicaid providers, and<br />
three <strong>of</strong> those are accepting new Medicaid patients.<br />
RESPONSE 3: The board notes that 37-4-405(5)(c), MCA, allows limited access<br />
permit holders to provide dental hygiene services to patients who are unable to<br />
receive regular dental care due to age, infirmity, disability, or financial constraints.<br />
The board concluded that <strong>the</strong> statute does not limit LAP services based upon access<br />
to dental care or location <strong>of</strong> or patient proximity to a dental <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />
COMMENT 4: One commenter asserted that because LAP services may only be<br />
provided to patients or residents <strong>of</strong> facilities or programs who, due to age, infirmity,<br />
disability, or financial constraints, are unable to receive regular dental care, <strong>the</strong><br />
board lacks <strong>the</strong> statutory authority to allow LAP services at <strong>the</strong> center. The<br />
commenter stated <strong>the</strong>re has been no pro<strong>of</strong> that <strong>the</strong> student population at <strong>the</strong> center<br />
has difficulty gaining access to dental care and believes that <strong>the</strong> center's students<br />
are not "unable to receive regular dental care." The commenter also stated that <strong>the</strong><br />
local Community Health Care Center (CHCC) provides dental care for low income<br />
and uninsured patients.<br />
RESPONSE 4: The board received additional documentation during <strong>the</strong> extended<br />
comment period and since this comment was submitted. Following consideration <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> additional information, <strong>the</strong> board concluded that at a minimum, <strong>the</strong>re exists a<br />
financial constraint on <strong>the</strong> young mo<strong>the</strong>rs and <strong>the</strong>ir children who are <strong>the</strong> population<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> center. The board notes that documentation indicates <strong>the</strong> population may<br />
also be limited in getting regular dental care by age and infirmity. The board also<br />
notes that <strong>the</strong> CHCC does not <strong>of</strong>fer or provide any regular preventative dental<br />
hygiene services.<br />
COMMENT 5: A commenter stated that <strong>the</strong> major national pediatric health<br />
organizations advise that children have a "dental home" so that dental care is<br />
provided or supervised by qualified child dental health specialists.<br />
RESPONSE 5: The board acknowledges <strong>the</strong> need for a dental home, but concluded<br />
that a LAP holder is an important part <strong>of</strong> this setting. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> LAP dental<br />
hygienist may only provide <strong>the</strong> limited dental hygiene services as outlined in 37-4-<br />
405(4), MCA.<br />
3-2/11/10 <strong>Montana</strong> Administrative Register